This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Larry Fink's Views on Tokenization and Blockchain Settlement
BlackRock CEO Larry Fink, speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos (January 2026), emphasized tokenization — converting real-world assets (like bonds, stocks, or real estate) into digital tokens on a blockchain. He stressed moving quickly toward this technology, including the idea of one common blockchain to enable efficient institutional settlement and reduce issues like corruption through transparency.
Key distinction he highlighted (based on interpretations of his remarks):
Tokenization alone won't transform markets on a massive scale.
True impact comes from liquidity absorption — how well the system integrates and moves large-scale institutional funds seamlessly onto the blockchain's balance sheet.
Most blockchains:
Excel at hosting tokenized assets.
Fall short on handling deep institutional liquidity, especially during market stress.
In high-pressure scenarios (e.g., financial crises), only robust settlement rails endure. Under strict regulations like Basel III, institutions require:
Rapid collateral movement
Regulated cash equivalents
Netting (offsetting trades to lower capital requirements)
Reduced pre-funding of accounts
Irrevocable legal finality
The XRP Ledger (XRPL) is positioned as purpose-built for this:
Focused on payments and settlement from the ground up
Predictable, low fees with no miner/extractor value (MEV) surprises
Native compatibility with ISO 20022 (global financial messaging standard)
Helps minimize trapped capital in cross-border Nostro/Vostro accounts
Result: Liquidity lives directly on the chain, not in separate systems.
Fink's reference to "one common blockchain" is interpreted here as a unified platform where tokenized assets, digital cash, and collateral can interact, net, and settle with low friction.
The post highlights two main architectures pursuing this vision:
Ethereum: Prioritizes asset tokenization first (widely used for real-world assets today)
XRPL: Prioritizes liquidity and settlement first
Indicators to monitor:
Tokenized U.S. Treasuries serving as live collateral in DeFi or trades
Wider adoption of regulated tokenized cash (e.g., digital dollars)
Policy shifts allowing lower pre-funding requirements
Major clearinghouses like DTCC moving from pilots to full production
BlackRock CEO Larry Fink, speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos (January 2026), emphasized tokenization — converting real-world assets (like bonds, stocks, or real estate) into digital tokens on a blockchain. He stressed moving quickly toward this technology, including the idea of one common blockchain to enable efficient institutional settlement and reduce issues like corruption through transparency.
Key distinction he highlighted (based on interpretations of his remarks):
Tokenization alone won't transform markets on a massive scale.
True impact comes from liquidity absorption — how well the system integrates and moves large-scale institutional funds seamlessly onto the blockchain's balance sheet.
Most blockchains:
Excel at hosting tokenized assets.
Fall short on handling deep institutional liquidity, especially during market stress.
In high-pressure scenarios (e.g., financial crises), only robust settlement rails endure. Under strict regulations like Basel III, institutions require:
Rapid collateral movement
Regulated cash equivalents
Netting (offsetting trades to lower capital requirements)
Reduced pre-funding of accounts
Irrevocable legal finality
The XRP Ledger (XRPL) is positioned as purpose-built for this:
Focused on payments and settlement from the ground up
Predictable, low fees with no miner/extractor value (MEV) surprises
Native compatibility with ISO 20022 (global financial messaging standard)
Helps minimize trapped capital in cross-border Nostro/Vostro accounts
Result: Liquidity lives directly on the chain, not in separate systems.
Fink's reference to "one common blockchain" is interpreted here as a unified platform where tokenized assets, digital cash, and collateral can interact, net, and settle with low friction.
The post highlights two main architectures pursuing this vision:
Ethereum: Prioritizes asset tokenization first (widely used for real-world assets today)
XRPL: Prioritizes liquidity and settlement first
Indicators to monitor:
Tokenized U.S. Treasuries serving as live collateral in DeFi or trades
Wider adoption of regulated tokenized cash (e.g., digital dollars)
Policy shifts allowing lower pre-funding requirements
Major clearinghouses like DTCC moving from pilots to full production
💩13❤3👍1🤔1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇺🇸 Horror in Florida: Man stabs girlfriend 100+ times, dumps 2-year-old son in lake — toddler's body later found in alligator's jaws.
Prosecutors now demand death penalty. Thomas Mosley pleads not guilty to double first-degree murder.
Prosecutors now demand death penalty. Thomas Mosley pleads not guilty to double first-degree murder.
🤬95💩12😱7🔥6🤮4
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Rob Schneider on the Somalian pirate daycare centers.😂
😁50
Current Status and Next Steps (as of January 23, 2026)
The SAVE Act concept did not die with the 118th Congress. Rep. Chip Roy reintroduced nearly identical legislation as H.R. 22 in the 119th Congress (2025–2026), early in January 2025.
It passed the House again (Republican majority) around April 2025 and was sent to the Senate.
As of now, it remains pending in the Senate (Republican-controlled, with President Trump in office).
Recent developments show strong push: President Trump, Elon Musk, and House Republicans are advocating for it (or an enhanced version) as part of election reform priorities. Pressure is mounting on Senate Republicans to advance it.
Likely next steps:
Senate committee markup/amendments → Rules or relevant committee (e.g., Rules and Administration).
Floor vote → With unified Republican control, passage is plausible, though moderate senators may seek changes to reduce burdens (e.g., more alternative proofs).
If passed → Reconciliation with House version (minor differences possible), then to President Trump for signature—highly likely to become law.
Potential timeline → Could move in 2026, especially if tied to must-pass legislation (e.g., funding bills). If delayed, it risks stalling amid other priorities.
The SAVE Act concept did not die with the 118th Congress. Rep. Chip Roy reintroduced nearly identical legislation as H.R. 22 in the 119th Congress (2025–2026), early in January 2025.
It passed the House again (Republican majority) around April 2025 and was sent to the Senate.
As of now, it remains pending in the Senate (Republican-controlled, with President Trump in office).
Recent developments show strong push: President Trump, Elon Musk, and House Republicans are advocating for it (or an enhanced version) as part of election reform priorities. Pressure is mounting on Senate Republicans to advance it.
Likely next steps:
Senate committee markup/amendments → Rules or relevant committee (e.g., Rules and Administration).
Floor vote → With unified Republican control, passage is plausible, though moderate senators may seek changes to reduce burdens (e.g., more alternative proofs).
If passed → Reconciliation with House version (minor differences possible), then to President Trump for signature—highly likely to become law.
Potential timeline → Could move in 2026, especially if tied to must-pass legislation (e.g., funding bills). If delayed, it risks stalling amid other priorities.
🤬25❤5🤮1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
SHOW CALL HER DADDY
Michelle Obama says he won’t consider running for president because some men aren’t ready for a "woman" president.
The truth is Mike has always hated America and America hates Michelle.
Michelle Obama says he won’t consider running for president because some men aren’t ready for a "woman" president.
The truth is Mike has always hated America and America hates Michelle.
🤮42💯25🤡5❤4
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
BREAKING: President Trump predicts the Democrats will SHUT DOWN the government again to impact the economy for the midterms
"I think we have a problem, because I think we're going to probably end up in another Democrat shutdown!"
"The shutdown cost us a lot. And I think they'll probably do it again. That's my feeling."
"I think we have a problem, because I think we're going to probably end up in another Democrat shutdown!"
"The shutdown cost us a lot. And I think they'll probably do it again. That's my feeling."
🤬45👍8💯5
REPORT: The FCC is Going to Start Cracking Down on Partisan TV Shows That Exist Only to Bash One Side Every Single Day
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/01/report-fcc-is-going-start-cracking-down-partisan/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/01/report-fcc-is-going-start-cracking-down-partisan/
The Gateway Pundit
REPORT: The FCC is Going to Start Cracking Down on Partisan TV Shows That Exist Only to Bash One Side Every Single Day | The Gateway…
Shows like ‘The View’ and liberal late-night shows, may soon find themselves under pressure from the FCC to include more Republican guests and to present a point of view other than the constant one-sided programming we see every day.
❤40👍11👏7
Our Gay Terminator is going full send 😆
https://fixupx.com/theinsiderpaper/status/2014722602242342976?s=46
https://fixupx.com/theinsiderpaper/status/2014722602242342976?s=46
FixupX
Insider Paper (@TheInsiderPaper)
JUST IN - Sec Scott Bessent says "I think Gavin Newsom may be cracking up with some of these things he's saying. I think he may be in over his hairdo ... if he brought the kneepads, maybe that was for his meeting with Alex Soros, I don't know."
👍27🤣18❤3😁3
Silver Market Analysis (January 23, 2026)
Physical Market Fundamentals
Annual mine production: ~830–835 million ounces (Moz).
Total supply (mine + recycling): ~1.03 billion ounces.
Total demand: ~1.16–1.2 billion ounces, with ~680 Moz industrial (solar, electronics, EVs, AI — largely non-recoverable).
Result: Structural deficits of 120–150 Moz annually for five consecutive years, cumulatively draining ~800 Moz from stocks since 2021.
Physical Stocks in Firm Hands
Identifiable, investable bullion (exchange vaults, ETFs, institutional): ~1.2–1.3 billion ounces. Broader above-ground estimates historically 2–3 billion ounces, but ongoing industrial consumption permanently removes metal from recoverable stocks.
Paper Silver and Leverage
COMEX open interest typically 500–800 Moz notional; annual trading volumes exceed 100 billion ounces equivalent.
OTC and unallocated accounts add further leverage.
Ratio of paper claims to deliverable/registered physical: commonly 100–400:1 (peaks cited at 350+:1 in 2025).
Most contracts are cash-settled or rolled; physical delivery remains <2%.
How Many Times Oversold?
Global paper claims represent silver 250–400 times beyond available physical bullion or annual supply — a function of derivatives liquidity, not literal fractional fraud in regulated markets.
Is It a Financial Bubble?
The high leverage enabled large shorts (primarily banks hedging producers) to cap prices despite persistent physical deficits and booming industrial demand. This created an artificial suppression below scarcity value. The 2025–2026 rally (price from ~$30–40 to $100+/oz, breaking all-time highs) reflected the unwind: vault drainage, spiking lease rates, and forced short covering. Fundamentals (deficits, green-tech demand, restricted exports) drove the move; speculative inflows amplified it.
When Will It Burst?
The “paper suppression bubble” already burst upward in 2025–2026 as physical tightness overwhelmed financial leverage. Current elevated prices (~$100–103/oz) may include speculative premium, but structural deficits and industrial tailwinds suggest sustained highs rather than imminent collapse. Corrections are possible, but no major supply response is imminent.
Key takeaway: Silver’s tightness is physical and ongoing, amplified — not created — by paper market dynamics. Monitor COMEX vault levels, ETF flows, and industrial offtake for next moves.
Physical Market Fundamentals
Annual mine production: ~830–835 million ounces (Moz).
Total supply (mine + recycling): ~1.03 billion ounces.
Total demand: ~1.16–1.2 billion ounces, with ~680 Moz industrial (solar, electronics, EVs, AI — largely non-recoverable).
Result: Structural deficits of 120–150 Moz annually for five consecutive years, cumulatively draining ~800 Moz from stocks since 2021.
Physical Stocks in Firm Hands
Identifiable, investable bullion (exchange vaults, ETFs, institutional): ~1.2–1.3 billion ounces. Broader above-ground estimates historically 2–3 billion ounces, but ongoing industrial consumption permanently removes metal from recoverable stocks.
Paper Silver and Leverage
COMEX open interest typically 500–800 Moz notional; annual trading volumes exceed 100 billion ounces equivalent.
OTC and unallocated accounts add further leverage.
Ratio of paper claims to deliverable/registered physical: commonly 100–400:1 (peaks cited at 350+:1 in 2025).
Most contracts are cash-settled or rolled; physical delivery remains <2%.
How Many Times Oversold?
Global paper claims represent silver 250–400 times beyond available physical bullion or annual supply — a function of derivatives liquidity, not literal fractional fraud in regulated markets.
Is It a Financial Bubble?
The high leverage enabled large shorts (primarily banks hedging producers) to cap prices despite persistent physical deficits and booming industrial demand. This created an artificial suppression below scarcity value. The 2025–2026 rally (price from ~$30–40 to $100+/oz, breaking all-time highs) reflected the unwind: vault drainage, spiking lease rates, and forced short covering. Fundamentals (deficits, green-tech demand, restricted exports) drove the move; speculative inflows amplified it.
When Will It Burst?
The “paper suppression bubble” already burst upward in 2025–2026 as physical tightness overwhelmed financial leverage. Current elevated prices (~$100–103/oz) may include speculative premium, but structural deficits and industrial tailwinds suggest sustained highs rather than imminent collapse. Corrections are possible, but no major supply response is imminent.
Key takeaway: Silver’s tightness is physical and ongoing, amplified — not created — by paper market dynamics. Monitor COMEX vault levels, ETF flows, and industrial offtake for next moves.
❤16🔥8💯7