Silver Market Analysis (January 23, 2026)

Physical Market Fundamentals

Annual mine production: ~830–835 million ounces (Moz).
Total supply (mine + recycling): ~1.03 billion ounces.
Total demand: ~1.16–1.2 billion ounces, with ~680 Moz industrial (solar, electronics, EVs, AI — largely non-recoverable).
Result: Structural deficits of 120–150 Moz annually for five consecutive years, cumulatively draining ~800 Moz from stocks since 2021.

Physical Stocks in Firm Hands

Identifiable, investable bullion (exchange vaults, ETFs, institutional): ~1.2–1.3 billion ounces. Broader above-ground estimates historically 2–3 billion ounces, but ongoing industrial consumption permanently removes metal from recoverable stocks.

Paper Silver and Leverage
COMEX open interest typically 500–800 Moz notional; annual trading volumes exceed 100 billion ounces equivalent.
OTC and unallocated accounts add further leverage.
Ratio of paper claims to deliverable/registered physical: commonly 100–400:1 (peaks cited at 350+:1 in 2025).
Most contracts are cash-settled or rolled; physical delivery remains <2%.

How Many Times Oversold?
Global paper claims represent silver 250–400 times beyond available physical bullion or annual supply — a function of derivatives liquidity, not literal fractional fraud in regulated markets.

Is It a Financial Bubble?
The high leverage enabled large shorts (primarily banks hedging producers) to cap prices despite persistent physical deficits and booming industrial demand. This created an artificial suppression below scarcity value. The 2025–2026 rally (price from ~$30–40 to $100+/oz, breaking all-time highs) reflected the unwind: vault drainage, spiking lease rates, and forced short covering. Fundamentals (deficits, green-tech demand, restricted exports) drove the move; speculative inflows amplified it.

When Will It Burst?
The “paper suppression bubble” already burst upward in 2025–2026 as physical tightness overwhelmed financial leverage. Current elevated prices (~$100–103/oz) may include speculative premium, but structural deficits and industrial tailwinds suggest sustained highs rather than imminent collapse. Corrections are possible, but no major supply response is imminent.

Key takeaway: Silver’s tightness is physical and ongoing, amplified — not created — by paper market dynamics. Monitor COMEX vault levels, ETF flows, and industrial offtake for next moves.

Hillary Clinton: "Enforcing the law is one thing. Terrorizing a population, using children as pawns, is another. My heart aches for Liam Ramos and his family."

🎵 OUT NOW 🎵

The Somali Waltz — Official Music Video

From Natasha Owens, in partnership with Real America’s Music, this bold new release is here to expose the truth through music — and help flip the woke liberal music industry on its head.

"If Governor Carney thinks he is going to make Canada a 'drop off port' for China to send goods and products into the United States, he is sorely mistaken. China will eat Canada alive, completely devour it, including the destruction of their businesses, social fabric, and general way of life. If Canada makes a deal with China, it will immediately be hit with a 100% Tariff against all Canadian goods and products coming into the U.S.A."

(Note: Trump refers to Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney as "Governor Carney," a reference to Carney's prior role as Governor of the Bank of Canada and Bank of England.)

Background on the Canada-China Agreement
The trigger is a trade agreement-in-principle reached on January 16, 2026, between Prime Minister Mark Carney and Chinese leadership:

Canada will reduce its tariff on Chinese-made electric vehicles from 100% to 6.1% for an annual quota of up to 49,000 vehicles.

Many of these EVs are expected to be priced under $35,000 CAD, aiming to boost affordable options for Canadian consumers and encourage Chinese investment in clean energy and manufacturing in Canada.

In exchange, China agreed to lower its tariffs on Canadian canola seed (a major export) from high levels to approximately 15% by March 1, 2026.

The deal is part of a broader "strategic partnership" reset, including potential cooperation in agri-food, technology, and critical minerals.

This follows Carney's recent international engagements, including a Davos speech perceived by some as critiquing U.S. trade coercion.

Why Trump Views This as a Threat
The U.S. currently imposes 100% tariffs on Chinese EVs to protect domestic manufacturing and counter what the administration sees as unfair subsidies and overcapacity in China's auto sector. Trump argues the Canadian concession creates a "drop-off port" loophole:

Chinese vehicles could enter Canada at low tariffs, then potentially flow into the U.S. market (via integrated North American supply chains or future transshipment). Even if USMCA rules of origin limit direct re-export, the administration worries it erodes U.S. leverage and exposes American automakers to indirect competition.

This fits Trump's broader "America First" trade strategy, which has previously included 100% tariff threats against BRICS nations attempting de-dollarization and targeted duties on Canada/Mexico over immigration and fentanyl issues.

Economic and Strategic Implications
A 100% across-the-board tariff on Canada would be economically devastating:

Canada sends roughly 75% of its exports to the U.S. (over $450 billion annually), with deeply integrated sectors like automotive, energy, and steel.

Disruption could raise costs for U.S. consumers and manufacturers (e.g., higher vehicle prices due to cross-border parts), but the asymmetric dependence means Canada would suffer far more acutely.

Under the USMCA (set for review in 2026), such tariffs could be challenged, but national security provisions (Section 232) have been used before to justify steel/aluminum duties.

Rep. Brandon Gill (R-TX) is a must follow and one of few very strong MAGA in Congress. He’s sharp, controlled and always brings the facts.

Here he is calling out Jack Smith for targeting President Trump.

Jake Tapper knows Gill is right. You can see it.

WATCH — Actor James Woods says that in order to qualify for an Oscar now, one of the two leads has to be a minority of some kind.

We need to get rid of all these courses..outlaw them all.

U.S. universities offer related academic programs in LGBTQ+ Studies, Queer Studies, Sexuality Studies, or intersections with public health, social policy, and gender studies. These include undergraduate minors/majors and graduate certificates/minors, often interdisciplinary and housed in departments of gender/women's studies, sociology, or public health.

Number of U.S. Universities Offering Similar Programs

Dedicated graduate-level certificates or minors explicitly focused on LGBTQ+/Queer/Sexuality Studies (closest analogs to the Australian example) exist at approximately 20–30 institutions. Examples include:
San Diego State University → LGBTQ+ Studies Graduate Certificate (12 credits, interdisciplinary).
University of Pennsylvania → LGBTQ Certificate (through School of Social Policy & Practice; includes policy courses like "LGBTQ+ Communities & Social Policy" and "Gender & Social Policy").

University of Washington → Graduate Certificate in Sexuality & Queer Studies.
CUNY Graduate Center → LGBTQ Studies Certificate.
Northern Illinois University → Graduate Certificate in LGBT Studies.
Rutgers University → LGBTQ Health Certificate.

Drexel University → Program for LGBTQ Public Health Certificate.
University of Alabama at Birmingham → LGBTQ Health and Wellbeing Graduate Certificate.
Vanderbilt University → Gender and Sexuality Studies Graduate Certificate.

University of Wisconsin-Madison → LGBTQ+ Studies Certificate (with graduate options).
Broader Gender, Women's, and Sexuality Studies (GWS) graduate programs, which frequently incorporate substantial LGBTQ+ content, exist at hundreds of institutions (directories list ~400–500 GWS departments/programs total, with many including queer theory, sexuality, or LGBTQ+ foci).

Undergraduate-level dedicated LGBTQ+/Queer Studies minors or certificates appear at ~100 institutions (e.g., University of Colorado Boulder, Cornell University graduate minor, University of Oregon).
Individual courses on LGBTQ+ topics are far more widespread, offered at thousands of colleges.

These programs trace origins to the 1970s (e.g., first courses at UC Berkeley and others in 1970), with dedicated departments emerging in the 1980s–1990s and growth accelerating since the 2000s.

Costs of These Programs
Costs for graduate certificates vary significantly by institution type, residency status, and program structure (typically 12–18 credits, often as add-ons to existing master's/doctoral degrees):
Public universities (in-state) — $5,000–$15,000 total (e.g., ~$400–$800 per credit).
Out-of-state or private institutions — $20,000–$50,000+ (e.g., $1,000–$2,000+ per credit).
Online or specialized examples — Oregon State University Ecampus rates ~$582 per graduate credit; Drexel University has program-specific fees.

JUST IN - Trump posts photos of an ICE agent's finger, that was reportedly bitten off by one of the protesters.