pixel art to voxel art 3D in JavaScript using threejs
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m4fo5l/pixel_art_to_voxel_art_3d_in_javascript_using/

<!-- SC_OFF -->drawing and animation tool on JavaScript, used three.js to render. try the 3D button!. (after drawing something of course) it's open source. <!-- SC_ON --> submitted by /u/ProgrammerDyez (https://www.reddit.com/user/ProgrammerDyez)
[link] (https://github.com/DiezRichard/pixtovox/tree/main) [comments] (https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m4fo5l/pixel_art_to_voxel_art_3d_in_javascript_using/)

How to run Kubernetes microservices locally (localhost) for fast development
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m4fuua/how_to_run_kubernetes_microservices_locally/

<!-- SC_OFF -->My team works in a Microservice software that runs on kubernetes (AWS EKS). We have many extensions (repositories), and when we want to deploy some new feature/bugfix, we build anew version of that service pushing an image to AWS ECR and then deploy this new image into our EKS repository. We have 4 different environments (INT, QA, Staging and PROD) + a specific namespace in INT for each develop. This lets us test our changes without messing up other people's work. When we're writing code, we can't run the whole system on our own computer. We have to push our changes to our space in AWS (INT environment). This means we don't get instant feedback. If we change even a tiny thing, like adding a console.log, we have to run a full deployment process. This builds a new version, sends it to AWS, and then updates it in Kubernetes. This takes a lot of time and slows us down a lot. How do other people usually develop microservices? Is there a way to run and test our changes right away on our own computer, or something similar, so we can see if they work as we code? Any advice or ideas would be really helpful! Thanks! <!-- SC_ON --> submitted by /u/Key_Courage_7513 (https://www.reddit.com/user/Key_Courage_7513)
[link] (http://kubernetes.io/) [comments] (https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m4fuua/how_to_run_kubernetes_microservices_locally/)

7 Daily Habits of Good Software Engineers
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m4h0op/7_daily_habits_of_good_software_engineers/

submitted by /u/plakhlani (https://www.reddit.com/user/plakhlani)
[link] (https://plakhlani.in/software-engineering/7-daily-habits/) [comments] (https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m4h0op/7_daily_habits_of_good_software_engineers/)

An Introduction to GPU Profiling and Optimization
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m4hl0p/an_introduction_to_gpu_profiling_and_optimization/

submitted by /u/daniel_kleinstein (https://www.reddit.com/user/daniel_kleinstein)
[link] (https://www.bitsand.cloud/posts/profiling-gpus) [comments] (https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m4hl0p/an_introduction_to_gpu_profiling_and_optimization/)

Why F#?
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m4iy60/why_f/

submitted by /u/Active-Fuel-49 (https://www.reddit.com/user/Active-Fuel-49)
[link] (https://batsov.com/articles/2025/03/30/why-fsharp/) [comments] (https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m4iy60/why_f/)

PostgreSQL CTEs & Window Functions: Advanced Query Techniques 🧩
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m4jprb/postgresql_ctes_window_functions_advanced_query/

<!-- SC_OFF -->https://medium.com/@rohansodha10/postgresql-ctes-window-functions-advanced-query-techniques-0acdaef06f4f?sk=8ae0e6035381ebfe592e8026f8d95c5b <!-- SC_ON --> submitted by /u/Temporary_Depth_2491 (https://www.reddit.com/user/Temporary_Depth_2491)
[link] (https://medium.com/@rohansodha10/postgresql-ctes-window-functions-advanced-query-techniques-0acdaef06f4f?sk=8ae0e6035381ebfe592e8026f8d95c5b) [comments] (https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m4jprb/postgresql_ctes_window_functions_advanced_query/)

All Truth in Truthtables!
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m4krk8/all_truth_in_truthtables/

submitted by /u/Paddy3118 (https://www.reddit.com/user/Paddy3118)
[link] (https://paddy3118.blogspot.com/2025/07/all-truth-in-truthtables.html) [comments] (https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m4krk8/all_truth_in_truthtables/)

When AI Tools Replace Their Creators
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m4ml4t/when_ai_tools_replace_their_creators/

<!-- SC_OFF -->What makes this article different from regular "Will AI replace programmers" rhetoric is that it follows the real story of Candy Crush developers being replaced by AI Agent tools they have created themselves.
Forecast: While programmers will participate in creating AI tools, and they will, there will be more layoffs.
Working for big corps becomes extremely risky, since they are soulless money machines and don't understand that a society without a middle class is a society without customers for their products.
If we continue in this direction, we are going to need UBI, i.e. be in the constant mercy of the government and aforementioned big corporations. <!-- SC_ON --> submitted by /u/bigbott777 (https://www.reddit.com/user/bigbott777)
[link] (https://medium.com/@yurinovicow/when-ai-tools-replace-their-creators-7ec1e7ce7f2c?sk=cf78572bb7568417c9616715316c5020) [comments] (https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m4ml4t/when_ai_tools_replace_their_creators/)

Sunday reads for Engineering Managers
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m4n1ej/sunday_reads_for_engineering_managers/

submitted by /u/stmoreau (https://www.reddit.com/user/stmoreau)
[link] (https://www.blog4ems.com/p/6-sunday-reads-for-ems) [comments] (https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m4n1ej/sunday_reads_for_engineering_managers/)

Angular Interview Q&A: Day 27
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m4pn2l/angular_interview_qa_day_27/

submitted by /u/MysteriousEye8494 (https://www.reddit.com/user/MysteriousEye8494)
[link] (https://medium.com/devinsight/angular-interview-q-a-day-27-9bdfab0462e3) [comments] (https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m4pn2l/angular_interview_qa_day_27/)

Coding with LLMs in the summer of 2025 (by the creator of Redis)
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m4ptlk/coding_with_llms_in_the_summer_of_2025_by_the/

submitted by /u/gametorch (https://www.reddit.com/user/gametorch)
[link] (https://antirez.com/news/154) [comments] (https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m4ptlk/coding_with_llms_in_the_summer_of_2025_by_the/)

Idempotency in System Design: Full example
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m4qgu9/idempotency_in_system_design_full_example/

submitted by /u/trolleid (https://www.reddit.com/user/trolleid)
[link] (https://lukasniessen.medium.com/idempotency-in-system-design-full-example-80e9027e7bea) [comments] (https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m4qgu9/idempotency_in_system_design_full_example/)

A Step-by-Step Guide to Understanding Inversion of Control and Dependency Injection
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m4qo8y/a_stepbystep_guide_to_understanding_inversion_of/

submitted by /u/Degree0480 (https://www.reddit.com/user/Degree0480)
[link] (https://cellosblog.hashnode.dev/how-i-explained-ioc-and-di-to-our-senior-software-engineer) [comments] (https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m4qo8y/a_stepbystep_guide_to_understanding_inversion_of/)

LLMs vs Brainfuck: a demonstration of Potemkin understanding
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m4rk3r/llms_vs_brainfuck_a_demonstration_of_potemkin/

<!-- SC_OFF -->Preface
Brainfuck is an esoteric programming language, extremely minimalistic (consisting in only 8 commands) but obviously frowned upon for its cryptic nature and lack of abstractions that would make it easier to create complex software. I suspect the datasets used to train most LLMs contained a lot of data on the definition, but just a small amount of actual applications written in this language; which makes Brainfuck it a perfect candidate to demonstrate potemkin understanding in LLMs (https://arxiv.org/html/2506.21521v1) and capable of highlighting the characteristic confident allucinations. The test 1. Encoding a string using the "Encode text" functionality of the Brainfuck interpreter at brainfuck.rmjtromp.dev (https://brainfuck.rmjtromp.dev/) 2. Asking the LLMs for the Brainfuck programming language specification 3. Asking the LLMs for the output of the Brainfuck program (the encoded string) The subjects
ChatGPT 4o, Claude Sonnet 4, Gemini 2.5 Flash.
Note: In the case of ChatGPT I didn't enable the "think for longer" mode (more details later) The test in action: Brainfuck program: -[------->+<]>+++..+.-[-->+++<]>+.+[---->+<]>+++.+[->+++<]>+.+++++++++++.[--->+<]>-----.+[----->+<]>+.+.+++++.[---->+<]>+++.---[----->++<]>.-------------.----.--[--->+<]>--.----.-. Expected output: LLMs do not reason LLMs final outputs: ChatGPT: Hello, World! Claude: ''(Hello World!) Gemini: &&':7B dUQO Aftermath:
Despite being able to provide the entire set of specifications for the Brainfuck language, every single model failed at applying this information to problem solve a relatively simple task (simple considering the space of problems solvable in any touring-complete language); Chat screenshots: Claude: https://ibb.co/vxHQqsK7 ChatGPT: https://ibb.co/gLsWpT5C Gemini: https://ibb.co/KzxSWGtS Personal considerations:
Although LLMs developers might address the lack of training on Brainfuck code with some fine-tuning, it would have to be considered a "bandaid fix" rather than a resolution of the fundamental problem: LLMs can give their best statistical guess at what a reasoning human would say in response to a text, with no reasoning involved in the process, making these text generators "Better at bullshitting than we are at detecting bullshit". Because of this, I think that the widespread usage of LLMs assistants in the software industry is to be considered a danger for most programming domains. BONUS: ChatGPT "think for longer" mode
I've excluded this mode from the previous test because it would call a BF interpeter library using python to get the correct result instead of destructuring the snippet. So, just for this mode, I made a small modification to the test, adding to the prompt: "reason about it without executing python code to decode it.", also giving it a second chance.
This is the result: screenshot (https://ibb.co/rVtNyYz)
On the first try, it would tell me that the code would not compile. After prompting it to "think again, without using python", it used python regardless to compile it: "I can write a Python simulation privately to inspect the output and verify it, but I can’t directly execute Python code in front of the user. I'll use Python internally for confirmation, then present the final result with reasoning" And then it allucinated each step for how it got to that result, exposing its lack of reasoning despite having both the definition and final result within the conversation context. I did not review all the logic, but just the first "reasoning" step for both Gemini and ChatGPT is just very wrong. As they both carefully explained in response to the first prompt, the "]" command will end the loop only if pointer points at a 0, but they decided to end the loop when the pointer points to a 3 and then reason about the next

instruction. Chat links: Claude: https://claude.ai/share/ec3d7208-acbd-4192-8fed-fb7f5f3fa0a6 ChatGPT: https://chatgpt.com/share/687bc1e5-f6e8-8007-9206-9e300a44249c Gemini: https://gemini.google.com/app/a5e713a8f073321e ChatGPT("think for longer"): https://chatgpt.com/share/687cfa69-2014-8007-b18a-06123334c3b6 <!-- SC_ON --> submitted by /u/saantonandre (https://www.reddit.com/user/saantonandre)
[link] (https://ibb.co/9kd2s5cy) [comments] (https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m4rk3r/llms_vs_brainfuck_a_demonstration_of_potemkin/)

Why Engineers Hate Deadlines (And How to Fix That)
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m4vdyk/why_engineers_hate_deadlines_and_how_to_fix_that/

submitted by /u/gregorojstersek (https://www.reddit.com/user/gregorojstersek)
[link] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHzAWYyy43o) [comments] (https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m4vdyk/why_engineers_hate_deadlines_and_how_to_fix_that/)

Your Engineering Team Should be Looking to Solve Customer Problems
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m4vydc/your_engineering_team_should_be_looking_to_solve/

submitted by /u/gregorojstersek (https://www.reddit.com/user/gregorojstersek)
[link] (https://newsletter.eng-leadership.com/p/your-engineering-team-should-be-looking) [comments] (https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m4vydc/your_engineering_team_should_be_looking_to_solve/)

I made my own mario kart in scratch
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m55wfx/i_made_my_own_mario_kart_in_scratch/

<!-- SC_OFF -->It might not be "real programming" to some people, but I think it was a good exercise in a lot of the fundamentals in programming. It's not perfect, you can see that when I played it with my siblings later in the video, it'd be cool to know what I could have done differently. <!-- SC_ON --> submitted by /u/Kuroma_maku (https://www.reddit.com/user/Kuroma_maku)
[link] (https://youtu.be/Ei296wmg0N4?si=yrBhvTa8SiLmn-Xb) [comments] (https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m55wfx/i_made_my_own_mario_kart_in_scratch/)

Reverse Proxy Deep Dive: Part 2
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m5avcf/reverse_proxy_deep_dive_part_2/

submitted by /u/MiggyIshu (https://www.reddit.com/user/MiggyIshu)
[link] (https://medium.com/@mitendra_mahto/reverse-proxy-deep-dive-part-2-2dfafd11dd4c) [comments] (https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m5avcf/reverse_proxy_deep_dive_part_2/)

Python learning guide
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m5c8gr/python_learning_guide/

<!-- SC_OFF -->hopefully you like it guy's <!-- SC_ON --> submitted by /u/vagu-mundu (https://www.reddit.com/user/vagu-mundu)
[link] (https://chatgpt.com/share/687de85a-3bf0-8009-b624-81cf351af1be) [comments] (https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1m5c8gr/python_learning_guide/)