Sochne wali baat hai

The overthrow of mother right was the world historic defeat of the female sex. The man took command in the home also; the woman was degraded and reduced to servitude; she became the slave of his lust and a mere instrument for the production of children

https://isreview.org/issues/02/engles_family/

https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1884/origin-family/ch02d.htm#:~:text=It%20is%20based%20on,because%20these%20children

Nature belongs to everyone, considering it as a property has given us a reason to exploit it.

You don't owe anything to live in this nature, and it shouldn't be considered or divided as individual property. It belongs to every living being. We don't have any kind of right to exploit it.

Nature provides everything to everyone and our current system wraps it up as a product and sells it to us as we owe them ( not the nature but the government ) for just existing here.

The rise and fall of rationality in language

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2107848118

To one love could remind of suffering to others it could remind of comfort. Someone might use words like collateral damage, losses or casualties to belittle the sight of people dying. At times people don't even need to fight their enemies, all they need to do is just categorize those not in favour, this works more than actually answering to their enemies, for example calling someone Naxal be it urban or dimagi.

Words don't just have meanings, they contain the whole idea of what we are and how we perceive life or beings around us.

Academia and the news agencies know about this and are constantly trying to manipulate others, every time you read a book or an article, the emotional impulse you get where it's not necessary or if you don't feel anything where you should have, is a sign that you are being manipulated.

This will go deeper than you think,
What I'm trying to say is that for some people the road of suffering which they are walking might be what they call love, without understanding what's happening to them. Even if they are suffering they don't understand where or whom to point.

These people will choose to call this path love because that's how they perceive it. While for others this same path would be called toxic relationship or even manipulation.

So each and every word has a whole idea of how we perceive it which also depends on the experiences we tied to these words.

So you have to see though these manipulation tricks, by noticing how you react to those words

😜 Handsome Gangatiri Boy

There's a simple loop that runs the modern economy: labour, wages, income, consumption, revenue, and then back to labour. A company pays labour, in wages, which becomes your income. You have some left over, so you buy things, consumption, which is another company's revenue, which they use to pay their labour. This is the circular flow of income or economic activities.

For most of the last century, we've treated this loop like a law of nature. But it's not. There's nothing natural about this loop. It's a system we built.

The reason modern capitalism hasn't already collapsed in the twentieth century wasn't because markets suddenly became humane, it's because we wrapped markets in governance interference.

Governance interferences like minimum wages, child labor laws, labor protections in general, unions, even public education. None of these things came from markets. What we know as the middle class was not a market-based outcome.

Capitalism in every country is generating incredible gains for a few while making huge swaths of the population slaves to industry. Eventually, governance structures were created to make sure people got paid, not because the market's heart suddenly grew three sizes, but because unpaid people don't stay peaceful. Strikes, riots, chaoses, labor movements, revolutions follow poverty.

Be that as it may, but what happens if Ai finally takes its intended pace? Our labor is what we trade to get income. As in all technological disruptions, capital's gonna use AI to eliminate labor, cause labour is inconvenient and will not be the most effective and efficient at that point of them. But without labour, people don't have income, which means they can't participate in consumption, which means capital is also in danger of automating itself out of relevance. We all see the problem, right? If nobody has any money, who actually buys the stuff these robots make?

Two economists published a mathematical proof that AI will destroy the economy.

Not might. Not could. Will — if nothing changes.

The paper is called "The AI Layoff Trap." Published March 2, 2026. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. Boston University. Peer reviewed. Mathematically modeled.

"At the limit, firms automate their way to boundless productivity and zero demand."

I get it that people are obsessed with words like hard work, labour and meritocracy.

But who actually gets the huge chunk of benefit out of it? It's the people who have the capital not the ones who are actually doing the labour.

Record numbers becoming billionaires through inheritance, UBS report finds | The super-rich | The Guardian https://share.google/N8yUmt52cSrmu9o2W


There's a high need of an Inheritance tax over billionaire to make Equal grounds for Each Individual.The claim that most ultra-wealthy individuals are "self-made" ignores structural economic reality Unearned Capital( https://www.oxfamamerica.org/explore/stories/how-are-billionaire-and-corporate-power-intensifying-global-inequality/?hl=en-GB ) Data from Oxfam reveals that roughly 60% of global billionaire wealth is derived from inheritance, monopoly power, or crony connections rather than innovation.
"Every Billionaire is a result of Failed Policy and governance." Billionaires are serious threat to any Society who wants to provide an equal opportunity to everyone.They are already consuming the most amount of share from our assets by paying less taxes thanks to the Brain-dead capitalist's argument of meritocracy which thier masters even themselves don't believe in.They are already using resources coming from our tax money for thier factories, creating fortunes from it and giving it to thier successors.Inheritance is the least thing they can do.Targeting inherited fortunes through a robust inheritance tax breaks the cycle of unearned economic power. It ensures that capital serves society as a whole, rather than perpetuating wealth dynasties.

The course of development we are heading towards is not for the great good of civilization or the people, it's sole purpose is maximization of profit for those who live at the top for which they even destroy or acquire better alternatives available in the nature or the market which again creates a huge gap between Haves and Have Nots

There's a reason why capitalism celebrates science and engineering while degrading humanities. Engineers build weapons, roads, factories, systems of surveillance, increases production and strengthens army ( WW1&2 happened because of competition between capitalist economies, colonialism being driven by capitalism ).

These studies focus more on Instrumental rationality, which focuses strictly on the most efficient means to achieve a specific goal, without ever questioning the moral value or wisdom of the end goal itself. And that's what humanities never abandons. History questions myths, philosophy questions authority, sociology reveals how hierarchies are not natural but man made.

What capitalism needs is certainty. It needs pure heroes and absolute enemies. It requires obedience without question.

The reason why capitalism pushes science by degrading humanities is not because they find it useless, but because it stops you from being the zombie they want, it makes you think that are we heading in the right direction? And it's the people who come from backgrounds like humanities or someone interested in them, who question their progress, which of course is only for profit maximization for the selected few.

The enemy of this Fascist state is clearly the people who can think, people who have their own opinion, people who aren't lap dogs of a particular wing, ideology or a party anymore. The state can easily control labours be it premium or cheap but not the people who can think. Most fascist dictatorships start by banning books. Then it's always the playwright, the creative people and the artist.

Fascism works by painting terrifying visions of the future, like hindu khatre me hai, immigrants taking everything you have and stuffs which are not even true. After which they position themselves as the strong men who will protect you from this future.

And the people who aren't zombies anymore are going to question them at every moment and that's what they hate. Fascism works by painting the future as being bleak and horrible and dangerous, and that they'll protect you from it but can you recall any step taken by these govt to ensure that those threats don't exist anymore? The problem is that they themselves don't want the threat or the enemy to be gone. This is the point where one has to think that are we really under threat? Or who exactly is threatening us?

These are the questions which the fascist state would hate to hear and that's why it becomes important for them to suppress any intellectual wing who can come up and question their wrong doings.

And they can easily solve this by manipulating people by using some words which those intellectual people might like and those who follow the state could use them as slur to defend the wrong doings of their state in the name of "Nationalism". Providing another enemy to keep them engaged.

People name anyone having empathy towards the people or other living beings who suffer because of the government as the "enemy of development" or simply "enemy of the state" and now "dimagi Naxal". That's exactly how we are wired, that's what they intended to do by degrading subjects like humanities. This helps them to continue their "profit driven development" which are most of the time unnecessary in those lands.

The BJP’s new “Dimagi Naxal” campaign has drawn criticism for branding journalists, academics and public figures as “intellectual Naxals”.

Its AI-generated video features journalist Rajdeep Sardesai and professor Nandita Narain, among others, prompting the Editors’ Guild of India to call it a threat to media professionals.

Critics say the campaign risks labelling dissent and criticism as support for Naxalism without evidence.