This is how it feels now having this docker container running in your VM where you are admin
π2
Daily
Not bad problem. The thing is that bruteforce will work as the constraint is 10^6.
https://leetcode.com/problems/next-greater-numerically-balanced-number/description/?envType=daily-question&envId=2025-10-24
#daily #medium
Not bad problem. The thing is that bruteforce will work as the constraint is 10^6.
https://leetcode.com/problems/next-greater-numerically-balanced-number/description/?envType=daily-question&envId=2025-10-24
#daily #medium
π1
Situation:
I'm onboarding one client to our service, there are bunch of rollouts that "enable" client on our side, and after that we need to ask them to test it with test users.
The engineer (lets say engX) responsible for that is on vacation for 1 week already, and engX will be on vacation for 1 more week. However we got a "gentle push" to prioritize the onboarding from them.
Now what happens, that we did rollout on our side and I'm pinging the engineer that is OOF (ofc engX does not reply), then my mngr tells me to ping engX's manager. I'm pinging engX's manager, and in about 1 hour I'm getting reply with test performed, results, etc.
I'm onboarding one client to our service, there are bunch of rollouts that "enable" client on our side, and after that we need to ask them to test it with test users.
The engineer (lets say engX) responsible for that is on vacation for 1 week already, and engX will be on vacation for 1 more week. However we got a "gentle push" to prioritize the onboarding from them.
Now what happens, that we did rollout on our side and I'm pinging the engineer that is OOF (ofc engX does not reply), then my mngr tells me to ping engX's manager. I'm pinging engX's manager, and in about 1 hour I'm getting reply with test performed, results, etc.
andreyka26_se
Situation: I'm onboarding one client to our service, there are bunch of rollouts that "enable" client on our side, and after that we need to ask them to test it with test users. The engineer (lets say engX) responsible for that is on vacation for 1 weekβ¦
Now, question, guess the country of engineer engX and the manager?))))))))))))))))
Actually it is HUGE difference between EMEA FAANG and USA FAANG. These guys in US are crazy as fuck, stressed, pushy etc. And I understand, you can looselose your job in 1 week cmon
I would be beaten by my manager if I work during my vacation
I would be beaten by my manager if I work during my vacation
π5
Daily
Easy one, to remember arithmetic progression, but if you don't want to bruteforce will work as well
https://leetcode.com/problems/calculate-money-in-leetcode-bank/description/?envType=daily-question&envId=2025-10-25
#daily #easy
Easy one, to remember arithmetic progression, but if you don't want to bruteforce will work as well
https://leetcode.com/problems/calculate-money-in-leetcode-bank/description/?envType=daily-question&envId=2025-10-25
#daily #easy
andreyka26_se
Distributed systems, Tanenbaum. Pretty similar to consistent hashing, but without a coordinator
Something that is called chord, and it has very interesting way of finding the right node (that has your key)
You have pointers to adjacent nodes (neighbours) + finger table, that is very unclear, but in the nutshell it has exponential βpointersβ where the data is. You can chatgpt it.
You have pointers to adjacent nodes (neighbours) + finger table, that is very unclear, but in the nutshell it has exponential βpointersβ where the data is. You can chatgpt it.
π2
andreyka26_se
Something that is called chord, and it has very interesting way of finding the right node (that has your key) You have pointers to adjacent nodes (neighbours) + finger table, that is very unclear, but in the nutshell it has exponential βpointersβ where theβ¦
I am wondering is it much worse than consistent/rendezvous hashing or not. Cause rendezvous does not beed coordinator in theory, as well as consistent
π2
Daily
OMG, absolutely love it. This amazing feeling to implement something close to real world.
Not sure how come this is medium, typically, the concurrency knowledge is something that is getting checked in "bank" related algo/oop questions, but in leetcode it is not.
https://leetcode.com/problems/simple-bank-system/description/?envType=daily-question&envId=2025-10-26
#daily #medium
OMG, absolutely love it. This amazing feeling to implement something close to real world.
Not sure how come this is medium, typically, the concurrency knowledge is something that is getting checked in "bank" related algo/oop questions, but in leetcode it is not.
https://leetcode.com/problems/simple-bank-system/description/?envType=daily-question&envId=2025-10-26
#daily #medium
β€1π₯1
andreyka26_se
Daily OMG, absolutely love it. This amazing feeling to implement something close to real world. Not sure how come this is medium, typically, the concurrency knowledge is something that is getting checked in "bank" related algo/oop questions, but in leetcodeβ¦
By the way, do you know why it won't work in concurrent world, e.g. 2 transfers at the same time {acc1 => acc2} and {acc1 => acc3)?
How would you handle it? Let's now even abstract it from database, let's say this is only in memory
How would you handle it? Let's now even abstract it from database, let's say this is only in memory
andreyka26_se
https://youtube.com/shorts/uHl3aC7J3a0?si=MWLKa3_5NMZXW3fo
Pls support with likeβ€οΈ
β€6π5