On this matter
Superiority isn’t granted to you because of your interests or hobbies (or how special and rare they are).
Felling worthy because you’re into a specific subject or a fandom is both harmful to you and others who don’t take part in them.
This ‘advantage’ and ‘being different’ is a short-lived feeling considering how often people’s interests change and when we get to the core of it all people shame you for your ‘mainstream’ interests and hobbies just to show their dominance (apparently we live in the wilderness now =-) ) and for the sake of making others feel less worthy of attention.
“Superior comes from selfishness. Selfishness comes from the sensation of being separate from all around you. We call this common term ‘ego’.” You can believe that your way of thinking is ‘superior’ to others’ just because you tend to compare yourself to them all the god damn time. Judgment and fear are some of the many negative products that grow from this selfishness.
Love whatever you want however you want as long as you’re not harming anyone in any way.
And don’t y’all EVER think you’re less valuable if you like pop music or haven’t read classic literature or don’t enjoy reading poems or haven’t watched a popular show or aren’t attracted to a certain aesthetic.

پست‌های شفق رو بخونید و بعد لطفا هروقت هرکسی رو دیدید که گفت زن‌های خانه‌دار مفت می‌خورن و می‌گردن، بردارید دندون‌هاشون رو بیارید پایین. دیه‌اش رو جور می‌کنیم.
https://t.me/bebakhsidnemishnasam/6772

مراجعه كننده يه دختر متولد٨٢ بود
واسه سونوگرافي بارداري
خودشم كووچولو بود خيلي
ميخواستم بگم زود نبود حالا ؟!
ديدم يه بچه اومد توو گفت مامان خسته شدم بيرون 😂😂

》دكترشكر《

@OfficialPersianTwitter

از دلایلی که باید پزشکان توییتری را نابود کنیم:

چندروز پیش یک نفر رو دیدم که اسم و سن بیمار رو توی عکسی که گذاشته بود تا فخر مرتبی جداولش رو بفروشه سانسور نکرده بود، کمدی.

بعد ناامن و اینا هم نبودها، اینترنی بود که انسان‌ها در دنیای واقعی می‌شناختنش.

می‌دونید کلاً این‌که می‌آن داستان‌های بیمارهاشون رو می‌گن و اکسپوزشون می‌کنن باعث می‌شه خیلی‌ها از دکتر رفتن فراری بشن و ترس این‌ رو داشته باشن که مبادا چیزی بگن که تبدیلشون کنه به نقل و نبات محافل توییتری.

فکر کنم بدون مبالغه تعداد معلمای آیلتس از کسایی که می‌خوان واسه آیلتس کلاس برن بیشتره ات دیس پوینت

https://t.me/IamZmeyTheWorldSerpant/9542
فلش‌کارتای Anki علوم‌پایه‌ای که ماهگذر درست کرده و به درد بچه‌های دندون و پزشکی و … می‌خوره
حاضران به غایبان برسانند.

this is exactly why I think Lil Nas X is such a trailblazer in the music industry. It’s so refreshing to see people like him being confident in the expression of their sexuality.
Because when Harry styles was selling nail polish and getting praised and called original, a pioneer and etc (which they aren’t by the way), Lil Nas X was taking risks, taking the narrative into his own hands, unapologetically celebrating the sexuality of gay men, giving the devil a lap danse in his music video and making the average american church goer shit their pants.
This is part of the lyrics of “call me by your name (montero)”:
“I wanna feel on your ass in Hawaii
I want that jet lag from fuckin' and flyin'
Shoot a child in your mouth while I'm ridin'”
About this lyrics he said in an interview with genius(I paraphrased a bit for simplicity):
“When I said that (the lyrics) in the studio, everybody looked at me like 😦😦🤨🤨🤨
It was kind of a funny moment, … but it’s about time that I say something out of pocket in a song.
….let’s normalize having these fucking lines in songs; the same way somebody might talk about fucking a girl ot a guy (in a straight relationship).
I feel like that’s really important for representation in general and this is gonna open more doors.
One day when somebody says “oh that person said that” and not even think about it, you know?”
now THIS is what I call original not whatever the fuck Harry Styles and their team are up to.
for so long representation of gay men in media has been “tame” and censored so it could be easy on the eyes of the straight viewer and so they wouldn’t call gay men “gross” and call AIDS a gay disease.
It’s time to move forward.
People like Harry Styles hold us back. They paint a nonthreatening, unasuming image of queerness and choose pleasing straight audience over the queer people who helped build their carriers.
If the celebrity/brand can pick sides, the audience has the power to do that too.
There’s the issues of selling an exploitative and voyeruistic-almost pornographic-image of queer relationships and then there’s the issue of straightwashing queer relationships, keeping it “tender” (in the words of Styles themself). and it’s tricky to get all the nuances correctly and not become trapped in either of those when creating queer media. Harry Styles is clearly struggling at keeping his balance and walking that fine line (pun intended). I hope they grows from this.
#Q

من فکر کنم قبلا گفته بودم در زمینه‌ی جنسیت نداشتن لباس‌ها هم بیلی پورتر پیشگام بوده نسبت به هری استایلز ولی خب هم بلکه و هم کوییر. مردم از مرد وایت بیشتر خوششون میاد.

آنپاپیولار اپنین:
بیلی پورتر (با این‌که گریم و آرایش چشم‌هایش رو اکثرا دوست ندارم) و لیل ناز اکس‌ از هری استایلز بهتر جنسیت نداشتن لباس رو نشون می‌دن. 🚶🏻

There’s literally nothing Harry Styles has done in this regard that a black men before him hasn’t done already, many times better. Sorry not sorry.

I remember Billy Porter being pissed at the disproportionate praise Harry Styles was getting, and rightfully so. Then white people got pissed at Billy Porter for being pissed.
But I get where Porter is coming from.
تا حالا شده یه جکی رو بگید و هیچ واکنشی دریافت نکنید بعد یه نفر توی جمع بلندتر از شما همون جک رو بگه و همه بخندن؟
من داینامیک هری استایلز و مردای کوییر سیاه‌پوستی که پیش‌گام پوشش بدون جنسیت بودن رو همین‌شکلی می‌بینم.
صدای سفیدپوستا هم که از همه بلندتره.
خب معلومه ناراحت می‌شن وقتی کل زحمتشون می‌شه به نام یکی دیگه:/

من هرسری یادم میفته وقتی بیلی پورتر این موضوع رو مطرح کرد فن‌های هری جوری بهش حمله‌ور شدن که بنده‌ی خدا مجبور شد عذرخواهی کنه که دست از سرش بردارن یک دور از اول انگشت به دهان می‌مانم.

حالا یکی توی کامنت‌های این آرتیکلی که هری توش چرت و پرت گفته نوشته بود:

“harry is what straight women think gay men are.”

and it really made sense, i feel like he’s just gay to a point that makes straight people go “awe” and think of queerness as all butterflies and roses, and nothing “gross”, cause well, remember, gay sex bad, straight sex good. 🤨 like he appeals to the idea of being gay? idk if i’m making sense.

i think he’s kinda fuelling the whole phenomenon of straight women fetishising gay men.

یه بار گفتم مردم از کوییرا میخوان که به اندازه قابل تحمل کوییر باشن؟

Yup. This is it. Cishet people are like ok go ahead be queer but don’t be “too queer” and they are also the ones who get to define what is too queer and what is just the right amount of queer.