Russian Military Assets in Arctic Bases
Red dots on the map mark Russia's extensive network of militarized installations along its Arctic coastline, stretching from the Kola Peninsula through the Barents, Kara, Laptev, East Siberian, and Chukchi Seas to the Bering Strait. Russia maintains the world's largest and most advanced Arctic military infrastructure, with over 50 refurbished or new facilities, including more than 13 airfields, 10 radar stations, multiple naval support points, and integrated bases on remote islands. This buildup, intensified since the 2010s, focuses on defending the Northern Sea Route (NSR), securing strategic nuclear forces, and projecting power as Arctic ice recedes.
Although conventional Arctic ground forces have been depleted by the Ukraine conflict—some brigades redeployed and suffering significant losses—core strategic capabilities, especially nuclear submarines, air defenses, and missile systems, remain strong and are receiving ongoing upgrades, including robotic systems, drones, and advanced electronic warfare through 2026.
The following is a concise, fact-based overview of key assets, sourced from U.S. DoD reports, USNI, CSIS, and open-source intelligence up to January 2026.
Naval Forces and Submarine Facilities
The Northern Fleet, based in Severomorsk (Kola Peninsula), is the core, with Arctic bases enabling region-wide operations.
Borei-class SSBNs and Yasen-class attack submarines carrying nuclear warheads, cruise missiles, and hypersonics; primarily Kola-based, with eastern support.
Surface combatants (cruisers, destroyers, frigates) and support ships.
At least 7 nuclear-powered icebreakers (Arktika-class) and over 30 diesel icebreakers, many equipped with Kalibr cruise missiles.
These assets support bastion defense for submarine patrols and NSR control.
Air Bases and Aviation
Refurbished airfields enable year-round operations and rapid response.
MiG-31BM interceptors (often Kinzhal-armed).
Su-34 strike fighters.
Tu-95MS and Tu-160 long-range bombers for patrol and strike.
Mi-38 Arctic helicopters and growing drone forces.
Key bases: Nagurskoye and Temp.
Air Defense and Coastal Missiles
Dense A2/AD network on islands and coastlines.
S-400 and S-300 long-range SAMs.
Pantsir-S1 for close-in defense.
Bastion-P systems with P-800 Oniks anti-ship missiles (300–500 km range).
Protects installations and NSR chokepoints.
Ground Forces and Specialized Units
Arctic-specific formations for extreme environments.
80th and 200th Separate Motorized Rifle Brigades; Pechenga area expanded to division strength in 2025–2026 with additional manpower and equipment.
Specialized vehicles (DT-30 trackers, snowmobiles).
Engineers, EW units, and new 2026 combat diver detachments for underwater infrastructure defense.
Troop levels range from hundreds to thousands per base, with losses partially offset by rotations and recruitment.
Surveillance and Emerging Systems
Voronezh early-warning radars and Arktika-M satellite integration.
Electronic warfare systems for GPS/comms disruption.
2026 additions: ground robots, UAVs, and upgraded command nodes.
Notable Bases
Nagurskoye (Franz Josef Land, “Arctic Trefoil”) – northernmost permanent facility.
Temp (Kotelny Island, “Northern Clover”) – forward airfield, air defenses, radar, and quarters for NSR monitoring.
This infrastructure ensures robust nuclear deterrence while providing offensive options against potential shipping threats or incursions.
Red dots on the map mark Russia's extensive network of militarized installations along its Arctic coastline, stretching from the Kola Peninsula through the Barents, Kara, Laptev, East Siberian, and Chukchi Seas to the Bering Strait. Russia maintains the world's largest and most advanced Arctic military infrastructure, with over 50 refurbished or new facilities, including more than 13 airfields, 10 radar stations, multiple naval support points, and integrated bases on remote islands. This buildup, intensified since the 2010s, focuses on defending the Northern Sea Route (NSR), securing strategic nuclear forces, and projecting power as Arctic ice recedes.
Although conventional Arctic ground forces have been depleted by the Ukraine conflict—some brigades redeployed and suffering significant losses—core strategic capabilities, especially nuclear submarines, air defenses, and missile systems, remain strong and are receiving ongoing upgrades, including robotic systems, drones, and advanced electronic warfare through 2026.
The following is a concise, fact-based overview of key assets, sourced from U.S. DoD reports, USNI, CSIS, and open-source intelligence up to January 2026.
Naval Forces and Submarine Facilities
The Northern Fleet, based in Severomorsk (Kola Peninsula), is the core, with Arctic bases enabling region-wide operations.
Borei-class SSBNs and Yasen-class attack submarines carrying nuclear warheads, cruise missiles, and hypersonics; primarily Kola-based, with eastern support.
Surface combatants (cruisers, destroyers, frigates) and support ships.
At least 7 nuclear-powered icebreakers (Arktika-class) and over 30 diesel icebreakers, many equipped with Kalibr cruise missiles.
These assets support bastion defense for submarine patrols and NSR control.
Air Bases and Aviation
Refurbished airfields enable year-round operations and rapid response.
MiG-31BM interceptors (often Kinzhal-armed).
Su-34 strike fighters.
Tu-95MS and Tu-160 long-range bombers for patrol and strike.
Mi-38 Arctic helicopters and growing drone forces.
Key bases: Nagurskoye and Temp.
Air Defense and Coastal Missiles
Dense A2/AD network on islands and coastlines.
S-400 and S-300 long-range SAMs.
Pantsir-S1 for close-in defense.
Bastion-P systems with P-800 Oniks anti-ship missiles (300–500 km range).
Protects installations and NSR chokepoints.
Ground Forces and Specialized Units
Arctic-specific formations for extreme environments.
80th and 200th Separate Motorized Rifle Brigades; Pechenga area expanded to division strength in 2025–2026 with additional manpower and equipment.
Specialized vehicles (DT-30 trackers, snowmobiles).
Engineers, EW units, and new 2026 combat diver detachments for underwater infrastructure defense.
Troop levels range from hundreds to thousands per base, with losses partially offset by rotations and recruitment.
Surveillance and Emerging Systems
Voronezh early-warning radars and Arktika-M satellite integration.
Electronic warfare systems for GPS/comms disruption.
2026 additions: ground robots, UAVs, and upgraded command nodes.
Notable Bases
Nagurskoye (Franz Josef Land, “Arctic Trefoil”) – northernmost permanent facility.
Temp (Kotelny Island, “Northern Clover”) – forward airfield, air defenses, radar, and quarters for NSR monitoring.
This infrastructure ensures robust nuclear deterrence while providing offensive options against potential shipping threats or incursions.
❤12👍3🔥3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
To the leaders of Europe:
The United States will take every necessary measure to ensure the highest level of national security in the Arctic region. This area is critical to our future, our defense, and our strategic stability.
We expect European nations to respect American leadership on this matter and to refrain from interference. Stability in the Arctic requires clarity of authority and decisive action. The United States will not hesitate to protect its interests.
The United States will take every necessary measure to ensure the highest level of national security in the Arctic region. This area is critical to our future, our defense, and our strategic stability.
We expect European nations to respect American leadership on this matter and to refrain from interference. Stability in the Arctic requires clarity of authority and decisive action. The United States will not hesitate to protect its interests.
❤35👍13👏6🤔2👎1🎉1
Was it the wife or he got a dose?
😁26🤣15❤4🤯2😱1💯1
Trump Announces Intent to Sue JPMorgan Chase Over Debanking
On January 17, 2026, President Donald Trump stated he plans to file a lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase within the next two weeks, accusing the bank of "incorrectly and inappropriately debanking" him after the January 6, 2021, events.
The announcement was made in response to a Wall Street Journal report claiming Trump had offered JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon the Federal Reserve Chair position. Trump called the report "totally untrue" and used it as an opportunity to reiterate his debanking allegations.
In his statement, Trump described January 6 as a "protest" and repeated his claim that the 2020 election was rigged.
Background
Trump has long alleged that major banks, including JPMorgan Chase, discriminated against him by closing accounts or refusing service due to political reasons tied to January 6. Similar claims have led to prior lawsuits, such as the Trump Organization's 2025 case against Capital One, and an executive order Trump signed in August 2025 to prevent politically motivated debanking.
JPMorgan's Response
The bank has consistently denied closing accounts based on political or religious beliefs, stating it supports efforts to address political debanking and that no customer's account should be closed for those reasons. CEO Jamie Dimon has also rejected accusations of political bias in banking decisions.
Current Status
No lawsuit has been filed yet; this remains an announced intention. The development underscores ongoing tensions between the Trump administration and large financial institutions regarding banking practices and political neutrality.
On January 17, 2026, President Donald Trump stated he plans to file a lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase within the next two weeks, accusing the bank of "incorrectly and inappropriately debanking" him after the January 6, 2021, events.
The announcement was made in response to a Wall Street Journal report claiming Trump had offered JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon the Federal Reserve Chair position. Trump called the report "totally untrue" and used it as an opportunity to reiterate his debanking allegations.
In his statement, Trump described January 6 as a "protest" and repeated his claim that the 2020 election was rigged.
Background
Trump has long alleged that major banks, including JPMorgan Chase, discriminated against him by closing accounts or refusing service due to political reasons tied to January 6. Similar claims have led to prior lawsuits, such as the Trump Organization's 2025 case against Capital One, and an executive order Trump signed in August 2025 to prevent politically motivated debanking.
JPMorgan's Response
The bank has consistently denied closing accounts based on political or religious beliefs, stating it supports efforts to address political debanking and that no customer's account should be closed for those reasons. CEO Jamie Dimon has also rejected accusations of political bias in banking decisions.
Current Status
No lawsuit has been filed yet; this remains an announced intention. The development underscores ongoing tensions between the Trump administration and large financial institutions regarding banking practices and political neutrality.
🔥19👍6❤3👏2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Swift ♾️ Ripple
Reset will occur swiftly.
👑♾️🟢
Reset will occur swiftly.
👑♾️🟢
👍12💯9🔥3👏3
History has a curious way of repeating itself.
More than 200 years ago, the Marquis de Lafayette honored Simón Bolívar, the Liberator of Venezuela, by presenting him with a medal of George Washington.
It was not a mere symbolic gesture. It represented shared struggles for freedom against tyranny.
Today, seeing María Corina Machado hand over her own medal, a symbol of resistance and sacrifice, to President Donald Trump is no coincidence. It is history coming full circle.
Different centuries. Different contexts. The same message.
Let me make one thing clear: I am not Venezuelan. But as an observer, it is impossible to ignore an evident fact: many Venezuelans genuinely appreciate Trump’s stance and actions against the regime that destroyed their country.
To those who hate Trump out of ideological reflex, propaganda, or by repeating slogans without analysis, they should listen more to those who lived that reality firsthand. While some hurl insults from comfort, others recognize who dared to call a dictatorship what it is, and who confronted tyrants without ambiguity.
This is not about fanaticism. It is about facts, consistency, and historical memory.
And today, history makes clear who knew how to recognize allies in the defense of freedom, and who chose to look the other way.
History is always watching. And it always settles accounts.
More than 200 years ago, the Marquis de Lafayette honored Simón Bolívar, the Liberator of Venezuela, by presenting him with a medal of George Washington.
It was not a mere symbolic gesture. It represented shared struggles for freedom against tyranny.
Today, seeing María Corina Machado hand over her own medal, a symbol of resistance and sacrifice, to President Donald Trump is no coincidence. It is history coming full circle.
Different centuries. Different contexts. The same message.
Let me make one thing clear: I am not Venezuelan. But as an observer, it is impossible to ignore an evident fact: many Venezuelans genuinely appreciate Trump’s stance and actions against the regime that destroyed their country.
To those who hate Trump out of ideological reflex, propaganda, or by repeating slogans without analysis, they should listen more to those who lived that reality firsthand. While some hurl insults from comfort, others recognize who dared to call a dictatorship what it is, and who confronted tyrants without ambiguity.
This is not about fanaticism. It is about facts, consistency, and historical memory.
And today, history makes clear who knew how to recognize allies in the defense of freedom, and who chose to look the other way.
History is always watching. And it always settles accounts.
❤26💯12👍9🔥2👏2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Swedish forces just arrived in Greenland and are trying to assemble their IKEA barracks but are having difficulty.
🤣78
In January 2026, the Trump administration advanced its Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) drug pricing initiative, aligning U.S. prices for select medications more closely with lower prices paid in other developed countries (e.g., Europe, Canada, Japan). This builds on a May 2025 executive order and relies on voluntary agreements with pharmaceutical companies, not mandatory enforcement.
Key Facts
The administration secured deals with 16 major companies (confirmed by multiple sources as of mid-January 2026), including Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, GSK, Merck, Novartis, Roche (Genentech), Sanofi, and others. A major December 2025 announcement added nine companies to earlier agreements.
These voluntary commitments were negotiated using leverage such as potential import tariffs, regulatory actions, and federal procurement incentives. In return, companies received a multi-year suspension of proposed pharmaceutical tariffs and pledged U.S. manufacturing investments. The deals target:
MFN-aligned pricing for Medicaid programs nationwide.
Direct-to-consumer discounts for cash-paying patients (uninsured or bypassing insurance) via the federal platform TrumpRx.gov, set to launch or become fully operational in January 2026.
Closer alignment of new drug launch prices with international benchmarks.
TrumpRx.gov acts as a government portal connecting patients directly to manufacturers' discounted offers, promoting transparency and bypassing intermediaries.
Reported Price Impacts
The administration highlighted discounts on select products for Medicaid and cash buyers, including:
Substantial reductions on GLP-1 drugs (e.g., diabetes/obesity treatments from Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk).
Average ~50% discounts on certain portfolios (e.g., Pfizer).
Claims of up to 50–90% savings on participating drugs for eligible patients.
Separately, Medicare negotiations (from prior law) delivered 38–79% list price cuts on 10 high-cost drugs, effective January 2026, saving billions for the program.
These steps offer targeted relief for Medicaid enrollees and cash payers, addressing the gap between U.S. and international prices.
Limitations and Developments
The initiative's scope is limited:
It covers only select drugs and channels (Medicaid, direct cash), not the full market.
Most Americans with private insurance or standard Medicare see minimal immediate change, as list prices remain manufacturer-set.
In early January 2026, the 16 participating companies raised list prices on 872 brand-name drugs (median ~4% increase), per independent trackers like 46brooklyn Research—following the industry's annual January pattern.
Analyses view this as a political and strategic success in pressuring the industry, but not a comprehensive reset. Sustained, widespread savings would require legislative changes to patents, pharmacy benefit managers, and global pricing structures.
As TrumpRx.gov deploys and data accumulates in 2026, real-world impacts on patients, pharmacies, and overall affordability will clarify. This reflects focused executive action yielding targeted gains in the ongoing effort to control U.S. prescription drug costs.
Key Facts
The administration secured deals with 16 major companies (confirmed by multiple sources as of mid-January 2026), including Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, GSK, Merck, Novartis, Roche (Genentech), Sanofi, and others. A major December 2025 announcement added nine companies to earlier agreements.
These voluntary commitments were negotiated using leverage such as potential import tariffs, regulatory actions, and federal procurement incentives. In return, companies received a multi-year suspension of proposed pharmaceutical tariffs and pledged U.S. manufacturing investments. The deals target:
MFN-aligned pricing for Medicaid programs nationwide.
Direct-to-consumer discounts for cash-paying patients (uninsured or bypassing insurance) via the federal platform TrumpRx.gov, set to launch or become fully operational in January 2026.
Closer alignment of new drug launch prices with international benchmarks.
TrumpRx.gov acts as a government portal connecting patients directly to manufacturers' discounted offers, promoting transparency and bypassing intermediaries.
Reported Price Impacts
The administration highlighted discounts on select products for Medicaid and cash buyers, including:
Substantial reductions on GLP-1 drugs (e.g., diabetes/obesity treatments from Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk).
Average ~50% discounts on certain portfolios (e.g., Pfizer).
Claims of up to 50–90% savings on participating drugs for eligible patients.
Separately, Medicare negotiations (from prior law) delivered 38–79% list price cuts on 10 high-cost drugs, effective January 2026, saving billions for the program.
These steps offer targeted relief for Medicaid enrollees and cash payers, addressing the gap between U.S. and international prices.
Limitations and Developments
The initiative's scope is limited:
It covers only select drugs and channels (Medicaid, direct cash), not the full market.
Most Americans with private insurance or standard Medicare see minimal immediate change, as list prices remain manufacturer-set.
In early January 2026, the 16 participating companies raised list prices on 872 brand-name drugs (median ~4% increase), per independent trackers like 46brooklyn Research—following the industry's annual January pattern.
Analyses view this as a political and strategic success in pressuring the industry, but not a comprehensive reset. Sustained, widespread savings would require legislative changes to patents, pharmacy benefit managers, and global pricing structures.
As TrumpRx.gov deploys and data accumulates in 2026, real-world impacts on patients, pharmacies, and overall affordability will clarify. This reflects focused executive action yielding targeted gains in the ongoing effort to control U.S. prescription drug costs.
❤15🔥2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Trump next step in Greenland 🇺🇸
👍22💯6❤5👏3👎1🤣1
Imminent Systemic Transition – A Critical Perspective
Reliable indicators suggest that a significant, multi-layered reconfiguration of global systems may be approaching or already underway. This is not speculative rumor or exercise; it represents a pivotal moment for which certain institutional and technological frameworks were ostensibly prepared.
Observed Developments:
Communication networks are exhibiting unusual latency and selective throttling, presenting as routine delays rather than overt disruption.
The onset of major change is characterized not by visible chaos, but by a progressive quieting of established channels — a deliberate silence preceding reconfiguration.
Institutional and Authority Shifts:
Traditional command hierarchies appear to have undergone rerouting, with civil institutions positioned to follow rather than direct subsequent actions.
Implementation of heightened security measures — including unnamed control points and non-attributable directives — is anticipated without formal public proclamation. These would manifest as felt restrictions on movement and activity rather than announced policy.
Law Enforcement and Accountability Actions:
Large-scale detentions and accountability processes are expected to occur outside mainstream media coverage, managed through secure data systems, administrative records, and closed proceedings.
Parallel Financial Rearchitecture:
The existing global financial framework is undergoing fundamental deconstruction and rebuilding at the foundational level. Ledgers are being reconciled, revalued, and restructured — not as a disorderly collapse, but as a deliberate, comprehensive reset.
The prior international monetary order was fundamentally structured around mechanisms of debt, interest accrual, and temporal obligation as instruments of centralized influence.
That paradigm is now reaching conclusion. Obligations rooted in the legacy system are anticipated to lose enforceability during the transition, effectively invalidating them without requiring formal "forgiveness."
The entities that derived authority from this structure have not necessarily lost influence outright, but rather the underlying architecture that sustained it.
Expected Public Experience:
The immediate aftermath will likely register not as triumph or resolution, but as widespread uncertainty, disorientation, and temporary stasis.
This period of pause should not be misinterpreted as breakdown; it constitutes a necessary reconfiguration interval.
Recommended Posture:
Maintain composure and vigilance.
Those attuned to underlying patterns will recognize the significance more readily, while overt expressions of alarm may dominate public reaction.
This juncture does not signify finality. It marks a transfer of operational control and the commencement of a new operational framework.
Reliable indicators suggest that a significant, multi-layered reconfiguration of global systems may be approaching or already underway. This is not speculative rumor or exercise; it represents a pivotal moment for which certain institutional and technological frameworks were ostensibly prepared.
Observed Developments:
Communication networks are exhibiting unusual latency and selective throttling, presenting as routine delays rather than overt disruption.
The onset of major change is characterized not by visible chaos, but by a progressive quieting of established channels — a deliberate silence preceding reconfiguration.
Institutional and Authority Shifts:
Traditional command hierarchies appear to have undergone rerouting, with civil institutions positioned to follow rather than direct subsequent actions.
Implementation of heightened security measures — including unnamed control points and non-attributable directives — is anticipated without formal public proclamation. These would manifest as felt restrictions on movement and activity rather than announced policy.
Law Enforcement and Accountability Actions:
Large-scale detentions and accountability processes are expected to occur outside mainstream media coverage, managed through secure data systems, administrative records, and closed proceedings.
Parallel Financial Rearchitecture:
The existing global financial framework is undergoing fundamental deconstruction and rebuilding at the foundational level. Ledgers are being reconciled, revalued, and restructured — not as a disorderly collapse, but as a deliberate, comprehensive reset.
The prior international monetary order was fundamentally structured around mechanisms of debt, interest accrual, and temporal obligation as instruments of centralized influence.
That paradigm is now reaching conclusion. Obligations rooted in the legacy system are anticipated to lose enforceability during the transition, effectively invalidating them without requiring formal "forgiveness."
The entities that derived authority from this structure have not necessarily lost influence outright, but rather the underlying architecture that sustained it.
Expected Public Experience:
The immediate aftermath will likely register not as triumph or resolution, but as widespread uncertainty, disorientation, and temporary stasis.
This period of pause should not be misinterpreted as breakdown; it constitutes a necessary reconfiguration interval.
Recommended Posture:
Maintain composure and vigilance.
Those attuned to underlying patterns will recognize the significance more readily, while overt expressions of alarm may dominate public reaction.
This juncture does not signify finality. It marks a transfer of operational control and the commencement of a new operational framework.
❤13🥱6💯3👏2🔥1🤡1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Death Penalty…
1-year-old boy Harvey Mucklebust was Suffocated to Death by Minnesota Rocking Horse Ranch Daycare employee, Theah Russell
No national media coverage because the child was the wrong color.
Three days prior, Savage police went to the day care on a report of an unresponsive 4-month-old with blood under their nose and mouth, the chief said. Two hours before the 911 call about Muklebust, that same child was found in a similar state, though police were not called to respond.
Police say "behavior and actions at the scene immediately raised suspicion, drawing investigative focus to her as the primary person of interest."
Authorities investigated Russell's background, finding "a documented history of attention-seeking behavior," including "nonsensical" 911 calls, firestarting and "erratic behavior toward other children,"
In an interview with police, Russell confessed to "intentionally suffocating" Muklebust and the other child "in an attention-seeking act," according to Juell. He added the employee "confessed to the attempted murder of our first victim on two occasions and to the murder of Harvey Muklebust."
https://rumble.com/v74dywy-1-year-old-boy-harvey-mucklebust-suffocated-to-death-by-minnesota-daycare-e.html
1-year-old boy Harvey Mucklebust was Suffocated to Death by Minnesota Rocking Horse Ranch Daycare employee, Theah Russell
No national media coverage because the child was the wrong color.
Three days prior, Savage police went to the day care on a report of an unresponsive 4-month-old with blood under their nose and mouth, the chief said. Two hours before the 911 call about Muklebust, that same child was found in a similar state, though police were not called to respond.
Police say "behavior and actions at the scene immediately raised suspicion, drawing investigative focus to her as the primary person of interest."
Authorities investigated Russell's background, finding "a documented history of attention-seeking behavior," including "nonsensical" 911 calls, firestarting and "erratic behavior toward other children,"
In an interview with police, Russell confessed to "intentionally suffocating" Muklebust and the other child "in an attention-seeking act," according to Juell. He added the employee "confessed to the attempted murder of our first victim on two occasions and to the murder of Harvey Muklebust."
https://rumble.com/v74dywy-1-year-old-boy-harvey-mucklebust-suffocated-to-death-by-minnesota-daycare-e.html
🤬57❤7🤯6