Shame his neck 🫠 is ok

https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/politics/prime-minister-anthony-albanese-tumbles-off-stage-while-posing-for-photographs-on-election-campaign-trail/news-story/06d3829e6e0ad9e72317674d6d7900c5?fbclid=IwY2xjawJa-wtleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHcz8r8SvYXy89DgjwkemOfA4bTn7qdDg9n3JjshgBtI0cElwbVvMuRx93Q_aem_rqbb_A0OjKdZWnvP0hxtoQ

Governors House Sydney.

Week 40
7th of April 2025.

The people are the government

The smirk does it for me.

The term ‘Law’ originates through the fiction of ownership, its original meaning was ‘Lord’; the landlords ‘word’ was law; the true term, that law is used in place of, is ‘Axiom’, meaning a selfevident truth that requires no proof, a universally accepted principle or rule.

The axioms of the land, the natural axioms, that all of mankind are bound by, are inalienable and immutable across the entire earth. We have 2 major styles of law in the world. - Roman/Civil law and Common law.

Civil law or statute law or Legislation is largely world-wide with an emphasis on government regulation, judge controlled decisions , individually varying decisions and the belief that government exercise uncontrolled legislative authority.

This is administered through Magistrates Court, County Court, Tribunals etc. “The law is subject to all the fluctuation in practice which grows out of the different principles of interpretation….much certainty of law is lost… Common law, now largely restricted to Canada, the US and Australia, has created a fixed rule of decisions in order that rights and property may be stable and certain.

It has always preferred the court/jury decision and repudiated outside authority. It has been equated with stability and just equality and “has great superiority over civil law as a practical jurisprudence regulating the affairs of society.

It excludes private interpretations and controls the arbitrary discretion of judges.” Simply put: Civil law/statute law/Legislation is government law. Common law is the people’s protection against government law.

The control of the “State” by the “Church” can be traced back to the 18th Dynasty in Egypt around 1550 BC with the deposing of the Amun Priests by the pharaoh Akhenaten, and their subsequent take over of control of the throne once Akhenaten was gone by the Amun Priests under the control of the High Priest, Ay, during the reign of the boy pharaoh Tutankhmen and into and through the 19th- 21st Dynasties from 1300 BC - 945 BC.

This persisted for the next 900 years until the next pivotal moment when Julius Caesar became Emperor of Rome and united with Cleopatra, instigating, in particular, the solar calendar of the Egyptians over the previous lunar calendar of the roman empire. Up until then, from around 509 BC, The Roman Republic, officially the Senate and People of Rome, was run through public representation of the Roman people, under what we might today call a form of Common law, but, like almost all organisations involving man, overtime it was infiltrated and corrupted by those seeking money and power and morphed into the Lex fori, the law of the forum.

https://acrobat.adobe.com/link/review?uri=urn:aaid:scds:US:685495de-46a2-3adc-aacd-1524384ec7c5

It’s almost certain that the Beijing-controlled 99-year lease will cease. Full story: https://bit.ly/449JGV2

Time to revolt against these sick fucks then destroy their homes, we need to do surveillance on these sickos and destroy what they destroy upon other's!. They do say, its a small world and won't be hard to trace down those involved.

Following orders is not an option. Who the fuck are these people serving for a foreign private corporation masquerading like they have some type of superiority or power over people.

https://7news.com.au/news/homeless-residents-living-in-moreton-bay-park-have-tents-belongings-bulldozed-and-dumped-by-council-rangers-c-18317342?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR4t0kc65SAN_QWz9vPCRpMdgsIkPvuaSRbvMjbeIdA2RJERiU6Q69W1ZXy1Pg_aem_SwU2T6iN9vrwbWHHEoQSEA

The High Court held that the law was unconstitutional. Its reasoning was that the act had conferred a power upon the NSW Supreme Court which was incompatible with section 71 of the constitution. Section 71 vests Australia's state supreme courts with federal judicial power. [9] The act was described by multiple justices in the majority as requiring the Supreme Court to (perform) non-judicial functions of such a nature that public confidence in the integrity of the judiciary as an institution ... is diminished'. [10] This was an attempt to ground Kable in the precedent of a test for invalidity set by Grollo v Palmer. [c] The preventative detention of Kable under the act for reasons of anticipated criminality was enough for Toohey J to declare that the Grollo test had been met.
https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:AP:3cdca32d-d3d0-4cdd-8466-928620ee8fc3

DR ANTHONY FAUCI EMAIL DEMANDING X TAKE DOWN THE UNITED NATIONS INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE ⚖️ CASE FOR SARS-COV-2 COVID19

CHECK X SHUNDRALLAH STILL BANNED FOR ANNOUNCING THE CASE

MUSK
TRUMP
FAUCI
ALL FACE UNITED NATIONS INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE ⚖️ JURISDICTION ENFORCEMENT IN ALL 196 COUNTRIES