Hitler aimed for world domination.

> "We National Socialists must go still further: The right to land and soil becomes a duty when a great nation seems destined to go under, unless its land is extended. Germany will either be a world power, or not at all. But in order to become a world power, it needs that size which gives it the necessary importance today, and gives life to its citizens." - Mein Kampf

> "there will be but two possibilities either the world will be governed according to the ideas of our modern democracy, and then the weight of any decision will result in favor of the numerically stronger races, or the world will be dominated in accordance with the laws of the natural order of force, and then it is the peoples of brutal will who will conquer, and consequently once again not the nation of self-restriction." - Mein Kampf

> "you know the Anglo-Saxons have the mission to govern the people they have subdued, precisely in the name of their superiority. The Nordic race is called to dominate the world, and this right must guide our foreign policy. It’s why we cannot envision any rapprochement with Russia" - Hitler in discussion with Otto Strasser, 1930

> "Mister Hitler agreed with me on the primacy of Germany’s interests in the matter of foreign policy. In his eyes, an entente with England corresponded with this imperative, the goal was the Nordic domination of Europe, and through America Nordic-Germanic domination of the world." - Hitler in discussion with Otto Strasser, 1930

Follow @redideologies

Rosenberg admits at Nuremberg the plan for Ukraine and the East in general: acquisition of their land for German settlement/expansion and exploitation of their labor. He says that while in Germany top officials publicly declared their contempt of the "inferior" Eastern Slavs, it was unwise to publicly declare such things in the East to not agitate their subjects.

——

MR. DODD: All right, I accept your interpretation; we won't have any trouble about that. Now, will you please look at this document? This is a memorandum found in your files, for your information.

ROSENBERG: Yes.

MR. DODD: You set out there, in the second paragraph, what you call the aim of German politics, notably in the Ukraine, as having been laid down by the Fuehrer. They are, you say, exploitation and mobilization of raw materials, a German settlement in certain regions, no artificial education of the population towards intellectualism, but the preservation of their labor strength; apart from that, an extensive unconcern with the interior affairs.

Then, moving down a little bit-because I don't think it is necessary to read all of it, much of it has been referred to in another document-we come down to the 12th line from the bottom of that paragraph. Beginning at the 14th line:

"After continuous observation of the state of affairs in the Occupied Eastern Territories, I am convinced that German politics may have their own, possibly contemptuous opinion of the qualities of the conquered peoples, but that it is not the mission of German political representatives to proclaim measures and opinions which could eventually reduce the conquered peoples to dull despair instead of promoting the desired utilization of manpower to capacity."

Then, in the next paragraph, you say:

"If at home we had to announce our aims to the whole nation most openly and aggressively, in contrast to the others, the political leaders in the East must remain silent where German policy calls for necessary harshness. They must remain silent as to any derogatory opinions which they may form about the conquered peoples. Yes, a clever German policy may in certain circumstances do more in the German interest through alleviations which do not affect policy and certain humane concessions, than through open, inconsiderate brutality."

Were you honestly expressing your views when you wrote that memorandum on the 16th of March 1942?

ROSENBERG: This document is correct.

Follow @redideologies

How can we be sure that the alleged crimes against the German ethnic community that Poles are accused of committing are nothing more than Nazi propaganda that is spread by neo-Nazis over and over again?

1) Hitler makes no mention of massacres in any of his secret speeches; in fact, in his most well-known secret speech, which was delivered on August 22, 1939, he said nothing about massacres. It should be emphasized that multiple military commanders in attendance took notes during the address, resulting in various transcripts of the speech, none of which included references to the alleged crimes.

2) In his diaries, Goebbels—unquestionably a maestro of propaganda—writes the following instead of reporting any massacres.

"Poland is not important",

"Everything is quiet in Danzig",

"Hitler doesn't take the Poles seriously at all",

"The Poles have become noticeably more reserved"

Vladimir Lenin was an anti-Zionist and wrote this:

"Whoever directly or otherwise puts forward the slogan of Jewish national culture... is the enemy of the proletariat, the defender of the old and caste element in Jewry, the tool of the rabbis and of the bourgeoisie."

He wanted them all to become international Marxists who abandoned any attachment to religion or identity. That, of course, would lead to the disappearance of Judaism eventually through assimilation.

No surprise the Soviet Union became the leading anti-Zionist state in the world which funded and armed all the Arab states against Israel.

Richard Walther Darré, Reich Minister of Food and Agriculture, called Slavs inferior and advocated confiscating their farms.

@redideologies

Together forever. 💩

More economic midwittery from Sewell. He's always dropping these incoherent takes on econ like most NatSucks.

So he says Hitler "didn't nationalize enough" while arguing that he and his ideology aren't communists. So if socialist Hitler was not socialist enough, what does that make him if not a commie who wants to nationalize everything?

Then says "they merely banned arms companies from profitting off the war". If a company can't profit, then it's not a private company, it's a state-run enterprise.

Funny how these NatSucks have no issue with the German State profiting off a war Hitler started on false pretenses by looting and sucking dry every country they invaded, but they're irked if some private German businessman makes a profit off a war Hitler started. They hate "profits" except when the state gets them to finance its war of extermination against Slavic nations.

Clown ideology.

After being expelled from the Italian Socialist Party, Mussolini stated unequivocally that he retained his socialist beliefs and will forge ahead with socialist revolution.

Source: Killing History

Follow @redideologies

A direct call for imperialism in the 25 points of the NSDAP.

Point 3: "We demand land and territory (colonies) for the maintenance of our people and the settlement of our surplus population."

@redideologies

Nazis had significant control of Danzig by 1933, basically took over the Senate.

"The party acquired the reins of power on June 20, 1933. In September 1933 the election gave the National Socialists 38 out of 72 seats in the Senate."

This is where they claim "massacres" were occurring? What a joke.

@redideolgies

After Hitler's takeover of Czechoslovakia, the British viewed this as a clear demonstration of Hitler's ambitions to go much further than "the lost territories" from World War I.

"On March 21 the British Minister at Warsaw handed the Polish Ministry for Foreign Affairs a memorandum in which it was stated that the German absorption of Czechoslovakia showed “clearly that the German Government resolved to go beyond their hitherto avowed aim to consolidate the German race”. If this extension of conquest “should prove subsequently part of a definite policy of domination, there is no state in Europe which is not directly or ultimately threatened”."