Video going viral of man using a flamethrower to melt snow after the recent storms.

He didnt lower the interest rates
https://www.youtube.com/live/NMGFPFmXaIM

🚨Democrats are calling federal law enforcement agents “nazis” who need to be “hunted.” Will the media ask Dems to condemn?

“If we have to hunt you down the way they hunted down Nazis for decades…we will find your identities!” - Philly DA Larry Krasner

The U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry (commonly referred to as the Senate Agriculture Committee) is indeed scheduled to hold a markup session on its version of crypto market structure legislation tomorrow, January 29, 2026, at 10:30 AM Eastern Time. This is not a full Senate floor vote but a committee-level business meeting where members debate, propose amendments, and vote to advance (or table) the bill for potential further action.

This development follows a short delay: the markup was originally set for earlier in the week (around January 27) but was postponed due to a winter storm impacting the Washington, D.C. area. Multiple sources, including reports from CoinDesk, Politico, and crypto-focused outlets like Crypto In America, confirm the rescheduled Thursday session.

Key Details on the Bill

Background and Content: The legislation, often described as a "digital asset market structure" bill, aims to provide regulatory clarity for cryptocurrencies and digital assets. It primarily seeks to delineate jurisdiction between the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Under the framework being advanced (led by Republican Chairman John Boozman), many digital assets would be classified as "digital commodities" under CFTC oversight, particularly for spot markets and trading activities. This builds on prior efforts and updated drafts released in January 2026.

Goals: The bill targets reducing market manipulation, wash trading, and other abusive practices by establishing clearer rules. Proponents argue it would foster innovation, attract institutional capital, and bring legitimacy to the U.S. crypto sector without overly restrictive securities-style regulation for non-security tokens.

Amendments and Dynamics: Thursday's session will likely involve debate over proposed amendments. Some reports indicate limited bipartisan support at this stage, with Democrats potentially pushing back on certain provisions (e.g., related to state-level enforcement or consumer protections). No major last-minute changes like credit card-related amendments are expected from key figures.

Next Steps if Advanced: If the committee approves the bill (potentially with amendments), it would move to the full Senate for consideration. Parallel efforts exist in the House, and any final law would require reconciliation between chambers and presidential signature. Broader context includes ongoing White House discussions with industry players (e.g., Coinbase and banks) on crypto policy.

This is a significant procedural step in a multi-year effort to create a comprehensive U.S. crypto regulatory framework, especially following shifts in congressional control and priorities in 2025-2026.

Connection to $RLUSD and #XRP

The association in many posts (including the one you shared) stems from the XRP community's perspective. Ripple's RLUSD (Ripple USD stablecoin) operates on the XRP Ledger and is positioned for institutional and cross-border use cases. A bill that classifies more assets as digital commodities (CFTC turf) rather than securities (SEC turf) could indirectly benefit XRP and related products by reducing regulatory uncertainty that has historically weighed on Ripple/XRP (e.g., from past SEC litigation). Ripple has emphasized RLUSD's compliance focus and potential for real-world adoption, with recent hires signaling expansion efforts.

However, this bill is not specifically about Ripple, XRP, or RLUSD—it's a broader market structure framework affecting spot trading, exchanges, and commodity classifications across the industry (including Bitcoin and others). Any positive spillover to XRP/RLUSD would come from improved overall clarity and reduced manipulation risks, which community members often highlight optimistically.

Tesla has officially announced that it has invested $2 billion into @xAI on January 16!

“Tesla entered into an agreement to invest approximately $2 billion to acquire shares of Series E Preferred Stock of xAI as part of their recently publicly disclosed financing round.

As set forth in Master Plan Part IV, Tesla is building products and services that bring AI into the physical world. Meanwhile, xAI is developing leading digital AI products and services, such as its large language model Grok.”

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 SEC Chair Paul Atkins has publicly stated that now is the "right time" to allow cryptocurrencies into 401(k) retirement plans, potentially opening access to the approximately $12.5 trillion U.S. defined-contribution retirement market.

This position reflects a significant pro-innovation shift in regulatory policy under the current administration. Atkins' comments, widely circulated on January 29, 2026, via crypto media outlets (e.g., CryptoBriefing, Phemex, TechFlow) and amplified across X by accounts such as Watcher.Guru, BitcoinMagazine, Crypto Rover, and others, emphasize that the crypto market has matured sufficiently to warrant inclusion—with important caveats.

Core Details from Verified Reporting

Atkins' Exact Framing: He described the moment as opportune to permit crypto exposure in 401(k)s, often phrased as "now is the right time to allow cryptocurrencies into 401(k) retirement accounts" or similar variants. In contexts like recent interviews (including CNBC's Squawk Box), he tied this to broader access for alternative assets, stressing implementation through professionally managed funds rather than direct, self-directed crypto holdings by individuals.

Protective Measures Emphasized: Atkins repeatedly highlighted the need for "protective guardrails" and cautious, collaborative rulemaking between the SEC, Department of Labor (DOL), and other agencies. This approach aims to address volatility, transparency issues, and investor protection under ERISA fiduciary standards—avoiding a repeat of prior DOL guidance that flagged crypto as excessively risky for broad retirement plan inclusion.
Policy Driver: This aligns with President Trump's August 2025 Executive Order on "Democratizing Access to Alternative Assets for 401(k) Investors," which directed agencies to remove unnecessary barriers to alternatives like private equity, real estate, and digital assets in retirement plans.

Broader Context and Reactions
Market Size and Potential Impact: The 401(k) ecosystem holds roughly $12.5 trillion in assets, covering tens of millions of American workers. Even modest allocations (e.g., 1–5% to crypto via ETFs or funds) could channel substantial institutional capital into digital assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum, enhancing liquidity and mainstream legitimacy.

Opposition and Scrutiny: Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) responded swiftly with a January 12, 2026, letter to Atkins (obtained by CNBC and referenced in Senate Banking Committee materials), expressing deep concerns. She warned that crypto's volatility, opacity, and fraud risks could cause workers to "lose big" in retirement savings, pressing for details on how the SEC would enforce fair valuation, combat manipulation, and educate retail investors. She requested responses by late January 2026.
No Immediate Rule Change: This is Atkins endorsing the direction publicly—likely in interviews or statements—but no final SEC or DOL rule has been adopted. Any change would involve proposed rulemaking, public comment periods, and inter-agency coordination to balance innovation with safeguards.

Factual Assessment

The statement originates from Atkins' recent remarks (amplified heavily in crypto communities on X today), building on his consistent pro-crypto regulatory philosophy since confirmation in 2025.
Sources lean bullish in tone from crypto-focused outlets and socialmedia, but mainstream coverage (e.g., CNBC) confirms the comments while highlighting risks and political pushback. No evidence contradicts the core claim—Atkins did express this view—but implementation remains prospective and conditional on protective frameworks.

This development signals continued momentum toward treating crypto more like traditional assets in tax-advantaged accounts, though volatility concerns persist. For anyone evaluating personal retirement implications, professional financial advice is essential—crypto's price swings make it unsuitable as a core holding for most long-term savers without proper diversification and risk management.