Reply to CDC Re: Natural Immunity v. Vaccine Immunity

https://www.icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Reply-to-CDC-Re-Natural-Immunity-v-Vaccine-Immunity.pdf

The exchange, while long, is definitely worth the read. In short – and this is going to be an understatement – the CDC fails to rebut the clear, consistent, and irrefutable science demonstrating the superiority of natural immunity compared to vaccine immunity. In summary:

• Who is more likely to get Covid-19 (the symptomatic disease)? The answer is clear. Natural immunity provides greater than 99% protection against Covid-19 while vaccine immunity is well below this level of protection even directly after vaccination and from there rapidly wanes.

• Who is more likely to become infected with and transmit the virus (with or without symptoms)? The answer is again crystal clear. Vaccine immunity does not prevent infection and transmission, while natural immunity does. As the Director of the CDC explained, the vaccinated need to wear masks because, “what [the COVID-19 vaccines] can’t do anymore is prevent transmission.”  (This point is also covered in a prior article.)

• Worse, based on official government data from the UK and Israel, the known adverse events from COVID-19 vaccine exceed the known benefits of vaccinating the naturally immune.

Clark Scholar Cognitive Warfare

This project was intended to define and identify cognitive warfare campaigns, in order to protect NATO and its allies. A solution, a dashboard which visualizes campaigns and tracks cognitive attacks, is currently being developed. This effort was made in cooperation between Johns Hopkins University, Imperial College London, and the Czech Technical University.

[source]

Hack the Mind Results Announced

Mind. Consciousness. Perception. The human brain. A potential battlefield of the 21st century. The notional sixth domain where warfare occurs in addition to land, sea, air, space and cyberspace.

Hack the Mind, Hack the Brain, Help Us Understand: Ideathon Results Announced --> additional info here

[source]

CNN’s Pamela Brown Grills NIH Director On ‘Oversight Failure’ for Wuhan Research: ‘Why Should Americans Trust You?’

CNN's Pamela Brown absolutely grilled Collins over the NIH's funding of New York-based nonprofit, EcoHealth alliance, which performed textbook Gain-of-Function research. Last week the NIH admitted that EcoHealth violated the terms of a grant by failing to report their achievement (which EcoHealth denies), sending both Fauci and Collins into full damage control over the weekend.

Now, the official story is that while EcoHealth violated their contract, and are allegedly 'in trouble' for failing to report their achievement, the NIH and NIAID (Collins and Fauci) maintain that the research still wasn't risky enough to qualify for enhanced oversight.

Brown didn't let Collins get away with his carefully crafted talking points - repeatedly pressing him over what else the NIH may be funding that they don't know about, and asking why the American people should trust them after last week's revelation.