Находки в опенсорсе: Python
1.06K subscribers
5 photos
332 links
Легкие задачки в опенсорсе из мира Python

Чат: @opensource_findings_chat
Download Telegram
🚀 New issue to wemake-services/django-modern-rest by @sobolevn
📝 Test and document that default values for components are supported (#1494)


Currently we don't ever test or document that a code like this:

from dmr import Body, Controller
from dmr.plugins.pydantic import PydanticSerializer


class MyController(Controller[PydanticSerializer]):
def post(
self,
parsed_body: Body[dict[str, str] | None] = None,
) -> str:
print(parsed_body)
return 'done'

is even supported.

What is important here?

1. We must call the endpoint function as-is, without any work from our part. Defaults must be real python defaults. And work the same way
2. But, if there are default for Body, we must issue required: false schema for the whole body

Snapshot test is required for this change.


#good_first_issue #help_wanted #opensource_september #django_modern_rest
sent via relator
🚀 New issue to wemake-services/django-modern-rest by @sobolevn
📝 It is possible to produce an empty `description` for `ResponseBody` (#1495)


django-modern-rest/dmr/openapi/generators/component_parsers.py

Lines 193 to 199 in f822e35

It misses or None part. Because we only skip None values from dumping.


#bug #good_first_issue #help_wanted #openapi #opensource_september #django_modern_rest
sent via relator
🚀 New issue to wemake-services/django-modern-rest by @sobolevn
📝 Test that nested URL patterns produce correct parameters (#1496)


We need to test a case like:

Router('tenants/<int:tenant_id>/', [path('users/<int:pk>/', MyController.as_view())])

It might contain a bug: we should get two path parameters, not one.


#good_first_issue #help_wanted #openapi #opensource_september #django_modern_rest
sent via relator
🚀 New issue to wemake-services/django-modern-rest by @sobolevn
📝 Test explicit `OpenAPIConfig.security` definition with `auth=None` per-endpoint (#1497)


Looks like we have a potential bug in how we define security in OpenAPI.
Here we always return None:

django-modern-rest/dmr/openapi/generators/security_scheme.py

Lines 24 to 37 in f822e35

But, if per-document security is set, we need to return [] as the value. Otherwise, None won't be dumped by our None-ignoring dump_schema rules. And security rules per this endpoint will be inherited from the document.

Which is wrong.

This would require a test and a fix. Maybe we should look at current config's security to define the return type?


#bug #good_first_issue #help_wanted #openapi #opensource_september #django_modern_rest
sent via relator
🚀 New issue to wemake-services/django-modern-rest by @sobolevn
📝 Fix unused `security` field in `EndpointMetadata` and `_BasePayload` (#1499)


We don't use these two things:

1. security field documentation here:

 django-modern-rest/dmr/metadata.py

 Lines 429 to 430 in f822e35

2. django-modern-rest/dmr/validation/payload.py

 Line 44 in f822e35

However, I don't think that this is right. Users must have an option to configure this directly.
Let's create this rule:

• Any user provided security objects must be saved to the metadata
• It must be merged with explicit auth= providers

It might be useful when people define some external security mechanims, for example that work on HTTP proxy level, or in other microservices.

New snapshot test is required for this change.


#bug #good_first_issue #help_wanted #openapi #opensource_september #django_modern_rest
sent via relator
🚀 New issue to wemake-services/django-modern-rest by @sobolevn
📝 Fix `operation_id` default generation rules (#1500)


Currently it produces: getAuthedandcookiescontrollerApiCookies for _AuthedAndCookiesController, see

django-modern-rest/tests/test_unit/test_plugins/test_msgspec/test_msgspec_snapshots.py

Lines 61 to 81 in f822e35

It must produce: getAuthedAndCookiesControllerApiCookies
Please, update all existing snapshots.


#bug #good_first_issue #help_wanted #openapi #opensource_september #django_modern_rest
sent via relator
🚀 New issue to wemake-services/django-modern-rest by @milssky
📝 Changes in benchmarking (#1505)


While working toward #207, I ran into the need for reliable benchmarking. We currently have four workers benchmarked using ab, which does not properly support HTTP/1.1. In particular, ab turns out to handle the -k flag incorrectly: it sends HTTP/1.0 requests with a Connection: Keep-Alive header, and different servers handle these requests differently. As a result, Uvicorn and Granian are effectively being tested under different conditions.

Furthermore, when multiple workers are used, the benchmark measures more than just the performance of the request-response lifecycle. The load generator creates a limited number of TCP connections, which the operating system distributes among the worker processes. Each keep-alive connection then remains bound to a single worker. This distribution may be uneven and can vary between runs, significantly affecting the resulting RPS.

Therefore, the current results cannot be used to evaluate the impact of individual parts of Django or a future RSGI implementation.

I see two possible approaches:

1. Fix the existing benchmark:
 • replace ab with a load generator that properly supports HTTP/1.1, such as hey;
 • run all servers with a single worker;
 • add Granian running in ASGI mode and soon add Granian in RSGO mode;
 • use the same concurrency level, duration, and other parameters for every server.
2. Keep the existing benchmark unchanged and add a separate benchmark for the request-response lifecycle:
 • use a single worker for Uvicorn, Granian, and Gunicorn;
 • use hey as the primary load generator;
 • run all servers under identical conditions;

Let’s discuss which direction we should take.


#feature #help_wanted #django_modern_rest
sent via relator
🚀 New issue to wemake-services/django-modern-rest by @sobolevn
📝 `test_custom_union_format` failed in CI (#1533)


Seed for the repro: --randomly-seed=1177358910

FAILED tests/test_unit/test_plugins/test_pydantic/test_pydantic_schema.py::test_custom_union_format[PydanticSerializer] - AssertionError: assert Schema(all_of...ne, defs=None) == Schema(all_of...ne, defs=None)

Omitting 58 identical items, use -vv to show
Differing attributes:
['type']

Drill down into differing attribute type:
type: [<OpenAPIType.STRING: 'string'>, <OpenAPIType.INTEGER: 'integer'>] != [<OpenAPIType.INTEGER: 'integer'>, <OpenAPIType.STRING: 'string'>]
At index 0 diff: <OpenAPIType.STRING: 'string'> != <OpenAPIType.INTEGER: 'integer'>

Full diff:
[
+ <OpenAPIType.STRING: 'string'>,
<OpenAPIType.INTEGER: 'integer'>,
- <OpenAPIType.STRING: 'string'>,
]
FAILED tests/test_unit/test_plugins/test_pydantic/test_pydantic_schema.py::test_custom_union_format[PydanticFastSerializer] - AssertionError: assert Schema(all_of...ne, defs=None) == Schema(all_of...ne, defs=None)

Omitting 58 identical items, use -vv to show
Differing attributes:
['type']

Drill down into differing attribute type:
type: [<OpenAPIType.STRING: 'string'>, <OpenAPIType.INTEGER: 'integer'>] != [<OpenAPIType.INTEGER: 'integer'>, <OpenAPIType.STRING: 'string'>]
At index 0 diff: <OpenAPIType.STRING: 'string'> != <OpenAPIType.INTEGER: 'integer'>

Full diff:
[
+ <OpenAPIType.STRING: 'string'>,
<OpenAPIType.INTEGER: 'integer'>,
- <OpenAPIType.STRING: 'string'>,
]

https://github.com/wemake-services/django-modern-rest/actions/runs/34912494319/job/104202853421?pr=1510


#bug #help_wanted #ci #opensource_september #django_modern_rest
sent via relator
Помните про https://github.com/ozeranskii/httptap?

Я писал о нем давно еще - > тут.

Наклепал много issue, для тех кто хочет вкатиться в OSS или попрактиковаться себя и свою LLM - welcome. Только, пожалуйста, без нейрослопа и не будьте meat-proxy. Не хочу тратить время на фиксы фиксов. Ибо вот даже простой фикс, я исправил (смотри историю коммитов в PR), так как почитал документацию, а автор видимо нет.
🔥5