Nazis were anti-Christian.

I run through some topics:

- by 1933 Danzig was controlled by the NSDAP by proxy
- No massacres of Germans in Poland pre-war
- Italy was aggressively Italianizing German-speakers in South Tyrol
- Hitler dismissed the plight of Germans in South Tyrol & cut a deal with Mussolini
- Proof of Hitler's tactical and selective use of the issue of diaspora Germans to execute expansion agenda
- Ruhr Poles were being suppressed by Germany too
- & more

More anti-Slavic hatred from Hitler in Mein Kampf:

> "During the Russo-Japanese War (commonly called the Manchurian Campaign in 1904-1905 between Russia and Japan over Manchuria and Korean territories), I was more mature and more observant. Here I took sides for more rational reasons and supported the Japanese in every discussion we had. I saw the defeat of the Russians as a defeat of the Austrian Slavs."

> "At first I was afraid and worried that the bullets had come from the pistol of a German student. They were angry at the Crown Prince over his constant work to convert the nation to a Slav region, and they wanted to free the German people from this enemy within."

So he supported the Japanese in the Japan-Russo war of 1905 seeing a Russian defeat as a defeat of "Austrian Slavs". In the second paragraph he condemns the Crown Prince for allegedly being friendly to Slavs, deeming him an "enemy within".

@redideologies

Lebensraum is the Germanic dream of the restoration of the Gothic empire of Germanarich from the Rhine to the Urals or the Gottorp Russian Empire, where most of the landlords were Ostsee Germans and owned millions of Baltic (in the Baltic Governorate) and Russian (in Ukraine, Belarus and Russia) slaves.

There is no doubt that after enslaving the Slavs, the Germans would have turned south and started conquering the sunny Mediterranean lands, paying homage to the Germanic barbarians invading the Roman Empire.

I don't see how the European right can be in favor of Hitler, who was a German socialist who put the Hindu swastika on the German banner, who respected Islam and even reasoned that if the Germans embraced Islam, they would oust the Arabs from ruling positions in the Caliphate and conquer the world by the right of the strong with this “heroic religion”.

NSDAP won elections in Danzig in 1933 and effectively controlled the city by proxy since that time.

The whole "German persecution" narrative was trumped up lies to justify aggression. They already ran the city.

NS whining about "muh judeo-bolshevism" is disingenuous crap. Not only was it exaggerated and not believed by Hitler privately, but rooted in hair-splitting nonsense.

Goebbels was an adulterous Marxist degenerate who said the difference between Hitlerism and Communism was "slight". Mussolini said the same, a thoroughbred Marxist himself. They're all rad-socialists themselves who want a Soviet economic system of total state planning and the abolition of private profit. Their beef with "Judeo-Bolsheviks" is nothing more than that they're Jewish and not into Nordicism or whatever, but have the same economic views as them.

The whole thing is a display of political schizophrenia. Socialists condemning other socialists because they're a different ethnicity and nothing more.

"Bolsheviks are bad for killing Russians but Hitler is good for slaughtering millions of Russians in the name of Lebensraum!"

STFU you disingenuous little freaks.

From David Irving:

"By ‘freedom’ the Ukrainians understood that instead of twice they now had to wash only once a month — the Germans with their scrubbing brushes would soon make themselves unpopular there. He as Fuhrer would set up his new administration there after ice cool calculations: what the Slavs might think about it would not put him out one bit. Nobody who ate German bread today got worked up about the fact that in the twelfth century the granaries east of the Elbe were regained by the sword. Here in the east we were repeating a process for a second time not unlike the conquest of America. For climatic reasons alone we could not venture further south than the Crimea" - Hitler's War

Rosenberg admits at Nuremberg the plan for Ukraine and the East in general: acquisition of their land for German settlement/expansion and exploitation of their labor. He says that while in Germany top officials publicly declared their contempt of the "inferior" Eastern Slavs, it was unwise to publicly declare such things in the East to not agitate their subjects.

——

MR. DODD: All right, I accept your interpretation; we won't have any trouble about that. Now, will you please look at this document? This is a memorandum found in your files, for your information.

ROSENBERG: Yes.

MR. DODD: You set out there, in the second paragraph, what you call the aim of German politics, notably in the Ukraine, as having been laid down by the Fuehrer. They are, you say, exploitation and mobilization of raw materials, a German settlement in certain regions, no artificial education of the population towards intellectualism, but the preservation of their labor strength; apart from that, an extensive unconcern with the interior affairs.

Then, moving down a little bit-because I don't think it is necessary to read all of it, much of it has been referred to in another document-we come down to the 12th line from the bottom of that paragraph. Beginning at the 14th line:

"After continuous observation of the state of affairs in the Occupied Eastern Territories, I am convinced that German politics may have their own, possibly contemptuous opinion of the qualities of the conquered peoples, but that it is not the mission of German political representatives to proclaim measures and opinions which could eventually reduce the conquered peoples to dull despair instead of promoting the desired utilization of manpower to capacity."

Then, in the next paragraph, you say:

"If at home we had to announce our aims to the whole nation most openly and aggressively, in contrast to the others, the political leaders in the East must remain silent where German policy calls for necessary harshness. They must remain silent as to any derogatory opinions which they may form about the conquered peoples. Yes, a clever German policy may in certain circumstances do more in the German interest through alleviations which do not affect policy and certain humane concessions, than through open, inconsiderate brutality."

Were you honestly expressing your views when you wrote that memorandum on the 16th of March 1942?

ROSENBERG: This document is correct.

Follow @redideologies

The Nazis kept the Soviet collective farm model in place when they conquered Ukraine. Further proof they were not "saving" anyone from Bolshevism but perpetuating the same system.

The propaganda said this:

> "Before the invasion, the Nazis had professed very different intentions. They were going to "liberate" the Ukraine from the double yoke of Russia and Bolshevism. They were going to set up an independent Ukrainian state and restore the former landlords to their possessions."

But the reality was this:

> "Instead of the "Greater Ukraine" which the Nazis had promised to set up by uniting Ruthenia and Eastern Galicia with the Soviet Ukraine, the Ukrainians saw the former division of their national territory carried still further and apparently perpetuated. Eastern Galicia was incorporated into the Polish Gouvernement General; Ruthenia (Sub-Carpathia) remained in the hands of Hungary; part of the Black Sea coast, including Odessa, was promised, if not actually turned over, to the Rumanians; while the rest of the Soviet Ukraine, now called Reichskommissariat Ukraine, was placed under the jurisdiction of Erich Koch, Gauleiter and Governor of East Prussia. The dream of a united and independent Ukraine was gone."

> "Thus far the Germans have introduced only minor changes, for the sake of efficiency, in the agricultural system. Contrary to expectations, the collective farms have not been abolished, but their managers have been replaced with German commissars or former Ukrainian émigrés."

Source

Follow @redideologies

British fascist Oswald Mosley was a member of the socialist Fabian Society, an MP for the socialist Labour Party, and said of himself: "I am not, and have never been, a man of the right. My position was on the left and is now in the center of politics."

He was also friends with FDR.

Follow @redideologies

Leon Degrelle was a traitor to Belgium. A quisling collaborator with the German occupation authorities who then was a key figure recruiting cannon fodder for Hitler's war of expansion in the East.

In what world is a "nationalist" some guy who betrays his country to foreign occupiers?

Like communists, fascists are not loyal to nation, they're loyal to whichever foreign power most closely resembles their political views.