"Karl Marx described the causes of capitalist development reasonably correctly. But we [Marxists and National Socialists] are both always and forever right about capitalism. The will to freedom rises up from the collapsing system. It finds its form in fundamentally new ideas: in Bolshevism and National Socialism. Both emerge with the ultimate belief that they will bring freedom to an entire world by overthrowing it. Bolshevism and National Socialism are embodied in two people who lead a purposeful minority in the will to the future: Lenin and Hitler." - Goebbels
"The difference between Communism and the Hitler faith is slight" - Goebbels
"The difference between Communism and the Hitler faith is slight" - Goebbels
💯21🫡1
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Karl Marx was raised Protestant and professed belief in Christ as a youth.
Marx wrote "On the Jewish Question" and said this:
"Let us consider the actual, worldly Jew – not the Sabbath Jew, as Bauer does, but the everyday Jew.Let us not look for the secret of the Jew in his religion, but let us look for the secret of his religion in the real Jew. What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest. What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money.Very well then! Emancipation from huckstering and money, consequently from practical, real Judaism, would be the self-emancipation of our time. An organization of society which would abolish the preconditions for huckstering, and therefore the possibility of huckstering, would make the Jew impossible. His religious consciousness would be dissipated like a thin haze in the real, vital air of society. On the other hand, if the Jew recognizes that this practical nature of his is futile and works to abolish it, he extricates himself from his previous development and works for human emancipation as such and turns against the supreme practical expression of human self-estrangement. We recognize in Judaism, therefore, a general anti-social element of the present time, an element which through historical development – to which in this harmful respect the Jews have zealously contributed – has been brought to its present high level, at which it must necessarily begin to disintegrate. In the final analysis, the emancipation of the Jews is the emancipation of mankind from Judaism."
And this:
"Once society has succeeded in abolishing the empirical essence of Judaism – huckstering and its preconditions – the Jew will have become impossible, because his consciousness no longer has an object, because the subjective basis of Judaism, practical need, has been humanized, and because the conflict between man’s individual-sensuous existence and his species-existence has been abolished. The social emancipation of the Jew is the emancipation of society from Judaism."
So Marx called for the abolition of Judaism and Jews as a unique group, so it's very hard for me to believe he was pursuing some tribalist agenda when he despised them. Don't attach the name Marx to these statements and your average Neo-Nazi would be shouting in agreement.
Fredrich Engels, Marx's closest collaborator and co-author of many communist texts, was a non-Jew. Ironically, Engels was notably less anti-Jewish in comparison with Marx and denounced the phenomenon publicly, although he made some private anti-Jewish remarks. How do the J-communism theorists explain that? The non-Jew Engels opposed anti-Semitism publicly, while the Jew Marx supported and contributed to it.
More from Marx:
"In 1845 in The Holy Family Marx claimed that in his articles in the Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher he had "proved that the task of abolishing the essence of Jewry is in truth the task of abolishing Jewry in civil society, abolishing the inhumanity of today's practice of life, the summit of which is the money system". In 1849 an article in the Neue Rheinische Zeitung, of which Marx was the editor, criticised the notion that Jews living in Prussia's Polish provinces should be regarded as Germans. The article declared that these Jews were "the filthiest of all races". "Neither by speech nor by descent- but only by their greed for profit - can they be looked upon as relatives of the Germans in Frankfurt." Robert Payne has remarked that "this solution of the Jewish question was not very different from Adolf Hitler's, for it involved the liquidation of Judaism"."
Marx wrote "On the Jewish Question" and said this:
"Let us consider the actual, worldly Jew – not the Sabbath Jew, as Bauer does, but the everyday Jew.Let us not look for the secret of the Jew in his religion, but let us look for the secret of his religion in the real Jew. What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest. What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money.Very well then! Emancipation from huckstering and money, consequently from practical, real Judaism, would be the self-emancipation of our time. An organization of society which would abolish the preconditions for huckstering, and therefore the possibility of huckstering, would make the Jew impossible. His religious consciousness would be dissipated like a thin haze in the real, vital air of society. On the other hand, if the Jew recognizes that this practical nature of his is futile and works to abolish it, he extricates himself from his previous development and works for human emancipation as such and turns against the supreme practical expression of human self-estrangement. We recognize in Judaism, therefore, a general anti-social element of the present time, an element which through historical development – to which in this harmful respect the Jews have zealously contributed – has been brought to its present high level, at which it must necessarily begin to disintegrate. In the final analysis, the emancipation of the Jews is the emancipation of mankind from Judaism."
And this:
"Once society has succeeded in abolishing the empirical essence of Judaism – huckstering and its preconditions – the Jew will have become impossible, because his consciousness no longer has an object, because the subjective basis of Judaism, practical need, has been humanized, and because the conflict between man’s individual-sensuous existence and his species-existence has been abolished. The social emancipation of the Jew is the emancipation of society from Judaism."
So Marx called for the abolition of Judaism and Jews as a unique group, so it's very hard for me to believe he was pursuing some tribalist agenda when he despised them. Don't attach the name Marx to these statements and your average Neo-Nazi would be shouting in agreement.
Fredrich Engels, Marx's closest collaborator and co-author of many communist texts, was a non-Jew. Ironically, Engels was notably less anti-Jewish in comparison with Marx and denounced the phenomenon publicly, although he made some private anti-Jewish remarks. How do the J-communism theorists explain that? The non-Jew Engels opposed anti-Semitism publicly, while the Jew Marx supported and contributed to it.
More from Marx:
"In 1845 in The Holy Family Marx claimed that in his articles in the Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher he had "proved that the task of abolishing the essence of Jewry is in truth the task of abolishing Jewry in civil society, abolishing the inhumanity of today's practice of life, the summit of which is the money system". In 1849 an article in the Neue Rheinische Zeitung, of which Marx was the editor, criticised the notion that Jews living in Prussia's Polish provinces should be regarded as Germans. The article declared that these Jews were "the filthiest of all races". "Neither by speech nor by descent- but only by their greed for profit - can they be looked upon as relatives of the Germans in Frankfurt." Robert Payne has remarked that "this solution of the Jewish question was not very different from Adolf Hitler's, for it involved the liquidation of Judaism"."
👍7
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Marx was poor and often had to take out loans (sometimes from Jews), which motivated much of his sentiment against them:
"He had many dealings with Jewish financial agents in the City of London. The Bambergers (father and son), Stiefel and Spielmann were German Jews whose names frequently crop up in the Marx-Engels correspondence. Marx made use of the Jews to raise small loans and to discount bills of exchange received from Dana (editor of the New York Daily Tribune) in advance payment for articles which Marx had agreed to write. Marx complained bitterly that the Jews would not discount his bills until confirmation from Dana had been received' and he was furious when they pressed him to honour debts due for repayment. Marx showed his contempt by always referring to them as "Jew (or little Jew) Bamberger" and "Jew Spielmann" or by imitating the nasal twang characteristic of the way in which some Jews from eastern Europe spoke German. Yet Marx had cause to regret the day when the Bambergers were not in business in London any more and were no longer available to discount his bills of exchange. In 1859 he wrote to Engels: 'it is the devil of a nuisance that I have no Bamberger in London any more.'"
He goes on to disparage his fellow J socialist Lasalle as a "Jewish n-word" among other insults. In fact, both privately and publicly he would go on and on about Jewish money-lenders (see above snippets) and that was his principle gripe with Jews as a group. All of this sounds strikingly similar to the Nazis' own rhetoric about Jews and money-lending.
In my view this fully refutes the J-communism conspiracy. If the only thing Marx is writing about Jews both in public and privately is negative and he is advocating for their disappearance as a group/religion, then how could he be the centerpiece of an agenda to advance that group's interests? Some people are emotionally attached to that theory though, so they will react with hostility to any facts that undermine it.
"He had many dealings with Jewish financial agents in the City of London. The Bambergers (father and son), Stiefel and Spielmann were German Jews whose names frequently crop up in the Marx-Engels correspondence. Marx made use of the Jews to raise small loans and to discount bills of exchange received from Dana (editor of the New York Daily Tribune) in advance payment for articles which Marx had agreed to write. Marx complained bitterly that the Jews would not discount his bills until confirmation from Dana had been received' and he was furious when they pressed him to honour debts due for repayment. Marx showed his contempt by always referring to them as "Jew (or little Jew) Bamberger" and "Jew Spielmann" or by imitating the nasal twang characteristic of the way in which some Jews from eastern Europe spoke German. Yet Marx had cause to regret the day when the Bambergers were not in business in London any more and were no longer available to discount his bills of exchange. In 1859 he wrote to Engels: 'it is the devil of a nuisance that I have no Bamberger in London any more.'"
He goes on to disparage his fellow J socialist Lasalle as a "Jewish n-word" among other insults. In fact, both privately and publicly he would go on and on about Jewish money-lenders (see above snippets) and that was his principle gripe with Jews as a group. All of this sounds strikingly similar to the Nazis' own rhetoric about Jews and money-lending.
In my view this fully refutes the J-communism conspiracy. If the only thing Marx is writing about Jews both in public and privately is negative and he is advocating for their disappearance as a group/religion, then how could he be the centerpiece of an agenda to advance that group's interests? Some people are emotionally attached to that theory though, so they will react with hostility to any facts that undermine it.
👍9
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
The only and main critique that the Nazis leveled at Marx and Marxism was its "denial of the personality principle" or the "race principle" and simply that Marx was "a Jew", deceptively ignoring the similarity of his own views on Jews with theirs. Rarely, if ever, did they critique Marxism on economic grounds and, in the case of Goebbels, asserted that Marx was right in his critique of capitalism:
"Karl Marx described the causes of capitalist development reasonably correctly. But we [Marxists and National Socialists] are both always and forever right about capitalism. The will to freedom rises up from the collapsing system. It finds its form in fundamentally new ideas: in Bolshevism and National Socialism. Both emerge with the ultimate belief that they will bring freedom to an entire world by overthrowing it. Bolshevism and National Socialism are embodied in two people who lead a purposeful minority in the will to the future: Lenin and Hitler." - Goebbels
"Lenin was the greatest man, second to Hitler. The difference between Communism and the Hitler faith is slight" - Goebbels
"Karl Marx described the causes of capitalist development reasonably correctly. But we [Marxists and National Socialists] are both always and forever right about capitalism. The will to freedom rises up from the collapsing system. It finds its form in fundamentally new ideas: in Bolshevism and National Socialism. Both emerge with the ultimate belief that they will bring freedom to an entire world by overthrowing it. Bolshevism and National Socialism are embodied in two people who lead a purposeful minority in the will to the future: Lenin and Hitler." - Goebbels
"Lenin was the greatest man, second to Hitler. The difference between Communism and the Hitler faith is slight" - Goebbels
👍7😇1
Forwarded from 옥수수 🌽
Karl Radl, a notorious NS grifter online, has consistently pigeonholed National Socialism with Traditional Christianity to dupe his retarded followers. He now claims that the NSDAP and especially Himmler out of all people (lol) were never interested in the occult, and it’s a jewish lie to make NS look “less” Christian.
Literally, the NS anthropology and racial theory cannot be substantially explained without any sorts of academic endeavors to further immerse into occultism to some degree, which makes Karl Radl’s argument diabolical. Did all the expeditions to Tibet and to find mythical objects like the Holy Grail and explorations of ancient civilizations thought to possess "Aryan" roots happen while not being influenced by a single ounce of occultist beliefs?
The dishonesty that these NS Christian essentialists promulgate is baffling.
Literally, the NS anthropology and racial theory cannot be substantially explained without any sorts of academic endeavors to further immerse into occultism to some degree, which makes Karl Radl’s argument diabolical. Did all the expeditions to Tibet and to find mythical objects like the Holy Grail and explorations of ancient civilizations thought to possess "Aryan" roots happen while not being influenced by a single ounce of occultist beliefs?
The dishonesty that these NS Christian essentialists promulgate is baffling.
👍11🏆1
Hitler in Mein Kampf downplayed the plight of the German speakers in South Tyrol (Italy) where they were being Italianized and blamed the Jews for "stirring up" the issue while allegedly ignoring the violence against Hitler's comrades in Germany. So the Jews were preaching sympathy for diaspora Germans in South Tyrol while Hitler thought it was a distraction? Make that make sense.
In that second pic Hitler specifically sides with Italy in the matter:
"in puffing up the South Tyrol question to an importance that will become fatal to the German people. Without considering whose cause they were serving, many so-called national men and parties and associations have joined, purely out of cowardice, the public opinion, stirred up by the Jews, and helped stupidly in supporting the fight against a system [Italian fascism] that we Germans... should consider the sole bright ray in this decaying world."
When Hitler came to power, he mostly dismissed the plight of the South Tyrolean Germans and cut a deal with Mussolini to bring them back to Germany, a deal he did not offer to the Poles because he wanted to invade them.
@redideologies
In that second pic Hitler specifically sides with Italy in the matter:
"in puffing up the South Tyrol question to an importance that will become fatal to the German people. Without considering whose cause they were serving, many so-called national men and parties and associations have joined, purely out of cowardice, the public opinion, stirred up by the Jews, and helped stupidly in supporting the fight against a system [Italian fascism] that we Germans... should consider the sole bright ray in this decaying world."
When Hitler came to power, he mostly dismissed the plight of the South Tyrolean Germans and cut a deal with Mussolini to bring them back to Germany, a deal he did not offer to the Poles because he wanted to invade them.
@redideologies
😇8💯5🔥1
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Marx specifically attacks the "Jewish finance houses" including the Rothschilds and labeled them "the loan-mongering Jews of Europe".
I'm not sure why Nazis don't love this guy, he was a socialist who despised Jews as a group.
I'm not sure why Nazis don't love this guy, he was a socialist who despised Jews as a group.
👍8💯4
Forwarded from Debunking Zoomer Historian
ZH continues to assert that Poland prepared an invasion of Germany in 1933, which is untrue and has already been debunked.
https://t.me/DebunkingZoomerHistorian/18
The following excerpt from the work of historian Richard J. Evans makes it abundantly evident that the economy of Nazi Germany was structured so that the "debts would be paid by territorial expansion in the near enough future."
"Hjalmar Schacht may not have been a rabble-rousing apostle of violence, but he had certainly become enough of a radical nationalist to approve wholeheartedly of the regime’s primary aim of rearming Germany at maximum speed. By the end of May 1933 he had come up with an ingenious scheme for DEFICIT FINANCING. A Metallurgical Research Institute (Metallurgisches Forschungsinstitut), set up by four big companies with a capital of a million Reichsmarks, was authorized to issue so-called ‘Mefo bills’, which were guaranteed by the state and discounted by the Reichsbank. The bank in turn simply met the bills presented to it by printing banknotes. Fifty percent of arms purchases by the military were made in these bills between 1934 and 1936. Since the Reichsbank covered the bills by printing money, the notes in circulation increased by 6,000 million by the end of March 1938, by which time about 12,000 million Mefo bills had been spent. Schacht was already worried about the inflationary effects of these measures, and he stopped the issue of Mefo bills in 1937, after which point tax vouchers and non-interest-bearing treasury notes were used instead. In the meantime, gross Reich debt had spiralled almost out of control. But neither Hitler nor his economic managers considered this very important. For deficit financing was only a short-term measure in their view; the debts would be paid by territorial expansion in the near enough future. And besides rapid rearmament, Hitler was busily taking other steps to ensure that this would not only be possible but would also, as he saw it, bring the maximum economic benefit."
~ The Third Reich in Power, Richard J. Evans
https://t.me/DebunkingZoomerHistorian/18
The following excerpt from the work of historian Richard J. Evans makes it abundantly evident that the economy of Nazi Germany was structured so that the "debts would be paid by territorial expansion in the near enough future."
"Hjalmar Schacht may not have been a rabble-rousing apostle of violence, but he had certainly become enough of a radical nationalist to approve wholeheartedly of the regime’s primary aim of rearming Germany at maximum speed. By the end of May 1933 he had come up with an ingenious scheme for DEFICIT FINANCING. A Metallurgical Research Institute (Metallurgisches Forschungsinstitut), set up by four big companies with a capital of a million Reichsmarks, was authorized to issue so-called ‘Mefo bills’, which were guaranteed by the state and discounted by the Reichsbank. The bank in turn simply met the bills presented to it by printing banknotes. Fifty percent of arms purchases by the military were made in these bills between 1934 and 1936. Since the Reichsbank covered the bills by printing money, the notes in circulation increased by 6,000 million by the end of March 1938, by which time about 12,000 million Mefo bills had been spent. Schacht was already worried about the inflationary effects of these measures, and he stopped the issue of Mefo bills in 1937, after which point tax vouchers and non-interest-bearing treasury notes were used instead. In the meantime, gross Reich debt had spiralled almost out of control. But neither Hitler nor his economic managers considered this very important. For deficit financing was only a short-term measure in their view; the debts would be paid by territorial expansion in the near enough future. And besides rapid rearmament, Hitler was busily taking other steps to ensure that this would not only be possible but would also, as he saw it, bring the maximum economic benefit."
~ The Third Reich in Power, Richard J. Evans
Telegram
Debunking Zoomer Historian
Debunking Zoomer Historian's video 'The Complete History of The Outbreak of WW2':
https://youtu.be/j9umwEhi7sI
In the section "Pre-Emptive Invasion", ZH says Poland planned to pre-emptively invade Germany in 1933, and as usual he is wrong.
Refer: Did Pilsudski…
https://youtu.be/j9umwEhi7sI
In the section "Pre-Emptive Invasion", ZH says Poland planned to pre-emptively invade Germany in 1933, and as usual he is wrong.
Refer: Did Pilsudski…
👍11
Forwarded from Debunking Zoomer Historian
Debunking ZH's "Hitler's Peace Offers 1933-1940"
At 2:23, ZH quotes Hitler's Reichstag address to demonstrate that Hitler was eager to disarm Germany. It is well known among historians that Hitler merely lied in public addresses; his true intentions are glaringly disclosed in his behind-closed-door remarks, such as the following, which occurred in the same year 1933, well before May.
“The future of Germany depends exclusively and only on the reconstruction of the Wehrmacht. All other tasks must cede precedence to the task of rearmament ... In any case, I [Hitler] take the view that in [the] future in case of conflict between the demands of the Wehrmacht and demands for other purposes, the interests of the Wehrmacht must in every case have priority.”
~ Adolf Hitler
Cabinet Meeting on 9 February 1933
«Curt Liebmann, noted Hitler's words [from the speech Hitler delivered on February 2, 1933] thus: ‘We might fight for new export markets; or we might – and this would be better – conquer new Lebensraum in the east, and Germanise it ruthlessly.’»
~ David Irving, Hitler's War and The War Path.
"Hitler told military leaders in early February 1933, it was pointless trying to boost exports; the only way to a long-term, secure recovery of the German economy was through the conquest of ‘living-space’ in the East, and preparations for this now had to take priority over everything else."
— The Third Reich in Power, Richard J. Evan
“The next 5 years in Germany must be devoted to the rearmament of the German people. Every publicly supported job creation scheme must be judged by the criterion of whether it is necessary from the point of view of the rearmament of the German people. This principle must always and everywhere stand in the foreground.”
— Hitler to his Ministers, 8 February 1933. ( Richard Evans, “The Third Reich in Power”, p 337)
“…rearmament was the overriding and determining force impelling economic policy from the earliest stage. Everything else was sacrificed to it. In the 6 years between January 1933 and the autumn of the Munich crisis, Hitler’s regime raised the share of national output going to the military from less than 1% to almost 20%. Never before had national production been redistributed on this scale or with such speed by a capitalist state in peacetime.”
— The Wages of Destruction,
At 2:23, ZH quotes Hitler's Reichstag address to demonstrate that Hitler was eager to disarm Germany. It is well known among historians that Hitler merely lied in public addresses; his true intentions are glaringly disclosed in his behind-closed-door remarks, such as the following, which occurred in the same year 1933, well before May.
“The future of Germany depends exclusively and only on the reconstruction of the Wehrmacht. All other tasks must cede precedence to the task of rearmament ... In any case, I [Hitler] take the view that in [the] future in case of conflict between the demands of the Wehrmacht and demands for other purposes, the interests of the Wehrmacht must in every case have priority.”
~ Adolf Hitler
Cabinet Meeting on 9 February 1933
«Curt Liebmann, noted Hitler's words [from the speech Hitler delivered on February 2, 1933] thus: ‘We might fight for new export markets; or we might – and this would be better – conquer new Lebensraum in the east, and Germanise it ruthlessly.’»
~ David Irving, Hitler's War and The War Path.
"Hitler told military leaders in early February 1933, it was pointless trying to boost exports; the only way to a long-term, secure recovery of the German economy was through the conquest of ‘living-space’ in the East, and preparations for this now had to take priority over everything else."
— The Third Reich in Power, Richard J. Evan
“The next 5 years in Germany must be devoted to the rearmament of the German people. Every publicly supported job creation scheme must be judged by the criterion of whether it is necessary from the point of view of the rearmament of the German people. This principle must always and everywhere stand in the foreground.”
— Hitler to his Ministers, 8 February 1933. ( Richard Evans, “The Third Reich in Power”, p 337)
“…rearmament was the overriding and determining force impelling economic policy from the earliest stage. Everything else was sacrificed to it. In the 6 years between January 1933 and the autumn of the Munich crisis, Hitler’s regime raised the share of national output going to the military from less than 1% to almost 20%. Never before had national production been redistributed on this scale or with such speed by a capitalist state in peacetime.”
— The Wages of Destruction,
👍12
Leon Degrelle had to practically beg Himmler to include Walloons as "Germanic" after being labeled a non-Germanic inferior group.
Himmler only obliged out of political convenience because Degrelle was mobilizing thousands as cannon fodder for Hitler's Lebensraum project.
@redideologies
Himmler only obliged out of political convenience because Degrelle was mobilizing thousands as cannon fodder for Hitler's Lebensraum project.
@redideologies
👍14😇3
Forwarded from Exposing Hitler as Zionist
This is a typically how neo Nazis respond to the argument/justification of the Nazis attacking so many European nations. So the Nazis had no choice but to invade European nations because of PROXIMITY (Lol)? Such a great reason to invade.
💯14👍4🔥1
Forwarded from 옥수수 🌽
On June 18 1940, Stalin’s USSR Officially Congratulated Hitler’s Germany for Successfully Conquering France
👍12