Broken Clock
As often Singapore is leading the way, but I think the price is a lot higher
As long as having a kid involve serious financial restraints birthrates won't recover. Not debating if it's a good or bad thing, it's pretty clear that people are not as willing to have kids if it involves a financial sacrifice.
Either government shoulder most of the cost of having a kid or they won't have more
Imagine if you can have business flights, 5 stars hotel, Michelin restaurants with 1 kid or you have to stay in economy, 4 stars hotel and much less restaurant and less living space for an extra kid
And it stays true at all income ladders except the highest ones
If you're lower income, are you willing to have a second kid if it means they're cramped in the same room and you have to watch your monthly expense?
If you're lower income, are you willing to have a second kid if it means they're cramped in the same room and you have to watch your monthly expense?
I think the pendulum has swang way too far into it being increasingly hard to have kids, governments are starting to react but we're very far from the level of efforts needed
It will takes dozens of years for people to understand the scale of the issue and take the necessary steps (more support and more taxes)
All those studies showing financial incentives don't work are pathetic.
Am I going to go for a kid because I get a free stroller and 10 free GP visit?
Am I going to go for a kid because I get a free stroller and 10 free GP visit?
I really hope this new SG initiative work a little because otherwise people will criticize financial incentives even more when the clear problem is that the adequate threshold has not been reached
A Singaporean citizen is worth 1m$ today in terms of lifelong taxes (pension excluded completely)
This doesn't count all the value of the work produced by said citizen over his lifetime which also benefit the country
Before you got maybe 200k of taxes per citizen and it cost you roughly zero