Forwarded from Exposing Hitler as Zionist
Yes, the Nazis were the FIRST TO bomb civilians, that is simply indisputable.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Wieluń
"Located near the German border, the town of Wieluń was completely undefended, lacking anti-air capabilities and a military garrison. Despite Wieluń having no military targets, airstrikes continued. German intelligence reports had stated there was a Polish cavalry brigade stationed in the town. The Luftwaffe bombed the nearby towns of Działoszyn, Radomsko, and Sulejów, which also had no military targets.
The attack on the town has been described as the first war crime committed by Germany in World War II. The Luftwaffe had reportedly bombed a "clearly marked" hospital, and strafed fleeing civilians. In the aftermath, 127 civilian casualties were reported – possibly "several hundred" – but the exact number remains unknown.[70% of the town (90 percent, in the city center) was destroyed"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Wieluń
"Located near the German border, the town of Wieluń was completely undefended, lacking anti-air capabilities and a military garrison. Despite Wieluń having no military targets, airstrikes continued. German intelligence reports had stated there was a Polish cavalry brigade stationed in the town. The Luftwaffe bombed the nearby towns of Działoszyn, Radomsko, and Sulejów, which also had no military targets.
The attack on the town has been described as the first war crime committed by Germany in World War II. The Luftwaffe had reportedly bombed a "clearly marked" hospital, and strafed fleeing civilians. In the aftermath, 127 civilian casualties were reported – possibly "several hundred" – but the exact number remains unknown.[70% of the town (90 percent, in the city center) was destroyed"
Wikipedia
Bombing of Wieluń
The bombing of Wieluń is considered by many to be the first major act of World War II, and the September Campaign. After Luftwaffe air units moved into Polish airspace in the early morning of 1 September, they reached the town of Wieluń by 04:40–45. Around…
🥰5👍3
According to David Irving, Hitler was planning a "United States of Europe" under German domination and planned to carve out territory in the East that would "last a hundred years". He was readying the German economy for war during these years.
> "contemplating Germany's economic position in 1936, Hitler chafed that so little had been accomplished to make the country self-sufficient - a basic prerequisite for war. In April he put Hermann Goring in charge of raw materials and foreign currency questions. Aboard his yacht Grille at Kiel he told Goebbels in May of his vision of a United States of Europe under German leadership. ...'The Fuhrer,' wrote Goebbels, sees a conflict coming in the Far East. Japan will thrash Russia. And then our great hour will come. Then we shall have to carve off enough territory to last us a hundred years.'"
> "Hitler announced that he had to resolve once and for all Germany's economic problems by enlarging her Lebensraum and thus her sources of raw materials and food. In detail, Hitler stated these two demands: 'First: in four years the German army must be ready for action; and second, in four years the German economy must be ready for war."
Follow @redideologies
> "contemplating Germany's economic position in 1936, Hitler chafed that so little had been accomplished to make the country self-sufficient - a basic prerequisite for war. In April he put Hermann Goring in charge of raw materials and foreign currency questions. Aboard his yacht Grille at Kiel he told Goebbels in May of his vision of a United States of Europe under German leadership. ...'The Fuhrer,' wrote Goebbels, sees a conflict coming in the Far East. Japan will thrash Russia. And then our great hour will come. Then we shall have to carve off enough territory to last us a hundred years.'"
> "Hitler announced that he had to resolve once and for all Germany's economic problems by enlarging her Lebensraum and thus her sources of raw materials and food. In detail, Hitler stated these two demands: 'First: in four years the German army must be ready for action; and second, in four years the German economy must be ready for war."
Follow @redideologies
🥰5😁4👍1
From Mein Kampf:
"For the organization of a Russian state formation was not the result of the political abilities of the Slavs in Russia, but only a wonderful example of the state-forming efficacity of the German element in an inferior race. Numerous mighty empires on earth have been created in this way. Lower nations led by Germanic organizers and overlords have more than once grown to be mighty state formations and have endured as long as the racial nudeus of the creative state race maintained itself. For centuries Russia drew nourishment from this Germanic nucleus of its upper leading strata. Today it can be regarded as almost totally exterminated and extinguished."
He's clearly saying there that Slavs are inferior and can only achieve greatness if led by Germans.
Follow @redideologies
"For the organization of a Russian state formation was not the result of the political abilities of the Slavs in Russia, but only a wonderful example of the state-forming efficacity of the German element in an inferior race. Numerous mighty empires on earth have been created in this way. Lower nations led by Germanic organizers and overlords have more than once grown to be mighty state formations and have endured as long as the racial nudeus of the creative state race maintained itself. For centuries Russia drew nourishment from this Germanic nucleus of its upper leading strata. Today it can be regarded as almost totally exterminated and extinguished."
He's clearly saying there that Slavs are inferior and can only achieve greatness if led by Germans.
Follow @redideologies
🥰9👍5
Mussolini hated Balkans people and called for the annihilation of Slavs.
> "Mussolini today repeats his praise of my speech, but shows me a clipping from the Resto del Carlino [daily newspaper of Bologna], and criticizes my Fascist salute, which was not according to regulations. Is there nothing really better to think about? Vidussoni comes to see me. After having spoken about a few casual things, he makes some political allusions and announces savage plans against the Slovenes. He wants to kill them all. I take the liberty of observing that there are a million of them. “That does not matter,” he answers firmly; “we must imitate the Ascari [Negro soldiers from Italian colonies] and exterminate them!”"
Source: Diaries Of Count Galeazzo Ciano, Italian Minister Of Foreign Affairs
It is alleged that Vidussoni said that not Mussolini. It's an impeccable source. Ciano was: "an Italian diplomat and politician who served as Foreign Minister in the government of his father-in-law, Benito Mussolini, from 1936 until 1943. During this period, he was widely seen as Mussolini's most probable successor as head of government"
Mussolini apparently said this:
> "When dealing with such a race as Slavic—inferior and barbarian—we must not pursue the carrot, but the stick policy … We should not be afraid of new victims … The Italian border should run across the Brenner Pass, Monte Nevoso and the Dinaric Alps … I would say we can easily sacrifice 500,000 barbaric Slavs for 50,000 Italians" - Source
Follow @redideologies
> "Mussolini today repeats his praise of my speech, but shows me a clipping from the Resto del Carlino [daily newspaper of Bologna], and criticizes my Fascist salute, which was not according to regulations. Is there nothing really better to think about? Vidussoni comes to see me. After having spoken about a few casual things, he makes some political allusions and announces savage plans against the Slovenes. He wants to kill them all. I take the liberty of observing that there are a million of them. “That does not matter,” he answers firmly; “we must imitate the Ascari [Negro soldiers from Italian colonies] and exterminate them!”"
Source: Diaries Of Count Galeazzo Ciano, Italian Minister Of Foreign Affairs
It is alleged that Vidussoni said that not Mussolini. It's an impeccable source. Ciano was: "an Italian diplomat and politician who served as Foreign Minister in the government of his father-in-law, Benito Mussolini, from 1936 until 1943. During this period, he was widely seen as Mussolini's most probable successor as head of government"
Mussolini apparently said this:
> "When dealing with such a race as Slavic—inferior and barbarian—we must not pursue the carrot, but the stick policy … We should not be afraid of new victims … The Italian border should run across the Brenner Pass, Monte Nevoso and the Dinaric Alps … I would say we can easily sacrifice 500,000 barbaric Slavs for 50,000 Italians" - Source
Follow @redideologies
🥰4🔥3👍2😁2🐳1
Mussolini had his own version of Lebensraum: Spacio Vitale.
> "Another element of Mussolini’s fascism was the idea of ‘spazio vitale’ which translates to ‘vital space’. It is the belief that Italy required more space to operate. It further related to fascism as, the territory that Mussolini identified was where the Roman Empire had previously controlled. This concept of ‘vital space’ relates to another important aspect of fascism – racism superiority. While Mussolini did not necessarily support the racial policies and practise of Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany, he did assert that some people were superior over others. For instance, he argued that it was justified for superior people to rule over inferior people. This is exemplified in a speech from 1920 that he gave, where he said:
“When dealing with such a race as Slavic—inferior and barbarian—we must not pursue the carrot, but the stick policy... We should not be afraid of new victims... The Italian border should run across the Brenner Pass, Monte Nevoso and the Dinaric Alps... I would say we can easily sacrifice 500,000 barbaric Slavs for 50,000 Italians...”
Source
Follow @redideologies
> "Another element of Mussolini’s fascism was the idea of ‘spazio vitale’ which translates to ‘vital space’. It is the belief that Italy required more space to operate. It further related to fascism as, the territory that Mussolini identified was where the Roman Empire had previously controlled. This concept of ‘vital space’ relates to another important aspect of fascism – racism superiority. While Mussolini did not necessarily support the racial policies and practise of Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany, he did assert that some people were superior over others. For instance, he argued that it was justified for superior people to rule over inferior people. This is exemplified in a speech from 1920 that he gave, where he said:
“When dealing with such a race as Slavic—inferior and barbarian—we must not pursue the carrot, but the stick policy... We should not be afraid of new victims... The Italian border should run across the Brenner Pass, Monte Nevoso and the Dinaric Alps... I would say we can easily sacrifice 500,000 barbaric Slavs for 50,000 Italians...”
Source
Follow @redideologies
⚡5🥰4👍2🔥1😱1
Forwarded from Red Ideologies
Marxists = communists with a class identity.
Fascists = communists with a national (civic) identity.
National Socialists = communists with an ethnic/racial identity.
They all want to abolish markets and establish a State-run economy, they just emphasize differently the other parts of their identity.
Follow @redideologies
Fascists = communists with a national (civic) identity.
National Socialists = communists with an ethnic/racial identity.
They all want to abolish markets and establish a State-run economy, they just emphasize differently the other parts of their identity.
Follow @redideologies
👍11😁6👏2🔥1
Why do you think it was so easy for Heimcuck to seamlessly transition from National-Socialism to Marxist-Socialism? He's now trying to straddle in between the two with the "National Bolshevik" larp.
Because they're cut from the same cloth and share about 80%-90% of the same source material. They're sister ideologies with immense overlap, that's why it's easy traffic from one to the other.
A historian says that 55% of SA recruits were "ex-communists". Hitler allegedly said this:
"we National Socialists wish precisely to attract all socialists, even the Communists; we wish to win them over from their international camp to the national one."
He also said he regretted supporting Franco and should have backed the Republican Reds in the Spanish civil war because they were "good socialists".
Now it all makes sense doesn't it?
Follow @redideologies
Because they're cut from the same cloth and share about 80%-90% of the same source material. They're sister ideologies with immense overlap, that's why it's easy traffic from one to the other.
A historian says that 55% of SA recruits were "ex-communists". Hitler allegedly said this:
"we National Socialists wish precisely to attract all socialists, even the Communists; we wish to win them over from their international camp to the national one."
He also said he regretted supporting Franco and should have backed the Republican Reds in the Spanish civil war because they were "good socialists".
Now it all makes sense doesn't it?
Follow @redideologies
😱8🔥4💯3👌2😁1
Hitler (socialist)
Mussolini (socialist)
Stalin (socialist)
FDR (socialist)
World War II was fought between variant shades of competing schizo socialists, all vying for supremacy for their variant shade of socialism.
Follow @redideologies
Mussolini (socialist)
Stalin (socialist)
FDR (socialist)
World War II was fought between variant shades of competing schizo socialists, all vying for supremacy for their variant shade of socialism.
Follow @redideologies
👍26🐳6🥰4🤯2💯2👌1
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
How can these soy larpers go around calling themselves "patriotic" (their new group is called "patriotic socialists") when you can see there that of the four flags they're flying, none are American, all are of foreign regimes. Heimcuck is always posing in front of Russian flags and not American ones and he called for "Death to America" in a speech during his Alt-Right phase. These people are the epitome of fifth-columnist traitors working for foreign governments, larping as "patriots". They exist to undermine the nation and exterminate it, for the benefit of their foreign paymasters.
👍12💯2🔥1
Leftists when losing the argument: "Nazi!" "Racist!"
Hitlerists when losing the argument: "Jew! Non-White! Shill!"
Same Saul Alinsky tactics. Two sides of the same coin.
Follow @redideologies
Hitlerists when losing the argument: "Jew! Non-White! Shill!"
Same Saul Alinsky tactics. Two sides of the same coin.
Follow @redideologies
💯13🐳6👍3🏆2🤯1
Further confirmation that Hitler said he sympathized more with the Republican Reds than Franco from Albert Speer's memoirs.
> "Two years ago, when we were about to meet, I still thought he was a true leader, but I met a fat little sergeant who couldn’t at all grasp my far-reaching plans. We ought to keep these Red Spaniards on the back burner — there are many thousands of them, after all. They’re lost to democracy, and to that reactionary crew around Franco too — we have real chances there. I believe you to the letter, Speer, that they were impressive people. I must say, in general, that during the civil war the idealism was not on Franco's side; it was to be found among the Reds. Certainly they pillaged and desecrated, but so did Franco’s men, without having any good reason for it — the Reds were working off centuries of hatred for the Catholic Church, which always oppressed the Spanish people. When I think of that I understand a good many things. Franco knows perfectly well why he objected only half a year ago to our employing these Spanish Reds. “But one of these days” — Hitler stabbed the air with his finger — “one of these days we’ll be able to make use of them. When we call it quits with Franco. Then we’ll let them go home. And you’ll see what happens then! The whole thing will start all over again. But with us on the opposite side. I don’t give a damn about that. Let him find out what I can be like!”"
Birds of a socialist feather flock together.
Source
Follow @redideologies
> "Two years ago, when we were about to meet, I still thought he was a true leader, but I met a fat little sergeant who couldn’t at all grasp my far-reaching plans. We ought to keep these Red Spaniards on the back burner — there are many thousands of them, after all. They’re lost to democracy, and to that reactionary crew around Franco too — we have real chances there. I believe you to the letter, Speer, that they were impressive people. I must say, in general, that during the civil war the idealism was not on Franco's side; it was to be found among the Reds. Certainly they pillaged and desecrated, but so did Franco’s men, without having any good reason for it — the Reds were working off centuries of hatred for the Catholic Church, which always oppressed the Spanish people. When I think of that I understand a good many things. Franco knows perfectly well why he objected only half a year ago to our employing these Spanish Reds. “But one of these days” — Hitler stabbed the air with his finger — “one of these days we’ll be able to make use of them. When we call it quits with Franco. Then we’ll let them go home. And you’ll see what happens then! The whole thing will start all over again. But with us on the opposite side. I don’t give a damn about that. Let him find out what I can be like!”"
Birds of a socialist feather flock together.
Source
Follow @redideologies
🥰8👍2👏2🏆1
From Table Talks, in 1942 Hitler allegedly said that:
> "if a new civil war breaks out [in Spain], I should not be surprised to see the Falangists compelled to make common cause with the Reds to rid themselves of the clerico-monarchical muck".
This lines up closely with the quote from Speer's memoir.
Spoken like a true commie: anti-clerical and anti-monarchy. Makes sense since those institutions were roadblocks to his own personal power.
Follow @redideologies
> "if a new civil war breaks out [in Spain], I should not be surprised to see the Falangists compelled to make common cause with the Reds to rid themselves of the clerico-monarchical muck".
This lines up closely with the quote from Speer's memoir.
Spoken like a true commie: anti-clerical and anti-monarchy. Makes sense since those institutions were roadblocks to his own personal power.
Follow @redideologies
🥰6🏆3
This isn't love of your people. Executed by guillotine for leaflets against the war.
Source
Follow @redideologies
Source
Follow @redideologies
🥰4
Like all socialists, Hitler was motivated by personal class and status insecurities and resentment.
He said in a 1941 speech:
> "First of all, the personal side of things: I understand very well that there is a world of difference between my own outlook on life and attitude, and that of President Roosevelt. Roosevelt came from an extremely wealthy family. By birth and origin he belonged to that class of people that is privileged in a democracy and assured of advancement. I myself was only the child of a small and poor family, and I had to struggle through life by work and effort in spite of immense hardships."
> "Two different paths in life! Franklin Roosevelt took power in the United States as the candidate of a thoroughly capitalistic party, which helps those who serve it. When I became the Chancellor of the German Reich, I was the leader of a popular national movement, which I had created myself. The powers that supported Mr. Roosevelt were the same powers I fought against, out of concern for the fate of my people, and out of deepest inner conviction..."
More evidence of it:
> "Hitler’s hatred of capitalism and admiration for socialism was no secret. He saw himself as a man of little wealth. In a March 27, 1936 speech to Krupp Locomotive factory workers, der Führer lamented, “Whenever I stand up for the German peasant, it is for the sake of the Volk. I have neither ancestral estate nor manor… I believe I am the only statesman in the world who does not have a bank account. I hold no stock, I have no shares in any companies. I do not draw any dividends.”"
> "In other speeches, Hitler claimed to be a plebeian comrade of little means. He told workers in Berlin, “All my life I have been a ‘have-not.’ At home I was a ‘have-not.’ I regard myself as belonging to them.” A true Marxist could not have been more elegant than Hitler’s assertion of his self-pity and poverty."
Follow @redideologies
He said in a 1941 speech:
> "First of all, the personal side of things: I understand very well that there is a world of difference between my own outlook on life and attitude, and that of President Roosevelt. Roosevelt came from an extremely wealthy family. By birth and origin he belonged to that class of people that is privileged in a democracy and assured of advancement. I myself was only the child of a small and poor family, and I had to struggle through life by work and effort in spite of immense hardships."
> "Two different paths in life! Franklin Roosevelt took power in the United States as the candidate of a thoroughly capitalistic party, which helps those who serve it. When I became the Chancellor of the German Reich, I was the leader of a popular national movement, which I had created myself. The powers that supported Mr. Roosevelt were the same powers I fought against, out of concern for the fate of my people, and out of deepest inner conviction..."
More evidence of it:
> "Hitler’s hatred of capitalism and admiration for socialism was no secret. He saw himself as a man of little wealth. In a March 27, 1936 speech to Krupp Locomotive factory workers, der Führer lamented, “Whenever I stand up for the German peasant, it is for the sake of the Volk. I have neither ancestral estate nor manor… I believe I am the only statesman in the world who does not have a bank account. I hold no stock, I have no shares in any companies. I do not draw any dividends.”"
> "In other speeches, Hitler claimed to be a plebeian comrade of little means. He told workers in Berlin, “All my life I have been a ‘have-not.’ At home I was a ‘have-not.’ I regard myself as belonging to them.” A true Marxist could not have been more elegant than Hitler’s assertion of his self-pity and poverty."
Follow @redideologies
👏5🥰4
Forwarded from The Real Martinez
"On the speaker's assertion that Lenin was the greatest man, second only to Hitler, and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight..."
That speaker was Joseph Goebbels in 1925.
Follow @martinezpolitics
That speaker was Joseph Goebbels in 1925.
Follow @martinezpolitics
🥰5
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
"But socialism and communism are different bro"
No they're not. They have the same end goal: collective (state) ownership of the means of production and a world in which all resources are shared equally among citizens. Egalitarian resource distribution.
Anyone saying these are different are trying to confuse you and trick you into accepting their agenda to abolish all (or most) private property and implement the communal system of collectivization.
Private property is antithetical to socialism because property in private hands always gives rise to private enterprise. Hence why all socialists, including fascists, are implacable foes of private property and seek to communalize it.
"Nothing outside the State" (Mussolini's famous phrase) = abolition of private property and enterprise. He wanted no challengers to State authority and that means eliminating anything not controlled by the State aka businesses and the private property that facilitates them.
@martinezpolitix
No they're not. They have the same end goal: collective (state) ownership of the means of production and a world in which all resources are shared equally among citizens. Egalitarian resource distribution.
Anyone saying these are different are trying to confuse you and trick you into accepting their agenda to abolish all (or most) private property and implement the communal system of collectivization.
Private property is antithetical to socialism because property in private hands always gives rise to private enterprise. Hence why all socialists, including fascists, are implacable foes of private property and seek to communalize it.
"Nothing outside the State" (Mussolini's famous phrase) = abolition of private property and enterprise. He wanted no challengers to State authority and that means eliminating anything not controlled by the State aka businesses and the private property that facilitates them.
@martinezpolitix
👍8😁5