Charging

started

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEhrYLC1rhQ&ab_channel=andreyka26_se

https://www.twitch.tv/andreyka26_

Now implementing system design solution for rate limiter in .NET

Whoever was in the stream once. I would appreciate any feedback especially negative. Maybe you would like to see some other way, cause Im trying to explain pretty deep so 99% of people would understand the concept we are doing. Another thing, maybe topic that we are doing: leetcode and system design is not that important/ exciting? Let me know yeah. But I need to hear from u.

Yeah, hate it. And in the end, if real primary needs your help during the incident - he can request assistance and you are going to be woken up as well and fix shit

Be careful with signing ur contract😁

mood

Now, try find the bug/problem in this code that was about to be merged :)

I will help. For the HandleWriteErrorIfNoReplicasAsync actually we don't need Task there. It is different nit comment 😁😁

Assume this is your setup. This change can be considered as refactoring, I don't see intention of behavior change, but there is very huge behavior change that will break the latter execution of the code

The problem with this change is that await does not propagate return statement from the called method. So in case there is zero clients, it will not return from the method and continue code execution below, and we will get exception cause we assume clients are not empty in subsequent lines.


So to make it work, we either need to check the response from HandleWriteErrorIfNoReplicasAsync, or throw exception there and handle it outside.

We are doing Repair On Read implementation. This is one of the Replication strategies to guarantee resiliency and reliability of the storages.
The idea is that client is responsible for handling conflicts and propagate the changes. We need only "no data loss" guarantee, which is also a bit relaxed.

Any way. We have meetings weekly, and the most skilled people (except me) were assigned to make it happen: level 67, our one principal/architect, level 65, our principal, 64, our senior and me 62.

Yesterday I had the funniest moment ever, we were all in meeting room, sharing the screen on big meet room screen, and discussing, PRs, next steps, architecture, problems, etc.

At one point conversation somehow moved to "what should be the best/better" naming to some variable that represents bag of timestamps of different events that happened to some object.

Imagine: 2 principals, senior and me discussing variable name for like 15-20 mins. It was epic and high level discussion😁

this pretty much confirms "the hardest thing in software engineering is naming"