Hitler in MK says the 1914 German borders were "anything but logical," they were insufficient space and demands a push further East to "Russia and its borderlands".
> "To demand the restoration of the 1914 borders is a political absurdity that’s fraught with such consequences as to appear criminal. The 1914 Reich borders were anything but logical. They were not really complete, in the sense of including all the members of the German nation, nor were they reasonable, in light of military-geographical effectiveness."
> "The 1914 borders are of no significance for the German future. They neither served to protect us in the past, nor do they offer any strength for the future. With these borders, the German people cannot attain an inner unity, nor can they assure their sustenance, nor, from a military viewpoint, are they advantageous, nor can they improve our relations with the other world powers–or better, with the real world powers."
> "Only one thing is certain: The attempt to restore the 1914 borders, even if successful, would demand so much of our people’s blood that no further sacrifice would be possible for such measures needed to really secure the life and future of the nation"
> "Therefore we National Socialists have purposely drawn a line through our pre-war conduct of foreign policy. We resume where we left off, six centuries ago. We put an end to the perpetual Germanic march towards the south and west of Europe, and tum our eyes towards the land of the East. We finally shut off the colonial–and trade-policy of pre-war times, and pass over to the land-policy of the future."
> "But when we speak of new land and soil in Europe today, we must principally think of Russia and its subject border states."
> "Our task, and the mission of the National Socialist movement, is to develop the political insight in our people that will enable them to realize that their future aim is not the fulfillment of some new and wildly adventurous March of Alexander, but rather as the industrious labor of the German plow, for which the sword will provide the soil."
> "All alliances should have been envisioned and judged only from this standpoint. If new territory were to be acquired in Europe, it should have been mainly at Russia’s expense. ...But when we speak of new land and soil in Europe today, we must principally think of Russia and its subject border states. ...The organization of the Russian state-structure was not a result of Russian Slavic political ability, but rather was a marvelous example of the state-building capacity of the Germanic element amidst an inferior race."
Follow @redideologies
> "To demand the restoration of the 1914 borders is a political absurdity that’s fraught with such consequences as to appear criminal. The 1914 Reich borders were anything but logical. They were not really complete, in the sense of including all the members of the German nation, nor were they reasonable, in light of military-geographical effectiveness."
> "The 1914 borders are of no significance for the German future. They neither served to protect us in the past, nor do they offer any strength for the future. With these borders, the German people cannot attain an inner unity, nor can they assure their sustenance, nor, from a military viewpoint, are they advantageous, nor can they improve our relations with the other world powers–or better, with the real world powers."
> "Only one thing is certain: The attempt to restore the 1914 borders, even if successful, would demand so much of our people’s blood that no further sacrifice would be possible for such measures needed to really secure the life and future of the nation"
> "Therefore we National Socialists have purposely drawn a line through our pre-war conduct of foreign policy. We resume where we left off, six centuries ago. We put an end to the perpetual Germanic march towards the south and west of Europe, and tum our eyes towards the land of the East. We finally shut off the colonial–and trade-policy of pre-war times, and pass over to the land-policy of the future."
> "But when we speak of new land and soil in Europe today, we must principally think of Russia and its subject border states."
> "Our task, and the mission of the National Socialist movement, is to develop the political insight in our people that will enable them to realize that their future aim is not the fulfillment of some new and wildly adventurous March of Alexander, but rather as the industrious labor of the German plow, for which the sword will provide the soil."
> "All alliances should have been envisioned and judged only from this standpoint. If new territory were to be acquired in Europe, it should have been mainly at Russia’s expense. ...But when we speak of new land and soil in Europe today, we must principally think of Russia and its subject border states. ...The organization of the Russian state-structure was not a result of Russian Slavic political ability, but rather was a marvelous example of the state-building capacity of the Germanic element amidst an inferior race."
Follow @redideologies
🫡6🏆2
When Hitlerists tell you "but but everyone other than Germany was a Jewish puppet so they deserved to be invaded" — it's not even true. German Rudolf, a Holocaust skeptic, wrote this about Poland:
> "After the end of World War One, when Zionist dreams about Palestine were temporarily disappointed, but new hopes had arisen with the Soviet experiment in Russia, no particular country was initially singled out, even though there was a perfect target: Poland. Between World War One and World War Two, Poland was a military dictatorship, which implemented a policy of ‘ethnic pressure,’ i.e., all non-Polish minorities were subjected to discriminations and various degrees of persecution with the intention to ‘convince’ them to emigrate (quite similar to what Israel does today in Palestine against non-Jews). The Jews in Poland were not exempt from this treatment."
> "As a matter of fact, Polish official as well as unofficial anti-Judaism was so massive that many Polish Jews preferred to live in Germany even during the Third Reich until late 1938 rather than to stay in their native country. Hence, there was enough justification to massively attack Poland for its rabid anti-Jewish attitude as there were reasons to attack Germany after Adolf Hitler rose to power there and step by step implemented a policy increasingly comparable to that already in effect in Poland"
Follow @redideologies
> "After the end of World War One, when Zionist dreams about Palestine were temporarily disappointed, but new hopes had arisen with the Soviet experiment in Russia, no particular country was initially singled out, even though there was a perfect target: Poland. Between World War One and World War Two, Poland was a military dictatorship, which implemented a policy of ‘ethnic pressure,’ i.e., all non-Polish minorities were subjected to discriminations and various degrees of persecution with the intention to ‘convince’ them to emigrate (quite similar to what Israel does today in Palestine against non-Jews). The Jews in Poland were not exempt from this treatment."
> "As a matter of fact, Polish official as well as unofficial anti-Judaism was so massive that many Polish Jews preferred to live in Germany even during the Third Reich until late 1938 rather than to stay in their native country. Hence, there was enough justification to massively attack Poland for its rabid anti-Jewish attitude as there were reasons to attack Germany after Adolf Hitler rose to power there and step by step implemented a policy increasingly comparable to that already in effect in Poland"
Follow @redideologies
👍8👌5
Fascist syndicalist Edmondo Rossini sought to "fuse nationalism with class struggle". Aka Marxism wrapped in a flag.
Follow @redideologies
Follow @redideologies
⚡12🏆1
1933 Mussolini declares the end of capitalism and a "decisive step in the path of social revolution". Aka the path towards full-Communism.
Follow @redideologies
Follow @redideologies
👌7👍4
In the 1940s Mussolini penned anonymous articles calling for bloody revolution against capitalism and declaring Fascist Italy "the only truly socialist government in existence... next to Soviet Russia".
Follow @redideologies
Follow @redideologies
⚡8👍2
British fascist Oswald Mosley was a member of the socialist Fabian Society, an MP for the socialist Labour Party, and said of himself: "I am not, and have never been, a man of the right. My position was on the left and is now in the center of politics."
He was also friends with FDR.
Follow @redideologies
He was also friends with FDR.
Follow @redideologies
⚡8🔥3🏆1
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
National vs international socialism is a false distinction
TIPS💲 BECOME A MEMBER 😎 FULL STREAM 💼
Follow 👉🏻 @martinezpolitix
TIPS
Follow 👉🏻 @martinezpolitix
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👌7
Mussolini apparently told the son of a US senator that fascism and communism are the same thing.
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
👌7
British communist and Fabian Society member George Bernard Shaw supported fascism saying "as a red hot communist I am in favour of fascism."
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
👌9
Former Italian PM Francesco Nitti said that fascism was the handiwork of "revolutionary socialists".
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
⚡7
Mussolini allegedly told fellow fascist Giuseppe Bottai that the differences between Bolshevism and Fascism "were minor" and both opposed Western capitalist countries.
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
👌9
Mussolini confiscated Catholic newspapers, called the papacy a "malignant tumor," called for the death of the Pope and said Islam was better than Christianity.
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
⚡8👌3🔥2
Mussolini was pro-Jewish until Hitler forced him not to be.
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
⚡5
Mussolini was little more than a shade of authoritarian Marxist socialist who hated the Church, the monarchy and sought to replace God with The State (and himself) as an object of worship.
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
👌8⚡4👍3
Mussolini's late stage rule, the Italian Social Republic, was moving inexorably towards full-Communism (the true end state/goal of fascism).
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
👌7⚡5🔥1
Adolf Eichmann said his "political feelings lay towards the left" and was just as much an economic socialist as a nationalist.
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
⚡5
Goebbels makes it clear he's a communist here, even parrots the Marxist line about workers' "alienation". Just ignore the customary fake denunciations of Marxism and read between the lines:
> "Marxist nonsense claimed to free labor, yet it degraded the work of its members and saw it as a curse and disgrace. It can hardly be our goal to abolish labor, but rather to give new meaning and content. The worker in a capitalist state — and that is his deepest misfortune — is no longer a living human being, a creator, a maker."
> "He has become a machine. A number, a cog in the machine without sense or understanding. He is alienated from what he produces. Labor is for him only a way to survive, not a path to higher blessings, not a joy, not something in which to take pride, or satisfaction, or encouragement, or a way to build character."
> "We are a workers’ party because we see in the coming battle between finance and labor the beginning and the end of the structure of the twentieth century. We are on the side of labor and against finance. Money is the measuring rod of liberalism, work and accomplishment that of the socialist state."
It doesn't get clearer than that. He is "on the side of labor" endeavoring towards a "socialist state". He hates business owners, land owners, people with wealth, and promises to redistribute that wealth to low-skilled laborers.
Follow @redideologies
> "Marxist nonsense claimed to free labor, yet it degraded the work of its members and saw it as a curse and disgrace. It can hardly be our goal to abolish labor, but rather to give new meaning and content. The worker in a capitalist state — and that is his deepest misfortune — is no longer a living human being, a creator, a maker."
> "He has become a machine. A number, a cog in the machine without sense or understanding. He is alienated from what he produces. Labor is for him only a way to survive, not a path to higher blessings, not a joy, not something in which to take pride, or satisfaction, or encouragement, or a way to build character."
> "We are a workers’ party because we see in the coming battle between finance and labor the beginning and the end of the structure of the twentieth century. We are on the side of labor and against finance. Money is the measuring rod of liberalism, work and accomplishment that of the socialist state."
It doesn't get clearer than that. He is "on the side of labor" endeavoring towards a "socialist state". He hates business owners, land owners, people with wealth, and promises to redistribute that wealth to low-skilled laborers.
Follow @redideologies
👌5
In 1925 Goebbels proposed an alliance with the communists.
> "In 1925, Goebbels published an open letter to “my friends of the left,” urging unity between socialists and Nazis against the capitalists. “You and I,” he wrote, “we are fighting one another although we are not really enemies.'"
Source
Follow @redideologies
> "In 1925, Goebbels published an open letter to “my friends of the left,” urging unity between socialists and Nazis against the capitalists. “You and I,” he wrote, “we are fighting one another although we are not really enemies.'"
Source
Follow @redideologies
👌8💯4👍3
👌7