Forwarded from Exposing Hitler as Zionist
If the German people should lose the war, he declared (in a further demonstration of his unchanged social-Darwinism), then it would indicate that it did not possess the ‘internal value (inneren Wert)’ that had been attributed to it, and he would have no sympathy with this people. " -Adolf Hitler
https://telegra.ph/Hitlers-February-1945-meeting-with-his-Gauleiters-05-02
https://telegra.ph/Hitlers-February-1945-meeting-with-his-Gauleiters-05-02
Telegraph
Hitler's February 1945 meeting with his Gauleiters
[on February 1945] Hitler’s appearance, when he entered the hall at 2p.m. that afternoon, was a shock to many of the Gauleiter, who had not seen him for six months or so. His physical condition had deteriorated sharply even during the space of those six months.…
⚡7😁4👍3
Philosopher of fascism Giovanni Gentile says here that the State's power is "entirely unconditional" and "not subject to negotiation or compromise".
That is the essence of fascism: the totalizing absolutist power of an unregulated and unchecked State.
Therefore this means that the State cannot be questioned by the citizenry; whatever actions it takes, no matter what it is, must be accepted and obeyed unconditionally.
The fascists seek to engender a drone-like unthinking citizenry that bows to and obeys the fascist ruling class, even if their policies become destructive as Mussolini's insane foreign policy was.
Under fascism the citizen is made not to think for himself but to let Mussolini do all the thinking for him. So if Mussolini decides that men in dresses are women and that vaccines are harmless and effective, then that's what you must believe also.
Follow 👉 @redideologies
That is the essence of fascism: the totalizing absolutist power of an unregulated and unchecked State.
Therefore this means that the State cannot be questioned by the citizenry; whatever actions it takes, no matter what it is, must be accepted and obeyed unconditionally.
The fascists seek to engender a drone-like unthinking citizenry that bows to and obeys the fascist ruling class, even if their policies become destructive as Mussolini's insane foreign policy was.
Under fascism the citizen is made not to think for himself but to let Mussolini do all the thinking for him. So if Mussolini decides that men in dresses are women and that vaccines are harmless and effective, then that's what you must believe also.
Follow 👉 @redideologies
❤17😁1
One of the few industrialists who supported Hitler, Fritz Thyssen, was chucked out of the party and interned in a concentration camp because he opposed Hitler's insane war-hawk foreign policy.
That's what you got if you didn't want to fight or support Hitler's bloodbath brother war.
Follow @redideologies
That's what you got if you didn't want to fight or support Hitler's bloodbath brother war.
Follow @redideologies
❤8👍5
Goebbels said that Hitler's tone on the Poles was "annihilatory".
Rosenberg called them "dreadful material".
Genocidal hatred of Slavic Poles (and others) is the furthest thing from "pro-White". It's anti-White.
Follow @redideologies
Rosenberg called them "dreadful material".
Genocidal hatred of Slavic Poles (and others) is the furthest thing from "pro-White". It's anti-White.
Follow @redideologies
🥰10👍5
D'Souza makes the case that fascism is a phenomenon of the Left, rooted in Marxist socialism. All of the leading figures of the ideology had strong Marxist priors who moved into fascism because they saw it as so similar to Marxism, committed to establishing a State-run collectivized command economy.
Deniers of this reality point to conflicts between fascists and communists, but as D'Souza lucidly explains, fascists also fought among themselves (Night of the Long Knives) and ideologies very similar to each other often do go to war (Sunni vs Shia, Catholic vs Protestant, Trotsky vs Stalin, etc.)
Follow @redideologies
Deniers of this reality point to conflicts between fascists and communists, but as D'Souza lucidly explains, fascists also fought among themselves (Night of the Long Knives) and ideologies very similar to each other often do go to war (Sunni vs Shia, Catholic vs Protestant, Trotsky vs Stalin, etc.)
Follow @redideologies
👍7😁5❤1
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Antifa is against racism not socialism. Natsocs are against anti-racism not socialism. They agree on the socialism. One wants a multi-racial socialism the other a racially exclusive socialism.
👍11😁9⚡1
In a discussion with Otto Strasser, Hitler said the Nordic race is "called to dominate the world" and implied that he was planning aggression towards Russia, deeming Slavs inferior to Nordics.
He said:
"Your errors in the domain of foreign policy are explained by your ignorance of racial factors. For example, you are enthusiastic about the Hindu independence movement … you know the Anglo-Saxons have the mission to govern the people they have subdued, precisely in the name of their superiority. The Nordic race is called to dominate the world, and this right must guide our foreign policy. It’s why we cannot envision any rapprochement with Russia, which is a Slavic-Tatar body surmounted by a Jewish head. I knew Slavs from my home country. In the era where a Germanic head ruled the Slavic body, entente was possible, Bismarck outlined this rapprochement before. But today, it would be a crime."
And:
"Mister Hitler agreed with me on the primacy of Germany’s interests in the matter of foreign policy. In his eyes, an entente with England corresponded with this imperative, the goal was the Nordic domination of Europe, and through America Nordic-Germanic domination of the world."
And:
"National Socialism would mean little if it was limited to Germany alone and did not seal the domination of the world by the white race for 1000 or 2000 years. That doesn’t mean the exploitation of other races. To put it simply, the inferior races are called to realize other destinies than the superior races. We want to assure the domination of the world in concert with the Anglo-Saxons."
Hitler was therefore a Nordic racial imperialist not a nationalist.
https://institutenr.org/2016/12/30/hitler-vs-strasser-the-historic-debate-of-may-21st-and-22nd-1930-otto-strasser/
Follow @redideologies
He said:
"Your errors in the domain of foreign policy are explained by your ignorance of racial factors. For example, you are enthusiastic about the Hindu independence movement … you know the Anglo-Saxons have the mission to govern the people they have subdued, precisely in the name of their superiority. The Nordic race is called to dominate the world, and this right must guide our foreign policy. It’s why we cannot envision any rapprochement with Russia, which is a Slavic-Tatar body surmounted by a Jewish head. I knew Slavs from my home country. In the era where a Germanic head ruled the Slavic body, entente was possible, Bismarck outlined this rapprochement before. But today, it would be a crime."
And:
"Mister Hitler agreed with me on the primacy of Germany’s interests in the matter of foreign policy. In his eyes, an entente with England corresponded with this imperative, the goal was the Nordic domination of Europe, and through America Nordic-Germanic domination of the world."
And:
"National Socialism would mean little if it was limited to Germany alone and did not seal the domination of the world by the white race for 1000 or 2000 years. That doesn’t mean the exploitation of other races. To put it simply, the inferior races are called to realize other destinies than the superior races. We want to assure the domination of the world in concert with the Anglo-Saxons."
Hitler was therefore a Nordic racial imperialist not a nationalist.
https://institutenr.org/2016/12/30/hitler-vs-strasser-the-historic-debate-of-may-21st-and-22nd-1930-otto-strasser/
Follow @redideologies
🥰7👏2
Hitler said he had no sympathy with his own people and they deserved to perish because they "failed the test of history" by losing the war.
Truth is that Hitler lost the war with his multiple stupid decisions and military blunders, then blamed his people and said they deserved to pay for it by being extinguished.
Complete lunatic.
Follow @redideologies
Truth is that Hitler lost the war with his multiple stupid decisions and military blunders, then blamed his people and said they deserved to pay for it by being extinguished.
Complete lunatic.
Follow @redideologies
👍16🥰5💯4👏1
Forwarded from ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ
From: Volker Ullrich, Hitler: Ascent 1889-1939
Reading through Hitler’s speeches from the period 1920–22, it seems amazing that he attracted larger and larger audiences with such repeated mantra-like phrases. But perhaps it was the monotonous repetition of his accusations, vows of revenge and promises for the future that was the key to his success. In the chapter in Mein Kampf that focuses on propaganda, Hitler wrote:
The receptivity of large masses is very limited. Their capacity to understand things is slight whereas their forgetfulness is great. Given this, effective propaganda must restrict itself to a handful of points, which it repeats as slogans as long as it takes for the dumbest member of the audience to get an idea of what they mean.
Hitler’s analysis was hardly original. In fact, it recalled a pre-war book by the Frenchman Gustave Le Bon entitled The Psychology of the Masses, which by 1919 was in its third edition. Like Hitler, Le Bon described the masses as stupid, egotistical, feminine, fickle, incapable of accepting criticism and ruled by uncontrollable urges. Hitler presumably became acquainted with Le Bon’s ideas through a book by the Munich neurologist J. R. Rossbach called The Soul of the Masses, which appeared in 1919 and quoted the Frenchman extensively.
IRONICALLY, THEREFORE, THE BEER-CELLAR RABBLE-ROUSER, WHO LIKED TO DEPICT HIMSELF AS A MAN OF THE PEOPLE, IN FACT DESPISED THE MASSES, WHICH HE REGARDED AS NOTHING MORE THAN A TOOL TO BE MANIPULATED TO ACHIEVE HIS POLITICAL AMBITIONS. In this respect, too, Hitler was no exception, but rather a mouthpiece of the cultural pessimism represented in particular by the authors associated with the “conservative revolution” in the Weimar Republic. Nonetheless, unlike those theoreticians, Hitler knew how to draw a mass audience, and that in turn attracted the interest of nationalistic conservatives.
Reading through Hitler’s speeches from the period 1920–22, it seems amazing that he attracted larger and larger audiences with such repeated mantra-like phrases. But perhaps it was the monotonous repetition of his accusations, vows of revenge and promises for the future that was the key to his success. In the chapter in Mein Kampf that focuses on propaganda, Hitler wrote:
The receptivity of large masses is very limited. Their capacity to understand things is slight whereas their forgetfulness is great. Given this, effective propaganda must restrict itself to a handful of points, which it repeats as slogans as long as it takes for the dumbest member of the audience to get an idea of what they mean.
Hitler’s analysis was hardly original. In fact, it recalled a pre-war book by the Frenchman Gustave Le Bon entitled The Psychology of the Masses, which by 1919 was in its third edition. Like Hitler, Le Bon described the masses as stupid, egotistical, feminine, fickle, incapable of accepting criticism and ruled by uncontrollable urges. Hitler presumably became acquainted with Le Bon’s ideas through a book by the Munich neurologist J. R. Rossbach called The Soul of the Masses, which appeared in 1919 and quoted the Frenchman extensively.
IRONICALLY, THEREFORE, THE BEER-CELLAR RABBLE-ROUSER, WHO LIKED TO DEPICT HIMSELF AS A MAN OF THE PEOPLE, IN FACT DESPISED THE MASSES, WHICH HE REGARDED AS NOTHING MORE THAN A TOOL TO BE MANIPULATED TO ACHIEVE HIS POLITICAL AMBITIONS. In this respect, too, Hitler was no exception, but rather a mouthpiece of the cultural pessimism represented in particular by the authors associated with the “conservative revolution” in the Weimar Republic. Nonetheless, unlike those theoreticians, Hitler knew how to draw a mass audience, and that in turn attracted the interest of nationalistic conservatives.
🥰4⚡1