Forwarded from ㅤ
Continuation of: https://t.me/exposinghitler/1085
Image is From: David Irving, Hitler's War.
This is what the neo-Nazis are cheering for.
"An SS major was in command. Among those executed were also 5 or 6 [White Polish] children aged from two to eight years old."
And I know for a fact that an immediate response from the Nazis might be
"those cruel acts against the White Polish kids were just a response to the persecution of ethnic Germans living in Polish territories. "
And here is the refutation: https://www.bitchute.com/video/eGaNuErtNHDF/
And the Bomberg massacre (which itself started only on 3rd September) was instigated by Abwehr:
"By 2007 after several years of studying German archives, documents were uncovered in which General Erwin Lahousen praised action of German saboteurs in Bydgoszcz and organized delivery of supplies and medical help to them. German historian Jochen Böhler, in his publication about the invasion of Poland, published in 2006, wrote that new documents uncovered from the German archives proved that Polish soldiers were attacked by Abwehr Agents and members of the German minority."
Yes that's right Hitler literally instigated a massacre that might result in the killing of ethnic Germans, so that he can use this as a reason why he attacked Poland, when in reality the real reason why he badly wanted to attack Poland is revealed in his May 1939 Speech.
After all, Hitler said he will fabricate the cause of war, the Gleitzwitz incident, Jabłonków incident, and this instigation of the massacre in Bomberg, all speak for themselves, that he really meant when he said he will fabricate the cause of the war.
Image is From: David Irving, Hitler's War.
This is what the neo-Nazis are cheering for.
"An SS major was in command. Among those executed were also 5 or 6 [White Polish] children aged from two to eight years old."
And I know for a fact that an immediate response from the Nazis might be
"those cruel acts against the White Polish kids were just a response to the persecution of ethnic Germans living in Polish territories. "
And here is the refutation: https://www.bitchute.com/video/eGaNuErtNHDF/
And the Bomberg massacre (which itself started only on 3rd September) was instigated by Abwehr:
"By 2007 after several years of studying German archives, documents were uncovered in which General Erwin Lahousen praised action of German saboteurs in Bydgoszcz and organized delivery of supplies and medical help to them. German historian Jochen Böhler, in his publication about the invasion of Poland, published in 2006, wrote that new documents uncovered from the German archives proved that Polish soldiers were attacked by Abwehr Agents and members of the German minority."
Yes that's right Hitler literally instigated a massacre that might result in the killing of ethnic Germans, so that he can use this as a reason why he attacked Poland, when in reality the real reason why he badly wanted to attack Poland is revealed in his May 1939 Speech.
After all, Hitler said he will fabricate the cause of war, the Gleitzwitz incident, Jabłonków incident, and this instigation of the massacre in Bomberg, all speak for themselves, that he really meant when he said he will fabricate the cause of the war.
Bitchute
DEBUNKED: 1939 Bloody Sunday - Bromberg Blutsonntag
In this video, the silly revisionist belief that 58,000 innocent ethnic German civilians were brutally massacred by a genocidal Polish nation in the months leading up to September 1939 while the world remained silent, which forced Hitler's hand and led to…
😁8👍4
Forwarded from Exposing Hitler as Zionist
Yes, the Nazis were the FIRST TO bomb civilians, that is simply indisputable.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Wieluń
"Located near the German border, the town of Wieluń was completely undefended, lacking anti-air capabilities and a military garrison. Despite Wieluń having no military targets, airstrikes continued. German intelligence reports had stated there was a Polish cavalry brigade stationed in the town. The Luftwaffe bombed the nearby towns of Działoszyn, Radomsko, and Sulejów, which also had no military targets.
The attack on the town has been described as the first war crime committed by Germany in World War II. The Luftwaffe had reportedly bombed a "clearly marked" hospital, and strafed fleeing civilians. In the aftermath, 127 civilian casualties were reported – possibly "several hundred" – but the exact number remains unknown.[70% of the town (90 percent, in the city center) was destroyed"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Wieluń
"Located near the German border, the town of Wieluń was completely undefended, lacking anti-air capabilities and a military garrison. Despite Wieluń having no military targets, airstrikes continued. German intelligence reports had stated there was a Polish cavalry brigade stationed in the town. The Luftwaffe bombed the nearby towns of Działoszyn, Radomsko, and Sulejów, which also had no military targets.
The attack on the town has been described as the first war crime committed by Germany in World War II. The Luftwaffe had reportedly bombed a "clearly marked" hospital, and strafed fleeing civilians. In the aftermath, 127 civilian casualties were reported – possibly "several hundred" – but the exact number remains unknown.[70% of the town (90 percent, in the city center) was destroyed"
Wikipedia
Bombing of Wieluń
The bombing of Wieluń is considered by many to be the first major act of World War II, and the September Campaign. After Luftwaffe air units moved into Polish airspace in the early morning of 1 September, they reached the town of Wieluń by 04:40–45. Around…
😁11👍5👏1
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Here's a comment from the linked CC article:
"As a Fascist at heart I agree with most of it. As a teenager I was a Socialist, of the eco-type who wanted only to provide support for the poor and stop the ravaging effects of global capitalism on the natural world. Nothing about that has ever changed. Then, as I grew up, I simply added to that list a desire to protect the native European peoples and their cultures, and voila, I was now a Fascist. The step from well-meaning Democratic Socialism to Fascism is much smaller than anyone dares admit. Looking through the early 20th century with clarity, it’s plain to see how Mosley came from Labour, Mussolini came from the Italian socialist party, the NSDAP came from the German Labor Party. Fascism is a labor movement."
There it is in their own plain words. As I've said before, fascism is labour Marxism wrapped in a flag. Goebbels called for a "labour state", admired Lenin and said he'd rather go down with Bolshevism than capitalism. They're all of a similar background, ex Marxists who merely add to it a patriotic discourse about Europe while sustaining their Marxist priors when it comes to econ.
They find it hard to deal with a critique of this from someone who is also patriotic about Europe and maintaining it racially and culturally, but who rejects the Marxism. We can be nationalists without falling for the labour theory of value economic nonsense that these dorks promote. For us they invent new labels and Saul Alinsky tactics, strawman arguments, or lame insults and trolling because they can't deal with the accusation that they're Marxists wrapped in a flag.
"As a Fascist at heart I agree with most of it. As a teenager I was a Socialist, of the eco-type who wanted only to provide support for the poor and stop the ravaging effects of global capitalism on the natural world. Nothing about that has ever changed. Then, as I grew up, I simply added to that list a desire to protect the native European peoples and their cultures, and voila, I was now a Fascist. The step from well-meaning Democratic Socialism to Fascism is much smaller than anyone dares admit. Looking through the early 20th century with clarity, it’s plain to see how Mosley came from Labour, Mussolini came from the Italian socialist party, the NSDAP came from the German Labor Party. Fascism is a labor movement."
There it is in their own plain words. As I've said before, fascism is labour Marxism wrapped in a flag. Goebbels called for a "labour state", admired Lenin and said he'd rather go down with Bolshevism than capitalism. They're all of a similar background, ex Marxists who merely add to it a patriotic discourse about Europe while sustaining their Marxist priors when it comes to econ.
They find it hard to deal with a critique of this from someone who is also patriotic about Europe and maintaining it racially and culturally, but who rejects the Marxism. We can be nationalists without falling for the labour theory of value economic nonsense that these dorks promote. For us they invent new labels and Saul Alinsky tactics, strawman arguments, or lame insults and trolling because they can't deal with the accusation that they're Marxists wrapped in a flag.
😁11👍6❤1
Forwarded from Exposing Hitler as Zionist
If the German people should lose the war, he declared (in a further demonstration of his unchanged social-Darwinism), then it would indicate that it did not possess the ‘internal value (inneren Wert)’ that had been attributed to it, and he would have no sympathy with this people. " -Adolf Hitler
https://telegra.ph/Hitlers-February-1945-meeting-with-his-Gauleiters-05-02
https://telegra.ph/Hitlers-February-1945-meeting-with-his-Gauleiters-05-02
Telegraph
Hitler's February 1945 meeting with his Gauleiters
[on February 1945] Hitler’s appearance, when he entered the hall at 2p.m. that afternoon, was a shock to many of the Gauleiter, who had not seen him for six months or so. His physical condition had deteriorated sharply even during the space of those six months.…
⚡7😁4👍3
Philosopher of fascism Giovanni Gentile says here that the State's power is "entirely unconditional" and "not subject to negotiation or compromise".
That is the essence of fascism: the totalizing absolutist power of an unregulated and unchecked State.
Therefore this means that the State cannot be questioned by the citizenry; whatever actions it takes, no matter what it is, must be accepted and obeyed unconditionally.
The fascists seek to engender a drone-like unthinking citizenry that bows to and obeys the fascist ruling class, even if their policies become destructive as Mussolini's insane foreign policy was.
Under fascism the citizen is made not to think for himself but to let Mussolini do all the thinking for him. So if Mussolini decides that men in dresses are women and that vaccines are harmless and effective, then that's what you must believe also.
Follow 👉 @redideologies
That is the essence of fascism: the totalizing absolutist power of an unregulated and unchecked State.
Therefore this means that the State cannot be questioned by the citizenry; whatever actions it takes, no matter what it is, must be accepted and obeyed unconditionally.
The fascists seek to engender a drone-like unthinking citizenry that bows to and obeys the fascist ruling class, even if their policies become destructive as Mussolini's insane foreign policy was.
Under fascism the citizen is made not to think for himself but to let Mussolini do all the thinking for him. So if Mussolini decides that men in dresses are women and that vaccines are harmless and effective, then that's what you must believe also.
Follow 👉 @redideologies
❤17😁1
One of the few industrialists who supported Hitler, Fritz Thyssen, was chucked out of the party and interned in a concentration camp because he opposed Hitler's insane war-hawk foreign policy.
That's what you got if you didn't want to fight or support Hitler's bloodbath brother war.
Follow @redideologies
That's what you got if you didn't want to fight or support Hitler's bloodbath brother war.
Follow @redideologies
❤8👍5
Goebbels said that Hitler's tone on the Poles was "annihilatory".
Rosenberg called them "dreadful material".
Genocidal hatred of Slavic Poles (and others) is the furthest thing from "pro-White". It's anti-White.
Follow @redideologies
Rosenberg called them "dreadful material".
Genocidal hatred of Slavic Poles (and others) is the furthest thing from "pro-White". It's anti-White.
Follow @redideologies
🥰10👍5
D'Souza makes the case that fascism is a phenomenon of the Left, rooted in Marxist socialism. All of the leading figures of the ideology had strong Marxist priors who moved into fascism because they saw it as so similar to Marxism, committed to establishing a State-run collectivized command economy.
Deniers of this reality point to conflicts between fascists and communists, but as D'Souza lucidly explains, fascists also fought among themselves (Night of the Long Knives) and ideologies very similar to each other often do go to war (Sunni vs Shia, Catholic vs Protestant, Trotsky vs Stalin, etc.)
Follow @redideologies
Deniers of this reality point to conflicts between fascists and communists, but as D'Souza lucidly explains, fascists also fought among themselves (Night of the Long Knives) and ideologies very similar to each other often do go to war (Sunni vs Shia, Catholic vs Protestant, Trotsky vs Stalin, etc.)
Follow @redideologies
👍7😁5❤1
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Antifa is against racism not socialism. Natsocs are against anti-racism not socialism. They agree on the socialism. One wants a multi-racial socialism the other a racially exclusive socialism.
👍11😁9⚡1
In a discussion with Otto Strasser, Hitler said the Nordic race is "called to dominate the world" and implied that he was planning aggression towards Russia, deeming Slavs inferior to Nordics.
He said:
"Your errors in the domain of foreign policy are explained by your ignorance of racial factors. For example, you are enthusiastic about the Hindu independence movement … you know the Anglo-Saxons have the mission to govern the people they have subdued, precisely in the name of their superiority. The Nordic race is called to dominate the world, and this right must guide our foreign policy. It’s why we cannot envision any rapprochement with Russia, which is a Slavic-Tatar body surmounted by a Jewish head. I knew Slavs from my home country. In the era where a Germanic head ruled the Slavic body, entente was possible, Bismarck outlined this rapprochement before. But today, it would be a crime."
And:
"Mister Hitler agreed with me on the primacy of Germany’s interests in the matter of foreign policy. In his eyes, an entente with England corresponded with this imperative, the goal was the Nordic domination of Europe, and through America Nordic-Germanic domination of the world."
And:
"National Socialism would mean little if it was limited to Germany alone and did not seal the domination of the world by the white race for 1000 or 2000 years. That doesn’t mean the exploitation of other races. To put it simply, the inferior races are called to realize other destinies than the superior races. We want to assure the domination of the world in concert with the Anglo-Saxons."
Hitler was therefore a Nordic racial imperialist not a nationalist.
https://institutenr.org/2016/12/30/hitler-vs-strasser-the-historic-debate-of-may-21st-and-22nd-1930-otto-strasser/
Follow @redideologies
He said:
"Your errors in the domain of foreign policy are explained by your ignorance of racial factors. For example, you are enthusiastic about the Hindu independence movement … you know the Anglo-Saxons have the mission to govern the people they have subdued, precisely in the name of their superiority. The Nordic race is called to dominate the world, and this right must guide our foreign policy. It’s why we cannot envision any rapprochement with Russia, which is a Slavic-Tatar body surmounted by a Jewish head. I knew Slavs from my home country. In the era where a Germanic head ruled the Slavic body, entente was possible, Bismarck outlined this rapprochement before. But today, it would be a crime."
And:
"Mister Hitler agreed with me on the primacy of Germany’s interests in the matter of foreign policy. In his eyes, an entente with England corresponded with this imperative, the goal was the Nordic domination of Europe, and through America Nordic-Germanic domination of the world."
And:
"National Socialism would mean little if it was limited to Germany alone and did not seal the domination of the world by the white race for 1000 or 2000 years. That doesn’t mean the exploitation of other races. To put it simply, the inferior races are called to realize other destinies than the superior races. We want to assure the domination of the world in concert with the Anglo-Saxons."
Hitler was therefore a Nordic racial imperialist not a nationalist.
https://institutenr.org/2016/12/30/hitler-vs-strasser-the-historic-debate-of-may-21st-and-22nd-1930-otto-strasser/
Follow @redideologies
🥰7👏2
Hitler said he had no sympathy with his own people and they deserved to perish because they "failed the test of history" by losing the war.
Truth is that Hitler lost the war with his multiple stupid decisions and military blunders, then blamed his people and said they deserved to pay for it by being extinguished.
Complete lunatic.
Follow @redideologies
Truth is that Hitler lost the war with his multiple stupid decisions and military blunders, then blamed his people and said they deserved to pay for it by being extinguished.
Complete lunatic.
Follow @redideologies
👍16🥰5💯4👏1