The Nazis kept the Soviet collective farm model in place when they conquered Ukraine. Further proof they were not "saving" anyone from Bolshevism but perpetuating the same system.
The propaganda said this:
> "Before the invasion, the Nazis had professed very different intentions. They were going to "liberate" the Ukraine from the double yoke of Russia and Bolshevism. They were going to set up an independent Ukrainian state and restore the former landlords to their possessions."
But the reality was this:
> "Instead of the "Greater Ukraine" which the Nazis had promised to set up by uniting Ruthenia and Eastern Galicia with the Soviet Ukraine, the Ukrainians saw the former division of their national territory carried still further and apparently perpetuated. Eastern Galicia was incorporated into the Polish Gouvernement General; Ruthenia (Sub-Carpathia) remained in the hands of Hungary; part of the Black Sea coast, including Odessa, was promised, if not actually turned over, to the Rumanians; while the rest of the Soviet Ukraine, now called Reichskommissariat Ukraine, was placed under the jurisdiction of Erich Koch, Gauleiter and Governor of East Prussia. The dream of a united and independent Ukraine was gone."
> "Thus far the Germans have introduced only minor changes, for the sake of efficiency, in the agricultural system. Contrary to expectations, the collective farms have not been abolished, but their managers have been replaced with German commissars or former Ukrainian Γ©migrΓ©s."
Source
Follow @redideologies
The propaganda said this:
> "Before the invasion, the Nazis had professed very different intentions. They were going to "liberate" the Ukraine from the double yoke of Russia and Bolshevism. They were going to set up an independent Ukrainian state and restore the former landlords to their possessions."
But the reality was this:
> "Instead of the "Greater Ukraine" which the Nazis had promised to set up by uniting Ruthenia and Eastern Galicia with the Soviet Ukraine, the Ukrainians saw the former division of their national territory carried still further and apparently perpetuated. Eastern Galicia was incorporated into the Polish Gouvernement General; Ruthenia (Sub-Carpathia) remained in the hands of Hungary; part of the Black Sea coast, including Odessa, was promised, if not actually turned over, to the Rumanians; while the rest of the Soviet Ukraine, now called Reichskommissariat Ukraine, was placed under the jurisdiction of Erich Koch, Gauleiter and Governor of East Prussia. The dream of a united and independent Ukraine was gone."
> "Thus far the Germans have introduced only minor changes, for the sake of efficiency, in the agricultural system. Contrary to expectations, the collective farms have not been abolished, but their managers have been replaced with German commissars or former Ukrainian Γ©migrΓ©s."
Source
Follow @redideologies
π₯°7π4π―3π₯2β€1
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Your average 4chan neo-nazi has no clue what Communism is. He thinks it's a transgender person with blue hair. No, it's the communalization of all land, property and private business into collective (state) control. He either doesn't know that, or he is trying to purposely redefine it as this other unrelated thing, in order to obscure the fact that he also believes in the communalization of all land, property and private business.... but within one ethnic or racial group. It's multi-racial vs racially exclusive socialism, that's all.
π₯7π6π1
Chapter 14 of MK explicitly lays out Hitler's plan to conquer soil "by the sword" in "Russia and its borderlands":
"Therefore the only possibility that Germany had to conduct a sound territorial policy was to acquire new territory in Europe itself. Colonies cannot serve this purpose, since they aren't suited for large-scale European settlement. From the 19" century on, it was no longer possible to peacefully acquire such colonies. Therefore any attempt at such a colonial expansion would have meant an enormous military struggle. Thus it was more practical to undertake that military struggle for new territory in Europe, rather than to wage war for foreign acquisition."
> "Such a decision naturally demands the nation's undivided attention. A policy like this requires all available energy on the part of everyone concerned, and cannot be carried out by half- measures or hesitatingly. The political leadership of the German Reich should have been exclusively devoted to this goal. No step should have been taken other than one that served as a means to this end. It should have been clear that such a goal could only be reached by war; and this prospect should have been faced with calm and collected determination."
> "All alliances should have been envisioned and judged only from this standpoint. If new territory were to be acquired in Europe, it should have been mainly at Russia's expense. Once again, the new German Reich should have set out on the same road as was formerly traveled by the Teutonic Knights-this time to acquire soil for the German plow by means of the German sword, and thus provide the nation with its daily bread."
> "Therefore we National Socialists have purposely drawn a line through our pre-war conduct of foreign policy. We resume where we left off, six centuries ago. We put an end to the perpetual Germanic march towards the south and west of Europe, and turn our eyes towards the land of the East. We finally shut off the colonialβand trade-policy of pre-war times, and pass over to the land-policy of the future. But when we speak of new land and soil in Europe today, we must principally think of Russia and its subject border states."
Follow @ redideologies
"Therefore the only possibility that Germany had to conduct a sound territorial policy was to acquire new territory in Europe itself. Colonies cannot serve this purpose, since they aren't suited for large-scale European settlement. From the 19" century on, it was no longer possible to peacefully acquire such colonies. Therefore any attempt at such a colonial expansion would have meant an enormous military struggle. Thus it was more practical to undertake that military struggle for new territory in Europe, rather than to wage war for foreign acquisition."
> "Such a decision naturally demands the nation's undivided attention. A policy like this requires all available energy on the part of everyone concerned, and cannot be carried out by half- measures or hesitatingly. The political leadership of the German Reich should have been exclusively devoted to this goal. No step should have been taken other than one that served as a means to this end. It should have been clear that such a goal could only be reached by war; and this prospect should have been faced with calm and collected determination."
> "All alliances should have been envisioned and judged only from this standpoint. If new territory were to be acquired in Europe, it should have been mainly at Russia's expense. Once again, the new German Reich should have set out on the same road as was formerly traveled by the Teutonic Knights-this time to acquire soil for the German plow by means of the German sword, and thus provide the nation with its daily bread."
> "Therefore we National Socialists have purposely drawn a line through our pre-war conduct of foreign policy. We resume where we left off, six centuries ago. We put an end to the perpetual Germanic march towards the south and west of Europe, and turn our eyes towards the land of the East. We finally shut off the colonialβand trade-policy of pre-war times, and pass over to the land-policy of the future. But when we speak of new land and soil in Europe today, we must principally think of Russia and its subject border states."
Follow @ redideologies
π₯°7π―4
On the Nazis' vitriolic anti-Slavic sentiment:
> "Hitler's conception of the Aryan Herrenvolk ("Aryan master race") explicitly excluded the vast majority of Slavs, regarding the Slavs as having dangerous Jewish and Asiatic influences. Because of this, the Nazis declared Slavs to be Untermenschen (subhumans). Exceptions were made for a small percentage of Slavs who were seen by the Nazis to be descended from German settlers and therefore fit to be Germanised to be considered part of the Aryan master race. Hitler described Slavs as "a mass of born slaves who feel the need of a master". Hitler declared that because Slavs were subhumans that the Geneva Conventions were not applicable to them, and German soldiers in World War II were thus permitted to ignore the Geneva Conventions in regards to Slavs. Hitler called Slavs "a rabbit family" meaning they were intrinsically idle and disorganized."
> "Nazi Germany's propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels had media speak of Slavs as primitive animals who were from the Siberian tundra who were like a "dark wave of filth". The Nazi notion of Slavs being inferior non-Aryans was part of the agenda for creating Lebensraum ("living space") for Germans and other Germanic people in eastern Europe that was initiated during World War II under Generalplan Ost: millions of Germans and other Germanic settlers would be moved into conquered territories of Eastern Europe, while the original Slavic inhabitants were to be annihilated, removed, or enslaved."
> "Nazi Germany's ally the Independent State of Croatia rejected the common conception that Croats were primarily a Slavic people and claimed that Croats were primarily the descendents of the Germanic Goths. However the Nazi regime continued to classify Croats as a"subhuman" in spite of the alliance. Nazi Germany's policy changed towards Slavs in response to military manpower shortages, in which it accepted Slavs to serve in its armed forces within occupied territories, in spite of them being considered subhuman, as a pragmatic means to resolve such manpower shortages."
Source
Follow @redideologies
> "Hitler's conception of the Aryan Herrenvolk ("Aryan master race") explicitly excluded the vast majority of Slavs, regarding the Slavs as having dangerous Jewish and Asiatic influences. Because of this, the Nazis declared Slavs to be Untermenschen (subhumans). Exceptions were made for a small percentage of Slavs who were seen by the Nazis to be descended from German settlers and therefore fit to be Germanised to be considered part of the Aryan master race. Hitler described Slavs as "a mass of born slaves who feel the need of a master". Hitler declared that because Slavs were subhumans that the Geneva Conventions were not applicable to them, and German soldiers in World War II were thus permitted to ignore the Geneva Conventions in regards to Slavs. Hitler called Slavs "a rabbit family" meaning they were intrinsically idle and disorganized."
> "Nazi Germany's propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels had media speak of Slavs as primitive animals who were from the Siberian tundra who were like a "dark wave of filth". The Nazi notion of Slavs being inferior non-Aryans was part of the agenda for creating Lebensraum ("living space") for Germans and other Germanic people in eastern Europe that was initiated during World War II under Generalplan Ost: millions of Germans and other Germanic settlers would be moved into conquered territories of Eastern Europe, while the original Slavic inhabitants were to be annihilated, removed, or enslaved."
> "Nazi Germany's ally the Independent State of Croatia rejected the common conception that Croats were primarily a Slavic people and claimed that Croats were primarily the descendents of the Germanic Goths. However the Nazi regime continued to classify Croats as a"subhuman" in spite of the alliance. Nazi Germany's policy changed towards Slavs in response to military manpower shortages, in which it accepted Slavs to serve in its armed forces within occupied territories, in spite of them being considered subhuman, as a pragmatic means to resolve such manpower shortages."
Source
Follow @redideologies
π₯°7
On Hitler's intentions to start a war with Poland as the first of numerous conquests to "secure German living space in the East".
Follow @redideologies
Follow @redideologies
π₯°10π1π1π―1
When they deny Lebensraum, just point them to Chapter 14 of MK. It's all there.
Follow @redideologies
Follow @redideologies
π₯°8π―1
Forwarded from Fragile Communism (FNCVG)
High-ranking Nazi officers warmly welcomed at the Workersβ Day military parade on 1 May 1941 in Moscow. This is day 608 of World War II.
π ΅Κα΄Ι’ΙͺΚα΄ α΄α΄α΄α΄πΙ΄Ιͺsα΄
π ΅Κα΄Ι’ΙͺΚα΄ α΄α΄α΄α΄πΙ΄Ιͺsα΄
β€9π4π―1
Forwarded from Fragile Communism (FNCVG)
Bolsheviks cooperated so much with nazis that the british and the french literally planned to bomb the Soviet Union in 1940 because the Soviets were helping the nazis too much, giving them the much needed oil and signing friendship agreements (German-Soviet pact in 1939) hoping that it would cripple the soviet oil industry which was fueling the german side.
And then commies have the audacity of accusing others of being "fascists".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Pike
π ΅Κα΄Ι’ΙͺΚα΄ α΄α΄α΄α΄πΙ΄Ιͺsα΄
And then commies have the audacity of accusing others of being "fascists".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Pike
π ΅Κα΄Ι’ΙͺΚα΄ α΄α΄α΄α΄πΙ΄Ιͺsα΄
π±10π3π2
> "Fascism began as a revision of Marxism by Marxists, a revision which developed in successive stages, so that these Marxists gradually stopped thinking of themselves as Marxists, and eventually stopped thinking of themselves as socialists. They never stopped thinking of themselves as anti-liberal revolutionaries." - "The Mystery of Fascism," David Ramsay Steele
Follow @redideologies
Follow @redideologies
π12π6π―4π±1
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The differences between Natsoc & NazBol are minimal
TIPSπ² BECOME A MEMBER π FULL STREAM πΌ
Follow π @martinezpolitix
TIPS
Follow π @martinezpolitix
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π8π4π3
The Falangist/Primo de Rivera analysis of the world (his point of view):
1- Marx's analysis and predictions are all correct
2- The theory of "historical phases" of Marx indicates that Capitalism leads inexorably to the communist revolution.
3- We are witnesses of how horrifying this revolution is, as Russia shows
4- Therefore we must dismantle capitalism to avoid that prophecy of Marx
So the fascist trick is telling you that to "avoid the communist revolution" we must "dismantle capitalism" aka implement communism.
Fascist Falangism aims to engineer a communist system via sophist trickery.
Follow @redideologies
1- Marx's analysis and predictions are all correct
2- The theory of "historical phases" of Marx indicates that Capitalism leads inexorably to the communist revolution.
3- We are witnesses of how horrifying this revolution is, as Russia shows
4- Therefore we must dismantle capitalism to avoid that prophecy of Marx
So the fascist trick is telling you that to "avoid the communist revolution" we must "dismantle capitalism" aka implement communism.
Fascist Falangism aims to engineer a communist system via sophist trickery.
Follow @redideologies
β€9π5π2π2π―2
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Jose Antonio on the Falange's aesthetics:
> blue shirt symbolizes the "proletariat"
> black and red flag mimics the "anarchist trade unions"
> hijacked the word "comrade" from the communists
So he essentially replicated and appropriated everything from the radical Marxist left. Because that's what he was.
@martinezpolitix
> blue shirt symbolizes the "proletariat"
> black and red flag mimics the "anarchist trade unions"
> hijacked the word "comrade" from the communists
So he essentially replicated and appropriated everything from the radical Marxist left. Because that's what he was.
@martinezpolitix
π9
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Fascists are thus crypto-communists who are using word tricks and sophistry to get you onside with Communism. Always been the case and still is today.
Fascists wanted the same socialist State system as the Marxists but without a bloody revolution and civil war like happened in Russia. So they chose to implement their socialism incrementally instead of all in one go.
Fascists wanted the same socialist State system as the Marxists but without a bloody revolution and civil war like happened in Russia. So they chose to implement their socialism incrementally instead of all in one go.
π9π6β€3
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Hitler cult operates as a prison gang
TIPSπ² BECOME A MEMBER π FULL STREAM πΌ
Follow π @martinezpolitix
TIPS
Follow π @martinezpolitix
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
β‘4π±4
> "Nonetheless, Mussolini remained dedicated to his heretical version of Marxism. According to English historian Paul Johnson, "Mussolini was a reluctant fascist because, underneath, he remained a Marxist, albeit a heretical one." Johnson also depicted fascism as "a Marxist heresy, indeed a modification of the Leninist heresy itself."
Excerpt from Killing History
Follow @redideologies
Excerpt from Killing History
Follow @redideologies
π6π―1
Communists and fascists behave like street gangs fighting over turf.
> "The champions of communism and nationalistic socialism conducted themselves as ideological brothers, competing for power as though they were members of different organized-crime families. In essence, Communists and National Socialists, like many collectivists, behave like street gangs who compete for authority over territory and power, differing little from the rivalry found between the Bloods and the Crips, in the inner cities of America."
Excerpt from Killing History
Follow @redideologies
> "The champions of communism and nationalistic socialism conducted themselves as ideological brothers, competing for power as though they were members of different organized-crime families. In essence, Communists and National Socialists, like many collectivists, behave like street gangs who compete for authority over territory and power, differing little from the rivalry found between the Bloods and the Crips, in the inner cities of America."
Excerpt from Killing History
Follow @redideologies
β€7
> "A. James Gregor has argued that Fascism is a Marxist heresy, (31) a claim that has to be handled with care. Marxism is a doctrine whose main tenets can be listed precisely: class struggle, historical materialism, surplus-value, nationalization of the means of production, and so forth. Nearly all of those tenets were explicitly repudiated by the founders of Fascism, and these repudiations of Marxism largely define Fascism. Yet however paradoxical it may seem, there is a close ideological relationship between Marxism and Fascism. We may compare this with the relationship between, say, Christianity and Unitarianism. Unitarianism repudiates all the distinctive tenets of Christianity, yet is still clearly an offshoot of Christianity, preserving an affinity with its parental stem." - "The Mystery of Fascism," David Ramsey Steele
Even that stuff they supposedly repudiated is a ruse. Fascist states did plenty of nationalization (they never repudiated that) and stated their intention to socialize most of the private market. On class struggle, fascist states operated similarly to communist ones. Hitler, Mussolini and Lenin all abolished private trade unions and made one large public union. Once these "proletarian warriors" take over the state, there's no need for "class struggle" any longer, since the "working class" now controls the means of production through the state and abolishes class differences.
Classes are eliminated, so no more struggle. Mussolini's "class cooperation" nonsense is really just the state conquering the private economy and everything private ("nothing outside the state"), and then forcing its own will on both the workers and employers who must follow state diktats. Employers become mere managers in state-directed firms, a few of which are left nominally private to give the appearance of a difference from communism when functionally they're the same in practice. Most big businesses are nationalized or the state buys a controlling share in it so it can direct the enterprise, which it can direct anyway via regulations. The "cooperation" is forced via the state, which is the same thing as the communist state nationalizing all the companies and directly making them do what it wishes.
Follow @redideologies
Even that stuff they supposedly repudiated is a ruse. Fascist states did plenty of nationalization (they never repudiated that) and stated their intention to socialize most of the private market. On class struggle, fascist states operated similarly to communist ones. Hitler, Mussolini and Lenin all abolished private trade unions and made one large public union. Once these "proletarian warriors" take over the state, there's no need for "class struggle" any longer, since the "working class" now controls the means of production through the state and abolishes class differences.
Classes are eliminated, so no more struggle. Mussolini's "class cooperation" nonsense is really just the state conquering the private economy and everything private ("nothing outside the state"), and then forcing its own will on both the workers and employers who must follow state diktats. Employers become mere managers in state-directed firms, a few of which are left nominally private to give the appearance of a difference from communism when functionally they're the same in practice. Most big businesses are nationalized or the state buys a controlling share in it so it can direct the enterprise, which it can direct anyway via regulations. The "cooperation" is forced via the state, which is the same thing as the communist state nationalizing all the companies and directly making them do what it wishes.
Follow @redideologies
β€5π4π2
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Proofs of Lebensraum: Hitler's Plan to Conquer & Colonize Slavic Lands | Martinez Politix Investigates
Duration: 01:28:44
Topic: In this episode, I look at Hitler's #1 foreign policy goal: Lebensraum, expanding Germany's living space to the East. I demolish the natsoc myth that Hitler only wanted to reclaim territories lost after World War I. Extensive quotes from Mein Kampf, Hitler's speeches to generals, and other sources unequivocally prove that Hitler was not satisfied with the pre-WWI (1914) German borders and sought to expand them eastward "by the sword" to create a contiguous land empire in Europe. In MK, Hitler identifies "Russia and its borderlands" as the fertile soil he wished to conquer, space he claimed was required to make Germany a world power once again, and that this would only be possible through war. Hitler declared Poles, Russians and all Slavs to be an "inferior race" who Germans had the right to rule and exploit. I also delve into German colonial policy in Ukraine in which Himmler led resettlement/colonization projects, moving tens of thousands of Ukrainians off their land and Germans in. After their land was usurped by German occupation authorities, tens of thousands of Ukrainians were shipped off to slave labour camps while some of their children were kidnapped for Himmler's breeding programs. Nazi Germany used Ukrainian nationalists as cannon fodder to help them fight the Soviets only to betray them later when their usefulness expired.
π¬ WATCH ON RUMBLE π¬
TIPSπ² BECOME A MEMBER π
Follow @martinezpolitix
Duration: 01:28:44
Topic: In this episode, I look at Hitler's #1 foreign policy goal: Lebensraum, expanding Germany's living space to the East. I demolish the natsoc myth that Hitler only wanted to reclaim territories lost after World War I. Extensive quotes from Mein Kampf, Hitler's speeches to generals, and other sources unequivocally prove that Hitler was not satisfied with the pre-WWI (1914) German borders and sought to expand them eastward "by the sword" to create a contiguous land empire in Europe. In MK, Hitler identifies "Russia and its borderlands" as the fertile soil he wished to conquer, space he claimed was required to make Germany a world power once again, and that this would only be possible through war. Hitler declared Poles, Russians and all Slavs to be an "inferior race" who Germans had the right to rule and exploit. I also delve into German colonial policy in Ukraine in which Himmler led resettlement/colonization projects, moving tens of thousands of Ukrainians off their land and Germans in. After their land was usurped by German occupation authorities, tens of thousands of Ukrainians were shipped off to slave labour camps while some of their children were kidnapped for Himmler's breeding programs. Nazi Germany used Ukrainian nationalists as cannon fodder to help them fight the Soviets only to betray them later when their usefulness expired.
π¬ WATCH ON RUMBLE π¬
TIPS
Follow @martinezpolitix
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π₯°8π5