Forwarded from THE MOVIE CHANNEL
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Lord of War (2005)
⭐️|10 | 122 min | Action, Crime, Drama
An arms dealer confronts the morality of his work as he is being chased by an INTERPOL Agent.
⭐️|10 | 122 min | Action, Crime, Drama
An arms dealer confronts the morality of his work as he is being chased by an INTERPOL Agent.
Look at the games motha futhers be playin. Wanting to get photographed being someone... and creating the perception of something being there which isn't.
How many fake hate crimes have we heard of since Trump has come into office? The Juicy Smolyeh incident was but one in the vast array one can find. We only know about this one so much because it was so very prominent
Check out fakehatecrimes.org and fakehatemap.com. The tales of "hate crimes" are so often spun up, and when they're later debunked, rarely is that tale told. Why? Victimization sells. Entire organizations live off of money created to battle "hate." It also sells in the media. It's a "juicy" kinda tale. The continued recycling of these tales helps to feed the narrative that this perceived hate exists and backs up the whypepo privilege + microaggression/systemic racism narrative.
Wash, rinse, repeat.
Story goes out saying something racist/evil/nazi/whypepo-hate/etc.
Story gets headlines.
Story reinforces narrative.
Media ge
How many fake hate crimes have we heard of since Trump has come into office? The Juicy Smolyeh incident was but one in the vast array one can find. We only know about this one so much because it was so very prominent
Check out fakehatecrimes.org and fakehatemap.com. The tales of "hate crimes" are so often spun up, and when they're later debunked, rarely is that tale told. Why? Victimization sells. Entire organizations live off of money created to battle "hate." It also sells in the media. It's a "juicy" kinda tale. The continued recycling of these tales helps to feed the narrative that this perceived hate exists and backs up the whypepo privilege + microaggression/systemic racism narrative.
Wash, rinse, repeat.
Story goes out saying something racist/evil/nazi/whypepo-hate/etc.
Story gets headlines.
Story reinforces narrative.
Media ge
Media gets sweet advertising clicks.
Organizations claiming to fight that hate can use it as a talking point to get more sweet donations.
Story gets debunked. Media will do a minor retraction which still gets clicks, but it isn't shared virally because it doesn't hit the same irrational emotion levels, so people only remember the original. Win/win for media dollars.
Organizations continue to used the debunked story in talking points because it sells and only a few recall that it was debunked. (We can just call them conspiracy theorists.)
Wash, rinse, repeat.
-R1O
Organizations claiming to fight that hate can use it as a talking point to get more sweet donations.
Story gets debunked. Media will do a minor retraction which still gets clicks, but it isn't shared virally because it doesn't hit the same irrational emotion levels, so people only remember the original. Win/win for media dollars.
Organizations continue to used the debunked story in talking points because it sells and only a few recall that it was debunked. (We can just call them conspiracy theorists.)
Wash, rinse, repeat.
-R1O
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/04/19/understanding-the-russian-disinformation-defense-as-predicted-in-2018/
By doubling down on the Russian Collusion narrative the conspirators created a ‘catch-22’ defense. They could/can claim Deripaska was/is giving disinformation in his version of events to support the interests of Russia and sewing chaos in America etc. And any Republican who would give Deripaska a platform to tell what happened in 2016 would be doing the bidding of Vladimir Putin. See how that works?
The soft coup team protects themselves by impugning the motive of Deripaska, and diminishing his credibility under the auspices of Russian disinformation.
By doubling down on the Russian Collusion narrative the conspirators created a ‘catch-22’ defense. They could/can claim Deripaska was/is giving disinformation in his version of events to support the interests of Russia and sewing chaos in America etc. And any Republican who would give Deripaska a platform to tell what happened in 2016 would be doing the bidding of Vladimir Putin. See how that works?
The soft coup team protects themselves by impugning the motive of Deripaska, and diminishing his credibility under the auspices of Russian disinformation.
The Last Refuge
Understanding The Russian Disinformation Defense - As Predicted in 2018... - The Last Refuge
Various mainstream media reports have discussed the latest declassification releases by saying the releases show the Steele Dossier was infected with “Russian Disinformation”. The framework of this “Russia disinformation” defense narrative is completely and…