🚨 BREAKING: Health Sec. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Dr. Oz just told every single hospital in America to use REAL FOOD aligned with new HHS guidelines, if they want to keep getting Medicare and Medicaid funds

MAHA WIN! 🇺🇸

"Dr. Oz sent out a health and safety notice to every hospital in this country at 11 o'clock this morning, asking them now to align their food purchases with the dietary guidelines in order to enjoy continued eligibility for Medicaid and Medicare payments."

"We're going to bring all the hospitals in the country in line with good food, and this is not something that we need to force hospitals to do. They want it."

"We have talked with them. They need the incentive, and this is going to help them with their procurement companies, the fact that it's now essentially a federal mandate."

I never understood why the Dems started these “No Kings” protests. Trump has not done anything that could be considered authoritarian or tyrannical.

But it just hit me.

I don’t think it’s for anything he’s done yet. I think it’s for something the Dems know he is GOING to do.

I think the Dems know Trump is going to use the full array of powers as POTUS, and they are preemptively establishing a narrative that Trump is a “King”, so when the time comes for Trump to go the Executive route, the Dems have already planted the idea in the public’s minds that Trump is a tyrant.

This fits the Dems’ modus operandi. They preemptively establish narratives and get in front of things they know are coming. The Dems have been the most accurate indicators of what is to come, by what they squeal about most.

I think they know Trump is going to do something substantial, and this is their desperate attempt to capture public opinion and mobilize mass protests/riots when Trump makes his big move.

Response to all the democrats about Trump’s EO being unlawful, i.e., violating state’s rights. Posted yesterday on X.

The Elections Clause gives states the initial role to set time, place and manner, but expressly authorizes Congress to enact nationwide rules for federal elections (House and Senate races), including voter registration, list maintenance, fraud prevention, and ballot procedures.

The Supreme Court has interpreted “manner” broadly to include “notices, registration, supervision of voting, protection of voters, prevention of fraud and corrupt practices,” etc.

The Help America Vote Act imposes mandatory minimum federal standards on states (e.g., statewide computerized voter registration lists, provisional ballots, and election administration improvements) and provides federal grants (“requirements payments”) explicitly conditioned on compliance. States must submit plans showing how they meet these standards to receive funding.

The National Voter Registration was also enacted under the Elections Clause. It mandates that states maintain accurate voter rolls (“list maintenance”), offer registration at certain agencies, and accept a federal mail-registration form. Courts have upheld NVRA provisions as valid under the Elections Clause precisely because they target voter eligibility verification and roll accuracy.

Trump’s EO explicitly cites both HAVA and NVRA as authority. It does not create new substantive rules from scratch; it directs federal agencies to implement and enhance existing federal statutory requirements using federal databases (SSA records, DHS’s SAVE program).

Moreover, Congress’s power under Article I, Section 8 to tax and spend for the general welfare includes the ability to attach conditions to federal grants to states. This is classic conditional spending, upheld in South Dakota v. Dole (1987): conditions must be unambiguous, related to the federal interest (here, integrity of federal elections), and not coercive.

- HAVA already does exactly this—grants are withheld or conditioned on states meeting federal election-administration standards.

- The EO (Section 5) authorizes withholding “federal funds from noncompliant states/localities where authorized by law.” This is not a new commandeering of state legislatures; states can decline the funds (and the attached conditions) if they wish. Precedent confirms Congress (and the executive administering congressional appropriations) can use the purse to encourage compliance without directly dictating state election codes.

Finally, Trump’s EO’s core mechanisms operate through federal entities like the post office, not state legislatures:

- USPS rulemaking directs the Postmaster General to require barcoded, trackable “Official Election Mail” envelopes and to transmit ballots only to voters on the federal/state-verified Mail-In/Absentee Participation Lists. USPS is a federal agency; the President may direct its operations via executive order. States are not forced to change their own mailing processes—they simply cannot use federal postal service for non-compliant ballots if they want the service.

This avoids the anti-commandeering doctrine (Printz v. United States, 1997), which prohibits the federal government from forcing state officials to enforce federal law. Here, the federal government is regulating its own property (mail) and funds.

Once Congress has acted (via HAVA/NVRA), federal requirements preempt conflicting state practices for federal elections.

The democrats are toast.

Join 👉 @professorsrecord

More thoughts on Trump's EO.

At first blush, I thought it was rather benign. That may be its greatest strength. The Youngstown Steel case, which is the definitive case on war powers, holds that the President's powers are at their "zenith" when he works in tandem with Congress. And that's what this EO does. It takes existing law, some of it 20 years old, and shoves it down the throats of all the democrat lawyers.

While Trump still has the "Trump card" through his plenary authority under Article II to do way more, the restraint of this EO is like pitching the Supreme Court a soft ball, where they affirm long held legal standards.

Much like the recent tariffs decision, where the Court struck down one provision, only to affirm several other routes for tariffs, with the President and Scott Bessent declaring victory by hiding their "real" power, I think a challenge to this EO may do the same.

It invokes Article II’s command that the President “shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” It frames non-citizen voting and unsecured mail-in ballots as violations of federal criminal statutes (18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 611, 1015; 52 U.S.C. §§ 20511, etc.).

The federal government has a direct duty to prevent dilution of the citizen vote through fraud or ineligible participation. Directing agencies (DHS, SSA, USPS, DOJ) to share verified citizenship data and secure postal transmission of ballots is faithful execution of existing prohibitions on non-citizen voting, not new legislation.

Courts have recognized broad presidential discretion in directing executive-branch enforcement priorities, especially for national interests like election integrity. Providing states with federal databases (SSA records + DHS SAVE) assists compliance with NVRA/HAVA list-maintenance requirements without commandeering state officials.

This is narrower than earlier 2025 attempts to rewrite registration forms, which faced injunctions; the 2026 EO focuses more on data-sharing and USPS operations.

Also consider the Guarantee Clause (Art. IV, §4): The EO cites the federal obligation to guarantee every state “a Republican Form of Government.” I would argue that widespread non-citizen voting or unverifiable mail-in processes undermines the republican character of elections by allowing ineligible votes to dilute lawful ones. This provides a constitutional hook for federal intervention to protect the integrity of the electoral process itself, beyond routine “manner” regulations.

In short, federal databases already exist for citizenship verification; the EO systematizes their use to fulfill HAVA/NVRA accuracy mandates.

The irony of course is that the swamp used these systems to inflate numbers and commit massive fraud.

Now their toys are being used against them.

Join 👉 @professorsrecord

"On Easter Sunday, the stone was rolled away and the grave was empty... It was a miracle in all of history — the resurrection of Jesus Christ," says POTUS.

"With Christ, not one thing can separate humanity from the power of God's everlasting love."
🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork
📎 X  (Twitter)▪️Truth Social

Will be on in a few minutes. Will talk Tina Peters, Trump’s EO, and Bondi resignation.

https://rumble.com/v77z8v2-absolute-storm-ep-199-4226-6pm-est.html

Join 👉 @professorsrecord

He is Risen.
Ep. 24 is up.
Confusion has never been greater in MAGA.
Death, Resurrection, and the Arena: Why I Still Stand With Donald J. Trump https://professordavidclements.substack.com/p/death-resurrection-and-the-arena

Join 👉 @professorsrecord

Fake MAGA is turning on Trump. Here's four reasons I won't.

Watch the full episode here: https://professordavidclements.substack.com/p/death-resurrection-and-the-arena

Join 👉 @professorsrecord

Making sense of Trump's Cabinet Turnover, Bongino Giving Cover for J6 Pipe Bomb Suspect, Etc.

Watch full episode here: https://professordavidclements.substack.com/p/death-resurrection-and-the-arena

Join 👉 @professorsrecord

Pretty amazing @ SteveBakerUSA found this even after FBI altered surveillance video of the pipe bomber. Does not look like Brian Cole Jr.!

https://www.veritasregnat.com/2026/04/06/previously-unreleased-video-contradicts-contention-onetime-pipe-bomb-suspect-did-not-have-a-limp/ https://x.com/realLizUSA/status/2041543811264921778/video/1

@LizHarrington76

Keep Your Friends Close and Enemies Closer. Look Deeper.

Watch the full episode here: https://professordavidclements.substack.com/p/death-resurrection-and-the-arena

Join 👉 @professorsrecord

Death and Resurrection. Whoever loses their life will find it.

Watch the full episode here: https://professordavidclements.substack.com/p/death-resurrection-and-the-arena

Join 👉 @professorsrecord

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMyE8_rwVco

Join 👉 @professorsrecord

Author: Shanaka Perara Link

Seven sentences. Five audiences. Every word is a weapon aimed at a different target. This is the most compressed piece of strategic signaling in the history of social media diplomacy.

On April 15, Trump posted: “China is very happy that I am permanently opening the Strait of Hormuz. I am doing it for them, also - And the World. This situation will never happen again. They have agreed not to send weapons to Iran. President Xi will give me a big, fat, hug when I get there in a few weeks. We are working together smartly, and very well! Doesn’t that beat fighting??? BUT REMEMBER, we are very good at fighting, if we have to - far better than anyone else!!!”

Decode every sentence.

“I am permanently opening the Strait of Hormuz.” The blockade is not a blockade. It is a service. Trump reframes the entire operation from aggression to provision. The navy enforcing interdiction is now the navy “opening” the strait. And “permanently” signals to oil markets, Asian importers, and Iran that the US intends to remain the guarantor of Hormuz transit indefinitely. Not as leverage. As architecture.

“I am doing it for them, also - And the World.” China imports over 50 percent of its energy through Hormuz. Trump positions the blockade as a gift to Beijing. The country whose Iranian oil he just cut off is now the beneficiary. Bessent said hours earlier: “They can get oil. Not Iranian oil.” Trump completes the sentence: and I am the one making sure they can.

“This situation will never happen again.” A doctrine in five words. The Hormuz crisis, Iran’s closure, the tolls, the mines, the 46 days of disruption will not recur because the United States is establishing permanent enforcement. No treaty. No negotiation. A unilateral declaration of perpetual chokepoint control posted on Truth Social.

“They have agreed not to send weapons to Iran.” Unverified. China’s MFA called the arms reports “entirely fabricated” hours earlier. But the sentence forces Beijing into a trap. If China confirms, it concedes publicly. If China denies, it implies the weapons were under consideration. Silence reads as confirmation. Every response validates the claim. The rhetorical structure is designed to be unfalsifiable in real time.

“President Xi will give me a big, fat, hug when I get there in a few weeks.” The May 14 to 15 summit confirmed in the most disarming language possible. “Big, fat, hug” humanizes the relationship for domestic audiences while signaling to Beijing that Trump views the summit as a victory lap. The framing shapes expectations before a single agenda item is discussed.

“Doesn’t that beat fighting???” The carrot. Three audiences: To China, cooperation beats confrontation. To Americans, this president ended a war with a deal. To Iran, fighting is the alternative and you are losing.

“BUT REMEMBER, we are very good at fighting, if we have to - far better than anyone else!!!” The stick. The hug is conditional. The cooperation is optional. The carrier strike group is not. The same paragraph offers peace and threatens war, and both are credible because the blockade proves both simultaneously.

One post. Seven sentences. Five audiences: China, Iran, domestic voters, oil markets, and the May summit negotiating table. Every word measured. Every ambiguity deliberate. Every claim unfalsifiable in the window that matters.

Trump did not write a tweet. He wrote a treaty draft disguised as a social media post.

Author: Shanaka Perara Link

🚨 BOMBSHELL from RFK Jr.:

The Biden administration was systematically shutting out Christian Families from becoming foster parents

“They excluded an entire class of people because of their religious beliefs.”

“They told states to pass laws refusing families with certain (mainly Christian) beliefs the right to care for children.”

https://rumble.com/v78l5qc-the-biden-admin-was-systematically-shutting-out-christian-families-from-bec.html