This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨BREAKING: OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE VOTES CONTEMPT AGAINST THE CLINTONS🚨
As of TODAY (Jan 21, 2026):
The House Oversight Committee just voted to hold BOTH Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress over the committee’s Jeffrey Epstein investigation.
Reported committee vote totals:
✅ Bill Clinton contempt: 34–8
✅ Hillary Clinton contempt: 28–15
Now here’s the part people need to understand:
1. THIS is step one — NOT the final outcome
Next, it goes to the FULL House for a vote.
2. Even if the House votes YES… DOJ decides what happens next
A contempt vote can be referred to DOJ, but prosecution is NOT automatic.
🟥 Republicans’ argument:
“You don’t get to ignore a subpoena.”
They say the Clintons refused to comply with lawful depositions.
🟦 The Clintons’ argument:
“This is political theater.”
Their lawyers argue the subpoenas are invalid, lack a real legislative purpose, and they offered sworn written statements instead of live depositions.
🔥 DISCUSSION TIME:
If Trump can be dragged through hearings, cameras, depositions, and courtrooms… Should the Clintons have to show up too?
As of TODAY (Jan 21, 2026):
The House Oversight Committee just voted to hold BOTH Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress over the committee’s Jeffrey Epstein investigation.
Reported committee vote totals:
✅ Bill Clinton contempt: 34–8
✅ Hillary Clinton contempt: 28–15
Now here’s the part people need to understand:
1. THIS is step one — NOT the final outcome
Next, it goes to the FULL House for a vote.
2. Even if the House votes YES… DOJ decides what happens next
A contempt vote can be referred to DOJ, but prosecution is NOT automatic.
🟥 Republicans’ argument:
“You don’t get to ignore a subpoena.”
They say the Clintons refused to comply with lawful depositions.
🟦 The Clintons’ argument:
“This is political theater.”
Their lawyers argue the subpoenas are invalid, lack a real legislative purpose, and they offered sworn written statements instead of live depositions.
🔥 DISCUSSION TIME:
If Trump can be dragged through hearings, cameras, depositions, and courtrooms… Should the Clintons have to show up too?
👍64👏7❤4🥱2
JUST IN: Elon Musk says "there will be more robots than people" in the future.
JUST IN: Elon Musk says he will start selling humanoid robots to the public by the end of next year.
JUST IN: Elon Musk says AI and robots will cause an "explosion" in the global economy.
"This is the path to abundance for all."
JUST IN: Elon Musk says he will start selling humanoid robots to the public by the end of next year.
JUST IN: Elon Musk says AI and robots will cause an "explosion" in the global economy.
"This is the path to abundance for all."
👎26👍17🔥4🤯4💯3👏1💩1🤣1
🚨BREAKING: American Academy of Pediatrics SLAMMED With Federal RICO Lawsuit for Vaccine Safety Fraud
AAP accused of operating a decades-long racketeering scheme that deceived America about vaccine safety for maximum profit.
Children's Health Defense and multiple plaintiffs just filed a federal RICO fraud case against the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP).
This isn’t a policy dispute. It’s an organized fraud allegation—using the same legal framework that took down Big Tobacco.
The lawsuit alleges the AAP helped manufacture false certainty that the CDC childhood vaccine schedule is thoroughly tested and safe.
It highlights the lack of proper vaccinated vs. unvaccinated safety comparisons for the cumulative schedule, despite repeated calls for more research.
Plaintiffs argue the AAP relied on theoretical talking points, not rigorous real-world safety validation, to shut down scrutiny.
Physicians allege they were professionally targeted and financially harmed for deviating from AAP protocols or questioning vaccine safety claims.
Families allege severe injury and death following routine vaccination—and claim medical judgment was overridden by rigid “standard of care” enforcement.
The complaint raises major conflict-of-interest concerns, including industry money and incentive structures tied to high vaccination rates.
Plaintiffs are seeking damages, forced disclosure of safety-testing gaps, and an end to blanket “safe and effective” assurances without qualification.
For years, parents were told to “trust the experts,” while legitimate safety questions were mocked, censored, or punished.
Now those questions are headed to the one place the system can’t silence them with talking points: federal court.
AAP accused of operating a decades-long racketeering scheme that deceived America about vaccine safety for maximum profit.
Children's Health Defense and multiple plaintiffs just filed a federal RICO fraud case against the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP).
This isn’t a policy dispute. It’s an organized fraud allegation—using the same legal framework that took down Big Tobacco.
The lawsuit alleges the AAP helped manufacture false certainty that the CDC childhood vaccine schedule is thoroughly tested and safe.
It highlights the lack of proper vaccinated vs. unvaccinated safety comparisons for the cumulative schedule, despite repeated calls for more research.
Plaintiffs argue the AAP relied on theoretical talking points, not rigorous real-world safety validation, to shut down scrutiny.
Physicians allege they were professionally targeted and financially harmed for deviating from AAP protocols or questioning vaccine safety claims.
Families allege severe injury and death following routine vaccination—and claim medical judgment was overridden by rigid “standard of care” enforcement.
The complaint raises major conflict-of-interest concerns, including industry money and incentive structures tied to high vaccination rates.
Plaintiffs are seeking damages, forced disclosure of safety-testing gaps, and an end to blanket “safe and effective” assurances without qualification.
For years, parents were told to “trust the experts,” while legitimate safety questions were mocked, censored, or punished.
Now those questions are headed to the one place the system can’t silence them with talking points: federal court.
👍23❤15🔥11
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Recent statements from NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte align closely with the strategic concerns about the Arctic that President Trump has emphasized for years. On January 21-22, 2026, during meetings and public remarks at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Rutte explicitly stated that NATO must defend and protect the Arctic region due to increasing activity by Russia and China.
Key points from Rutte's comments:
He described the Arctic as a critical security area, noting that "sea lanes are opening up" due to melting ice, creating new vulnerabilities and opportunities for adversaries.
Rutte highlighted Russia's military buildup and China's growing presence (despite not being an Arctic-bordering nation), referring to China as effectively a "ninth" player in the region through its activities and investments.
He stressed the need for collective NATO action to prevent Russia and China from gaining economic or military footholds, particularly in Greenland, which he tied to broader High North security.
Importantly, Rutte credited Trump directly: "It was Donald Trump... who already, when he was Trump 45 [in his first term], was making us aware collectively of the need to protect the High North and the Arctic." He added that "President Trump is right" on the urgency of bolstering defenses there.
This comes amid ongoing U.S.-NATO discussions on a "framework" for enhanced Arctic cooperation, including Greenland's role, following Trump's renewed focus on the region for national security reasons.
Broader Geopolitical Context
The Arctic's rising strategic importance is driven by verifiable trends:
Climate-driven changes: Accelerated ice melt is opening navigable routes like Russia's Northern Sea Route and Canada's Northwest Passage, potentially shortening global shipping times by thousands of miles and unlocking vast untapped resources (oil, gas, rare earth minerals estimated at trillions in value).
Russian actions: Moscow has reopened Soviet-era bases, deployed advanced weapons systems (e.g., hypersonic missiles, submarines), and claims expansive continental shelf rights. Russia views the Arctic as a core national interest, with significant military investments.
Chinese ambitions: Beijing's "Polar Silk Road" initiative involves heavy investments in infrastructure, research stations, and mining across Arctic nations. China self-identifies as a "near-Arctic state" and seeks dual-use (civilian-military) access.
NATO's position: Seven of the eight Arctic littoral states are now NATO members (U.S., Canada, Denmark/Greenland, Iceland, Norway, Finland, Sweden), leaving Russia as the outlier. This gives the alliance a strong positional advantage, but coordination has lagged until recent years.
Trump's first administration (2017-2021) was among the first to elevate these issues prominently: reopening Arctic policy debates, pushing for icebreaker fleets, and raising Greenland's value (including the 2019 proposal to purchase it, which highlighted its bases and mineral potential). His pressure on NATO allies to meet the 2% GDP defense spending target also strengthened the alliance's overall capacity, with many European nations increasing contributions significantly since 2016—facts Rutte has acknowledged positively in multiple contexts.
While Rutte did not use the exact phrase "next frontline" in official transcripts, his emphasis on urgent defense against Russia and China in a rapidly changing Arctic echoes that characterization and validates long-standing warnings from Trump and other security-focused voices. This shift in NATO rhetoric reflects evolving realities on the ground, not appeasement but recognition of hard power dynamics.
America's interests in the Arctic—through Alaska, alliances, and bases like Pituffik in Greenland—are indeed a northern shield for transatlantic security. Strengthening it requires sustained investment and alliance unity, as both Trump and Rutte have argued.
Key points from Rutte's comments:
He described the Arctic as a critical security area, noting that "sea lanes are opening up" due to melting ice, creating new vulnerabilities and opportunities for adversaries.
Rutte highlighted Russia's military buildup and China's growing presence (despite not being an Arctic-bordering nation), referring to China as effectively a "ninth" player in the region through its activities and investments.
He stressed the need for collective NATO action to prevent Russia and China from gaining economic or military footholds, particularly in Greenland, which he tied to broader High North security.
Importantly, Rutte credited Trump directly: "It was Donald Trump... who already, when he was Trump 45 [in his first term], was making us aware collectively of the need to protect the High North and the Arctic." He added that "President Trump is right" on the urgency of bolstering defenses there.
This comes amid ongoing U.S.-NATO discussions on a "framework" for enhanced Arctic cooperation, including Greenland's role, following Trump's renewed focus on the region for national security reasons.
Broader Geopolitical Context
The Arctic's rising strategic importance is driven by verifiable trends:
Climate-driven changes: Accelerated ice melt is opening navigable routes like Russia's Northern Sea Route and Canada's Northwest Passage, potentially shortening global shipping times by thousands of miles and unlocking vast untapped resources (oil, gas, rare earth minerals estimated at trillions in value).
Russian actions: Moscow has reopened Soviet-era bases, deployed advanced weapons systems (e.g., hypersonic missiles, submarines), and claims expansive continental shelf rights. Russia views the Arctic as a core national interest, with significant military investments.
Chinese ambitions: Beijing's "Polar Silk Road" initiative involves heavy investments in infrastructure, research stations, and mining across Arctic nations. China self-identifies as a "near-Arctic state" and seeks dual-use (civilian-military) access.
NATO's position: Seven of the eight Arctic littoral states are now NATO members (U.S., Canada, Denmark/Greenland, Iceland, Norway, Finland, Sweden), leaving Russia as the outlier. This gives the alliance a strong positional advantage, but coordination has lagged until recent years.
Trump's first administration (2017-2021) was among the first to elevate these issues prominently: reopening Arctic policy debates, pushing for icebreaker fleets, and raising Greenland's value (including the 2019 proposal to purchase it, which highlighted its bases and mineral potential). His pressure on NATO allies to meet the 2% GDP defense spending target also strengthened the alliance's overall capacity, with many European nations increasing contributions significantly since 2016—facts Rutte has acknowledged positively in multiple contexts.
While Rutte did not use the exact phrase "next frontline" in official transcripts, his emphasis on urgent defense against Russia and China in a rapidly changing Arctic echoes that characterization and validates long-standing warnings from Trump and other security-focused voices. This shift in NATO rhetoric reflects evolving realities on the ground, not appeasement but recognition of hard power dynamics.
America's interests in the Arctic—through Alaska, alliances, and bases like Pituffik in Greenland—are indeed a northern shield for transatlantic security. Strengthening it requires sustained investment and alliance unity, as both Trump and Rutte have argued.
👍18❤2❤🔥1
The Democrat open borders plan to entrench single party rule, explained in under two minutes
Flood the country with untold millions of illegals by land, sea, and air from all over the world. Enough to eclipse the populations of 36 individual US states so far
Prioritize the needs of these millions of non-citizens over the needs of the American citizen, with free flights, buses, hotels, meals and phones, ensuring their loyalty to the political party that imported them
Keep them in the country at all costs, even when they commit violent crime like murder and rape. Attack the language used to describe the criminals, as opposed to the criminals themselves. Slander critics as racist
Ensure their privileges are made irrevocable with city and state sanctuary laws that act as population magnets. Codify permanent status and ensure non-cooperation with ICE
Count the non-citizens in the census that will determine congressional apportionment in the House of Representatives. As of now, that would equal 13 extra congressional districts a tremendous amount of electoral power
Wage a massive, heavily funded lawfare campaign to change state voting laws that legalize mass mail-in ballots, no signature verification, and no proof of citizenship requirements, making it nearly impossible to prove voter fraud
Lock in the permanent voting majority with campaign promises of lavish benefits and permanent privileges, enshrining generational fealty to the Democrat Party
Win elections
Entrenched single-party rule has been
The best part? Your tax dollars are paying for it
Flood the country with untold millions of illegals by land, sea, and air from all over the world. Enough to eclipse the populations of 36 individual US states so far
Prioritize the needs of these millions of non-citizens over the needs of the American citizen, with free flights, buses, hotels, meals and phones, ensuring their loyalty to the political party that imported them
Keep them in the country at all costs, even when they commit violent crime like murder and rape. Attack the language used to describe the criminals, as opposed to the criminals themselves. Slander critics as racist
Ensure their privileges are made irrevocable with city and state sanctuary laws that act as population magnets. Codify permanent status and ensure non-cooperation with ICE
Count the non-citizens in the census that will determine congressional apportionment in the House of Representatives. As of now, that would equal 13 extra congressional districts a tremendous amount of electoral power
Wage a massive, heavily funded lawfare campaign to change state voting laws that legalize mass mail-in ballots, no signature verification, and no proof of citizenship requirements, making it nearly impossible to prove voter fraud
Lock in the permanent voting majority with campaign promises of lavish benefits and permanent privileges, enshrining generational fealty to the Democrat Party
Win elections
Entrenched single-party rule has been
The best part? Your tax dollars are paying for it
💯22🤬5👍4❤2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨 BREAKING: DON LEMON has been CHARGED by the Trump DOJ after he stormed a church with leftist rioters, along with SEVEN other people - POLITICO
YES, LET'S GO! 🔥
Hold Lemon accountable to the maximum. If a conservative stormed a mosque, there would be H*LL TO PAY!
PRISON!
YES, LET'S GO! 🔥
Hold Lemon accountable to the maximum. If a conservative stormed a mosque, there would be H*LL TO PAY!
PRISON!
❤76👏24💯21🔥6
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Larry Fink's Views on Tokenization and Blockchain Settlement
BlackRock CEO Larry Fink, speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos (January 2026), emphasized tokenization — converting real-world assets (like bonds, stocks, or real estate) into digital tokens on a blockchain. He stressed moving quickly toward this technology, including the idea of one common blockchain to enable efficient institutional settlement and reduce issues like corruption through transparency.
Key distinction he highlighted (based on interpretations of his remarks):
Tokenization alone won't transform markets on a massive scale.
True impact comes from liquidity absorption — how well the system integrates and moves large-scale institutional funds seamlessly onto the blockchain's balance sheet.
Most blockchains:
Excel at hosting tokenized assets.
Fall short on handling deep institutional liquidity, especially during market stress.
In high-pressure scenarios (e.g., financial crises), only robust settlement rails endure. Under strict regulations like Basel III, institutions require:
Rapid collateral movement
Regulated cash equivalents
Netting (offsetting trades to lower capital requirements)
Reduced pre-funding of accounts
Irrevocable legal finality
The XRP Ledger (XRPL) is positioned as purpose-built for this:
Focused on payments and settlement from the ground up
Predictable, low fees with no miner/extractor value (MEV) surprises
Native compatibility with ISO 20022 (global financial messaging standard)
Helps minimize trapped capital in cross-border Nostro/Vostro accounts
Result: Liquidity lives directly on the chain, not in separate systems.
Fink's reference to "one common blockchain" is interpreted here as a unified platform where tokenized assets, digital cash, and collateral can interact, net, and settle with low friction.
The post highlights two main architectures pursuing this vision:
Ethereum: Prioritizes asset tokenization first (widely used for real-world assets today)
XRPL: Prioritizes liquidity and settlement first
Indicators to monitor:
Tokenized U.S. Treasuries serving as live collateral in DeFi or trades
Wider adoption of regulated tokenized cash (e.g., digital dollars)
Policy shifts allowing lower pre-funding requirements
Major clearinghouses like DTCC moving from pilots to full production
BlackRock CEO Larry Fink, speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos (January 2026), emphasized tokenization — converting real-world assets (like bonds, stocks, or real estate) into digital tokens on a blockchain. He stressed moving quickly toward this technology, including the idea of one common blockchain to enable efficient institutional settlement and reduce issues like corruption through transparency.
Key distinction he highlighted (based on interpretations of his remarks):
Tokenization alone won't transform markets on a massive scale.
True impact comes from liquidity absorption — how well the system integrates and moves large-scale institutional funds seamlessly onto the blockchain's balance sheet.
Most blockchains:
Excel at hosting tokenized assets.
Fall short on handling deep institutional liquidity, especially during market stress.
In high-pressure scenarios (e.g., financial crises), only robust settlement rails endure. Under strict regulations like Basel III, institutions require:
Rapid collateral movement
Regulated cash equivalents
Netting (offsetting trades to lower capital requirements)
Reduced pre-funding of accounts
Irrevocable legal finality
The XRP Ledger (XRPL) is positioned as purpose-built for this:
Focused on payments and settlement from the ground up
Predictable, low fees with no miner/extractor value (MEV) surprises
Native compatibility with ISO 20022 (global financial messaging standard)
Helps minimize trapped capital in cross-border Nostro/Vostro accounts
Result: Liquidity lives directly on the chain, not in separate systems.
Fink's reference to "one common blockchain" is interpreted here as a unified platform where tokenized assets, digital cash, and collateral can interact, net, and settle with low friction.
The post highlights two main architectures pursuing this vision:
Ethereum: Prioritizes asset tokenization first (widely used for real-world assets today)
XRPL: Prioritizes liquidity and settlement first
Indicators to monitor:
Tokenized U.S. Treasuries serving as live collateral in DeFi or trades
Wider adoption of regulated tokenized cash (e.g., digital dollars)
Policy shifts allowing lower pre-funding requirements
Major clearinghouses like DTCC moving from pilots to full production
💩13❤3👍1🤔1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇺🇸 Horror in Florida: Man stabs girlfriend 100+ times, dumps 2-year-old son in lake — toddler's body later found in alligator's jaws.
Prosecutors now demand death penalty. Thomas Mosley pleads not guilty to double first-degree murder.
Prosecutors now demand death penalty. Thomas Mosley pleads not guilty to double first-degree murder.
🤬95💩12😱7🔥6🤮4