Forwarded from Fragile Communism (FNCVG)
High-ranking Nazi officers warmly welcomed at the Workersβ Day military parade on 1 May 1941 in Moscow. This is day 608 of World War II.
π ΅Κα΄Ι’ΙͺΚα΄ α΄α΄α΄α΄πΙ΄Ιͺsα΄
π ΅Κα΄Ι’ΙͺΚα΄ α΄α΄α΄α΄πΙ΄Ιͺsα΄
β€9π4π―1
Forwarded from Fragile Communism (FNCVG)
Bolsheviks cooperated so much with nazis that the british and the french literally planned to bomb the Soviet Union in 1940 because the Soviets were helping the nazis too much, giving them the much needed oil and signing friendship agreements (German-Soviet pact in 1939) hoping that it would cripple the soviet oil industry which was fueling the german side.
And then commies have the audacity of accusing others of being "fascists".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Pike
π ΅Κα΄Ι’ΙͺΚα΄ α΄α΄α΄α΄πΙ΄Ιͺsα΄
And then commies have the audacity of accusing others of being "fascists".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Pike
π ΅Κα΄Ι’ΙͺΚα΄ α΄α΄α΄α΄πΙ΄Ιͺsα΄
π±10π3π2
> "Fascism began as a revision of Marxism by Marxists, a revision which developed in successive stages, so that these Marxists gradually stopped thinking of themselves as Marxists, and eventually stopped thinking of themselves as socialists. They never stopped thinking of themselves as anti-liberal revolutionaries." - "The Mystery of Fascism," David Ramsay Steele
Follow @redideologies
Follow @redideologies
π12π6π―4π±1
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The differences between Natsoc & NazBol are minimal
TIPSπ² BECOME A MEMBER π FULL STREAM πΌ
Follow π @martinezpolitix
TIPS
Follow π @martinezpolitix
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π8π4π3
The Falangist/Primo de Rivera analysis of the world (his point of view):
1- Marx's analysis and predictions are all correct
2- The theory of "historical phases" of Marx indicates that Capitalism leads inexorably to the communist revolution.
3- We are witnesses of how horrifying this revolution is, as Russia shows
4- Therefore we must dismantle capitalism to avoid that prophecy of Marx
So the fascist trick is telling you that to "avoid the communist revolution" we must "dismantle capitalism" aka implement communism.
Fascist Falangism aims to engineer a communist system via sophist trickery.
Follow @redideologies
1- Marx's analysis and predictions are all correct
2- The theory of "historical phases" of Marx indicates that Capitalism leads inexorably to the communist revolution.
3- We are witnesses of how horrifying this revolution is, as Russia shows
4- Therefore we must dismantle capitalism to avoid that prophecy of Marx
So the fascist trick is telling you that to "avoid the communist revolution" we must "dismantle capitalism" aka implement communism.
Fascist Falangism aims to engineer a communist system via sophist trickery.
Follow @redideologies
β€9π5π2π2π―2
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Jose Antonio on the Falange's aesthetics:
> blue shirt symbolizes the "proletariat"
> black and red flag mimics the "anarchist trade unions"
> hijacked the word "comrade" from the communists
So he essentially replicated and appropriated everything from the radical Marxist left. Because that's what he was.
@martinezpolitix
> blue shirt symbolizes the "proletariat"
> black and red flag mimics the "anarchist trade unions"
> hijacked the word "comrade" from the communists
So he essentially replicated and appropriated everything from the radical Marxist left. Because that's what he was.
@martinezpolitix
π9
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Fascists are thus crypto-communists who are using word tricks and sophistry to get you onside with Communism. Always been the case and still is today.
Fascists wanted the same socialist State system as the Marxists but without a bloody revolution and civil war like happened in Russia. So they chose to implement their socialism incrementally instead of all in one go.
Fascists wanted the same socialist State system as the Marxists but without a bloody revolution and civil war like happened in Russia. So they chose to implement their socialism incrementally instead of all in one go.
π9π6β€3
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Hitler cult operates as a prison gang
TIPSπ² BECOME A MEMBER π FULL STREAM πΌ
Follow π @martinezpolitix
TIPS
Follow π @martinezpolitix
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
β‘4π±4
> "Nonetheless, Mussolini remained dedicated to his heretical version of Marxism. According to English historian Paul Johnson, "Mussolini was a reluctant fascist because, underneath, he remained a Marxist, albeit a heretical one." Johnson also depicted fascism as "a Marxist heresy, indeed a modification of the Leninist heresy itself."
Excerpt from Killing History
Follow @redideologies
Excerpt from Killing History
Follow @redideologies
π6π―1
Communists and fascists behave like street gangs fighting over turf.
> "The champions of communism and nationalistic socialism conducted themselves as ideological brothers, competing for power as though they were members of different organized-crime families. In essence, Communists and National Socialists, like many collectivists, behave like street gangs who compete for authority over territory and power, differing little from the rivalry found between the Bloods and the Crips, in the inner cities of America."
Excerpt from Killing History
Follow @redideologies
> "The champions of communism and nationalistic socialism conducted themselves as ideological brothers, competing for power as though they were members of different organized-crime families. In essence, Communists and National Socialists, like many collectivists, behave like street gangs who compete for authority over territory and power, differing little from the rivalry found between the Bloods and the Crips, in the inner cities of America."
Excerpt from Killing History
Follow @redideologies
β€7
> "A. James Gregor has argued that Fascism is a Marxist heresy, (31) a claim that has to be handled with care. Marxism is a doctrine whose main tenets can be listed precisely: class struggle, historical materialism, surplus-value, nationalization of the means of production, and so forth. Nearly all of those tenets were explicitly repudiated by the founders of Fascism, and these repudiations of Marxism largely define Fascism. Yet however paradoxical it may seem, there is a close ideological relationship between Marxism and Fascism. We may compare this with the relationship between, say, Christianity and Unitarianism. Unitarianism repudiates all the distinctive tenets of Christianity, yet is still clearly an offshoot of Christianity, preserving an affinity with its parental stem." - "The Mystery of Fascism," David Ramsey Steele
Even that stuff they supposedly repudiated is a ruse. Fascist states did plenty of nationalization (they never repudiated that) and stated their intention to socialize most of the private market. On class struggle, fascist states operated similarly to communist ones. Hitler, Mussolini and Lenin all abolished private trade unions and made one large public union. Once these "proletarian warriors" take over the state, there's no need for "class struggle" any longer, since the "working class" now controls the means of production through the state and abolishes class differences.
Classes are eliminated, so no more struggle. Mussolini's "class cooperation" nonsense is really just the state conquering the private economy and everything private ("nothing outside the state"), and then forcing its own will on both the workers and employers who must follow state diktats. Employers become mere managers in state-directed firms, a few of which are left nominally private to give the appearance of a difference from communism when functionally they're the same in practice. Most big businesses are nationalized or the state buys a controlling share in it so it can direct the enterprise, which it can direct anyway via regulations. The "cooperation" is forced via the state, which is the same thing as the communist state nationalizing all the companies and directly making them do what it wishes.
Follow @redideologies
Even that stuff they supposedly repudiated is a ruse. Fascist states did plenty of nationalization (they never repudiated that) and stated their intention to socialize most of the private market. On class struggle, fascist states operated similarly to communist ones. Hitler, Mussolini and Lenin all abolished private trade unions and made one large public union. Once these "proletarian warriors" take over the state, there's no need for "class struggle" any longer, since the "working class" now controls the means of production through the state and abolishes class differences.
Classes are eliminated, so no more struggle. Mussolini's "class cooperation" nonsense is really just the state conquering the private economy and everything private ("nothing outside the state"), and then forcing its own will on both the workers and employers who must follow state diktats. Employers become mere managers in state-directed firms, a few of which are left nominally private to give the appearance of a difference from communism when functionally they're the same in practice. Most big businesses are nationalized or the state buys a controlling share in it so it can direct the enterprise, which it can direct anyway via regulations. The "cooperation" is forced via the state, which is the same thing as the communist state nationalizing all the companies and directly making them do what it wishes.
Follow @redideologies
β€5π4π2
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Proofs of Lebensraum: Hitler's Plan to Conquer & Colonize Slavic Lands | Martinez Politix Investigates
Duration: 01:28:44
Topic: In this episode, I look at Hitler's #1 foreign policy goal: Lebensraum, expanding Germany's living space to the East. I demolish the natsoc myth that Hitler only wanted to reclaim territories lost after World War I. Extensive quotes from Mein Kampf, Hitler's speeches to generals, and other sources unequivocally prove that Hitler was not satisfied with the pre-WWI (1914) German borders and sought to expand them eastward "by the sword" to create a contiguous land empire in Europe. In MK, Hitler identifies "Russia and its borderlands" as the fertile soil he wished to conquer, space he claimed was required to make Germany a world power once again, and that this would only be possible through war. Hitler declared Poles, Russians and all Slavs to be an "inferior race" who Germans had the right to rule and exploit. I also delve into German colonial policy in Ukraine in which Himmler led resettlement/colonization projects, moving tens of thousands of Ukrainians off their land and Germans in. After their land was usurped by German occupation authorities, tens of thousands of Ukrainians were shipped off to slave labour camps while some of their children were kidnapped for Himmler's breeding programs. Nazi Germany used Ukrainian nationalists as cannon fodder to help them fight the Soviets only to betray them later when their usefulness expired.
π¬ WATCH ON RUMBLE π¬
TIPSπ² BECOME A MEMBER π
Follow @martinezpolitix
Duration: 01:28:44
Topic: In this episode, I look at Hitler's #1 foreign policy goal: Lebensraum, expanding Germany's living space to the East. I demolish the natsoc myth that Hitler only wanted to reclaim territories lost after World War I. Extensive quotes from Mein Kampf, Hitler's speeches to generals, and other sources unequivocally prove that Hitler was not satisfied with the pre-WWI (1914) German borders and sought to expand them eastward "by the sword" to create a contiguous land empire in Europe. In MK, Hitler identifies "Russia and its borderlands" as the fertile soil he wished to conquer, space he claimed was required to make Germany a world power once again, and that this would only be possible through war. Hitler declared Poles, Russians and all Slavs to be an "inferior race" who Germans had the right to rule and exploit. I also delve into German colonial policy in Ukraine in which Himmler led resettlement/colonization projects, moving tens of thousands of Ukrainians off their land and Germans in. After their land was usurped by German occupation authorities, tens of thousands of Ukrainians were shipped off to slave labour camps while some of their children were kidnapped for Himmler's breeding programs. Nazi Germany used Ukrainian nationalists as cannon fodder to help them fight the Soviets only to betray them later when their usefulness expired.
π¬ WATCH ON RUMBLE π¬
TIPS
Follow @martinezpolitix
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π₯°8π5
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Hitler betrayed the Ukrainian nationalists, kept collective farming in place & colonized their lands for German expansion
π¬ FULL VIDEO π¬
Follow π @martinezpolitix
π¬ FULL VIDEO π¬
Follow π @martinezpolitix
π₯°9β‘2
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π10π―1
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Hitler's own written words prove he wanted to conquer soil in "Russia & its borderlands" for Lebensraum, 1914 borders "not sufficient" he said
π¬ FULL VIDEO π¬
Follow π @martinezpolitix
π¬ FULL VIDEO π¬
Follow π @martinezpolitix
π₯°9π₯2π1
Stalin's "about-face" on Hitler after Barbarossa was a ploy to protect the image of socialism.
> "Only after Hitler's invasion of his partner-Stalin's Soviet Union-did the Russian propaganda machine go into high gear to reposition their old Nazi allies back to the right-wing of the political spectrum, lambasting their spurned pals as evil capitalists bent on destroying the less fortunate. This tactic was an understandable ploy. Stalin was afraid that Hitler's and Mussolini's explicitly socialist context would tarnish his own future efforts to socialize the world."
Excerpt from Killing History
Follow @redideologies
> "Only after Hitler's invasion of his partner-Stalin's Soviet Union-did the Russian propaganda machine go into high gear to reposition their old Nazi allies back to the right-wing of the political spectrum, lambasting their spurned pals as evil capitalists bent on destroying the less fortunate. This tactic was an understandable ploy. Stalin was afraid that Hitler's and Mussolini's explicitly socialist context would tarnish his own future efforts to socialize the world."
Excerpt from Killing History
Follow @redideologies
π9
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
German Nazis labeled Ukrainians "negroes," called Poles inferior animals, SS-run collective farms in Ukraine, deported Ukrainians to slave labour camps, kidnapped their children
π¬ FULL VIDEO π¬
Follow π @martinezpolitix
π¬ FULL VIDEO π¬
Follow π @martinezpolitix
π₯°10π―4
Rosenberg admits at Nuremberg the plan for Ukraine and the East in general: acquisition of their land for German settlement/expansion and exploitation of their labor. He says that while in Germany top officials publicly declared their contempt of the "inferior" Eastern Slavs, it was unwise to publicly declare such things in the East to not agitate their subjects.
ββ
MR. DODD: All right, I accept your interpretation; we won't have any trouble about that. Now, will you please look at this document? This is a memorandum found in your files, for your information.
ROSENBERG: Yes.
MR. DODD: You set out there, in the second paragraph, what you call the aim of German politics, notably in the Ukraine, as having been laid down by the Fuehrer. They are, you say, exploitation and mobilization of raw materials, a German settlement in certain regions, no artificial education of the population towards intellectualism, but the preservation of their labor strength; apart from that, an extensive unconcern with the interior affairs.
Then, moving down a little bit-because I don't think it is necessary to read all of it, much of it has been referred to in another document-we come down to the 12th line from the bottom of that paragraph. Beginning at the 14th line:
"After continuous observation of the state of affairs in the Occupied Eastern Territories, I am convinced that German politics may have their own, possibly contemptuous opinion of the qualities of the conquered peoples, but that it is not the mission of German political representatives to proclaim measures and opinions which could eventually reduce the conquered peoples to dull despair instead of promoting the desired utilization of manpower to capacity."
Then, in the next paragraph, you say:
"If at home we had to announce our aims to the whole nation most openly and aggressively, in contrast to the others, the political leaders in the East must remain silent where German policy calls for necessary harshness. They must remain silent as to any derogatory opinions which they may form about the conquered peoples. Yes, a clever German policy may in certain circumstances do more in the German interest through alleviations which do not affect policy and certain humane concessions, than through open, inconsiderate brutality."
Were you honestly expressing your views when you wrote that memorandum on the 16th of March 1942?
ROSENBERG: This document is correct.
Follow @redideologies
ββ
MR. DODD: All right, I accept your interpretation; we won't have any trouble about that. Now, will you please look at this document? This is a memorandum found in your files, for your information.
ROSENBERG: Yes.
MR. DODD: You set out there, in the second paragraph, what you call the aim of German politics, notably in the Ukraine, as having been laid down by the Fuehrer. They are, you say, exploitation and mobilization of raw materials, a German settlement in certain regions, no artificial education of the population towards intellectualism, but the preservation of their labor strength; apart from that, an extensive unconcern with the interior affairs.
Then, moving down a little bit-because I don't think it is necessary to read all of it, much of it has been referred to in another document-we come down to the 12th line from the bottom of that paragraph. Beginning at the 14th line:
"After continuous observation of the state of affairs in the Occupied Eastern Territories, I am convinced that German politics may have their own, possibly contemptuous opinion of the qualities of the conquered peoples, but that it is not the mission of German political representatives to proclaim measures and opinions which could eventually reduce the conquered peoples to dull despair instead of promoting the desired utilization of manpower to capacity."
Then, in the next paragraph, you say:
"If at home we had to announce our aims to the whole nation most openly and aggressively, in contrast to the others, the political leaders in the East must remain silent where German policy calls for necessary harshness. They must remain silent as to any derogatory opinions which they may form about the conquered peoples. Yes, a clever German policy may in certain circumstances do more in the German interest through alleviations which do not affect policy and certain humane concessions, than through open, inconsiderate brutality."
Were you honestly expressing your views when you wrote that memorandum on the 16th of March 1942?
ROSENBERG: This document is correct.
Follow @redideologies
π₯°11π3π’3π1
It doesn't matter which version or translation of MK you want to cite, it says the same stuff about Lebensraum: conquer Russia by the sword.
This is the Stalag translation, same as the Dalton one.
@redideologies
This is the Stalag translation, same as the Dalton one.
@redideologies
π₯°10π3
Forwarded from γ
€
This passage from Goebbels Diaries (entry dated 12 May 1941) clearly puts an end to the whole neo-Nazi narrative that Operation Barbarossa was a pre-emptive attack.
π11π±5