Goebbels had his children poisoned with cyanide capsules then shot his wife and himself.
"The children were knocked out with morphine by an SS doctor and then had cyanide capsules crushed between their teeth. Afterwards Goebbels shot his wife, then himself." - Source
Really someone to idolize.
Follow @redideologies
"The children were knocked out with morphine by an SS doctor and then had cyanide capsules crushed between their teeth. Afterwards Goebbels shot his wife, then himself." - Source
Really someone to idolize.
Follow @redideologies
💯9🫡8👍3⚡2🔥2😁1
Forwarded from ㅤ
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
You can learn more about Dirlewanger Brigade here: https://youtu.be/VHRH-pcFVio
🥰9⚡1👍1😁1
Let me fix this:
https://t.me/exposinghitler/1103
Marxism = Economic Socialism
NatSoc = Germanic In-Group Economic Socialism
@redideologies
https://t.me/exposinghitler/1103
Marxism = Economic Socialism
NatSoc = Germanic In-Group Economic Socialism
@redideologies
Telegram
Exposing Hitler as Zionist
The difference between National Socialism and Marxism is simple:
Marxism=Economic Socialism
NatSoc=Racial Socialism
Marxism=Economic Socialism
NatSoc=Racial Socialism
🏆6
Fascism demands total subservience to the State, negates all "individual rights"... which means that you exist to serve the whims of the State bureaucrats and can't disagree with any of their policies... ever.
> One of the most outspoken American fascists was economist Lawrence Dennis. In his 1936 book, The Coming American Fascism, Dennis declared that defenders of “18th-century Americanism” were sure to become “the laughing stock of their own countrymen” and that the adoption of economic fascism would intensify “national spirit” and put it behind “the enterprises of public welfare and social control.” The big stumbling block to the development of economic fascism, Dennis bemoaned, was “liberal norms of law or constitutional guarantees of private rights.”
> Certain British intellectuals were perhaps the most smitten of anyone by fascism. George Bernard Shaw announced in 1927 that his fellow “socialists should be delighted to find at last a socialist [Mussolini] who speaks and thinks as responsible rulers do.” He helped form the British Union of Fascists whose “Outline of the Corporate State,” according to the organization’s founder, Sir Oswald Mosley, was “on the Italian Model.”
> The state comes before the individual. Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary defines fascism as “a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized, autocratic government.” This stands in stark contrast to the classical liberal idea that individuals have natural rights that pre-exist government; that government derives its “just powers” only through the consent of the governed; and that the principal function of government is to protect the lives, liberties, and properties of its citizens, not to aggrandize the state.
> Mussolini viewed these liberal ideas (in the European sense of the word “liberal”) as the antithesis of fascism: “The Fascist conception of life,” Mussolini wrote, “stresses the importance of the State and accepts the individual only in so far as his interests coincide with the State. It is opposed to classical liberalism [which] denied the State in the name of the individual; Fascism reasserts the rights of the State as expressing the real essence of the individual.”
> Mussolini thought it was unnatural for a government to protect individual rights: “The maxim that society exists only for the well-being and freedom of the individuals composing it does not seem to be in conformity with nature’s plans.”[7] “If classical liberalism spells individualism,” Mussolini continued, “Fascism spells government.” The essence of fascism, therefore, is that government should be the master, not the servant, of the people.
Source
Follow @redideologies
> One of the most outspoken American fascists was economist Lawrence Dennis. In his 1936 book, The Coming American Fascism, Dennis declared that defenders of “18th-century Americanism” were sure to become “the laughing stock of their own countrymen” and that the adoption of economic fascism would intensify “national spirit” and put it behind “the enterprises of public welfare and social control.” The big stumbling block to the development of economic fascism, Dennis bemoaned, was “liberal norms of law or constitutional guarantees of private rights.”
> Certain British intellectuals were perhaps the most smitten of anyone by fascism. George Bernard Shaw announced in 1927 that his fellow “socialists should be delighted to find at last a socialist [Mussolini] who speaks and thinks as responsible rulers do.” He helped form the British Union of Fascists whose “Outline of the Corporate State,” according to the organization’s founder, Sir Oswald Mosley, was “on the Italian Model.”
> The state comes before the individual. Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary defines fascism as “a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized, autocratic government.” This stands in stark contrast to the classical liberal idea that individuals have natural rights that pre-exist government; that government derives its “just powers” only through the consent of the governed; and that the principal function of government is to protect the lives, liberties, and properties of its citizens, not to aggrandize the state.
> Mussolini viewed these liberal ideas (in the European sense of the word “liberal”) as the antithesis of fascism: “The Fascist conception of life,” Mussolini wrote, “stresses the importance of the State and accepts the individual only in so far as his interests coincide with the State. It is opposed to classical liberalism [which] denied the State in the name of the individual; Fascism reasserts the rights of the State as expressing the real essence of the individual.”
> Mussolini thought it was unnatural for a government to protect individual rights: “The maxim that society exists only for the well-being and freedom of the individuals composing it does not seem to be in conformity with nature’s plans.”[7] “If classical liberalism spells individualism,” Mussolini continued, “Fascism spells government.” The essence of fascism, therefore, is that government should be the master, not the servant, of the people.
Source
Follow @redideologies
FEE
Economic Fascism
Few Americans are aware of or can recall how so many Americans and Europeans viewed economic fascism as the wave of the future during the 1930s.
❤7👌2👍1👏1💯1🏆1
Fascist philosopher Giovanni Gentile's "ethical state" concept says that the State is supreme and individuals are nothing. Individual is defined as regular citizens who are not part of the State bureaucracy.
What that means in essence is that you cannot disagree with any action taken by the State, you are its eternal slave.
Follow @redideologies
What that means in essence is that you cannot disagree with any action taken by the State, you are its eternal slave.
Follow @redideologies
👍6❤4
The strongest influence on Fascism was Karl Marx who called for a totalizing centralized State with direct control over all factors of economic production (land, capital & labor).
> "Under fascism, the state, through official cartels, controlled all aspects of manufacturing, commerce, finance, and agriculture. Planning boards set product lines, production levels, prices, wages, working conditions, and the size of firms. Licensing was ubiquitous; no economic activity could be undertaken without government permission." - source
Full video here 📽
Follow 👉 @redideologies
> "Under fascism, the state, through official cartels, controlled all aspects of manufacturing, commerce, finance, and agriculture. Planning boards set product lines, production levels, prices, wages, working conditions, and the size of firms. Licensing was ubiquitous; no economic activity could be undertaken without government permission." - source
Full video here 📽
Follow 👉 @redideologies
👌6😁4
On fascist cronyism.
> "Mussolini’s “revolving door” swung far and wide:
Signor Caiano, one of Mussolini’s most trusted advisers, was an officer in the Royal Navy before and during the war; when the war was over, he joined the Orlando Shipbuilding Company; in October 1922, he entered Mussolini’s cabinet, and the subsidies for naval construction and the merchant marine came under the control of his department. General Cavallero, at the close of the war, left the army and entered the Pirelli Rubber Company . . . ; in 1925 he became undersecretary at the Ministry of War; in 1930 he left the Ministry of War, and entered the service of the Ansaldo armament firm. Among the directors of the big . . . companies in Italy, retired generals and generals on active service became very numerous after the advent of Fascism." - Source
Mussolini's state-run economy only worked for the politically connected. The average Joe small businessman was hung out to dry.
> "The burgeoning state control of business swelled the state bureaucracy and led to widespread centralization and corruption. Small businesses were left to fail and have their assets swallowed up by big businesses and big banks. Nearly 100,000 businesses failed from 1926–1935 in Italy, almost fourfold the number that failed in the previous ten years. By 1935, Mussolini boasted that fully three-fourths of Italian businesses rested on the shoulders of the state."
> "From 1928–1932 production was cut by one-fourth and national income by one-third, and by the end of 1934 one-third of capital capacity sat idle and over one million workers were unemployed. The state progressively intervened to stave off the ill effects of its monetary inflation and extend its control. It bailed out big businesses and banks, fostered mergers and acquisitions, cartelized the remaining, now larger enterprises, and renewed spending, mainly for war." - Source
> "Mussolini’s “revolving door” swung far and wide:
Signor Caiano, one of Mussolini’s most trusted advisers, was an officer in the Royal Navy before and during the war; when the war was over, he joined the Orlando Shipbuilding Company; in October 1922, he entered Mussolini’s cabinet, and the subsidies for naval construction and the merchant marine came under the control of his department. General Cavallero, at the close of the war, left the army and entered the Pirelli Rubber Company . . . ; in 1925 he became undersecretary at the Ministry of War; in 1930 he left the Ministry of War, and entered the service of the Ansaldo armament firm. Among the directors of the big . . . companies in Italy, retired generals and generals on active service became very numerous after the advent of Fascism." - Source
Mussolini's state-run economy only worked for the politically connected. The average Joe small businessman was hung out to dry.
> "The burgeoning state control of business swelled the state bureaucracy and led to widespread centralization and corruption. Small businesses were left to fail and have their assets swallowed up by big businesses and big banks. Nearly 100,000 businesses failed from 1926–1935 in Italy, almost fourfold the number that failed in the previous ten years. By 1935, Mussolini boasted that fully three-fourths of Italian businesses rested on the shoulders of the state."
> "From 1928–1932 production was cut by one-fourth and national income by one-third, and by the end of 1934 one-third of capital capacity sat idle and over one million workers were unemployed. The state progressively intervened to stave off the ill effects of its monetary inflation and extend its control. It bailed out big businesses and banks, fostered mergers and acquisitions, cartelized the remaining, now larger enterprises, and renewed spending, mainly for war." - Source
😁5👍3
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Natsoc is asked "How many White people did Hitler kill?"
He refuses to acknowledge that Hitler killed Whites and then defended the killing of Whites because "Hitler fought for White living space".
So here we have the Natsoc logic: if you claim to be fighting for Whites, you get to kill and abuse as many White people as you want, steal their land/resources, etc. All transgressions are permitted, if you do so in the name of "Whites".
The truth is that Hitler was not fighting for Whites, but Germans only, against other Whites. The living space was for Germans, not "Whites" in general, and the process of acquiring the space meant blotting out millions of Slavic Whites who Hitler and Himmler hated.
One standard for Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin.... a completely different standard for Hitler. Do these people care about Whites? Or do they simply care about Hitler and his dream of German Empire?
Clearly the latter.
Follow @redideologies
He refuses to acknowledge that Hitler killed Whites and then defended the killing of Whites because "Hitler fought for White living space".
So here we have the Natsoc logic: if you claim to be fighting for Whites, you get to kill and abuse as many White people as you want, steal their land/resources, etc. All transgressions are permitted, if you do so in the name of "Whites".
The truth is that Hitler was not fighting for Whites, but Germans only, against other Whites. The living space was for Germans, not "Whites" in general, and the process of acquiring the space meant blotting out millions of Slavic Whites who Hitler and Himmler hated.
One standard for Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin.... a completely different standard for Hitler. Do these people care about Whites? Or do they simply care about Hitler and his dream of German Empire?
Clearly the latter.
Follow @redideologies
👍14🥰6😁4💯3
True statement here.
> "Hitler is often depicted as the prototypical totalitarian—a man who believed in the superiority of the German state, a German nationalist to the extreme. But according to Snyder, this depiction is deeply flawed. Rather, Hitler was a “racial anarchist”—a man for whom states were transitory, laws meaningless, ethics a facade."
Hitler didn't believe in nation-states (other than his own)... and erased the borders of quite a few of them. He also didn't believe in laws or ethics beyond "might is right". He even said that his own people deserved to perish because they lost the war.
Follow @redideologies
> "Hitler is often depicted as the prototypical totalitarian—a man who believed in the superiority of the German state, a German nationalist to the extreme. But according to Snyder, this depiction is deeply flawed. Rather, Hitler was a “racial anarchist”—a man for whom states were transitory, laws meaningless, ethics a facade."
Hitler didn't believe in nation-states (other than his own)... and erased the borders of quite a few of them. He also didn't believe in laws or ethics beyond "might is right". He even said that his own people deserved to perish because they lost the war.
Follow @redideologies
👍5🥰5😁2
Red Ideologies
Natsoc is asked "How many White people did Hitler kill?" He refuses to acknowledge that Hitler killed Whites and then defended the killing of Whites because "Hitler fought for White living space". So here we have the Natsoc logic: if you claim to be fighting…
"Hitler fought for Western civilization"
By allying with the Soviet Bolsheviks and facilitating them gobbling up the Baltics and half of Poland.
No, Hitler fought for German domination over Western civilization, at the expense of many Whites killed in his and Mussolini's campaigns of conquest.
These people lean heavily on propagandistic slogans, memes, oversimplified talking points, etc., but when you dig into the details it all falls apart.
Follow @redideologies
By allying with the Soviet Bolsheviks and facilitating them gobbling up the Baltics and half of Poland.
No, Hitler fought for German domination over Western civilization, at the expense of many Whites killed in his and Mussolini's campaigns of conquest.
These people lean heavily on propagandistic slogans, memes, oversimplified talking points, etc., but when you dig into the details it all falls apart.
Follow @redideologies
👍9🥰5😁3
Hitler prevented the Ukrainians from establishing their own State because the war aim was to colonize their land for German Lebensraum.
🥰13👍6😁3
Forwarded from ㅤ
Continuation of: https://t.me/exposinghitler/1085
Image is From: David Irving, Hitler's War.
This is what the neo-Nazis are cheering for.
"An SS major was in command. Among those executed were also 5 or 6 [White Polish] children aged from two to eight years old."
And I know for a fact that an immediate response from the Nazis might be
"those cruel acts against the White Polish kids were just a response to the persecution of ethnic Germans living in Polish territories. "
And here is the refutation: https://www.bitchute.com/video/eGaNuErtNHDF/
And the Bomberg massacre (which itself started only on 3rd September) was instigated by Abwehr:
"By 2007 after several years of studying German archives, documents were uncovered in which General Erwin Lahousen praised action of German saboteurs in Bydgoszcz and organized delivery of supplies and medical help to them. German historian Jochen Böhler, in his publication about the invasion of Poland, published in 2006, wrote that new documents uncovered from the German archives proved that Polish soldiers were attacked by Abwehr Agents and members of the German minority."
Yes that's right Hitler literally instigated a massacre that might result in the killing of ethnic Germans, so that he can use this as a reason why he attacked Poland, when in reality the real reason why he badly wanted to attack Poland is revealed in his May 1939 Speech.
After all, Hitler said he will fabricate the cause of war, the Gleitzwitz incident, Jabłonków incident, and this instigation of the massacre in Bomberg, all speak for themselves, that he really meant when he said he will fabricate the cause of the war.
Image is From: David Irving, Hitler's War.
This is what the neo-Nazis are cheering for.
"An SS major was in command. Among those executed were also 5 or 6 [White Polish] children aged from two to eight years old."
And I know for a fact that an immediate response from the Nazis might be
"those cruel acts against the White Polish kids were just a response to the persecution of ethnic Germans living in Polish territories. "
And here is the refutation: https://www.bitchute.com/video/eGaNuErtNHDF/
And the Bomberg massacre (which itself started only on 3rd September) was instigated by Abwehr:
"By 2007 after several years of studying German archives, documents were uncovered in which General Erwin Lahousen praised action of German saboteurs in Bydgoszcz and organized delivery of supplies and medical help to them. German historian Jochen Böhler, in his publication about the invasion of Poland, published in 2006, wrote that new documents uncovered from the German archives proved that Polish soldiers were attacked by Abwehr Agents and members of the German minority."
Yes that's right Hitler literally instigated a massacre that might result in the killing of ethnic Germans, so that he can use this as a reason why he attacked Poland, when in reality the real reason why he badly wanted to attack Poland is revealed in his May 1939 Speech.
After all, Hitler said he will fabricate the cause of war, the Gleitzwitz incident, Jabłonków incident, and this instigation of the massacre in Bomberg, all speak for themselves, that he really meant when he said he will fabricate the cause of the war.
Bitchute
DEBUNKED: 1939 Bloody Sunday - Bromberg Blutsonntag
In this video, the silly revisionist belief that 58,000 innocent ethnic German civilians were brutally massacred by a genocidal Polish nation in the months leading up to September 1939 while the world remained silent, which forced Hitler's hand and led to…
😁8👍4
Forwarded from Exposing Hitler as Zionist
Yes, the Nazis were the FIRST TO bomb civilians, that is simply indisputable.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Wieluń
"Located near the German border, the town of Wieluń was completely undefended, lacking anti-air capabilities and a military garrison. Despite Wieluń having no military targets, airstrikes continued. German intelligence reports had stated there was a Polish cavalry brigade stationed in the town. The Luftwaffe bombed the nearby towns of Działoszyn, Radomsko, and Sulejów, which also had no military targets.
The attack on the town has been described as the first war crime committed by Germany in World War II. The Luftwaffe had reportedly bombed a "clearly marked" hospital, and strafed fleeing civilians. In the aftermath, 127 civilian casualties were reported – possibly "several hundred" – but the exact number remains unknown.[70% of the town (90 percent, in the city center) was destroyed"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Wieluń
"Located near the German border, the town of Wieluń was completely undefended, lacking anti-air capabilities and a military garrison. Despite Wieluń having no military targets, airstrikes continued. German intelligence reports had stated there was a Polish cavalry brigade stationed in the town. The Luftwaffe bombed the nearby towns of Działoszyn, Radomsko, and Sulejów, which also had no military targets.
The attack on the town has been described as the first war crime committed by Germany in World War II. The Luftwaffe had reportedly bombed a "clearly marked" hospital, and strafed fleeing civilians. In the aftermath, 127 civilian casualties were reported – possibly "several hundred" – but the exact number remains unknown.[70% of the town (90 percent, in the city center) was destroyed"
Wikipedia
Bombing of Wieluń
The bombing of Wieluń is considered by many to be the first major act of World War II, and the September Campaign. After Luftwaffe air units moved into Polish airspace in the early morning of 1 September, they reached the town of Wieluń by 04:40–45. Around…
😁11👍5👏1
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Here's a comment from the linked CC article:
"As a Fascist at heart I agree with most of it. As a teenager I was a Socialist, of the eco-type who wanted only to provide support for the poor and stop the ravaging effects of global capitalism on the natural world. Nothing about that has ever changed. Then, as I grew up, I simply added to that list a desire to protect the native European peoples and their cultures, and voila, I was now a Fascist. The step from well-meaning Democratic Socialism to Fascism is much smaller than anyone dares admit. Looking through the early 20th century with clarity, it’s plain to see how Mosley came from Labour, Mussolini came from the Italian socialist party, the NSDAP came from the German Labor Party. Fascism is a labor movement."
There it is in their own plain words. As I've said before, fascism is labour Marxism wrapped in a flag. Goebbels called for a "labour state", admired Lenin and said he'd rather go down with Bolshevism than capitalism. They're all of a similar background, ex Marxists who merely add to it a patriotic discourse about Europe while sustaining their Marxist priors when it comes to econ.
They find it hard to deal with a critique of this from someone who is also patriotic about Europe and maintaining it racially and culturally, but who rejects the Marxism. We can be nationalists without falling for the labour theory of value economic nonsense that these dorks promote. For us they invent new labels and Saul Alinsky tactics, strawman arguments, or lame insults and trolling because they can't deal with the accusation that they're Marxists wrapped in a flag.
"As a Fascist at heart I agree with most of it. As a teenager I was a Socialist, of the eco-type who wanted only to provide support for the poor and stop the ravaging effects of global capitalism on the natural world. Nothing about that has ever changed. Then, as I grew up, I simply added to that list a desire to protect the native European peoples and their cultures, and voila, I was now a Fascist. The step from well-meaning Democratic Socialism to Fascism is much smaller than anyone dares admit. Looking through the early 20th century with clarity, it’s plain to see how Mosley came from Labour, Mussolini came from the Italian socialist party, the NSDAP came from the German Labor Party. Fascism is a labor movement."
There it is in their own plain words. As I've said before, fascism is labour Marxism wrapped in a flag. Goebbels called for a "labour state", admired Lenin and said he'd rather go down with Bolshevism than capitalism. They're all of a similar background, ex Marxists who merely add to it a patriotic discourse about Europe while sustaining their Marxist priors when it comes to econ.
They find it hard to deal with a critique of this from someone who is also patriotic about Europe and maintaining it racially and culturally, but who rejects the Marxism. We can be nationalists without falling for the labour theory of value economic nonsense that these dorks promote. For us they invent new labels and Saul Alinsky tactics, strawman arguments, or lame insults and trolling because they can't deal with the accusation that they're Marxists wrapped in a flag.
😁11👍6❤1
Forwarded from Exposing Hitler as Zionist
If the German people should lose the war, he declared (in a further demonstration of his unchanged social-Darwinism), then it would indicate that it did not possess the ‘internal value (inneren Wert)’ that had been attributed to it, and he would have no sympathy with this people. " -Adolf Hitler
https://telegra.ph/Hitlers-February-1945-meeting-with-his-Gauleiters-05-02
https://telegra.ph/Hitlers-February-1945-meeting-with-his-Gauleiters-05-02
Telegraph
Hitler's February 1945 meeting with his Gauleiters
[on February 1945] Hitler’s appearance, when he entered the hall at 2p.m. that afternoon, was a shock to many of the Gauleiter, who had not seen him for six months or so. His physical condition had deteriorated sharply even during the space of those six months.…
⚡7😁4👍3
Philosopher of fascism Giovanni Gentile says here that the State's power is "entirely unconditional" and "not subject to negotiation or compromise".
That is the essence of fascism: the totalizing absolutist power of an unregulated and unchecked State.
Therefore this means that the State cannot be questioned by the citizenry; whatever actions it takes, no matter what it is, must be accepted and obeyed unconditionally.
The fascists seek to engender a drone-like unthinking citizenry that bows to and obeys the fascist ruling class, even if their policies become destructive as Mussolini's insane foreign policy was.
Under fascism the citizen is made not to think for himself but to let Mussolini do all the thinking for him. So if Mussolini decides that men in dresses are women and that vaccines are harmless and effective, then that's what you must believe also.
Follow 👉 @redideologies
That is the essence of fascism: the totalizing absolutist power of an unregulated and unchecked State.
Therefore this means that the State cannot be questioned by the citizenry; whatever actions it takes, no matter what it is, must be accepted and obeyed unconditionally.
The fascists seek to engender a drone-like unthinking citizenry that bows to and obeys the fascist ruling class, even if their policies become destructive as Mussolini's insane foreign policy was.
Under fascism the citizen is made not to think for himself but to let Mussolini do all the thinking for him. So if Mussolini decides that men in dresses are women and that vaccines are harmless and effective, then that's what you must believe also.
Follow 👉 @redideologies
❤17😁1
One of the few industrialists who supported Hitler, Fritz Thyssen, was chucked out of the party and interned in a concentration camp because he opposed Hitler's insane war-hawk foreign policy.
That's what you got if you didn't want to fight or support Hitler's bloodbath brother war.
Follow @redideologies
That's what you got if you didn't want to fight or support Hitler's bloodbath brother war.
Follow @redideologies
❤8👍5