This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This poor lady is being refused to be with her dying father in hospital by security! This is so sad this lady says she had to sign an end of life form so the hospital would alow the family in to be with him and now they're being refused entry. This is blackmail and murder!
- Australia
- Australia
π€¬1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
β οΈ π«π
Video proof that the jabs are causing all of the blood vessels to fill with CLOTS!
Video proof that the jabs are causing all of the blood vessels to fill with CLOTS!
π1
Forwarded from HATS π©
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Attorney Thomas Renz has "Absolute proof" murder was committed by vaccine companies.
@HATSTRUTH π©
@HATSTRUTH π©
π1
Austria makes Covid vaccination COMPULSORY for all over-18s today.
https://mol.im/a/10463123 via https://dailym.ai/android
https://mol.im/a/10463123 via https://dailym.ai/android
Mail Online
Austria makes Covid vaccination COMPULSORY for all over-18s today and claims protesters objecting to the move are 'very scary'β¦
The mandate has over the past months has garnered outrage from far-right extremists as the country's new domestic intelligence chief on Friday said foreign activists were coming to Austria to 'network'.
π’1
Forwarded from HATS π©
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The cabal, it's always been a family business.
@HATSTRUTH π©
@HATSTRUTH π©
Forwarded from Lawyers of Light
I have now read the Human Rights review documentation and I am seriously concerned.
The review seeks to impose a rights culture that displaces personal responsibility in favour of "the public interestβ.
The proposed reforms say βthe international human rights framework recognises that not all rights are absolute and that an individualβs rights may need to be balanced, either against the rights of others or against the wider public interest.
Further concerning statements are:
βThe idea that rights come alongside duties and responsibilities is steeped in the UK tradition of liberty, but is also reflected in the qualifications in the Convention and is explicit in Article 29 of the UN Declaration of Human Rights (βEveryone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possibleβ). The increasing reliance on human rights claims over the years has, however, led to a culture of rights decoupled from our responsibilities as citizens, and a displacement of due consideration of the wider public interestβ.
"Whilst human rights are universal, a Bill of Rights could require the courts to give greater consideration to the behaviour of claimants and the wider public interest when interpreting and balancing qualified rights. More broadly, our proposals can also set out more clearly the extent to which the behaviour of claimants is a factor that the courts take into account when deciding what sort of remedy, if any, is appropriate. This will ensure that claimantsβ responsibilities, and the rights of others, form a part of the process of making a claim based on the violation of a human rightβ.
There are other concerning statements too, but you get the gist from the above.
Under the proposed reforms it is clear that Parliament is seeking to impose itself as arbiter of when a person can have human rights and when they cannot. This is disgraceful. It does not matter the crime, major or minor, a person must always have their human rights available to them and protected. It is abundantly clear to me that although the proposed reforms mention the courts power to decide matters, the govt expect the courts to be led on this by parliament, (and legislation), whatever the govt decide their rules to be at any given time.
This is an overt attack on personal freedoms in a bid to enforce communitarianism (which is worse than socialism, and is in fact totalitarianism). Wider interests should never trump an individualβs rights, the latter of which are fundamental freedoms that are God given.
These proposed changes seek to make sure that Human Rights are NOT fundamental and universal. Giving power to the courts to say you are not entitled to your human rights if they think your behaviour has not been what they consider "good" is a huge worry, knowing how much the courts are now refusing to challenge govt policy decisions and harmful legislation.
The separation of powers has been lost in this country for some time now. These proposed reforms confirm parliaments march to make itself the sovereign power and authority to decide on people's fundamental rights according to its own whim, and this must be stopped at all costs.
The consultation is open until 8th March and the link to respond to it is below. We desperately need everyone to take action and say no to these reforms.
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/human-rights-act-reform-a-modern-bill-of-rights
The review seeks to impose a rights culture that displaces personal responsibility in favour of "the public interestβ.
The proposed reforms say βthe international human rights framework recognises that not all rights are absolute and that an individualβs rights may need to be balanced, either against the rights of others or against the wider public interest.
Further concerning statements are:
βThe idea that rights come alongside duties and responsibilities is steeped in the UK tradition of liberty, but is also reflected in the qualifications in the Convention and is explicit in Article 29 of the UN Declaration of Human Rights (βEveryone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possibleβ). The increasing reliance on human rights claims over the years has, however, led to a culture of rights decoupled from our responsibilities as citizens, and a displacement of due consideration of the wider public interestβ.
"Whilst human rights are universal, a Bill of Rights could require the courts to give greater consideration to the behaviour of claimants and the wider public interest when interpreting and balancing qualified rights. More broadly, our proposals can also set out more clearly the extent to which the behaviour of claimants is a factor that the courts take into account when deciding what sort of remedy, if any, is appropriate. This will ensure that claimantsβ responsibilities, and the rights of others, form a part of the process of making a claim based on the violation of a human rightβ.
There are other concerning statements too, but you get the gist from the above.
Under the proposed reforms it is clear that Parliament is seeking to impose itself as arbiter of when a person can have human rights and when they cannot. This is disgraceful. It does not matter the crime, major or minor, a person must always have their human rights available to them and protected. It is abundantly clear to me that although the proposed reforms mention the courts power to decide matters, the govt expect the courts to be led on this by parliament, (and legislation), whatever the govt decide their rules to be at any given time.
This is an overt attack on personal freedoms in a bid to enforce communitarianism (which is worse than socialism, and is in fact totalitarianism). Wider interests should never trump an individualβs rights, the latter of which are fundamental freedoms that are God given.
These proposed changes seek to make sure that Human Rights are NOT fundamental and universal. Giving power to the courts to say you are not entitled to your human rights if they think your behaviour has not been what they consider "good" is a huge worry, knowing how much the courts are now refusing to challenge govt policy decisions and harmful legislation.
The separation of powers has been lost in this country for some time now. These proposed reforms confirm parliaments march to make itself the sovereign power and authority to decide on people's fundamental rights according to its own whim, and this must be stopped at all costs.
The consultation is open until 8th March and the link to respond to it is below. We desperately need everyone to take action and say no to these reforms.
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/human-rights-act-reform-a-modern-bill-of-rights
GOV.UK
Human Rights Act Reform: A Modern Bill of Rights
A consultation on proposals to reform the Human Rights Act 1998.
Forwarded from HATS π©
GET FREE SHIPPING STARTING FROM TODAY! β€οΈππ―π€π€
Represent the truth π―π
https://www.hatstruth.shop/realtruthcap
https://www.hatstruth.shop/hatsbeanie
https://www.hatstruth.shop/hatsluggage
https://www.hatstruth.shop/mug
https://www.hatstruth.shop/hatscrewneck
https://www.hatstruth.shop/menssneaks
https://www.hatstruth.shop/woemnslowtopsneaks
https://www.hatstruth.shop/lightjacket
https://www.hatstruth.shop/menspolo
Represent the truth π―π
https://www.hatstruth.shop/realtruthcap
https://www.hatstruth.shop/hatsbeanie
https://www.hatstruth.shop/hatsluggage
https://www.hatstruth.shop/mug
https://www.hatstruth.shop/hatscrewneck
https://www.hatstruth.shop/menssneaks
https://www.hatstruth.shop/woemnslowtopsneaks
https://www.hatstruth.shop/lightjacket
https://www.hatstruth.shop/menspolo
π π¬π§ UK CONVOY π¬π§ LATEST DEVELOPMENTS AS OF 1ST FEBRUARYπ ALL WILL BE REVEALED ON THURSDAY BUT THIS IS ENOUGH TO GET YOU IN GEAR #DoYourBit REMEMBER THIS IS BY THE PEOPLE FOR THE PEOPLE & MILLIONS EXPECTED!
Forwarded from Active Patriot
A landmark report into child sexual abuse has said that authorities must routinely record the ethnicities of suspects to tackle grooming gangs.
https://t.co/SiZRbTsWD4
https://t.co/SiZRbTsWD4
www.thetimes.co.uk
Ethnic background of child abusers βmust be recordedβ
A landmark report into child sexual abuse has said that authorities must routinely record the ethnicities of suspects to tackle grooming gangs.Police failure