This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨 BREAKING: THE ARCTIC POWER SHIFT HAS BEGUN
Marco Rubio is walking into meetings with Denmark and Greenland RIGHT NOW — not for diplomacy theater, but because President Trump is moving to secure Greenland for the United States.
This isn’t a land grab.
This is geopolitical survival.
Greenland sits on the front line of the Arctic battlefield — the shortest route for Russian submarines, Chinese hypersonics, and the next great resource war.
Whoever controls it controls the northern gateway to North America.
Trump isn’t asking.
He’s acting.
The Western Hemisphere is being reclaimed.
The Arctic is being locked down.
And history is being written in real time.
Greenland is no longer a frozen island.
It is the keystone of global power.
Marco Rubio is walking into meetings with Denmark and Greenland RIGHT NOW — not for diplomacy theater, but because President Trump is moving to secure Greenland for the United States.
This isn’t a land grab.
This is geopolitical survival.
Greenland sits on the front line of the Arctic battlefield — the shortest route for Russian submarines, Chinese hypersonics, and the next great resource war.
Whoever controls it controls the northern gateway to North America.
Trump isn’t asking.
He’s acting.
The Western Hemisphere is being reclaimed.
The Arctic is being locked down.
And history is being written in real time.
Greenland is no longer a frozen island.
It is the keystone of global power.
❤40💯20👍10💩1
LIES THE MEDIA CONTINUES TO TELL ABOUT TINA PETERS
LIE #1: Tina “breached” election machines
Tina’s charges do not including “breaching" ANYTHING!
The SOS Jena Griswold DELETED 29,000 election records including log files Tina Peters preserved as required by law.
LIE #2: Tina allowed “unauthorized” access to the machines.
Election Rule 20.5.3B provides that the Clerk may grant consultant access to equipment if they supervise the consultant. Conan Hayes was supervised at all times.
LIE #3: Jena Griswold was Tina Peters “boss”
Tina Peters was elected by the PEOPLE.
She acted under her oath and authority as the elected clerk to fulfill her duty to the people and the Colorado and US Constitution.
LIE #4: Tina Peters was convicted by a jury of her peers.
The jury was not allowed hear 41 motions for Tina’s defense including instructions regarding her duty to preserve election records under 52 USC 20701.
The jury was TAINTED and nothing was done!
LIE #5: Tina was convicted by a “Republican” DA in a Republican county.
The Republican DA and Commissioners were corrupt!
The judge was clearly biased and DA Dan Rubinstein was actively communicating with the Biden DOJ regarding Mesa County since 2021.
For official updates from Tina Peters and to support her legal defense, visit tinapeters.us
LIE #1: Tina “breached” election machines
Tina’s charges do not including “breaching" ANYTHING!
The SOS Jena Griswold DELETED 29,000 election records including log files Tina Peters preserved as required by law.
LIE #2: Tina allowed “unauthorized” access to the machines.
Election Rule 20.5.3B provides that the Clerk may grant consultant access to equipment if they supervise the consultant. Conan Hayes was supervised at all times.
LIE #3: Jena Griswold was Tina Peters “boss”
Tina Peters was elected by the PEOPLE.
She acted under her oath and authority as the elected clerk to fulfill her duty to the people and the Colorado and US Constitution.
LIE #4: Tina Peters was convicted by a jury of her peers.
The jury was not allowed hear 41 motions for Tina’s defense including instructions regarding her duty to preserve election records under 52 USC 20701.
The jury was TAINTED and nothing was done!
LIE #5: Tina was convicted by a “Republican” DA in a Republican county.
The Republican DA and Commissioners were corrupt!
The judge was clearly biased and DA Dan Rubinstein was actively communicating with the Biden DOJ regarding Mesa County since 2021.
For official updates from Tina Peters and to support her legal defense, visit tinapeters.us
😱15❤8🔥6🤬1
Oregon is resuming a standard process to remove approximately 800,000 inactive voter registrations from its rolls.
These are outdated records—typically from people who have moved, passed away, or become disengaged (e.g., mail returned undeliverable). Inactive voters do not receive ballots and cannot vote unless they reactivate their registration. The buildup occurred because Oregon paused routine removals around 2017, unlike most states that clean lists after two federal election cycles of inactivity. The restart follows legal requirements under federal law (National Voter Registration Act) and pressure from lawsuits and federal oversight.
This is routine administrative maintenance, not evidence of widespread fraud or "fake" voters. Inactive records are not usable for voting, and claims portraying the 800,000 as proof of systemic criminality do not hold up under scrutiny.
On Portland's political history: The last Republican to serve as mayor was Connie McCready (1979–1980, completing a term). Portland's mayoral elections are nonpartisan, and no registered Republican has held the office since.
Vote-by-mail in Oregon began with limited testing authorized in 1981, became permanent for local elections in 1987, and expanded statewide through a 1998 voter-approved measure, with full implementation by 2000.
Oregon's presidential voting shifted Democratic starting in 1988; the last Republican win was Reagan in 1984.
The timelines you noted—mail voting rollout coinciding with the end of Republican mayoral and presidential success in the state—do align roughly. However, evidence points to broader demographic and cultural shifts driving the change: urban growth in progressive-leaning areas (Portland, Eugene), in-migration of younger/tech-sector residents, and West Coast trends seen similarly in Washington and California.
Extensive studies of universal mail-in voting, including Oregon's decades-long experience, find increased turnout overall, no consistent partisan advantage, and no documented systemic fraud capable of flipping outcomes.
Actual voter fraud in Oregon's system remains extremely rare—isolated incidents only, not organized schemes. The state uses signature verification, ballot tracking, chain-of-custody rules, and post-election audits, with county-level administration involving bipartisan officials.
In short, the voter roll cleanup addresses long-overdue housekeeping, not a massive exposure of election crime. Mail-in voting's vulnerabilities are debated, but no credible evidence ties it directly to one-party dominance in Oregon through fraudulent means. The state's political lean appears rooted in population changes and voter preferences, not manipulated rolls.
Voter Roll Purges Across U.S. States
Voter roll maintenance ("purges") is federally mandated under the NVRA for all states, primarily removing inactive records (moved, deceased, disengaged) after notices and inactivity periods.
Nationwide (2022–2024): ~21 million removals (~9% of registered voters), mostly for non-response to notices, relocation, or death.
Oregon: Resuming paused process; targeting ~800,000 inactive records (~25% of 3.1M total voters) due to multi-year backlog from ~2017 halt.
Comparisons (Recent Cycles):
Georgia (~8–9M voters): Highly proactive; ~500,000 removed in 2025 alone, plus ongoing flags.
Texas (~18M voters): Aggressive; >1 million ineligible removed since 2021, emphasizing noncitizens.
Florida (~14–15M voters): Large-scale; ~1 million drop in recent period via inactive removals.
Ohio (~8M voters): Regular; ~155,000 in 2024.
California (~22M voters): Less frequent; slower cleanups, often lawsuit-driven
These are outdated records—typically from people who have moved, passed away, or become disengaged (e.g., mail returned undeliverable). Inactive voters do not receive ballots and cannot vote unless they reactivate their registration. The buildup occurred because Oregon paused routine removals around 2017, unlike most states that clean lists after two federal election cycles of inactivity. The restart follows legal requirements under federal law (National Voter Registration Act) and pressure from lawsuits and federal oversight.
This is routine administrative maintenance, not evidence of widespread fraud or "fake" voters. Inactive records are not usable for voting, and claims portraying the 800,000 as proof of systemic criminality do not hold up under scrutiny.
On Portland's political history: The last Republican to serve as mayor was Connie McCready (1979–1980, completing a term). Portland's mayoral elections are nonpartisan, and no registered Republican has held the office since.
Vote-by-mail in Oregon began with limited testing authorized in 1981, became permanent for local elections in 1987, and expanded statewide through a 1998 voter-approved measure, with full implementation by 2000.
Oregon's presidential voting shifted Democratic starting in 1988; the last Republican win was Reagan in 1984.
The timelines you noted—mail voting rollout coinciding with the end of Republican mayoral and presidential success in the state—do align roughly. However, evidence points to broader demographic and cultural shifts driving the change: urban growth in progressive-leaning areas (Portland, Eugene), in-migration of younger/tech-sector residents, and West Coast trends seen similarly in Washington and California.
Extensive studies of universal mail-in voting, including Oregon's decades-long experience, find increased turnout overall, no consistent partisan advantage, and no documented systemic fraud capable of flipping outcomes.
Actual voter fraud in Oregon's system remains extremely rare—isolated incidents only, not organized schemes. The state uses signature verification, ballot tracking, chain-of-custody rules, and post-election audits, with county-level administration involving bipartisan officials.
In short, the voter roll cleanup addresses long-overdue housekeeping, not a massive exposure of election crime. Mail-in voting's vulnerabilities are debated, but no credible evidence ties it directly to one-party dominance in Oregon through fraudulent means. The state's political lean appears rooted in population changes and voter preferences, not manipulated rolls.
Voter Roll Purges Across U.S. States
Voter roll maintenance ("purges") is federally mandated under the NVRA for all states, primarily removing inactive records (moved, deceased, disengaged) after notices and inactivity periods.
Nationwide (2022–2024): ~21 million removals (~9% of registered voters), mostly for non-response to notices, relocation, or death.
Oregon: Resuming paused process; targeting ~800,000 inactive records (~25% of 3.1M total voters) due to multi-year backlog from ~2017 halt.
Comparisons (Recent Cycles):
Georgia (~8–9M voters): Highly proactive; ~500,000 removed in 2025 alone, plus ongoing flags.
Texas (~18M voters): Aggressive; >1 million ineligible removed since 2021, emphasizing noncitizens.
Florida (~14–15M voters): Large-scale; ~1 million drop in recent period via inactive removals.
Ohio (~8M voters): Regular; ~155,000 in 2024.
California (~22M voters): Less frequent; slower cleanups, often lawsuit-driven
👍21❤6
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
TRUMP: We found the LEAKER!
“The leaker has been found, and is in jail right now, and that's the leaker on Venezuela — and will probably be in jail for a long time. — There could be others” 👀
https://rumble.com/v74bzxk-the-leaker-has-been-found-and-is-in-jail-right-now.html
“The leaker has been found, and is in jail right now, and that's the leaker on Venezuela — and will probably be in jail for a long time. — There could be others” 👀
https://rumble.com/v74bzxk-the-leaker-has-been-found-and-is-in-jail-right-now.html
🔥41❤5
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨 BREAKING: Sen. Rand Paul is set to file a bill to BAN welfare benefits for refugees, asylees, and illegals TOMORROW
Yesterday, President Trump announced a FREEZE on welfare for illegals. @SenRandPaul’s bill makes it PERMANENT, AND goes MUCH further by excluding ALL non-citizens
The “End Welfare for Non-citizens” bans:
- SNAP (food stamps)
- Medicaid
- Cash and tax benefits
- Other federal subsidies
from being given to ANYONE who is not a U.S. citizen.
This is a no-brainer! 🔥
Yesterday, President Trump announced a FREEZE on welfare for illegals. @SenRandPaul’s bill makes it PERMANENT, AND goes MUCH further by excluding ALL non-citizens
The “End Welfare for Non-citizens” bans:
- SNAP (food stamps)
- Medicaid
- Cash and tax benefits
- Other federal subsidies
from being given to ANYONE who is not a U.S. citizen.
This is a no-brainer! 🔥
❤57💯40👍2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Ursula von der Leyen Panics and declares that Greenland belongs to Denmark and NATO, Not America — President Trump just dragged the Arctic's raw power game out into the open
This isn’t about the people of Greenland, It's a literal choke point for the next era of Arctic shipping lanes, Massive rare-earth deposits, and a backdoor into America.
Trump is right… If the U.S. doesn't claim it, China or Russia will. China already has a foot in the door — our back door — and for the first time in a very long time, we have a president willing to treat it that way.
President Trump is going to take Greenland… they will prosper, and once again, America will prosper. He is the President of the United States. He is doing what is best for America.
And there ain’t a damn thing they can do about it.
https://rumble.com/v74c7y8-ursula-von-der-leyen-panics-and-declares-that-greenland-belongs-to-denmark-.html
This isn’t about the people of Greenland, It's a literal choke point for the next era of Arctic shipping lanes, Massive rare-earth deposits, and a backdoor into America.
Trump is right… If the U.S. doesn't claim it, China or Russia will. China already has a foot in the door — our back door — and for the first time in a very long time, we have a president willing to treat it that way.
President Trump is going to take Greenland… they will prosper, and once again, America will prosper. He is the President of the United States. He is doing what is best for America.
And there ain’t a damn thing they can do about it.
https://rumble.com/v74c7y8-ursula-von-der-leyen-panics-and-declares-that-greenland-belongs-to-denmark-.html
❤56💩3🤮1
The Keystone Beneath the Ice
In summer 2018, a classified U.S. Air Force survey from Thule Air Base detected a massive artificial structure three kilometers under Greenland’s eastern ice sheet: 420 meters long, perfectly symmetrical, with a faint energy signature. Drilling confirmed an alien craft—intact, ancient, its hull of unknown self-repairing alloy.
The discovery went straight to President Trump on August 12, 2018. After a terse briefing, he issued clear orders: “Secure it completely. No leaks, no sharing. Get Greenland if needed.”
Trump grasped the stakes instantly. The melting ice would expose the site within decades. The technology—unlimited energy, gravitational propulsion, revolutionary materials—would decide global primacy. China and Russia were already maneuvering in the Arctic. Only exclusive U.S. control was acceptable.
He personally directed Project POLAR VAULT, a black program reporting to the White House. Excavation began in 2019: a hidden subsurface complex built into the ice. Top scientists worked in isolation.
Publicly, Trump opened talks with Denmark in early 2019, then in August publicly floated buying Greenland. The world laughed, calling it eccentric real-estate thinking. In reality, it normalized U.S. strategic focus on the island and bought time.
Reverse-engineering delivered results fast.
2020: inertial damping field tested successfully.
2022: reactionless gravitational propulsion demonstrated.
2023: vacuum-energy reactors producing megawatts.
2024: alien computing substrates broke every foreign cipher.
Protection was relentless. Russian and Chinese probing was detected and blocked without escalation.
In 2025, the Greenland Strategic Autonomy Accord was signed: permanent U.S. security jurisdiction over key zones, exclusive research rights, full defense responsibility—in exchange for massive economic investment and retained local self-governance. Nuuk approved overwhelmingly; Copenhagen accepted the inevitable.
By 2026, the craft remained in place, still yielding secrets. American power had quietly transformed: absolute energy independence, unmatched strategic deterrence, restored technological dominance for generations.
History would argue over Trump’s methods and rhetoric. But on Greenland and the buried alien vessel, his vision proved correct: some discoveries are too critical to share, some responsibilities too great for any nation but America to carry.
The ice continued to melt. The secret stayed secure. The future belonged to the United States.
[A story]
In summer 2018, a classified U.S. Air Force survey from Thule Air Base detected a massive artificial structure three kilometers under Greenland’s eastern ice sheet: 420 meters long, perfectly symmetrical, with a faint energy signature. Drilling confirmed an alien craft—intact, ancient, its hull of unknown self-repairing alloy.
The discovery went straight to President Trump on August 12, 2018. After a terse briefing, he issued clear orders: “Secure it completely. No leaks, no sharing. Get Greenland if needed.”
Trump grasped the stakes instantly. The melting ice would expose the site within decades. The technology—unlimited energy, gravitational propulsion, revolutionary materials—would decide global primacy. China and Russia were already maneuvering in the Arctic. Only exclusive U.S. control was acceptable.
He personally directed Project POLAR VAULT, a black program reporting to the White House. Excavation began in 2019: a hidden subsurface complex built into the ice. Top scientists worked in isolation.
Publicly, Trump opened talks with Denmark in early 2019, then in August publicly floated buying Greenland. The world laughed, calling it eccentric real-estate thinking. In reality, it normalized U.S. strategic focus on the island and bought time.
Reverse-engineering delivered results fast.
2020: inertial damping field tested successfully.
2022: reactionless gravitational propulsion demonstrated.
2023: vacuum-energy reactors producing megawatts.
2024: alien computing substrates broke every foreign cipher.
Protection was relentless. Russian and Chinese probing was detected and blocked without escalation.
In 2025, the Greenland Strategic Autonomy Accord was signed: permanent U.S. security jurisdiction over key zones, exclusive research rights, full defense responsibility—in exchange for massive economic investment and retained local self-governance. Nuuk approved overwhelmingly; Copenhagen accepted the inevitable.
By 2026, the craft remained in place, still yielding secrets. American power had quietly transformed: absolute energy independence, unmatched strategic deterrence, restored technological dominance for generations.
History would argue over Trump’s methods and rhetoric. But on Greenland and the buried alien vessel, his vision proved correct: some discoveries are too critical to share, some responsibilities too great for any nation but America to carry.
The ice continued to melt. The secret stayed secure. The future belonged to the United States.
[A story]
❤29🤔14🔥7👍5🤣3👏1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Vice President JD VANCE just DEFEATED the anti-Trump War Powers vote in the Senate on Venezuela, casting the tie-breaking vote, 51-50
👍62❤11❤🔥6
Official vote record: https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202627
List of 81 Republicans Who Voted "Nay" (Supporting NED Funding)
The following Republicans voted against the defunding amendment:
Robert B. Aderholt (AL-4)
Mark Alford (MO-4)
Don Bacon (NE-2)
James Baird (IN-4)
Beth Baumgartner (WA)
Cliff Bentz (OR-2)
Stephanie Bice (OK-5)
Gus Bilirakis (FL-12)
Vern Buchanan (FL-16)
Ken Calvert (CA-41)
Mike Carey (OH-15)
John Carter (TX-31)
Juan Ciscomani (AZ-6)
Tom Cole (OK-4)
Rick Crawford (AR-1)
Mario Diaz-Balart (FL-26)
Chuck Edwards (NC-11)
Jake Ellzey (TX-6)
Ron Estes (KS-4)
Mike Evans (CO)
Randy Feenstra (IA-4)
Brian Fitzpatrick (PA-1)
Mike Flood (NE-1)
Scott Franklin (FL-18)
Andrew Garbarino (NY-2)
Carlos Gimenez (FL-28)
John Goldman (TX)
Brett Guthrie (KY-2)
Mike Haridopolos (FL)
French Hill (AR-2)
Ashley Hinson (IA-2)
Bill Huizenga (MI-4)
Will Hurd (CO)
Darrell Issa (CA-48)
John Joyce (PA-13)
Thomas Kean Jr. (NJ-7)
Mike Kelly (PA-16)
Jen Kiggans (VA-2)
Kevin Kiley (CA-3)
Young Kim (CA-40)
Darin LaHood (IL-16)
Nick LaLota (NY-1)
Bob Latta (OH-5)
Mike Lawler (NY-17)
Frank Lucas (OK-3)
Ryan Mackenzie (PA)
Nicole Malliotakis (NY-11)
Celeste Maloy (UT-2)
Brian Mast (FL-21)
Michael McCaul (TX-10)
Dan Meuser (PA-9)
John Moolenaar (MI-2)
Blake Moore (UT-1)
Nathaniel Moran (TX-1)
Dan Newhouse (WA-4)
Zach Nunn (IA-3)
Jay Obernolte (CA-23)
August Pfluger (TX-11)
Mike Rogers (AL-3)
Hal Rogers (KY-5)
John Rutherford (FL-5)
María Elvira Salazar (FL-27)
Mike Simpson (ID-2)
Adrian Smith (NE-3)
Lloyd Smucker (PA-11)
Elise Stefanik (NY-21)
Dale Strong (AL-5)
Van Taylor (TX)
Claudia Tenney (NY-24)
Michael Turner (OH-10)
David Valadao (CA-22)
Ann Wagner (MO-2)
Tim Walberg (MI-5)
Daniel Webster (FL-11)
Bruce Westerman (AR-4)
Rob Wittman (VA-1)
Steve Womack (AR-3)
(Note: Some districts reflect standard 2025-2026 alignments; new or special election members may vary. Full names and districts cross-referenced from official House records and reports.)
Contact Information
Direct emails are rarely public to reduce spam; use official contact forms. Washington, D.C. office phones start with (202) 225-XXXX.
Call the Capitol switchboard at (202) 224-3121 and request the member's office.
Visit each representative's official site (typically https://[lastname].house.gov) for D.C. and district office phones, plus contact/email forms.
Search the full House directory at https://www.house.gov/representatives for updated details.
List of 81 Republicans Who Voted "Nay" (Supporting NED Funding)
The following Republicans voted against the defunding amendment:
Robert B. Aderholt (AL-4)
Mark Alford (MO-4)
Don Bacon (NE-2)
James Baird (IN-4)
Beth Baumgartner (WA)
Cliff Bentz (OR-2)
Stephanie Bice (OK-5)
Gus Bilirakis (FL-12)
Vern Buchanan (FL-16)
Ken Calvert (CA-41)
Mike Carey (OH-15)
John Carter (TX-31)
Juan Ciscomani (AZ-6)
Tom Cole (OK-4)
Rick Crawford (AR-1)
Mario Diaz-Balart (FL-26)
Chuck Edwards (NC-11)
Jake Ellzey (TX-6)
Ron Estes (KS-4)
Mike Evans (CO)
Randy Feenstra (IA-4)
Brian Fitzpatrick (PA-1)
Mike Flood (NE-1)
Scott Franklin (FL-18)
Andrew Garbarino (NY-2)
Carlos Gimenez (FL-28)
John Goldman (TX)
Brett Guthrie (KY-2)
Mike Haridopolos (FL)
French Hill (AR-2)
Ashley Hinson (IA-2)
Bill Huizenga (MI-4)
Will Hurd (CO)
Darrell Issa (CA-48)
John Joyce (PA-13)
Thomas Kean Jr. (NJ-7)
Mike Kelly (PA-16)
Jen Kiggans (VA-2)
Kevin Kiley (CA-3)
Young Kim (CA-40)
Darin LaHood (IL-16)
Nick LaLota (NY-1)
Bob Latta (OH-5)
Mike Lawler (NY-17)
Frank Lucas (OK-3)
Ryan Mackenzie (PA)
Nicole Malliotakis (NY-11)
Celeste Maloy (UT-2)
Brian Mast (FL-21)
Michael McCaul (TX-10)
Dan Meuser (PA-9)
John Moolenaar (MI-2)
Blake Moore (UT-1)
Nathaniel Moran (TX-1)
Dan Newhouse (WA-4)
Zach Nunn (IA-3)
Jay Obernolte (CA-23)
August Pfluger (TX-11)
Mike Rogers (AL-3)
Hal Rogers (KY-5)
John Rutherford (FL-5)
María Elvira Salazar (FL-27)
Mike Simpson (ID-2)
Adrian Smith (NE-3)
Lloyd Smucker (PA-11)
Elise Stefanik (NY-21)
Dale Strong (AL-5)
Van Taylor (TX)
Claudia Tenney (NY-24)
Michael Turner (OH-10)
David Valadao (CA-22)
Ann Wagner (MO-2)
Tim Walberg (MI-5)
Daniel Webster (FL-11)
Bruce Westerman (AR-4)
Rob Wittman (VA-1)
Steve Womack (AR-3)
(Note: Some districts reflect standard 2025-2026 alignments; new or special election members may vary. Full names and districts cross-referenced from official House records and reports.)
Contact Information
Direct emails are rarely public to reduce spam; use official contact forms. Washington, D.C. office phones start with (202) 225-XXXX.
Call the Capitol switchboard at (202) 224-3121 and request the member's office.
Visit each representative's official site (typically https://[lastname].house.gov) for D.C. and district office phones, plus contact/email forms.
Search the full House directory at https://www.house.gov/representatives for updated details.
❤19🔥5👍2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Bret Weinstein’s analysis of the 80 Ivermectin court cases reveals a mind blowing statistic.
In the 40 cases where Ivermectin was permitted, 38 survived.
In the 40 cases where it was not, 38 died.
Using a standard statistical formula, the chances that Ivermectin had no impact are roughly 1 in 20 quadrillion.
Yet, we were denied this treatment.
This is one of the biggest medical tragedies in modern history!
In the 40 cases where Ivermectin was permitted, 38 survived.
In the 40 cases where it was not, 38 died.
Using a standard statistical formula, the chances that Ivermectin had no impact are roughly 1 in 20 quadrillion.
Yet, we were denied this treatment.
This is one of the biggest medical tragedies in modern history!
🔥63😱6
🚨 BREAKING: Minneapolis rioters successfully BROKE OPEN a weapons locker in a federal vehicle and STOLE A RIFLE and ammunition before fleeing
I captured the thief’s face and license plate on the getaway vehicle.
PLEASE SHARE and HELP IDENTIFY this POS.
I have forwarded this to the top levels of the FBI.
I captured the thief’s face and license plate on the getaway vehicle.
PLEASE SHARE and HELP IDENTIFY this POS.
I have forwarded this to the top levels of the FBI.
🤬48❤1