The education of children for God is the most important business done on earth.
-- R. L. Dabney
-- R. L. Dabney
π6
There is no true knowledge apart from Christ, the arche.
Every line of true knowledge must find its completeness as it converges on God, just as every beam of daylight leads the eye to the sun. If religion is excluded from our study, every process of thought will be arrested before it reaches its proper goal.
-- R. L. Dabney
Every line of true knowledge must find its completeness as it converges on God, just as every beam of daylight leads the eye to the sun. If religion is excluded from our study, every process of thought will be arrested before it reaches its proper goal.
-- R. L. Dabney
π6
The Decalogue in Wycliffe's Bible:
And the Lord spak alle these wordis, Y am thi Lord God, that ladde thee out of the lond of Egipt, fro the hous of seruage.
Thou schalt not haue alien goddis bifore me.
Thou schalt not make to thee a grauun ymage, nethir ony licnesse of thing which is in heuene aboue, and which is in erthe bynethe, nether of tho thingis, that ben in watris vndur erthe; thou schalt not herie tho, nether thou schalt worschipe; for Y am thi worschipe; for Y am thi Lord God, a strorng gelouse louyere; and Y visite the wickidnesse of fadris in to the thridde and the fourthe generacioun of hem that haten me, and Y do mercy in to a thousynde, to hem that louen me, and kepen myn heestis.
Thou schalt not take in veyn the name of thi Lord God, for the Lord schal not haue hym giltles, that takith in veyn the name of his Lord God.
Haue thou mynde, that thou halowe the dai of the sabat; in sixe daies thou schalt worche and schalt do alle thi werkis; forsothe in the seuenthe day is the sabat of thi Lord God; thou schalt not do ony werk, thou, and thi sone, and thi douytir, and thi seruaunt, and thin handmaide, thi werk beeste, and the comelyng which is withynne thi yatis; for in sixe dayes God made heuene and erthe, the see, and alle thingis that ben in tho, and restide in the seuenthe dai; herfor the Lord blesside the dai of the sabat, and halwide it.
Onoure thi fadir and thi moder, that thou be long lyuyng on the lond which thi Lord God schal yyue to thee.
Thou schalt not sle.
Thou schalt do no letcherie.
Thou schalt do no theft.
Thou schalt not speke fals witnessyng ayens thi neiybore.
Thou schalt not coueyten the hous of thi neiybore, nether thou schalt desyre his wijf, not seruaunt, not handmaide, not oxe, not asse, nether alle thingis that ben hise.
And the Lord spak alle these wordis, Y am thi Lord God, that ladde thee out of the lond of Egipt, fro the hous of seruage.
Thou schalt not haue alien goddis bifore me.
Thou schalt not make to thee a grauun ymage, nethir ony licnesse of thing which is in heuene aboue, and which is in erthe bynethe, nether of tho thingis, that ben in watris vndur erthe; thou schalt not herie tho, nether thou schalt worschipe; for Y am thi worschipe; for Y am thi Lord God, a strorng gelouse louyere; and Y visite the wickidnesse of fadris in to the thridde and the fourthe generacioun of hem that haten me, and Y do mercy in to a thousynde, to hem that louen me, and kepen myn heestis.
Thou schalt not take in veyn the name of thi Lord God, for the Lord schal not haue hym giltles, that takith in veyn the name of his Lord God.
Haue thou mynde, that thou halowe the dai of the sabat; in sixe daies thou schalt worche and schalt do alle thi werkis; forsothe in the seuenthe day is the sabat of thi Lord God; thou schalt not do ony werk, thou, and thi sone, and thi douytir, and thi seruaunt, and thin handmaide, thi werk beeste, and the comelyng which is withynne thi yatis; for in sixe dayes God made heuene and erthe, the see, and alle thingis that ben in tho, and restide in the seuenthe dai; herfor the Lord blesside the dai of the sabat, and halwide it.
Onoure thi fadir and thi moder, that thou be long lyuyng on the lond which thi Lord God schal yyue to thee.
Thou schalt not sle.
Thou schalt do no letcherie.
Thou schalt do no theft.
Thou schalt not speke fals witnessyng ayens thi neiybore.
Thou schalt not coueyten the hous of thi neiybore, nether thou schalt desyre his wijf, not seruaunt, not handmaide, not oxe, not asse, nether alle thingis that ben hise.
π5
Inasmuch as the Roman Catholic Church teaches truth enough to save the souls of men (of which I have no doubt); inasmuch as it proclaims the Divine authority of the Scriptures, the obligation of the Decalogue, and the retributions of eternity; and inasmuch as it calls upon men to worship God the Father, Son and Spirit, it is unspeakably better than no church at all. And therefore, when the choice is between that and none, it is right and wise to encourage the establishment of churches under the control of Catholic priests.
-- Charles Hodge
-- Charles Hodge
π€5π4π2β‘1
It may be inferred again that the present movement for womenβs rights will certainly prevail from the history of its only opponent, Northern conservatism. This is a party which never conserves anything. Its history has been that it demurs to each aggression of the progressive party, and aims to save its credit by a respectable amount of growling, but always acquiesces at last in the innovation. What was the resisted novelty of yesterday is today one of the accepted principles of conservatism; it is now conservative only in affecting to resist the next innovation, which will tomorrow be forced upon its timidity and will be succeeded by some third revolution; to be denounced and then adopted in its turn. American conservatism is merely the shadow that follows Radicalism as it moves forward towards perdition.
-- R. L. Dabney, written in 1897
-- R. L. Dabney, written in 1897
π5
Inequality Is an Inescapable Concept:
The fact of law introduces a fundamental and basic inequality in society. The abolition of law will not eliminate inequality, because then the very fact of sheer survival will create an elite and establish a fundamental inequality.
-- R. J. Rushdoony, Institutes vol. 1, I.V
The fact of law introduces a fundamental and basic inequality in society. The abolition of law will not eliminate inequality, because then the very fact of sheer survival will create an elite and establish a fundamental inequality.
-- R. J. Rushdoony, Institutes vol. 1, I.V
π4
But nearly all public men and divines declare that the State schools are the glory of America, that they are a finality, and in no event to be surrendered. And we have seen that their complete secularization is logically inevitable. Christians must prepare themselves then, for the following results: All prayers, catechisms, and Bibles will ultimately be driven out of the schools.
-- R. L. Dabney, written in 1879.
-- R. L. Dabney, written in 1879.
π3
John Calvin couldn't get ordained in the average Presbyterian denomination today.
They would reject his high view of the sacraments and his pronouncement of absolution as "too Catholic."
They would reject his view of church and state as a "denial of the two kingdoms."
They would reject him as "unwinsome" for calling his opponents barking dogs and filthy swine.
And finally, they would reject him as an "antisemite" and "misogynist" for his comments on Jews and women.
They would reject his high view of the sacraments and his pronouncement of absolution as "too Catholic."
They would reject his view of church and state as a "denial of the two kingdoms."
They would reject him as "unwinsome" for calling his opponents barking dogs and filthy swine.
And finally, they would reject him as an "antisemite" and "misogynist" for his comments on Jews and women.
π14
Doctrine of Covenant Succession - Rayburn.pdf
754 KB
The doctrine of covenant succession, a centerpiece of the Reformed Presbyterian tradition, was chipped away at by late Puritan experimentalism, the Great Awakening, and almost entirely supplanted by the revivalism of the Second Great Awakening.
This tighly-argued essay by PCA minister Robert Rayburn explores the history of the doctrine as well as its basis in Reformation theology and Scripture. I'll be sharing a few snippets from it over the coming days to whet your appetite.
This tighly-argued essay by PCA minister Robert Rayburn explores the history of the doctrine as well as its basis in Reformation theology and Scripture. I'll be sharing a few snippets from it over the coming days to whet your appetite.
π3
Forwarded from Confessional Lutheran Theology
Whoβs closer to the Truth, (Lutherans exempted here) theologically speaking? Put another way; whoβs wrong theology is more correct? Protestantism only.
Anonymous Poll
15%
Arminians
45%
Calvinists
24%
Anabaptists
16%
Other (please comment)
For all the tacit assumption in the evangelical world that the churchβs children will have a βconversion experience,β a conscious stepping from darkness into light, this is surely not the biblical expectation. Several times witness is born to faith stretching back to infancy (Ps. 22:910, 71:56; 51 2 Tim. 3:15; cf. 1 Kgs. 18:12), and even beyond (Luke 1:15).
-- Robert Rayburn, The Presbyterian Doctrine of Covneant Succession
-- Robert Rayburn, The Presbyterian Doctrine of Covneant Succession
π3
Charles Hodge, speaking of a revival of religion such as occurred during the Great Awakening, wrote:
No one can fail to remark that this too exclusive dependance on revivals tends to produce a false or unscriptural form of religion.... The ordinary means of grace become insipid or distasteful....Perhaps however the most deplorable result of the mistake we are now considering is, the neglect which it necessarily induces of the divinely appointed means of careful Christian nurture....
Family training of children, and pastoral instruction of the young, are almost entirely lost sight of. We have long felt and often expressed the conviction that this is one of the most serious evils in the present state of our churches.
-- from Robert Rayburn, The Presbyterian Doctrine of Covneant Succession
No one can fail to remark that this too exclusive dependance on revivals tends to produce a false or unscriptural form of religion.... The ordinary means of grace become insipid or distasteful....Perhaps however the most deplorable result of the mistake we are now considering is, the neglect which it necessarily induces of the divinely appointed means of careful Christian nurture....
Family training of children, and pastoral instruction of the young, are almost entirely lost sight of. We have long felt and often expressed the conviction that this is one of the most serious evils in the present state of our churches.
-- from Robert Rayburn, The Presbyterian Doctrine of Covneant Succession
π6
Gentlemen, if you want to find a good wife,
(1) Improve your looks: grooming, style, body, etc.
(2) Dedicate yourself to your vocation and craft; women do want to feel financially secure, but even if you aren't well-off currently, if you demonstrate you have the skill and discipline to get there, she'll accept that, too.
(3) Literally ask her out. Talk to her dad. If she's a good woman, she'll respect you for asking even if she turns you down. And if she doesn't and makes things weird, you know she isn't a good woman. But if you've done (1) and (2), gents, I'll bet you she says yes.
(1) Improve your looks: grooming, style, body, etc.
(2) Dedicate yourself to your vocation and craft; women do want to feel financially secure, but even if you aren't well-off currently, if you demonstrate you have the skill and discipline to get there, she'll accept that, too.
(3) Literally ask her out. Talk to her dad. If she's a good woman, she'll respect you for asking even if she turns you down. And if she doesn't and makes things weird, you know she isn't a good woman. But if you've done (1) and (2), gents, I'll bet you she says yes.
π6π₯4π€1
It is emphatically clear from Deuteronomy to Proverbs to Ephesians that nurture, not evangelism, is the paradigm of childrearing in the covenant home, a nurture which presupposes a heart, however young, set free, or soon to be set free, from the native blindness and opposition to the truth into which the fall has cast all mankind from conception (Ps 51:5). It can only be thought remarkable that the contrary paradigm -- adolescent unbelief overcome in an experience of new birth now so securely fixed in the evangelical mind, never once appears in Scripture in an exemplary role and almost never appears at all.
-- Robert Rayburn, The Presbyterian Doctrine of Covneant Succession
-- Robert Rayburn, The Presbyterian Doctrine of Covneant Succession
π₯6π2
They're called elders for a reason:
The church is the one and only industry that will take a fresh graduate and put him in charge of 200+ people. An overempahsis on the spiritual nature of the the church's spiritual leadership has caused us to overlook the leadership component.
Gray hair is a crown of glory;
it is gained in a righteous life. (Prov. 16:31)
The church is the one and only industry that will take a fresh graduate and put him in charge of 200+ people. An overempahsis on the spiritual nature of the the church's spiritual leadership has caused us to overlook the leadership component.
Gray hair is a crown of glory;
it is gained in a righteous life. (Prov. 16:31)
π2
Can the Church of Rome of Today be Called a True Church of Christ? Says Turretin:
III. The Church of Rome can be regarded under a twofold view: either as it is Christian, with regard to the profession of Christianity and of gospel truth which it retains; or papal, with regard to subjection to the pope, and corruptions and capital errors (in faith as well as in morals) which she has mingled with and built upon those truths besides and contrary to the Word of God.
We can speak of it in different ways. In the former respect, we do not deny that there is some truth in it; but in the latter (under which it is regarded here) we deny that it can be called Christian and apostolic, but Antichristian and apostate. In this sense, we confess that it can still improperly and relatively be called a Christian church in a threefold respect.
First, with respect to the people of God or the elect still remaining in it, who are ordered to come out of her, even at the time of the destruction of Babylon (Rev. 18:4).
(2) With respect to external form or certain ruins of a scattered church, in which its traces are seen to this day, both with respect to the Word of God and the preaching of it (which, although corrupted, still remain in her); and with respect to the administration of the sacraments and especially of baptism, which is still preserved entire in her as to substance.
(3) With respect to Christian and evangelical truths concerning the one and triune God, Christ the God-man Mediator, his incarnation, death and resurrection and other heads of doctrine by which she is distinguished from assemblies of pagans and infidels.
-- Institutes, vol. 3, 18th Topic, Q. 14
III. The Church of Rome can be regarded under a twofold view: either as it is Christian, with regard to the profession of Christianity and of gospel truth which it retains; or papal, with regard to subjection to the pope, and corruptions and capital errors (in faith as well as in morals) which she has mingled with and built upon those truths besides and contrary to the Word of God.
We can speak of it in different ways. In the former respect, we do not deny that there is some truth in it; but in the latter (under which it is regarded here) we deny that it can be called Christian and apostolic, but Antichristian and apostate. In this sense, we confess that it can still improperly and relatively be called a Christian church in a threefold respect.
First, with respect to the people of God or the elect still remaining in it, who are ordered to come out of her, even at the time of the destruction of Babylon (Rev. 18:4).
(2) With respect to external form or certain ruins of a scattered church, in which its traces are seen to this day, both with respect to the Word of God and the preaching of it (which, although corrupted, still remain in her); and with respect to the administration of the sacraments and especially of baptism, which is still preserved entire in her as to substance.
(3) With respect to Christian and evangelical truths concerning the one and triune God, Christ the God-man Mediator, his incarnation, death and resurrection and other heads of doctrine by which she is distinguished from assemblies of pagans and infidels.
-- Institutes, vol. 3, 18th Topic, Q. 14
π6