Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The gates fraudation
The FDA has asked a federal judge to make the public wait until the year 2076 to disclose all of the data and information it relied upon to license Pfizerβs COVID-19 vaccine. That is not a typo. It wants 55 years to produce this information to the public.
As explained in a prior article, the FDA repeatedly promised βfull transparencyβ with regard to Covid-19 vaccines, including reaffirming βthe FDAβs commitment to transparencyβ when licensing Pfizerβs COVID-19 vaccine.
With that promise in mind, in August and immediately following approval of the vaccine, more than 30 academics, professors, and scientists from this countryβs most prestigious universities requested the data and information submitted to the FDA by Pfizer to license its COVID-19 vaccine.
The FDAβs response? It produced nothing. So, in September, my firm filed a lawsuit against the FDA on behalf of this group to demand this information. To date, almost three months after it licensed Pfizerβs vaccine, the FDA still has not released a single page. Not one.
Instead, two days ago, the FDA asked a federal judge to give it until 2076 to fully produce this information. The FDA asked the judge to let it produce the 329,000+ pages of documents Pfizer provided to the FDA to license its vaccine at the rate of 500 pages per month, which means its production would not be completed earlier than 2076. The FDAβs promise of transparency is, to put it mildly, a pile of illusions.
It took the FDA precisely 108 days from when Pfizer started producing the records for licensure (on May 7, 2021) to when the FDA licensed the Pfizer vaccine (on August 23, 2021). Taking the FDA at its word, it conducted an intense, robust, thorough, and complete review and analysis of those documents in order to assure that the Pfizer vaccine was safe and effective for licensure. While it can conduct that intense review of Pfizerβs documents in 108 days, it now asks for over 20,000 days to make these documents available to the public.
So, letβs get this straight. The federal government shields Pfizer from liability. Gives it billions of dollars. Makes Americans take its product. But wonβt let you see the data supporting its productβs safety and efficacy. Who does the government work for?
The lesson yet again is that civil and individual rights should never be contingent upon a medical procedure. Everyone who wants to get vaccinated and boosted should be free to do so. But nobody should be coerced by the government to partake in any medical procedure. Certainly not one where the government wants to hide the full information relied upon for its licensure until the year 2076!
https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/fda-asks-federal-judge-to-grant-it?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&utm_source=
As explained in a prior article, the FDA repeatedly promised βfull transparencyβ with regard to Covid-19 vaccines, including reaffirming βthe FDAβs commitment to transparencyβ when licensing Pfizerβs COVID-19 vaccine.
With that promise in mind, in August and immediately following approval of the vaccine, more than 30 academics, professors, and scientists from this countryβs most prestigious universities requested the data and information submitted to the FDA by Pfizer to license its COVID-19 vaccine.
The FDAβs response? It produced nothing. So, in September, my firm filed a lawsuit against the FDA on behalf of this group to demand this information. To date, almost three months after it licensed Pfizerβs vaccine, the FDA still has not released a single page. Not one.
Instead, two days ago, the FDA asked a federal judge to give it until 2076 to fully produce this information. The FDA asked the judge to let it produce the 329,000+ pages of documents Pfizer provided to the FDA to license its vaccine at the rate of 500 pages per month, which means its production would not be completed earlier than 2076. The FDAβs promise of transparency is, to put it mildly, a pile of illusions.
It took the FDA precisely 108 days from when Pfizer started producing the records for licensure (on May 7, 2021) to when the FDA licensed the Pfizer vaccine (on August 23, 2021). Taking the FDA at its word, it conducted an intense, robust, thorough, and complete review and analysis of those documents in order to assure that the Pfizer vaccine was safe and effective for licensure. While it can conduct that intense review of Pfizerβs documents in 108 days, it now asks for over 20,000 days to make these documents available to the public.
So, letβs get this straight. The federal government shields Pfizer from liability. Gives it billions of dollars. Makes Americans take its product. But wonβt let you see the data supporting its productβs safety and efficacy. Who does the government work for?
The lesson yet again is that civil and individual rights should never be contingent upon a medical procedure. Everyone who wants to get vaccinated and boosted should be free to do so. But nobody should be coerced by the government to partake in any medical procedure. Certainly not one where the government wants to hide the full information relied upon for its licensure until the year 2076!
https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/fda-asks-federal-judge-to-grant-it?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&utm_source=
Substack
FDA Asks Federal Judge to Grant it Until the Year 2076 to Fully Release Pfizerβs COVID-19 Vaccine Data
The fed govβt shields Pfizer from liability. Gives it billions of dollars. Makes Americans take its product. But wonβt let you see the data supporting its safety/efficacy. Who does the gov't work for?
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"We don't have to agree on everything, we don't even need to get on but can we agree that what you're born with is yours and it's yours alone?"
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Heartbreaking what they're doing to people's lives in the name of "health" π’
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Archbishop Viganoβ¦. He has held high positions including being Sec Gen of the Vatican City Governatorate.
He is immensely credible (the corrupt (CIA controlled) Wikipedia tries to discredit him π which always a good sign).
The courageous Archbishop has historically exposed financial and sexual scandals in the Vatican.
NB There are many, many thousands of intellectuals etc. publicly speaking out about the invisible war that we are presently embroiled in.
Share
He is immensely credible (the corrupt (CIA controlled) Wikipedia tries to discredit him π which always a good sign).
The courageous Archbishop has historically exposed financial and sexual scandals in the Vatican.
NB There are many, many thousands of intellectuals etc. publicly speaking out about the invisible war that we are presently embroiled in.
Share
π₯WELCOME TO HELLπ₯#DoYourBit make this tweet go big time #EnoughisEnough https://twitter.com/Cbds4S/status/1461583287558754304?t=QytG1d2i25Dcf2lP3bKaRQ&s=19
Twitter
CBDS4S
@ManCityHelp π₯WELCOME TO HELLπ₯ Most people we know saw 1984 as a warning not a guidebook. If the footballers don't make a stand against tyranny soon & carry on being obedient complicity theorists π & this nightmare consumes football you might as well giveβ¦
Forwarded from BOX CLEVER ARMY π
π«‘ π
π¨ #EnoughisEnough KDB had the β£ π and got Covid and in isolation. The club Doctors at the football clubs should be ashamed of themselves π€¬