Gentlemen, if you have ever uttered the words, "I need to vent," or some variation thereof, the Ministry of Masculinity officially revokes your man card. Please see me at the front desk to hand it over.
๐5๐3โก2
Baptism Is Our Common Battle-Flag:
Above all the narrow, meagre patriotism on earth is the large, free, ecumenical patriotism of those who embrace in their love and fealty the whole body of the baptized. All who are baptized into the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, recognizing the Trinity of Persons in the Godhead, the incarnation of the Son and his priestly sacrifice, whether they be Greeks, or Arminians, or Romanists, or Lutherans, or Calvinists, or the simple souls who do not know what to call themselves, are our brethren. Baptism is our common countersign. It is the common rallying standard at the head of our several columns. It is our common battle-flag, which we carry forward across the enemyโs line and nail aloft in the heights crowned with victory. We will be confined in our love and allegiance by no party lines. We follow and serve one common Lord. Hence there can be only โone Lord, one faith, one baptism,โ and hence only one indivisible, inalienable โsacramental host of Godโs elect.โ
โ A. A. Hodge, Baptism and Infant Baptism
Above all the narrow, meagre patriotism on earth is the large, free, ecumenical patriotism of those who embrace in their love and fealty the whole body of the baptized. All who are baptized into the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, recognizing the Trinity of Persons in the Godhead, the incarnation of the Son and his priestly sacrifice, whether they be Greeks, or Arminians, or Romanists, or Lutherans, or Calvinists, or the simple souls who do not know what to call themselves, are our brethren. Baptism is our common countersign. It is the common rallying standard at the head of our several columns. It is our common battle-flag, which we carry forward across the enemyโs line and nail aloft in the heights crowned with victory. We will be confined in our love and allegiance by no party lines. We follow and serve one common Lord. Hence there can be only โone Lord, one faith, one baptism,โ and hence only one indivisible, inalienable โsacramental host of Godโs elect.โ
โ A. A. Hodge, Baptism and Infant Baptism
๐6
Forwarded from ๐ฑ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฝ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฎ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฎ๐๐๐๐๐๐ (Andy Underhile)
In a world where people have experienced routine divorce, break-ups, countless meaningless hookups, and a billion ended friendships, saying "Christianity isn't a religion, it's a relationship" is a pretty bad marketing ploy.
๐14
What Are "the Last Days"? From Heb. 1...
Long ago, at many times and in many ways, God spoke to our fathers by the prophets, but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son...
The demonatrative pronoun confirms the author is referring to days in which he and his audience are living, in the late 60s A.D. Later in 8:13, he says, And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.
The ceremonial temple worship is what is obsolete, and as history confirms, did indeed vanish away just a few years later in 70 A.D. So therefore, the last days are the tail end of the Jewish eon, the Old Covenant age.
Long ago, at many times and in many ways, God spoke to our fathers by the prophets, but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son...
The demonatrative pronoun confirms the author is referring to days in which he and his audience are living, in the late 60s A.D. Later in 8:13, he says, And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.
The ceremonial temple worship is what is obsolete, and as history confirms, did indeed vanish away just a few years later in 70 A.D. So therefore, the last days are the tail end of the Jewish eon, the Old Covenant age.
๐4
There is a strange idea abroad that in every subject the ancient books should be read only by the professionals, and that the amateur should content himself with the modern books.... The student is half afraid to meet one of the great philosophers face to face. He feels himself inadequate and thinks he will not understand him. But if he only knew, the great man, just because of his greatness, is much more intelligible than his modern commentator. This mistaken preference for the modern books and this shyness of the old ones is nowhere more rampant than in theology.... This seems to me topsy-turvy.
-- C. S. Lewis, Introduction to On the Incarnation, by St. Athanasius
-- C. S. Lewis, Introduction to On the Incarnation, by St. Athanasius
๐5
In spite of tears and pain and death we believe that the God who made us all is infinitely wise and good. As Abraham staggered not at the promises of God through unbelief, but was strong in faith, giving the glory to God, and was fully persuaded that what He had promised He was able to perform, so do we base our hope in God alone and hope against hope till the day breaks. We rest in what God is. I believe that this alone is true faith. Any faith that must be supported by the evidence of the senses is not real faith. โJesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed.โ
The testimony of faith is that, no matter how things look in this fallen world, all Godโs acts are wrought in perfect wisdom. The incarnation of the Eternal Son in human flesh was one of Godโs mighty deeds, and we may be sure that this awesome deed was done with a perfection possible only to the Infinite. Without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh.
A.W Tozer - Knowledge of the Holy
The testimony of faith is that, no matter how things look in this fallen world, all Godโs acts are wrought in perfect wisdom. The incarnation of the Eternal Son in human flesh was one of Godโs mighty deeds, and we may be sure that this awesome deed was done with a perfection possible only to the Infinite. Without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh.
A.W Tozer - Knowledge of the Holy
โก5
The Narnia Code: If you've read and loved the Chronicles of Narnia, this talk by Lewis scholar Michael Ward will increase your appreciation. The basic thesis is that each book corresponds to one of the seven planets of the ancient cosmos. Fascinating talk.
https://youtu.be/h_beSe2cLQI?si=to4xcSwxJVjpsvG7
https://youtu.be/h_beSe2cLQI?si=to4xcSwxJVjpsvG7
YouTube
Planet Narnia | Dr. Michael Ward | Patrick Henry College
In addition to the Faith & Reason lecture on Lewis' classic "The Abolition of Man," Dr. Ward graciously delivered a lecture on his highly acclaimed book, "Planet Narnia," which argues that the interpretive key to the Narnia books is the seven planets of medievalโฆ
๐2
Fear Is a Species of Idolatry:
To sanctify the God of armies means to exalt his power highly; so as to remember that he holds the government of the world, and that the beginning and the end of good and evil actions are at his disposal. Hence it follows that, in some respects, God is robbed of his holiness, when we do not immediately betake ourselves to him in cases of perplexity.... no higher affront can be offered to God than to give way to fear, as if he were not exalted above all creatures, so as to control all events. On the other hand, when we rely on his aid, and, through victorious steadfastness of faith, despise dangers, then do we actually ascribe to him lawful government; for if we are not convinced that innumerable methods, though unknown to us, are in his power for our deliverance, we conceive of him as a dead idol.
-- John Calvin, Commentary on Isaiah [8:13]
To sanctify the God of armies means to exalt his power highly; so as to remember that he holds the government of the world, and that the beginning and the end of good and evil actions are at his disposal. Hence it follows that, in some respects, God is robbed of his holiness, when we do not immediately betake ourselves to him in cases of perplexity.... no higher affront can be offered to God than to give way to fear, as if he were not exalted above all creatures, so as to control all events. On the other hand, when we rely on his aid, and, through victorious steadfastness of faith, despise dangers, then do we actually ascribe to him lawful government; for if we are not convinced that innumerable methods, though unknown to us, are in his power for our deliverance, we conceive of him as a dead idol.
-- John Calvin, Commentary on Isaiah [8:13]
๐5
Forwarded from Revolt Against The Modern World
โDivorce takes all authority from the father, all dignity from the mother, all security from the child, and transforms domestic society into a struggle between strength and weakness; it constitutes the family as a temporary lease, where the inconstancy of the human heart stipulates its passions, and which ends where new passions begin.โ
~Louis de Bonald
~Louis de Bonald
๐9
The Vine and the Olive Tree:
These similar passages from John 15 and Romans 11, respectively, raise a dilemma: If we accept preservation of the saints, and yet the text depicts people being "cut out," what exactly are they being cut off from?
We must deny they are being cut off from decretal election and justification, yet John 15:1 says the vine they are cut off from is Christ. Therefore, they must have had a true relationship to Christ yet not true regeneration and salvation.
By comparing to Romans 11, we conclude the tree is the covenant of grace since it began with Jews and only later were Gentiles grafted in. So these are members of the covenant who have fallen away, as Paul also warns of in 1 Cor. 10 and Heb. 6 & 10.
These similar passages from John 15 and Romans 11, respectively, raise a dilemma: If we accept preservation of the saints, and yet the text depicts people being "cut out," what exactly are they being cut off from?
We must deny they are being cut off from decretal election and justification, yet John 15:1 says the vine they are cut off from is Christ. Therefore, they must have had a true relationship to Christ yet not true regeneration and salvation.
By comparing to Romans 11, we conclude the tree is the covenant of grace since it began with Jews and only later were Gentiles grafted in. So these are members of the covenant who have fallen away, as Paul also warns of in 1 Cor. 10 and Heb. 6 & 10.
๐3๐ค2
Infant baptism is the sixth point of Calvinism. Baptistbros are OUT! ๐คฃ
๐ฅ5๐3
Forwarded from Revolt Against The Modern World
โEurope's rise is written in the terms of Christianity and Monarchy; Europe's decay in the terms of Republicanism, Progressivism, and Godlessness."
~Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn
~Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn
๐ฅ5๐3
The New Covenant is better than the Old not in that it is substantively different; rather, by types and shadows it pointed to the same thing which the New delivers:
Redemption through Christ.
Redemption through Christ.
๐4
Young Earth Creationism is Logical:
1) A straightforward reading of Scripture yields a young earth position.
2) The only reason some attempt to invent an old earth interpretation is to comport with modern science.
3) Modern science is based on assumptions completely unprovable, such as that current natural laws have always functioned as currently observed.
4) Yet again, a straightforward reading of Scripture would lead us to the opposite conclusion. (A) Paul says that death came through sin (Rom. 5:12), but we cannot imagine how life, even at the cellular level, can exist without death. (B) He says all creation is groaning under the weight of sin Rom. 8:22); if man is now subject to age and death, why not creation as well? (C) Moses indicates it likely didn't rain before the flood (Gen. 2:5-6). (D) The lifespans recorded in Genesis are unimaginable to modern science (Gen. 5). (E) How a flood could cover the entire Earth with current water supply is inconceivable (Gen. 7).
5) The only logical conclusion is that modern science is founded on shaky assumptions, so attempting to appease it is ridiculous. Simple faith in God's Word is most logical.
1) A straightforward reading of Scripture yields a young earth position.
2) The only reason some attempt to invent an old earth interpretation is to comport with modern science.
3) Modern science is based on assumptions completely unprovable, such as that current natural laws have always functioned as currently observed.
4) Yet again, a straightforward reading of Scripture would lead us to the opposite conclusion. (A) Paul says that death came through sin (Rom. 5:12), but we cannot imagine how life, even at the cellular level, can exist without death. (B) He says all creation is groaning under the weight of sin Rom. 8:22); if man is now subject to age and death, why not creation as well? (C) Moses indicates it likely didn't rain before the flood (Gen. 2:5-6). (D) The lifespans recorded in Genesis are unimaginable to modern science (Gen. 5). (E) How a flood could cover the entire Earth with current water supply is inconceivable (Gen. 7).
5) The only logical conclusion is that modern science is founded on shaky assumptions, so attempting to appease it is ridiculous. Simple faith in God's Word is most logical.
๐14๐1
Kinism is a new name for an ancient belief:
Love and loyalty to one's blood relations as a central moral duty. Only in a depraved age where these creational basics are questioned do they need to be labelled and reiterated. As biblical support, see 1 Tim. 5:8, Romans 9:1-5, & the 5th Commandment.
Over against naked neighbor-hatred, Kinism affirms the imago Dei of all people, their right to live in their land, and their duty to love their people. Basically, true Kinism advocates Kinism for every tribe.
Love and loyalty to one's blood relations as a central moral duty. Only in a depraved age where these creational basics are questioned do they need to be labelled and reiterated. As biblical support, see 1 Tim. 5:8, Romans 9:1-5, & the 5th Commandment.
Over against naked neighbor-hatred, Kinism affirms the imago Dei of all people, their right to live in their land, and their duty to love their people. Basically, true Kinism advocates Kinism for every tribe.
๐9
Emperor Constantine (272 - 337 A.D.)
Born in modern-day Serbia to Helen, a devout Christian, and Constantius, a Roman tetrarch with Christian sympathies. Constantine was a genius military strategist who cut his teeth campaigning against barbarians on the Empire's northern frontiers. He succeeded his father as tetrarch, and was subsequently challenged by another tetrarch, Maxentius. Despite being outnumbered >2:1 and against all counsel, Constantine won a series of brilliant victories culminating at the Battle of the Milvian Bridge. Maxentius built a pontoon bridge allowing his army to escape if he lost. As the story goes, Constantine placed the Chi Rho symbol on his troops' shields in response to a dream, and during the battle, he saw the Chi Rho in the sky, followed by the words, "In Hoc Signo Vinces" or, "In this sign, conquer." That he did, and as Maxentius fled with his army, the bridge collapsed with Maxentius himself on it, drowning him. Constantine returned to Rome and did not sacrifice to Jupiter, but rather thanked the Christian God. Following this, he consolidated power, made a peace pact in 313 with the Eastern emperor Licinius, which included the famous Edict of Milan, legalizing Christianity and returning property stolen by Diocletian. Eventually, Licinius broke this pact and Constantine, especially in response to the Christian outcry, faced Licinius and easily defeated him. He moved the capital to Constantinople, and from there called the Council of Nicaea in 325 to settle the Arian controversy. There, he bowed to the elders who still bore injuries and scars from Diocletianโs persecution. He was baptized shortly before death by his friend, the Christian historian Eusebius.
Born in modern-day Serbia to Helen, a devout Christian, and Constantius, a Roman tetrarch with Christian sympathies. Constantine was a genius military strategist who cut his teeth campaigning against barbarians on the Empire's northern frontiers. He succeeded his father as tetrarch, and was subsequently challenged by another tetrarch, Maxentius. Despite being outnumbered >2:1 and against all counsel, Constantine won a series of brilliant victories culminating at the Battle of the Milvian Bridge. Maxentius built a pontoon bridge allowing his army to escape if he lost. As the story goes, Constantine placed the Chi Rho symbol on his troops' shields in response to a dream, and during the battle, he saw the Chi Rho in the sky, followed by the words, "In Hoc Signo Vinces" or, "In this sign, conquer." That he did, and as Maxentius fled with his army, the bridge collapsed with Maxentius himself on it, drowning him. Constantine returned to Rome and did not sacrifice to Jupiter, but rather thanked the Christian God. Following this, he consolidated power, made a peace pact in 313 with the Eastern emperor Licinius, which included the famous Edict of Milan, legalizing Christianity and returning property stolen by Diocletian. Eventually, Licinius broke this pact and Constantine, especially in response to the Christian outcry, faced Licinius and easily defeated him. He moved the capital to Constantinople, and from there called the Council of Nicaea in 325 to settle the Arian controversy. There, he bowed to the elders who still bore injuries and scars from Diocletianโs persecution. He was baptized shortly before death by his friend, the Christian historian Eusebius.
๐2
Constantine was... (And if you say he was an unbeliever, please explain why he would fake-convert to an unpopular religion)
Anonymous Poll
31%
A genuine Christian who ruled well
65%
A genuine Christian but a mixed bag
3%
An unbeliever but still a net positive
2%
An unbeliever and a poor ruler
๐1
Medieval Angelic Classifications:
Seraphim (Is. 6:1-7, cf. Num. 21:4-9)
Cherubim (Ezek. 10, cf. Gen. 3:24, Ex. 25:20)
Thrones (aka Ophanim, Ezek. 1:15-21, cf. Ezek. 10 & Col. 1:16)
Dominions (aka Kuriotes, Eph. 1:21, Col. 1:16, cf. Jude 1:8)
Virtues (aka Dumanis, 1 Cor. 15:24, Eph. 1:21, 2 Thess. 1:7, 1 Pet. 3:22, cf. 2 Thess. 2:9)
Powers (aka Exousia, 1 Cor. 15:24, Eph. 1:21, 3:10, 6:12, Col. 1:16, 2:10, 2:15, 1 Pet. 3:22).
Principalities (aka Arche, Rom. 8:38, 1 Cor. 15:24, Eph. 1:21, 3:10, 6:12, Col. 1:16, 2:10, 2:15)
Archangels (1 Thess. 4:16: Jude 1:9)
Angels (Matt. 18:10, cf. Heb. 1)
Seraphim (Is. 6:1-7, cf. Num. 21:4-9)
Cherubim (Ezek. 10, cf. Gen. 3:24, Ex. 25:20)
Thrones (aka Ophanim, Ezek. 1:15-21, cf. Ezek. 10 & Col. 1:16)
Dominions (aka Kuriotes, Eph. 1:21, Col. 1:16, cf. Jude 1:8)
Virtues (aka Dumanis, 1 Cor. 15:24, Eph. 1:21, 2 Thess. 1:7, 1 Pet. 3:22, cf. 2 Thess. 2:9)
Powers (aka Exousia, 1 Cor. 15:24, Eph. 1:21, 3:10, 6:12, Col. 1:16, 2:10, 2:15, 1 Pet. 3:22).
Principalities (aka Arche, Rom. 8:38, 1 Cor. 15:24, Eph. 1:21, 3:10, 6:12, Col. 1:16, 2:10, 2:15)
Archangels (1 Thess. 4:16: Jude 1:9)
Angels (Matt. 18:10, cf. Heb. 1)
๐5
Regarding the angelic classifications, it is your view that.... (Please discuss)
Anonymous Poll
19%
These are definitely 9 distinct angelic classes
49%
Some of these are synonyms; there are classes but not necessarily the classical 9
16%
There are no angelic classes
16%
There are definitely 9 angelic classes AND most if not all of the medieval descriptions are true