This is your election season reminder that Christ is King, His word is law, and anyone who refuses to obey Him rules illegitimately.
β‘15
Forwarded from The Very Lutheran Project
You should still vote, don't get me wrong. I'm voting for Trump myself. Nonetheless, apocalyptic projections and insane stakesmanship over this election is only going to contribute to you feeling powerless and stupid.
-Voting is not a replacement for irl community building.
-Voting is not a replacement for having your life together.
-Voting doesn't fix your problems.
All it does is help determine down the line how easy or difficult some of that is going to be on your end. Take control of your life, relying on God to set things in order.
-Voting is not a replacement for irl community building.
-Voting is not a replacement for having your life together.
-Voting doesn't fix your problems.
All it does is help determine down the line how easy or difficult some of that is going to be on your end. Take control of your life, relying on God to set things in order.
β‘9
And baptism is sufficient and effectual for the whole life of man; yes, and it reaches and is referred to all the sins of all those who are baptized. For the promise of God is true. The seal of the promise is true, not deceivable. The power of Christ is ever effectual to thoroughly cleanse and wash away all the sins of those who are his. However often we have sinned in our lifetime, let us call to remembrance the mystery of holy baptism, with which we are washed for the whole course of our life, that we might know and not doubt that our sins are forgiven by the same God and our Lord. Yes, and forgiven by the blood of Christ, into whom we are grafted once by baptism, that he might always work salvation in us, till we are received out of misery into glory.
-- Heinrich Bullinger, Decades, 5.8
-- Heinrich Bullinger, Decades, 5.8
π₯6π3
DIVISION OF THEOLOGY INTO FOUR GREAT DEPARTMENTS
The usual treatment of Theology distinguishes four departments, which are named Exegetical Theology, Historical Theology, Systematic Theology and Practical Theology.
The point to be observed for our present purpose is the position given Exegetical Theology as the first among these four. This precedence is due to the instinctive recognition that at the beginning of all Theology lies a passive, receptive attitude on the part of the one who engages in its study.
The assumption of such an attitude is characteristic of all truly exegetical pursuit. It is eminently a process in which God speaks and man listens. Exegetical Theology, however, should not be regarded as confined to Exegesis.
The former is a larger whole of which the latter is indeed an important part, but after all only a part. Exegetical Theology in the wider sense comprises the following disciplines:
(a) the study of the actual content of Holy Scripture;
(b) the inquiry into the origin of the several Biblical writings, including the identity of the writers, the time and occasion of composition, dependence on possible sources, etc. This is called Introduction, and may be regarded as a further carrying out of the process of Exegesis proper;
(c) the putting of the question of how these several writings came to be collected into the unity of a Bible or book; this part of the process bears the technical name of Canonics;
(d) the study of the actual self-disclosures of God in time and space which lie back of even the first committal to writing of any Biblical document, and which for a long time continued to run alongside of the inscripturation of revealed material; this last-named procedure is called the study of Biblical Theology.
The order in which the four steps are here named is, of course, the order in which they present themselves successively to the investigating mind of man. When looking at the process from the point of view of the divine activity the order requires to be reversed, the sequence here being
(a) the divine self-revelation;
(b) the committal to writing of the revelation-product;
(c) the gathering of the several writings thus produced into the unity of a collection;
(d) the production and guidance of the study of the content of the Biblical writings.
The usual treatment of Theology distinguishes four departments, which are named Exegetical Theology, Historical Theology, Systematic Theology and Practical Theology.
The point to be observed for our present purpose is the position given Exegetical Theology as the first among these four. This precedence is due to the instinctive recognition that at the beginning of all Theology lies a passive, receptive attitude on the part of the one who engages in its study.
The assumption of such an attitude is characteristic of all truly exegetical pursuit. It is eminently a process in which God speaks and man listens. Exegetical Theology, however, should not be regarded as confined to Exegesis.
The former is a larger whole of which the latter is indeed an important part, but after all only a part. Exegetical Theology in the wider sense comprises the following disciplines:
(a) the study of the actual content of Holy Scripture;
(b) the inquiry into the origin of the several Biblical writings, including the identity of the writers, the time and occasion of composition, dependence on possible sources, etc. This is called Introduction, and may be regarded as a further carrying out of the process of Exegesis proper;
(c) the putting of the question of how these several writings came to be collected into the unity of a Bible or book; this part of the process bears the technical name of Canonics;
(d) the study of the actual self-disclosures of God in time and space which lie back of even the first committal to writing of any Biblical document, and which for a long time continued to run alongside of the inscripturation of revealed material; this last-named procedure is called the study of Biblical Theology.
The order in which the four steps are here named is, of course, the order in which they present themselves successively to the investigating mind of man. When looking at the process from the point of view of the divine activity the order requires to be reversed, the sequence here being
(a) the divine self-revelation;
(b) the committal to writing of the revelation-product;
(c) the gathering of the several writings thus produced into the unity of a collection;
(d) the production and guidance of the study of the content of the Biblical writings.
π4
This would be better structured as a simple 10k credit, but as it is, Trump is proposing to allow families to contribute 10k a year to a (sort of) tax-exempt account to cover homeschool costs. So really the benefit is 10k x your marginal rate. Still pretty based.
https://www.infowars.com/posts/trump-pledges-to-grant-homeschoolers-a-10000-per-child-tax-write-off
https://www.infowars.com/posts/trump-pledges-to-grant-homeschoolers-a-10000-per-child-tax-write-off
Infowars
Trump Pledges to Grant Homeschoolers a $10,000 Per-Child Tax Write-Off
"To every homeschool family, I will be your champion. Do not vote Democrat, they are looking to destroy you," Trump said.
π3π₯1
I made this observation 2 years ago after the midterms. Let's see if it's true. Praying not.
https://t.me/protestantpost/558
https://t.me/protestantpost/558
Telegram
Protestant Post
For the past two years, America has been governed by the most incompetent and unpopular administration in living memory. That the midterms were not an absolute wipeout tells us either...
a) Election fraud is occurring on such an industrial scale that votingβ¦
a) Election fraud is occurring on such an industrial scale that votingβ¦
π3
Brothers, make sure you show up to vote on abortion ballot measures if there are any in your state. Regardless of what you do at the top of the ticket (though I'd encourage a Trump vote).
π12
Get on the record and drop your predictions in the comments:
Mine is Harris wins, odds 75/25. If Trump wins, it'll be because he flips VA or MN -- states they didn't think would need "fortifying." He will lose PA, MI, and WI like last time, though I expect GA and AZ to flip.
Edit: I'm praying for Trump to win and either way, Christ is King and we will win in the end. No blackpilling allowed.
Mine is Harris wins, odds 75/25. If Trump wins, it'll be because he flips VA or MN -- states they didn't think would need "fortifying." He will lose PA, MI, and WI like last time, though I expect GA and AZ to flip.
Edit: I'm praying for Trump to win and either way, Christ is King and we will win in the end. No blackpilling allowed.
π3
It is, then, fundamentally necessary and wholesome for Christians to know that God foreknows nothing contingently, but that he foresees, purposes, and does all things according to his own immutable, eternal, and infallible willβ¦ For the Christianβs chief and only comfort in adversity lies in knowing that God does not lie, but brings all things to pass immutably, and that his will cannot be resisted, altered, or impeded.
β Martin Luther, The Bondage of the Will
β Martin Luther, The Bondage of the Will
π₯9π1
Great sermon on baptism by Rev. Rich Lusk on Acts 2:38.
https://youtu.be/x-jMPqTk5tE?si=nvWVCzlPIRF1PZ2w
https://youtu.be/x-jMPqTk5tE?si=nvWVCzlPIRF1PZ2w
YouTube
The Gospel in Water: Baptism, Union with Christ, and Salvation
The Gospel in Water: Baptism, Union with Christ, and Salvation
(Acts 2:37-41)
by: Pastor Rich Lusk
(Acts 2:37-41)
by: Pastor Rich Lusk
π4π₯1
Baptism first is a sacrament of the new covenant wherewith... they, which truly do belong unto the covenant as being now incorporated into Christ are sealed by Him (Act. 19:5), that they should be no longer their own men, but His (1Co. 6:19), by whom they are called into the society of the covenant, and consequently into one body with Him and all the saints, and into participation of all spiritual and heavenly good things (Eph. 1:12); and are cleansed by this baptism (Eph. 5:26), as the water of regeneration, from all their sins, by virtue of Christ's blood (Tit. 3:5); and buried into the death with Christ, that as He rose from death by the favor of the Father, so we should walk in newness of life (Rom. 6:4). Whereupon it hath been usually called the sacrament of repentance for the remission of sins (Mar. 1:4), the sacrament of faith, the seal of the covenant, the water of regeneration, the washing away of sins, the sacrament of new life.
-- Jerome Zanchi, Confession of the Christian Religion, Ch. 15
-- Jerome Zanchi, Confession of the Christian Religion, Ch. 15
π₯8π1
That Baptism does not only signify, but really and truly seal and convey, grace to those to whom it belongs according to the covenant -- that is, to the elect.... This efficacy does result... From the personal presence and sovereignly gracious operation of the Holy Spirit, who uses the sacrament as his instrument and medium. Through these channels the grace signified is really
conveyed to the persons to whom, according to the divine counsel, it truly belongs.
-- A.A. Hodge, Commentary on the Westminster Confesssion [28.6]
conveyed to the persons to whom, according to the divine counsel, it truly belongs.
-- A.A. Hodge, Commentary on the Westminster Confesssion [28.6]
π₯9
DEFINITION OF BIBLICAL THEOLOGY
Biblical Theology is that branch of Exegetical Theology which deals with the process of the self-revelation of God deposited in the Bible. In the above definition the term βrevelationβ is taken as a noun of action. Biblical Theology deals with revelation as a divine activity, not as the finished product of that activity. Its nature and method of procedure will therefore naturally have to keep in close touch with, and so far as possible reproduce, the features of the divine work itself.
The main features of the latter are the following:
1. The historic progressiveness of the revelation-process It has not completed itself in one exhaustive act, but unfolded itself in a long series of successive acts. In the abstract, it might conceivably have been otherwise. But as a matter of fact this could not be, because revelation does not stand alone by itself, but is (so far as Special Revelation is concerned) inseparably attached to another activity of God, which we call Redemption.
Now redemption could not be otherwise than historically successive, because it addresses itself to the generations of mankind coming into existence in the course of history. Revelation is the interpretation of redemption; it must, therefore, unfold itself in instalments as redemption does.
And yet it is also obvious that the two processes are not entirely co-extensive, for revelation comes to a close at a point where redemption still continues.
In order to understand this, we must take into account an important distinction within the sphere of redemption itself. Redemption is partly objective and central, partly subjective and individual. By the former we designate those redeeming acts of God, which take place on behalf of, but outside of, the human person. By the latter we designate those acts of God which enter into the human subject. We call the objective acts central, because, happening in the centre of the circle of redemption, they concern all alike, and are not in need of, or capable of, repetition. Such objective-central acts are the incarnation, the atonement, the resurrection of Christ.
The acts in the subjective sphere are called individual, because they are repeated in each individual separately. Such subjective-individual acts are regeneration, justification, conversion, sanctification, glorification. Now revelation accompanies the process of objective-central redemption only, and this explains why redemption extends further than revelation. To insist upon its accompanying subjective-individual redemption would imply that it dealt with questions of private, personal concern, instead of with the common concerns of the world of redemption collectively. Still this does not mean that the believer cannot, for his subjective experience, receive enlightenment from the source of revelation in the Bible, for we must remember that continually, alongside the objective process, there was going on the work of subjective application, and that much of this is reflected in the Scriptures. Subjective-individual redemption did not first begin when objective-central redemption ceased; it existed alongside of it from the beginning. There lies only one epoch in the future when we may expect objective-central redemption to be resumed, viz., at the Second Coming of Christ. At that time there will take place great redemptive acts concerning the world and the people of God collectively. These will add to the volume of truth which we now possess.
Biblical Theology is that branch of Exegetical Theology which deals with the process of the self-revelation of God deposited in the Bible. In the above definition the term βrevelationβ is taken as a noun of action. Biblical Theology deals with revelation as a divine activity, not as the finished product of that activity. Its nature and method of procedure will therefore naturally have to keep in close touch with, and so far as possible reproduce, the features of the divine work itself.
The main features of the latter are the following:
1. The historic progressiveness of the revelation-process It has not completed itself in one exhaustive act, but unfolded itself in a long series of successive acts. In the abstract, it might conceivably have been otherwise. But as a matter of fact this could not be, because revelation does not stand alone by itself, but is (so far as Special Revelation is concerned) inseparably attached to another activity of God, which we call Redemption.
Now redemption could not be otherwise than historically successive, because it addresses itself to the generations of mankind coming into existence in the course of history. Revelation is the interpretation of redemption; it must, therefore, unfold itself in instalments as redemption does.
And yet it is also obvious that the two processes are not entirely co-extensive, for revelation comes to a close at a point where redemption still continues.
In order to understand this, we must take into account an important distinction within the sphere of redemption itself. Redemption is partly objective and central, partly subjective and individual. By the former we designate those redeeming acts of God, which take place on behalf of, but outside of, the human person. By the latter we designate those acts of God which enter into the human subject. We call the objective acts central, because, happening in the centre of the circle of redemption, they concern all alike, and are not in need of, or capable of, repetition. Such objective-central acts are the incarnation, the atonement, the resurrection of Christ.
The acts in the subjective sphere are called individual, because they are repeated in each individual separately. Such subjective-individual acts are regeneration, justification, conversion, sanctification, glorification. Now revelation accompanies the process of objective-central redemption only, and this explains why redemption extends further than revelation. To insist upon its accompanying subjective-individual redemption would imply that it dealt with questions of private, personal concern, instead of with the common concerns of the world of redemption collectively. Still this does not mean that the believer cannot, for his subjective experience, receive enlightenment from the source of revelation in the Bible, for we must remember that continually, alongside the objective process, there was going on the work of subjective application, and that much of this is reflected in the Scriptures. Subjective-individual redemption did not first begin when objective-central redemption ceased; it existed alongside of it from the beginning. There lies only one epoch in the future when we may expect objective-central redemption to be resumed, viz., at the Second Coming of Christ. At that time there will take place great redemptive acts concerning the world and the people of God collectively. These will add to the volume of truth which we now possess.
π3π₯1
Here it is said, "Ye that are baptized in to Christ, put on Christ." The reason of this speech is threefold. (1) The washing of the body with water is an outward sign to represent to our eyes and mind the inward washing and our union or conjunction with Christ. Therefore, they that are baptized are said "to put on Christ." (2) Because the washing by water seals unto us our inward engrafting into Christ. For as certainly as the body is washed with water, so certainly are they that believe engrafted into Christ. (3) Because baptism is after a sort an instrument whereby our insition into Christ and fellowship with Him is effected. For in the right and lawful use of baptism, God according to His own promise engrafts them into Christ that believe. And the inward washing is conferred with the outward washing. For these causes, they that are washed with water in baptism are said "to put on Christ."
-- William Perkins, Commentary on Galatians
-- William Perkins, Commentary on Galatians
π6π1