Forwarded from Martinez Politics
How can these soy larpers go around calling themselves "patriotic" (their new group is called "patriotic socialists") when you can see there that of the four flags they're flying, none are American, all are of foreign regimes. Heimcuck is always posing in front of Russian flags and not American ones and he called for "Death to America" in a speech during his Alt-Right phase. These people are the epitome of fifth-columnist traitors working for foreign governments, larping as "patriots". They exist to undermine the nation and exterminate it, for the benefit of their foreign paymasters.
👍12💯2🔥1
Leftists when losing the argument: "Nazi!" "Racist!"
Hitlerists when losing the argument: "Jew! Non-White! Shill!"
Same Saul Alinsky tactics. Two sides of the same coin.
Follow @redideologies
Hitlerists when losing the argument: "Jew! Non-White! Shill!"
Same Saul Alinsky tactics. Two sides of the same coin.
Follow @redideologies
💯13🐳6👍3🏆2🤯1
Further confirmation that Hitler said he sympathized more with the Republican Reds than Franco from Albert Speer's memoirs.
> "Two years ago, when we were about to meet, I still thought he was a true leader, but I met a fat little sergeant who couldn’t at all grasp my far-reaching plans. We ought to keep these Red Spaniards on the back burner — there are many thousands of them, after all. They’re lost to democracy, and to that reactionary crew around Franco too — we have real chances there. I believe you to the letter, Speer, that they were impressive people. I must say, in general, that during the civil war the idealism was not on Franco's side; it was to be found among the Reds. Certainly they pillaged and desecrated, but so did Franco’s men, without having any good reason for it — the Reds were working off centuries of hatred for the Catholic Church, which always oppressed the Spanish people. When I think of that I understand a good many things. Franco knows perfectly well why he objected only half a year ago to our employing these Spanish Reds. “But one of these days” — Hitler stabbed the air with his finger — “one of these days we’ll be able to make use of them. When we call it quits with Franco. Then we’ll let them go home. And you’ll see what happens then! The whole thing will start all over again. But with us on the opposite side. I don’t give a damn about that. Let him find out what I can be like!”"
Birds of a socialist feather flock together.
Source
Follow @redideologies
> "Two years ago, when we were about to meet, I still thought he was a true leader, but I met a fat little sergeant who couldn’t at all grasp my far-reaching plans. We ought to keep these Red Spaniards on the back burner — there are many thousands of them, after all. They’re lost to democracy, and to that reactionary crew around Franco too — we have real chances there. I believe you to the letter, Speer, that they were impressive people. I must say, in general, that during the civil war the idealism was not on Franco's side; it was to be found among the Reds. Certainly they pillaged and desecrated, but so did Franco’s men, without having any good reason for it — the Reds were working off centuries of hatred for the Catholic Church, which always oppressed the Spanish people. When I think of that I understand a good many things. Franco knows perfectly well why he objected only half a year ago to our employing these Spanish Reds. “But one of these days” — Hitler stabbed the air with his finger — “one of these days we’ll be able to make use of them. When we call it quits with Franco. Then we’ll let them go home. And you’ll see what happens then! The whole thing will start all over again. But with us on the opposite side. I don’t give a damn about that. Let him find out what I can be like!”"
Birds of a socialist feather flock together.
Source
Follow @redideologies
🥰8👍2👏2🏆1
From Table Talks, in 1942 Hitler allegedly said that:
> "if a new civil war breaks out [in Spain], I should not be surprised to see the Falangists compelled to make common cause with the Reds to rid themselves of the clerico-monarchical muck".
This lines up closely with the quote from Speer's memoir.
Spoken like a true commie: anti-clerical and anti-monarchy. Makes sense since those institutions were roadblocks to his own personal power.
Follow @redideologies
> "if a new civil war breaks out [in Spain], I should not be surprised to see the Falangists compelled to make common cause with the Reds to rid themselves of the clerico-monarchical muck".
This lines up closely with the quote from Speer's memoir.
Spoken like a true commie: anti-clerical and anti-monarchy. Makes sense since those institutions were roadblocks to his own personal power.
Follow @redideologies
🥰6🏆3
This isn't love of your people. Executed by guillotine for leaflets against the war.
Source
Follow @redideologies
Source
Follow @redideologies
🥰4
Like all socialists, Hitler was motivated by personal class and status insecurities and resentment.
He said in a 1941 speech:
> "First of all, the personal side of things: I understand very well that there is a world of difference between my own outlook on life and attitude, and that of President Roosevelt. Roosevelt came from an extremely wealthy family. By birth and origin he belonged to that class of people that is privileged in a democracy and assured of advancement. I myself was only the child of a small and poor family, and I had to struggle through life by work and effort in spite of immense hardships."
> "Two different paths in life! Franklin Roosevelt took power in the United States as the candidate of a thoroughly capitalistic party, which helps those who serve it. When I became the Chancellor of the German Reich, I was the leader of a popular national movement, which I had created myself. The powers that supported Mr. Roosevelt were the same powers I fought against, out of concern for the fate of my people, and out of deepest inner conviction..."
More evidence of it:
> "Hitler’s hatred of capitalism and admiration for socialism was no secret. He saw himself as a man of little wealth. In a March 27, 1936 speech to Krupp Locomotive factory workers, der Führer lamented, “Whenever I stand up for the German peasant, it is for the sake of the Volk. I have neither ancestral estate nor manor… I believe I am the only statesman in the world who does not have a bank account. I hold no stock, I have no shares in any companies. I do not draw any dividends.”"
> "In other speeches, Hitler claimed to be a plebeian comrade of little means. He told workers in Berlin, “All my life I have been a ‘have-not.’ At home I was a ‘have-not.’ I regard myself as belonging to them.” A true Marxist could not have been more elegant than Hitler’s assertion of his self-pity and poverty."
Follow @redideologies
He said in a 1941 speech:
> "First of all, the personal side of things: I understand very well that there is a world of difference between my own outlook on life and attitude, and that of President Roosevelt. Roosevelt came from an extremely wealthy family. By birth and origin he belonged to that class of people that is privileged in a democracy and assured of advancement. I myself was only the child of a small and poor family, and I had to struggle through life by work and effort in spite of immense hardships."
> "Two different paths in life! Franklin Roosevelt took power in the United States as the candidate of a thoroughly capitalistic party, which helps those who serve it. When I became the Chancellor of the German Reich, I was the leader of a popular national movement, which I had created myself. The powers that supported Mr. Roosevelt were the same powers I fought against, out of concern for the fate of my people, and out of deepest inner conviction..."
More evidence of it:
> "Hitler’s hatred of capitalism and admiration for socialism was no secret. He saw himself as a man of little wealth. In a March 27, 1936 speech to Krupp Locomotive factory workers, der Führer lamented, “Whenever I stand up for the German peasant, it is for the sake of the Volk. I have neither ancestral estate nor manor… I believe I am the only statesman in the world who does not have a bank account. I hold no stock, I have no shares in any companies. I do not draw any dividends.”"
> "In other speeches, Hitler claimed to be a plebeian comrade of little means. He told workers in Berlin, “All my life I have been a ‘have-not.’ At home I was a ‘have-not.’ I regard myself as belonging to them.” A true Marxist could not have been more elegant than Hitler’s assertion of his self-pity and poverty."
Follow @redideologies
👏5🥰4
Forwarded from The Real Martinez
"On the speaker's assertion that Lenin was the greatest man, second only to Hitler, and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight..."
That speaker was Joseph Goebbels in 1925.
Follow @martinezpolitics
That speaker was Joseph Goebbels in 1925.
Follow @martinezpolitics
🥰5
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
"But socialism and communism are different bro"
No they're not. They have the same end goal: collective (state) ownership of the means of production and a world in which all resources are shared equally among citizens. Egalitarian resource distribution.
Anyone saying these are different are trying to confuse you and trick you into accepting their agenda to abolish all (or most) private property and implement the communal system of collectivization.
Private property is antithetical to socialism because property in private hands always gives rise to private enterprise. Hence why all socialists, including fascists, are implacable foes of private property and seek to communalize it.
"Nothing outside the State" (Mussolini's famous phrase) = abolition of private property and enterprise. He wanted no challengers to State authority and that means eliminating anything not controlled by the State aka businesses and the private property that facilitates them.
@martinezpolitix
No they're not. They have the same end goal: collective (state) ownership of the means of production and a world in which all resources are shared equally among citizens. Egalitarian resource distribution.
Anyone saying these are different are trying to confuse you and trick you into accepting their agenda to abolish all (or most) private property and implement the communal system of collectivization.
Private property is antithetical to socialism because property in private hands always gives rise to private enterprise. Hence why all socialists, including fascists, are implacable foes of private property and seek to communalize it.
"Nothing outside the State" (Mussolini's famous phrase) = abolition of private property and enterprise. He wanted no challengers to State authority and that means eliminating anything not controlled by the State aka businesses and the private property that facilitates them.
@martinezpolitix
👍8😁5
Forwarded from The Real Martinez
Mussolini the Red.
> "The teenage Mussolini characterized himself as a socialist and got involved in socialist organizations. When he left Italy for a sojourn in Switzerland at the age of 19, he carried a nickel medallion of Karl Marx in his pocket. Back home a couple of years later, Mussolini developed a reputation for left-wing radicalism, got himself arrested and showed a taste for the idea of politically-directed violence. Revolution was in the air and he was well up for it."
> "By 1912, Mussolini was in the leadership circle of Italy’s Socialist Party and editing their newspaper Avanti! He was very effective at the job, doubling circulation and personally becoming a widely read radical socialist journalist. One is that he was caught up in the nationalist fervour surrounding the war. Another is that he was mindful of Marx’s aphorism that social revolution usually follows war and thus saw it as an enabler for what he wanted politically."
> "But speaking for himself at the time, Mussolini was clear on his ideology: “I am and shall remain a socialist and my convictions will never change! They are bred into my very bones.” And looking at the early fascist program, one can see massive overlaps with a socialist agenda circa early 20th century. Among other things, there was to be a minimum wage, an eight-hour workday, a progressive tax on capital, expropriation of uncultivated lands, and universal suffrage."
https://troymedia.com/viewpoint/mussolini-fascism-more-left-than-right/
> "The teenage Mussolini characterized himself as a socialist and got involved in socialist organizations. When he left Italy for a sojourn in Switzerland at the age of 19, he carried a nickel medallion of Karl Marx in his pocket. Back home a couple of years later, Mussolini developed a reputation for left-wing radicalism, got himself arrested and showed a taste for the idea of politically-directed violence. Revolution was in the air and he was well up for it."
> "By 1912, Mussolini was in the leadership circle of Italy’s Socialist Party and editing their newspaper Avanti! He was very effective at the job, doubling circulation and personally becoming a widely read radical socialist journalist. One is that he was caught up in the nationalist fervour surrounding the war. Another is that he was mindful of Marx’s aphorism that social revolution usually follows war and thus saw it as an enabler for what he wanted politically."
> "But speaking for himself at the time, Mussolini was clear on his ideology: “I am and shall remain a socialist and my convictions will never change! They are bred into my very bones.” And looking at the early fascist program, one can see massive overlaps with a socialist agenda circa early 20th century. Among other things, there was to be a minimum wage, an eight-hour workday, a progressive tax on capital, expropriation of uncultivated lands, and universal suffrage."
https://troymedia.com/viewpoint/mussolini-fascism-more-left-than-right/
Troy Media • Re-inventing how Canadians stay in touch
Mussolini more a man of the left than of the right
Pat Murphy for Troy Media • His fascist program had more in common with an authoritarian socialist – rather than a right-wing - agenda
😁5❤1
Forwarded from The Real Martinez
I've heard this more than a few times:
"Capitalism and Communism are both jewish"
The truth is that the statement is kind of vacuous. The claim seems to stem from the idea that both systems have had prominent jewish proponents. But they also have had and still have prominent non-jewish proponents.
Adam Smith, Fredrick Hayek and Jean-Baptist Say were major influencers behind free market economics. None jewish. Some prominent ones like Milton Friedman, David Ricardo and Ludwig von Mises were.
Fredrich Engels, Charles Fourier, Thomas Hodgskin, Georges Sorel and other non-jews were influential on communist/socialist economics. There were also prominent jewish ones: Karl Marx, Kurt Eisner, Leon Trotsky, Karl Radek, Rosa Luxembourg. Marx gets all the credit, but there were plenty of others involved.
Truth is that you can cherry pick jewish proponents of literally any economic school. Plenty of jews are proponents of the Keynesian (mixed economy) school of econ, does that make mixed economies inherently "jewish" too?
It's usually some flavour of "third positionist" doing the "both are jewish" bit to sell their own system as the only good "non-jewish" alternative. But I can do this same thing with Fascism. Mussolini's jewish mistress, Margherita Sarfatti, helped "craft the ideology". At least 5 jews were among the 119 founders of the Italian Fascist Party at its first meeting and "it was one of them (Cesare Goldman) who provided the room where the meeting was held". 10,000 Italian Jews were members of the Fascist party. A quote: "Jews rarely opposed Mussolini until 1938, when the Fascist government enacted a series of racist laws against them. Until that date, most Jewish attitudes to Fascism ranged from mild criticism, to indifference, to fervent support of the regime."
None of these are inherently "jewish".
The only ideologies you can properly claim are "jewish" are Judaism and Zionism because they're actually the religion and national homeland movement of jews. Maybe also Cultural Marxism because it was motivated by an ethnic desire of its founders to break down "authoritarian tendencies" in the goyim.
People usually resort to this meme logic because they can't argue for or against these concepts in principle, so they do the "whatever I don't like is jewish" 4chan bit to avoid actual argumentation.
Follow @martinezpolitics
"Capitalism and Communism are both jewish"
The truth is that the statement is kind of vacuous. The claim seems to stem from the idea that both systems have had prominent jewish proponents. But they also have had and still have prominent non-jewish proponents.
Adam Smith, Fredrick Hayek and Jean-Baptist Say were major influencers behind free market economics. None jewish. Some prominent ones like Milton Friedman, David Ricardo and Ludwig von Mises were.
Fredrich Engels, Charles Fourier, Thomas Hodgskin, Georges Sorel and other non-jews were influential on communist/socialist economics. There were also prominent jewish ones: Karl Marx, Kurt Eisner, Leon Trotsky, Karl Radek, Rosa Luxembourg. Marx gets all the credit, but there were plenty of others involved.
Truth is that you can cherry pick jewish proponents of literally any economic school. Plenty of jews are proponents of the Keynesian (mixed economy) school of econ, does that make mixed economies inherently "jewish" too?
It's usually some flavour of "third positionist" doing the "both are jewish" bit to sell their own system as the only good "non-jewish" alternative. But I can do this same thing with Fascism. Mussolini's jewish mistress, Margherita Sarfatti, helped "craft the ideology". At least 5 jews were among the 119 founders of the Italian Fascist Party at its first meeting and "it was one of them (Cesare Goldman) who provided the room where the meeting was held". 10,000 Italian Jews were members of the Fascist party. A quote: "Jews rarely opposed Mussolini until 1938, when the Fascist government enacted a series of racist laws against them. Until that date, most Jewish attitudes to Fascism ranged from mild criticism, to indifference, to fervent support of the regime."
None of these are inherently "jewish".
The only ideologies you can properly claim are "jewish" are Judaism and Zionism because they're actually the religion and national homeland movement of jews. Maybe also Cultural Marxism because it was motivated by an ethnic desire of its founders to break down "authoritarian tendencies" in the goyim.
People usually resort to this meme logic because they can't argue for or against these concepts in principle, so they do the "whatever I don't like is jewish" 4chan bit to avoid actual argumentation.
Follow @martinezpolitics
😁6❤2👍2
A July 1941 secret meeting between Hitler and all the top brass reveals his true intentions in the East: conquest of new territory for German Lebensraum.
He states unequivocally that the "liberator" narrative was nothing more than public-facing propaganda to win support for Barbarossa, and that the real mission was to "dominate... administer... exploit" the conquered Eastern lands.
> "It was essential that we should not proclaim our aims before the whole world; also, this was not necessary, but the chief thing was that we ourselves should know what we wanted. In no case should our own way be made more difficult by superfluous declarations. Such declarations were superfluous because we could do everything wherever we had the power, and what was beyond our power we would not be able to do anyway."
> "What we told the world about the motives for our measures ought to be conditioned, therefore, by tactical reasons. We ought to proceed here in exactly the same way as we did in the cases of Norway, Denmark, Holland and Belgium. In these cases too we said nothing about our aims, and if we were clever we would continue in the same way"
> "We shall then emphasize again that we were forced to occupy, administer and secure a certain area; it was in the interest of the inhabitants that we should provide order, food, traffic, etc., hence our measures. It should not be recognizable that thereby a final settlement is being initiated! We can nevertheless take all necessary measures—shooting, resettling, etc.—and we shall take them."
> "But we do not want to make any people into enemies prematurely and unnecessarily. Therefore we shall act as though we wanted to exercise a mandate only. It must be clear to us, however, that we shall never withdraw from these areas."
> "Accordingly we should act: 1. To do nothing which may obstruct the final settlement, but to prepare for it only in secret; 2. To emphasize that we are liberators. In particular: The Crimea has to be evacuated by all foreigners and to be settled by Germans only. In the same way the former Austrian part of Galicia will become Reich territory."
> "In principle we have now to face the task of cutting up the giant cake according to our needs, in order to be able: first, to dominate it; second, to administer it; and third, to exploit it."
Follow 👉🏻 @redideologies
He states unequivocally that the "liberator" narrative was nothing more than public-facing propaganda to win support for Barbarossa, and that the real mission was to "dominate... administer... exploit" the conquered Eastern lands.
> "It was essential that we should not proclaim our aims before the whole world; also, this was not necessary, but the chief thing was that we ourselves should know what we wanted. In no case should our own way be made more difficult by superfluous declarations. Such declarations were superfluous because we could do everything wherever we had the power, and what was beyond our power we would not be able to do anyway."
> "What we told the world about the motives for our measures ought to be conditioned, therefore, by tactical reasons. We ought to proceed here in exactly the same way as we did in the cases of Norway, Denmark, Holland and Belgium. In these cases too we said nothing about our aims, and if we were clever we would continue in the same way"
> "We shall then emphasize again that we were forced to occupy, administer and secure a certain area; it was in the interest of the inhabitants that we should provide order, food, traffic, etc., hence our measures. It should not be recognizable that thereby a final settlement is being initiated! We can nevertheless take all necessary measures—shooting, resettling, etc.—and we shall take them."
> "But we do not want to make any people into enemies prematurely and unnecessarily. Therefore we shall act as though we wanted to exercise a mandate only. It must be clear to us, however, that we shall never withdraw from these areas."
> "Accordingly we should act: 1. To do nothing which may obstruct the final settlement, but to prepare for it only in secret; 2. To emphasize that we are liberators. In particular: The Crimea has to be evacuated by all foreigners and to be settled by Germans only. In the same way the former Austrian part of Galicia will become Reich territory."
> "In principle we have now to face the task of cutting up the giant cake according to our needs, in order to be able: first, to dominate it; second, to administer it; and third, to exploit it."
Follow 👉🏻 @redideologies
🥰4🔥3👍2😁2🏆1
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
New article
"Compiled evidence of the German National Socialists' and Italian Fascists' homicidal hatred of the Slavic peoples. Statements from Hitler, Himmler, Rosenberg, Goebbels, Bormann, Koch and other top brass reveal a deep-seated venomous enmity towards all Slavs and a vehement desire to conquer Slavic territory for German Lebensraum. Statements from Mein Kampf and meetings with generals prove that Hitler's #1 foreign policy goal was taking by force new living space in the East. Also challenged is the standard revisionist narrative that Hitler's only mission in the East was "liberating" the Slavs from Stalin's evil Bolshevism. That is easily refuted with six points: 1) The top Natsocs' stated homicidal contempt for Slavs 2) clear statements from Hitler himself on his plans for conquest of new land 3) his Molotov-Ribbentrop pact which gave Stalin the green light to conquer parts of Poland & the Baltics 4) A July 1941 secret meeting between Hitler & top brass in which Hitler states clearly that the "liberator" narrative was public-facing propaganda to win support for Barbarossa, but the real agenda was to "dominate, administer & exploit" the newly acquired Slavic lands 5) Hitler's private statements of admiration for Stalin & his socialist autocracy 6) fascist economics is so similar to its Soviet counterpart that fascist claims of anti-Communism are hollow propaganda born of an internecine brother war with fellow socialists."
https://martinezperspective.net/2023/06/hitler-said-slavs-were-an-inferior-race-incapable-of-statecraft-planned-to-subjugate-them/
"Compiled evidence of the German National Socialists' and Italian Fascists' homicidal hatred of the Slavic peoples. Statements from Hitler, Himmler, Rosenberg, Goebbels, Bormann, Koch and other top brass reveal a deep-seated venomous enmity towards all Slavs and a vehement desire to conquer Slavic territory for German Lebensraum. Statements from Mein Kampf and meetings with generals prove that Hitler's #1 foreign policy goal was taking by force new living space in the East. Also challenged is the standard revisionist narrative that Hitler's only mission in the East was "liberating" the Slavs from Stalin's evil Bolshevism. That is easily refuted with six points: 1) The top Natsocs' stated homicidal contempt for Slavs 2) clear statements from Hitler himself on his plans for conquest of new land 3) his Molotov-Ribbentrop pact which gave Stalin the green light to conquer parts of Poland & the Baltics 4) A July 1941 secret meeting between Hitler & top brass in which Hitler states clearly that the "liberator" narrative was public-facing propaganda to win support for Barbarossa, but the real agenda was to "dominate, administer & exploit" the newly acquired Slavic lands 5) Hitler's private statements of admiration for Stalin & his socialist autocracy 6) fascist economics is so similar to its Soviet counterpart that fascist claims of anti-Communism are hollow propaganda born of an internecine brother war with fellow socialists."
https://martinezperspective.net/2023/06/hitler-said-slavs-were-an-inferior-race-incapable-of-statecraft-planned-to-subjugate-them/
😁6🔥5👍3
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
These people are really confused. 👇👇
https://t.me/pugilatoNSHC/5987
Barbarossa had nothing to do with saving anyone from communism (fascism is a variation of Marxism, what Giovanni Gentile called "practical Marxism," so how could it be "anti-communist"?) These ppl are repeating what was public-facing propaganda to conceal the real agenda of murderous Lebensraum. A July 1941 secret meeting between Hitler and top brass revealed as much:
> "It was essential that we should not proclaim our aims before the whole world; also, this was not necessary, but the chief thing was that we ourselves should know what we wanted"
> "What we told the world about the motives for our measures ought to be conditioned, therefore, by tactical reasons."
> "But we do not want to make any people into enemies prematurely and unnecessarily. Therefore we shall act as though we wanted to exercise a mandate only. It must be clear to us, however, that we shall never withdraw from these areas."
> "Accordingly we should act: 1. To do nothing which may obstruct the final settlement, but to prepare for it only in secret; 2. To emphasize that we are liberators. "
> "In particular: The Crimea has to be evacuated by all foreigners and to be settled by Germans only. In the same way the former Austrian part of Galicia will become Reich territory."
> "In principle we have now to face the task of cutting up the giant cake according to our needs, in order to be able: first, to dominate it; second, to administer it; and third, to exploit it."
Obviously they couldn't just announce that they wanted to steal land from the Russians so they sold ppl a bill of goods about saving the world from Bolshevism, which they had just allied with in Molotov-Ribbentrop, an ideology that Ribbentrop himself called "a form of National Socialism" and that Goebbels said he'd "rather go down with". We need to do away with this stupid myth.
https://t.me/pugilatoNSHC/5987
Barbarossa had nothing to do with saving anyone from communism (fascism is a variation of Marxism, what Giovanni Gentile called "practical Marxism," so how could it be "anti-communist"?) These ppl are repeating what was public-facing propaganda to conceal the real agenda of murderous Lebensraum. A July 1941 secret meeting between Hitler and top brass revealed as much:
> "It was essential that we should not proclaim our aims before the whole world; also, this was not necessary, but the chief thing was that we ourselves should know what we wanted"
> "What we told the world about the motives for our measures ought to be conditioned, therefore, by tactical reasons."
> "But we do not want to make any people into enemies prematurely and unnecessarily. Therefore we shall act as though we wanted to exercise a mandate only. It must be clear to us, however, that we shall never withdraw from these areas."
> "Accordingly we should act: 1. To do nothing which may obstruct the final settlement, but to prepare for it only in secret; 2. To emphasize that we are liberators. "
> "In particular: The Crimea has to be evacuated by all foreigners and to be settled by Germans only. In the same way the former Austrian part of Galicia will become Reich territory."
> "In principle we have now to face the task of cutting up the giant cake according to our needs, in order to be able: first, to dominate it; second, to administer it; and third, to exploit it."
Obviously they couldn't just announce that they wanted to steal land from the Russians so they sold ppl a bill of goods about saving the world from Bolshevism, which they had just allied with in Molotov-Ribbentrop, an ideology that Ribbentrop himself called "a form of National Socialism" and that Goebbels said he'd "rather go down with". We need to do away with this stupid myth.
Telegram
Pugilato NSHC ꑭ
Tal día como hoy hace 82 años, 3 millones de alemanes junto a miles de voluntarios europeos lanzaban la operación Barbarroja para liberar del comunismo a las naciones del este infectadas por la pеstе rоjа.
Honor y gloria.
Honor y gloria.
😱5⚡2
From David Irving's Hitler's War, he explains that Hitler chose the timing of the attack further East based on rumors that Stalin might sign an agreement with the Serbs, so he ordered a ruthless intervention against the Serbs killing up to 17,000 civilians in air bombings:
"Of the United States he was not afraid. But Russia must be defeated now. ‘We have the chance to 37 2 iv: ‘War of Liberation’ smash Russia while our own rear is free. That chance will not recur so soon. I would be betraying the future of the German people if I did not seize it now!’ Hitler urged his generals to have no compunctions about violating their treaty with Russia. Stalin had only cynically signed it; but he also urged them not to underestimate the Russian tanks or air force, or to rely too heavily on Germany’s allies in this fight. He drilled into his generals that this would be a war between great ideologies, and as such very different from the war in the west. ‘In the east cruelty now will be kindness for the future. The Russian commissars and GPU officials were criminals, and were to be treated as such. ‘It is not our job to see that these criminals survive.’"
> "On April 3 the political clouds began to clear: Hewel brought to Hitler a disturbing Forschungsamt intercept proving that Stalin was on the point of signing a pact with the new anti-German regime in Belgrade. It was, therefore, now or never. An hour after midnight — it was now April 6, 1941 — he sent for Dr. Goebbels. He needed company. He told Goebbels that he was going to prosecute this war against the Serbs without pity. Hitler sipped tea until five -twenty, the appointed zero hour for his attack, then retired to bed as German armoured and infantry divisions began storming the fron- tiers of Greece and Yugoslavia. Three hundred German bombers were in the air, heading for Belgrade."
> "Within twelve days of Hitler’s attack, Yugoslavia was defeated. The British Expeditionary Force found itself fighting a hopeless rearguard action against the German armoured and mountain corps which had comfortably side-stepped the formidable Metaxas line to pour into Yugoslavia and Greece. The British had committed a real blunder in purchasing the coup d’etat in Belgrade. Hitler had ordered the attack to begin with die saturation bombing of Belgrade — with an eye to the deterrent effect on other powers, notably Turkey and the Soviet Union. As many as 17,000 civilians were killed in the air raid; robbed of their nerve centre, the Yugoslav armies caved in."
"Of the United States he was not afraid. But Russia must be defeated now. ‘We have the chance to 37 2 iv: ‘War of Liberation’ smash Russia while our own rear is free. That chance will not recur so soon. I would be betraying the future of the German people if I did not seize it now!’ Hitler urged his generals to have no compunctions about violating their treaty with Russia. Stalin had only cynically signed it; but he also urged them not to underestimate the Russian tanks or air force, or to rely too heavily on Germany’s allies in this fight. He drilled into his generals that this would be a war between great ideologies, and as such very different from the war in the west. ‘In the east cruelty now will be kindness for the future. The Russian commissars and GPU officials were criminals, and were to be treated as such. ‘It is not our job to see that these criminals survive.’"
> "On April 3 the political clouds began to clear: Hewel brought to Hitler a disturbing Forschungsamt intercept proving that Stalin was on the point of signing a pact with the new anti-German regime in Belgrade. It was, therefore, now or never. An hour after midnight — it was now April 6, 1941 — he sent for Dr. Goebbels. He needed company. He told Goebbels that he was going to prosecute this war against the Serbs without pity. Hitler sipped tea until five -twenty, the appointed zero hour for his attack, then retired to bed as German armoured and infantry divisions began storming the fron- tiers of Greece and Yugoslavia. Three hundred German bombers were in the air, heading for Belgrade."
> "Within twelve days of Hitler’s attack, Yugoslavia was defeated. The British Expeditionary Force found itself fighting a hopeless rearguard action against the German armoured and mountain corps which had comfortably side-stepped the formidable Metaxas line to pour into Yugoslavia and Greece. The British had committed a real blunder in purchasing the coup d’etat in Belgrade. Hitler had ordered the attack to begin with die saturation bombing of Belgrade — with an eye to the deterrent effect on other powers, notably Turkey and the Soviet Union. As many as 17,000 civilians were killed in the air raid; robbed of their nerve centre, the Yugoslav armies caved in."
🥰4👍2
Irving reports on Hitler telling his aides that Stalin had "great achievements" and was the "greatest living statesman":
> "The next day, Papen also raised Stalin’s future with Hitler, and the Fiihrer repeated what he had told Goebbels a month before — that once the Wehrmacht had occupied a certain forward line in Russia, it might be possible to find common ground with the Red dictator, who was after all a man of enormous achievements. As another diplomat — Hasso von Etzdorf — noted: ‘ [Hitler] sees two possibilities as to Stalin’s fate; either he gets bumped off by his own people, or he tries to make peace with us. Because, he says, Stalin as the greatest living statesman must realise that at sixty-six you can’t begin your life’s work all over again if it will take a lifetime to complete it; so he’ll try to salvage what he can, with our acquiescence. And in this we should meet him halfway. If Stalin could only decide to seek expansion for Russia toward the south, the Persian Gulf, as he [Hitler] recommended to him once [November 1940], then peaceful co-existence between Russia and Germany would be conceivable."
Follow @redideologies
> "The next day, Papen also raised Stalin’s future with Hitler, and the Fiihrer repeated what he had told Goebbels a month before — that once the Wehrmacht had occupied a certain forward line in Russia, it might be possible to find common ground with the Red dictator, who was after all a man of enormous achievements. As another diplomat — Hasso von Etzdorf — noted: ‘ [Hitler] sees two possibilities as to Stalin’s fate; either he gets bumped off by his own people, or he tries to make peace with us. Because, he says, Stalin as the greatest living statesman must realise that at sixty-six you can’t begin your life’s work all over again if it will take a lifetime to complete it; so he’ll try to salvage what he can, with our acquiescence. And in this we should meet him halfway. If Stalin could only decide to seek expansion for Russia toward the south, the Persian Gulf, as he [Hitler] recommended to him once [November 1940], then peaceful co-existence between Russia and Germany would be conceivable."
Follow @redideologies
👍5🥰4🫡1
David Irving reports on Hitler's plans for colonizing the East:
> "By mid-October 1941, despite the foul weather, Hitler was still bred widi optimism. On the thirteenth he began laying the foundations for a Nazi version of a united Europe. Hewel wrote, ‘Reich foreign minister visits the Fuhrer; first thoughts on a European manifesto. Probably in the economic sphere first of all, and probably at the beginning of the winter. Fuhrer is in very best and relaxed mood.’ Over dinner he revealed that he had been thinking of calling together the economic experts of Denmark, Norway, Holland, Belgium, Sweden, and Finland. ‘All those who have a feeling for Europe can join in this work,’ he said, meaning the colonization of the east. When Todt and Gauleiter Fritz Sauckel dined with Hitler on October 17, they were brimming with everything they had just seen in the east."
> "Again Hitler dreamed aloud of the vast construction projects whereby he would open up the east. ‘Above all we must lay roads,’ Koeppen wrote that night, describing the dinner conversation: He told Dr. Todt he must expand his original projects considerably. For this purpose he will be able to make use of the three million prisoners for the next twenty years. The major roads — the Fuhrer spoke today not only of the highway to the Crimea but also of one to the Caucasus and of two or three through the more northern territories — must be laid across the areas of greatest scenic beauty. Where the big rivers are crossed, German cities must arise, as centers of the Wehrmacht, police, administration, and Party authorities."
> "Along these roads will lie the German farmsteads, and soon the monotonous steppe, with its Asiatic appearance, will look very different indeed. In ten years four million Germans will have settled there, and in twenty years at least ten million. They will come not only from the Reich but above all from America, and from Scandinavia, Holland, and Flanders too. And the rest of Europe shall play its part in this opening up of the Russian wastes as well. . . The Fuhrer then reverted to the theme that ‘contrary to what some people think’ no education or welfare is to be laid on for the native population. Knowledge of the road signs will suffice, there will be no call for German schoolmasters there."
> "By ‘freedom’ the Ukrainians understood that instead of twice they now had to wash only once a month — the Germans with their scrubbing brushes would soon make themselves unpopular there. He as Fuhrer would set up his new administration there after ice cool calculations: what the Slavs might think about it would not put him out one bit. Nobody who ate German bread today got worked up about the fact that in the twelfth century the granaries east of the Elbe were regained by the sword. Here in the east we were repeating a process for a second time not unlike the conquest of America. For climatic reasons alone we could not venture further south than the Crimea — he did not mention the Caucasus at this point — even now hundreds of our mountain troops on Crete had malaria! The Fuhrer kept repeating that he wished he was ten or fifteen years younger so he could live through the rest of this process."
Follow @redideologies
> "By mid-October 1941, despite the foul weather, Hitler was still bred widi optimism. On the thirteenth he began laying the foundations for a Nazi version of a united Europe. Hewel wrote, ‘Reich foreign minister visits the Fuhrer; first thoughts on a European manifesto. Probably in the economic sphere first of all, and probably at the beginning of the winter. Fuhrer is in very best and relaxed mood.’ Over dinner he revealed that he had been thinking of calling together the economic experts of Denmark, Norway, Holland, Belgium, Sweden, and Finland. ‘All those who have a feeling for Europe can join in this work,’ he said, meaning the colonization of the east. When Todt and Gauleiter Fritz Sauckel dined with Hitler on October 17, they were brimming with everything they had just seen in the east."
> "Again Hitler dreamed aloud of the vast construction projects whereby he would open up the east. ‘Above all we must lay roads,’ Koeppen wrote that night, describing the dinner conversation: He told Dr. Todt he must expand his original projects considerably. For this purpose he will be able to make use of the three million prisoners for the next twenty years. The major roads — the Fuhrer spoke today not only of the highway to the Crimea but also of one to the Caucasus and of two or three through the more northern territories — must be laid across the areas of greatest scenic beauty. Where the big rivers are crossed, German cities must arise, as centers of the Wehrmacht, police, administration, and Party authorities."
> "Along these roads will lie the German farmsteads, and soon the monotonous steppe, with its Asiatic appearance, will look very different indeed. In ten years four million Germans will have settled there, and in twenty years at least ten million. They will come not only from the Reich but above all from America, and from Scandinavia, Holland, and Flanders too. And the rest of Europe shall play its part in this opening up of the Russian wastes as well. . . The Fuhrer then reverted to the theme that ‘contrary to what some people think’ no education or welfare is to be laid on for the native population. Knowledge of the road signs will suffice, there will be no call for German schoolmasters there."
> "By ‘freedom’ the Ukrainians understood that instead of twice they now had to wash only once a month — the Germans with their scrubbing brushes would soon make themselves unpopular there. He as Fuhrer would set up his new administration there after ice cool calculations: what the Slavs might think about it would not put him out one bit. Nobody who ate German bread today got worked up about the fact that in the twelfth century the granaries east of the Elbe were regained by the sword. Here in the east we were repeating a process for a second time not unlike the conquest of America. For climatic reasons alone we could not venture further south than the Crimea — he did not mention the Caucasus at this point — even now hundreds of our mountain troops on Crete had malaria! The Fuhrer kept repeating that he wished he was ten or fifteen years younger so he could live through the rest of this process."
Follow @redideologies
🥰5
Video debunking German propaganda about Polish 'massacres' of Germans before outbreak of World War II. Evidence that any serious massacres occurred before the war are scant. Hitler ordered the 10 fold exaggeration of the numbers killed in a skirmish that occurred several days AFTER the invasion, the infamous "Bloody Sunday" in Bromberg, which some historians have linked to instigation tactics by German agents:
> "Beginning in early September, the Nazi intelligence organization Abwehr reported in documents prepared by general Erwin von Lahousen that German armed saboteurs conducting operations behind the front line in Bydgoszcz suffered heavy losses.[4][5][6] Their operations coordinated by Abwehr residents in Bydgoszcz-Grischner are documented in operational reports and plans in Abwehr archives. Among the tasks allocated to armed saboteur groups documented in German archives were: blowing up the main office of the German organization Deutsche Vereinigung, the passport office Deutsche Paßstelle, the German private school, and setting fire to the German theater and offices of the Jungdeutsche Partei.[4] These operations are documented as coordinated and organized by Schutzstaffel SS"
> "A Polish investigation concluded in 2004 that Polish troops had been shot at by members of the German minority and German military intelligence (Abwehr) agents; around 40–50 Poles and between 100 and 300 Germans were killed."
Follow @redideologies
> "Beginning in early September, the Nazi intelligence organization Abwehr reported in documents prepared by general Erwin von Lahousen that German armed saboteurs conducting operations behind the front line in Bydgoszcz suffered heavy losses.[4][5][6] Their operations coordinated by Abwehr residents in Bydgoszcz-Grischner are documented in operational reports and plans in Abwehr archives. Among the tasks allocated to armed saboteur groups documented in German archives were: blowing up the main office of the German organization Deutsche Vereinigung, the passport office Deutsche Paßstelle, the German private school, and setting fire to the German theater and offices of the Jungdeutsche Partei.[4] These operations are documented as coordinated and organized by Schutzstaffel SS"
> "A Polish investigation concluded in 2004 that Polish troops had been shot at by members of the German minority and German military intelligence (Abwehr) agents; around 40–50 Poles and between 100 and 300 Germans were killed."
Follow @redideologies
👍8🥰4😁2