He keeps having this debate about if Israel is doing genocide on Palestine and his argument is essentially "no because you can't prove intent" even though several of the criteria for genocide have been met. It's a weak argument because it's predicated on his supposed knowledge of the opinions and feelings of Israeli leadership. Nevertheless, he maintains that position on his little hill of shit, for some (((unknown))) reason.

Ironically his refusal to concede this point just enables other dumb leftists to completely eviscerate 90% of his argument while he clings to this idea that Isreal has no genocidal intent.