🔴India Urges Its Nationals to Leave Iran

🔽The Indian Embassy in Tehran has asked its nationals to leave Iran as soon as possible, in a move that has raised questions about its timing and political implications—particularly following the visit of Narendra Modi to Israel and amid escalating regional tensions.

➡️In this context, two key observations arise:

1⃣ First, Indian authorities recently detained an Iranian vessel on alleged legal grounds, without any clear escalatory response from Tehran, prompting criticism over what some perceive as a weak reaction.

2⃣ Second, India’s continued investment in Chabahar Port despite these developments has led some to question why Tehran does not reconsider this cooperation if it views New Delhi’s actions as unfriendly.


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Direct U.S. Intervention in Selecting Iraq’s Prime Minister: Brack Praises Al-Sudani

🌕Thomas Brack described his meeting with Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani as productive, noting discussions on Iraq’s goals to build a stable and prosperous future in line with the U.S. President’s plan for peace and prosperity in the region.

🤔Brack emphasized that having an effective Iraqi leadership aligned with U.S. policies is a key step toward achieving stability, in a clear reference to Al-Sudani’s role following the U.S. veto of the Coordination Framework candidate Nouri al-Maliki.

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Israeli Aggressions: Border Attrition and the Failure of Deterrence

📄The News:

🌕On February 23, 2026, Israeli occupation forces executed a series of targeted strikes across the Lebanese border. Key incidents included :

🔢 artillery illumination rounds over Kfar Chouba,
🔢 an acoustic bomb dropped by a drone on Karkla,
🔢 and heavy machine-gun fire directed at the outskirts of Alma al-Shaab, Labbouneh, and Aitaroun.
🔢 Additionally, Israeli artillery targeted Lebanese territorial waters off the coast of Naqoura.

🖊Strategic Analysis:

🫶These maneuvers constitute "operational harassment," a calculated Israeli tactic designed to test the Axis of Resistance's readiness and probe for structural weaknesses in the current rules of engagement. The maritime shelling near Naqoura is a significant escalation, signaling an attempt to assert fire control over disputed naval boundaries. On land, the persistent machine-gun fire reflects a deep-seated Israeli insecurity regarding the Resistance’s tactical positioning in the border woods.

🔴 Position and Assessment:

✌These acts are not isolated incidents but a systematic violation of Lebanese sovereignty. The reliance on "soft" aggression—such as acoustic bombs and illumination rounds—demonstrates the enemy's fear of a full-scale kinetic response while simultaneously trying to maintain a state of psychological warfare against border populations.

🫶History proves that the Zionist entity only retreats when the cost of provocation becomes unsustainable. Documented patterns show that such escalations often precede broader attempts to redraw "buffer zones" through intimidation rather than direct combat.

🔴 Geopolitical Outlook:

Moving forward, the border will likely remain a flashpoint for low-intensity conflict as Israel attempts to normalize these incursions. However, the expansion of strikes into Lebanese territorial waters suggests a potential shift toward maritime friction. If the occupation persists in bypassing established red lines, a calibrated response from the Resistance is inevitable to restore the balance of terror and protect Lebanese resources.

#Lebanon #Naqoura #Resistance #IsraeliAggression #TheObserver

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Beirut Embassy Evacuation:

🌕Washington Clears the Deck for Regional War


📄The News:

✌On February 23, 2026, the U.S. State Department ordered the mandatory evacuation of non-emergency personnel and their families from the U.S. Embassy in Beirut. This diplomatic drawdown coincides with the largest American military buildup in the Middle East since the 2003 invasion of Iraq. The deployment features the arrival of the USS Gerald R. Ford carrier strike group to join the USS Abraham Lincoln, alongside over 50 advanced fighter jets (F-16, F-22, F-35) moved to regional bases within the last 24 hours. This maneuver precedes crucial nuclear talks in Geneva and follows President Donald Trump’s deadline for Tehran to meet U.S. demands or face "limited military strikes."

🖊Strategic Analysis:

🫶Staff reductions at U.S. Embassy Beirut are historically a bellwether for imminent kinetic action. By thinning its diplomatic footprint, Washington is attempting to insulate its personnel from the inevitable asymmetrical retaliation that would follow a strike on Iranian soil. The current posture—comprising 14 warships and dozens of fuel tankers—suggests preparations for a sustained air campaign rather than a "symbolic" strike. Centrally, the U.S. is signaling a shift from coercive diplomacy to direct military confrontation, seeking to dismantle Iran's nuclear infrastructure and weaken the Axis of Resistance through a decisive blow.

🔴 Position and Assessment:

🫶The "prudent" reduction of the Beirut footprint is a clear admission of American vulnerability. Washington realizes that Lebanon is the frontline of Iranian deterrence; any strike on Tehran will activate Hezbollah’s strategic arsenal against U.S. assets and the Zionist entity. This escalation reveals the failure of American diplomacy, which now relies solely on brute force to dictate regional terms. Evidence from the June 2025 skirmishes shows that Iran and its allies no longer adhere to traditional "proportionality," rendering American attempts at "limited" warfare a dangerous strategic fallacy.

🔴 Geopolitical Outlook:

👌The region is now on a hair-trigger. If the Geneva talks on Thursday fail to yield immediate concessions, a U.S. strike is statistically probable within a 10-day window. Expect an immediate Iranian counter-response targeting U.S. bases in Qatar and the Emirates, coupled with a total mobilization of the border fronts in Lebanon and Syria. This is no longer a deterrent display; it is the final positioning of assets for a conflict intended to break the regional stalemate, though it risks a catastrophic overextension of U.S. power.

#Lebanon #USA #Iran #Geopolitics #AxisOfResistance #TheObserver


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴The Illusion of a "Quick Win": Trump’s Military Surge and the Strategic Reality of Iran

📄The News:

🫶President Donald Trump has dismissed intelligence suggesting General Dan Caine warned of the catastrophic risks of a full-scale war with Iran, labeling the reports "100 percent incorrect." Asserting that a conflict could be "easily won," Trump has overseen the deployment of a massive naval and air armada, spearheaded by the USS Gerald R. Ford and USS Abraham Lincoln.

✌This deployment represents nearly 50% of total U.S. global air power currently concentrated in the region.

🖊 Strategic Analysis:

👌The concentration of half of America's global air assets in a single theater is an escalation of "maximum pressure" into the realm of kinetic preparation. However, the rhetoric of an "easy victory" ignores the evolution of asymmetric warfare and the doctrine of "Strategic Depth" employed by the Axis of Resistance. Historically, U.S. reliance on air superiority has failed to achieve political submission in the Middle East; in the case of Iran, the cost of engagement involves the immediate paralysis of global energy corridors—a variable the White House appears to be discounting.

🔴 Position and Assessment:

✌Trump’s dismissal of military counsel highlights a dangerous disconnect between ideological bravado and operational reality. The assumption that advanced carrier strike groups can deliver a decisive blow without a prolonged regional conflagration is flawed.

🫶The Axis of Resistance operates on a decentralized model that renders conventional "victory" metrics obsolete. Evidence suggests that any strike would trigger a multi-front response, nullifying the tactical advantages of U.S. naval positioning.

🔴 Forward-Looking Predictions:

🔢 Overextension: Maintaining 50% of global air power in one sector creates strategic vulnerabilities elsewhere, forcing a future drawdown or a costly long-term stalemate.

🔢 Regional Blowback: Expect heightened coordination among regional resistance factions, aimed at making the cost of U.S. presence unsustainable through precision strikes and maritime disruption.

🔢 Pivot to Negotiation: As the reality of a "non-easy" war sets in, the U.S. will likely be forced back to the negotiating table by mid-2026, driven by economic instability and the refusal of regional allies to host a direct conflict.


#Iran #USA #Geopolitics #AxisOfResistance #StrategicAnalysis #TheObserver


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴The Ford’s Decay: The Myth of American Steel in the Age of Resistance


🤔The twice-extended deployment of the USS Gerald R. Ford is not a display of dominance, but a testament to logistical failure and the desperate clinging to a $13.3 billion floating liability.


🔴 Executive Opening

✌While the Pentagon’s propaganda machine continues to frame the USS Gerald R. Ford as the pinnacle of naval engineering, the reality at sea is a cynical comedy of errors. Surpassing 241 days in theater, this "floating fortress" has devolved into a high-tech prison. Marred by failing sewage systems that require $400,000 daily acid flushes and a crew so demoralized they are openly begging to quit, the Ford is less a deterrent and more a bloated monument to imperial overreach. Washington’s decision to extend its deployment yet again reveals a terrifying truth: they cannot afford to withdraw this hunk of "fake steel" because they have nothing left to mask the cratering of American prestige in West Asia.


🔴 Contextual Background

🫶The aircraft carrier was once the ultimate symbol of colonial enforcement—power projection without proximity. But the geopolitical clock has struck midnight on that era. In the age of precision strikes and asymmetric swarms, these 100,000-ton behemoths have become "slow-moving targets." Breaking post-Vietnam deployment records isn't a badge of honor; it is a symptom of a Navy that has run out of ideas and functional hulls. The Ford’s predicament echoes the frantic desperation of Vietnam, only this time the "jungle" is a sea of high-speed missiles and indigenous technological defiance.


🔴 Strategic Analysis

✌The cynicism of the Ford’s current positioning lies in its status as a "strategic hostage."

🔘 Technological Fraud: A ship that costs $13.3 billion but cannot manage its own waste disposal is the perfect metaphor for the corruption of the U.S. military-industrial complex. It is a gold-plated paper tiger.

🔘 The Myth of Air Superiority: The Ford is held in place because land-based U.S. assets in the region are now perceived as "sitting ducks." Washington has been forced to pack 5,000 sailors into a decaying steel shell, betting on a platform that is reaching structural exhaustion.

🔘 Human Sacrifice: The systemic disregard for the crew’s basic welfare—denying them births, funerals, and stability—proves that the empire prioritizes the image of the steel over the reality of the men. It is the management of a sinking brand.

🔴 Evidence & Documentation

🔘 Maintenance Masquerade: The daily $400k "acid flushes" are a temporary bandage on a systemic mechanical failure. You don't perform surgery in a hurricane unless you are desperate.

🔘 Futile Logistics: Shipping 700 tonnes of munitions via C-17s to a ship with a broken spirit is a logistical exercise in futility. No amount of ordnance can compensate for a crew that has lost faith in the mission and the vessel.

🔘 The Moral Deficit: Defense reporting now uses descriptors for morale that haven't been seen since the Fall of Saigon. When sailors want to quit the Navy en masse while stationed on its "best" ship, the strategic game is already lost.

🔴 Position & Argument

👌The USS Gerald R. Ford is a weapon of the past being forced to fight the wars of the future. It is not a platform of strength; it is a logistical burden. Washington refuses to blink not because it is ready for war, but because it is terrified of the vacuum that would follow the Ford’s departure. Using 5,000 humans as "ballast" for a political bluff is a height of moral bankruptcy. The Ford is not holding the line; it is being held together by duct tape and desperation, waiting for a reality check that its sophisticated radars will not be able to deflect.

🌕Forward-Looking Assessment

🔢 Structural Catastrophe:

Continued over-deployment will likely lead to a catastrophic mechanical or nuclear propulsion failure, forcing a humiliating towed withdrawal that would shatter the U.S. Navy’s image for decades.

🔢 The Death of the Carrier Doctrine:

The "Ford disaster" will mark the end of the carrier era.

🫶Future historians will view these ships as the "Maginot Line" of the 21st century—expensive, static, and ultimately irrelevant.

🔢 The Final Act:

🫶Should the current tensions boil over, the Ford will not be the hammer. It will be the anvil. U.S. resources will be diverted to simply protecting this $13 billion target, ensuring a tactical nightmare for any commander involved.

📌Conclusion


✌The USS Gerald R. Ford is the ultimate symbol of an empire in denial. It is a $13 billion floating relic, plagued by internal decay and surrounded by an external reality it can no longer control. Every day it remains at sea is not a victory for American power, but a countdown to the inevitable realization that steel—no matter how expensive—cannot stop the tide of history.

#TheObserver
#AlMuraqeb
#USSGeraldRFord
#USNavy
#AxisOfResistance
#StrategicAttrition
#GeopoliticalRealities
#NavalOverstretch
#ImperialDecay
#WestAsiaStrategy


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴The Strategic Pivot: Russian Su-35s to Reshape Iranian Skies


📄The News:

👌Russian state media outlets confirm the imminent delivery of 16 Su-35 multi-role fighter jets to the Islamic Republic of Iran. This initial batch is reported to be the precursor to a larger strategic transfer involving three additional squadrons arriving in the near future. This development marks the most significant modernization of Iranian air power in decades, transitioning the fleet into the era of advanced generation 4++ capabilities.

🖊 Strategic Analysis:

✌The acquisition of the Su-35 is a geopolitical game-changer that addresses the primary vulnerability in the Axis of Resistance's defensive architecture: air superiority. For years, the Western-Zionist military calculus relied on a perceived technological gap in Iranian aviation. The introduction of Russia’s premier air-superiority fighter effectively nullifies this advantage. Structurally, this move cements the Moscow-Tehran defense axis, signaling a definitive shift toward a multipolar security order in West Asia. It is the direct consequence of failed Western "maximum pressure" campaigns which have instead accelerated the military integration of Eurasian powers.

🔴 Position and Assessment:

👌The delivery of these jets is a legitimate exercise of sovereignty and a vital deterrent against ongoing regional aggression. Documented evidence of Su-35 performance in modern theaters demonstrates its ability to challenge Western fifth-generation assets. By integrating these fighters with its existing indigenous long-range drone and missile programs, Iran is creating a "denial of access" environment that renders pre-emptive strike scenarios by the Israeli entity or US forces functionally obsolete and prohibitively expensive.

✌Forward-Looking Predictions:

🔢 Erosion of Air Hegemony: The era of uncontested Israeli or US air incursions in the region is ending; the cost of aerial engagement will become a primary deterrent.

🔢 Deepening Military Synergy: Expect subsequent contracts involving advanced S-400 missile systems and joint electronic warfare initiatives, creating an impenetrable defensive shield over Iranian territory.

🔢 Regional Recalibration: Gulf states and regional actors will likely pivot toward intensified diplomacy with Tehran, recognizing that the military balance has shifted permanently in favor of the Axis of Resistance.

#Iran #Russia #Su35 #Geopolitics #AxisOfResistance #StrategicBalance #TheObserver

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Iraq Officially Deposits Maritime Map…

While "Arab Embrace" Aligns Against Its Sole Sea Outlet

In a clear sovereign move, the Iraqi government has deposited its maritime domain map with the United Nations. The coordinates have been officially published on the UN website to establish Iraq's legal rights to its territorial waters, specifically in the Khor Abdullah area—the sole maritime artery connecting Iraq to the Gulf and the world.
Iraq, which possesses only this narrow maritime corridor as an outlet to international waters, acted within international legal frameworks to confirm its borders and sovereign rights. However, the response was immediate.
Rapid Arab Alignment
The following nations quickly declared full solidarity with Kuwait, rejecting any perceived infringement on "Kuwaiti maritime sovereignty":
• United Arab Emirates
• Jordan
• Bahrain
• Qatar
• Saudi Arabia

The Sole Outlet
Iraq does not possess extensive open coastlines or multiple maritime alternatives. Khor Abdullah is not a political choice, but a geographical necessity. Any interpretation or measure that leads to the restriction of Iraq's maritime movement or challenges its rights beyond established border points effectively tightens the noose on its economy, ports, trade, and sovereignty.

Between Sovereignty and Alignment
The Iraqi move falls under the right of states to establish maritime boundaries according to international norms. Conversely, the rapid alignment against this measure is viewed by many as a political message exceeding diplomatic support, impacting the sensitive maritime balance in a region whose economy cannot withstand further restrictions.

Ultimately, the geographical reality remains constant:
If Khor Abdullah is restricted for Iraq, it suffocates an entire nation that possesses no other path to the sea.

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴The Axis of Resistance: Prepared for All Scenarios

The News

Tehran has signaled total readiness for any escalation, including high-level assassination attempts, as the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) successfully dismantled a sophisticated "Mojahedin-e-Khalq" (MEK) network. Backed by the Zionist Mossad, the cell targeted the Presidential Palace and the Supreme National Security Council. Concurrently, Donald Trump’s return to a "Maximum Pressure" rhetoric has been met with Iranian strategic defiance, with Trump labeling Ayatollah Khamenei as "stubborn" in the face of failed American dictates.

Strategic Analysis

The timing of these disrupted terror plots highlights a desperate shift by the Zionist-American apparatus. Facing a multipolar shift, the U.S. under Trump is reverting to a personality-driven hostility that ignores 45 years of institutionalized resistance. The "stubbornness" Trump cites is actually a calculated refusal to surrender sovereign assets. Historically, whenever the West targets the leadership of the Resistance, the structural response is a rapid leap in deterrent capabilities.

Position & Evidence

The Zionist media’s admission—that targeting Ayatollah Khamenei would trigger an immediate transition to a nuclear-armed Iran—proves that the "Supreme Leader" is the primary stabilizer preventing total regional conflagration. Trump’s erratic approach lacks the nuance to understand that Iran’s security architecture is no longer vulnerable to 20th-century "regime change" tactics. The IRGC’s recent counter-intelligence success proves that internal infiltration attempts are being met with superior Iranian kinetic and electronic response.
Geopolitical Predictions

1. Nuclear Posture:
Any kinetic move by the Trump administration or Tel Aviv will result in an immediate revision of Iran's nuclear doctrine (Fatwa), moving toward full weaponization as a survival necessity.

2. Failed Proxy Wars: The reliance on the MEK and similar spent forces will yield zero strategic gains, further isolating the U.S. from meaningful diplomacy.

3. Regional Integration: Iran will deepen its military-industrial ties with the East, rendering Western sanctions and threats tactically obsolete.

#Iran #IRGC #ResistanceAxis #Trump #Geopolitics #Tehran

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Sovereignty Defined by Defiance: LAF Stands Firm Against Zionist Threats


The News

In a profound display of national doctrine, Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) personnel have refused orders to evacuate their positions at "Tallet al-Amra" in the Wazzani plains. Despite direct threats broadcast by Israeli quadcopters and the deployment of sound bombs and warning shots near "Sarda," a Lebanese officer and his unit remained stationed with their equipment and tents to prevent Zionist infiltration. While UNIFIL issued a tepid request for the Israeli military to cease its provocations—confirming the troops are within official Lebanese territory—the LAF maintained a direct standoff against the heavy arsenal stationed at the newly established Zionist site in "Tallet al-Hamamis."

Strategic Analysis

This standoff is a calculated rejection of the Zionist attempt to expand their "buffer zone" through psychological warfare and kinetic intimidation. By targeting the LAF, the occupation forces seek to test the limits of the Lebanese state's commitment to its border integrity. Historically, the LAF has demonstrated that it is not a bystander in border disputes, as seen in the 2010 Odeisseh clash. Strategically, this defiance complicates the Israeli military's objective of isolating the Resistance from the national military institution, proving that the defense of the south is a unified national priority.

Position & Evidence

The physical presence of Lebanese soldiers, facing down a massive military machine with nothing but light armor and conviction, exposes the limitations of Israeli deterrence. UNIFIL’s habitual "soft language" provides no protection; it is the boots on the ground that define the border. We view this refusal to retreat as a vital pillar of the "Army, People, Resistance" equation. The evidence is clear: when the national army refuses to yield to "warning shots," the enemy’s psychological operations collapse, leaving them with no choice but to escalate at a cost they cannot currently afford or to humiliatingly withdraw their threats.

Geopolitical Predictions

1. Strategic Stalemate: The Zionist command will likely refrain from a direct kinetic strike on the LAF unit to avoid a diplomatic catastrophe and a multi-front escalation they are not prepared to manage.

2. Reinforced Border Posture: The Wazzani and Sarda sectors will become permanent flashpoints where Lebanese sovereignty is physically asserted, hindering future Israeli ground incursions.

3. Internal Cohesion: This incident will bolster domestic support for the LAF’s role in the national defense strategy, further aligning the military's functional goals with the broader Resistance Axis framework.

#Lebanon #LAF #Wazzani #Sovereignty #ResistanceAxis #SouthLebanon

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Electronic Trap: When American Technology Becomes Its Fatal Weakness


By: Dr. Wassim Jaber


Within 48 hours, two American aircraft vanished over the Gulf. The first: an E-3 AWACS—the aerial command center managing 600 simultaneous targets. The second: an MQ-4C surveillance drone, which sent a distress signal and then evaporated. These were not malfunctions, but an electronic strike that cut the engines mid-air.

American leaks reveal the terror: "We fear this will be applied to manned aircraft during the hour of attack." An Iranian commander coolly responds: "Their perception that we are weak is entirely wrong." While Senator Graham screams, "Retreat is a disaster!", Washington announces the resumption of negotiations in Oman.

The meaning is clear: the immense pressure to strike Iran has collided with a hard physical reality—Iran possesses a weapon that turns American aerial superiority into a lethal electronic nightmare.

I. Electromagnetic Physics: Remotely Extinguishing Aircraft
What occurred was not "standard jamming," but a total cessation of engines in flight.
High-Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse (HEMP)

The Precise Physical Mechanism:

• Ground-based devices emit high-energy electromagnetic pulses at specific frequencies.

• The pulse penetrates the aircraft fuselage, inducing an "electrical storm" within the wiring and circuitry.

• Electronic circuits burn out instantly—specifically the engine control systems.

• The engine shuts down automatically because the Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC) fails entirely.

Technical Evidence: The MQ-4C disappeared seconds after its distress call—the hallmark of an EMP: immediate, total impact, rather than a gradual failure.

Potential Iranian Application: Upgraded Russian Krasukha-4 systems—with broadcasting power exceeding 10kW, capable of blinding radars and paralyzing electronics within a 300km radius.

II. The Sino-Russian Weapon: Electronically Arming Iran

Iran did not develop these capabilities in isolation; it acquired the pinnacle of Chinese and Russian technology following the failed coup attempt on January 13, 2026.
Military 5G Networks

• What China provided: Specialized military 5G networks—data speeds 100x faster than 4G, with latency under one millisecond.

• Integrated AI: Real-time data analysis and tactical decisions without human intervention.

• Quantum Encryption: Unhackable, even by the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA).
The Strategic Result: Iran possesses "digital eyes" monitoring every American movement in real-time, while America lost its comprehensive vision after Starlink was disabled in January.
The Chinese Ship "Yuan Wang 1": The Dragon’s Eye in the Gulf

• Gigantic Low-Frequency Radars: Capable of detecting F-35 stealth aircraft.

• Early Warning: Detects take-offs 30 minutes before aircraft reach Iranian airspace.

• Operational Integration: Linking these to Iran’s HQ-9 air defense systems allows missiles to be guided toward targets before they even cross the border.

III. Technological Deterrence: Why Trump Retreated Despite Pressure
The pressure on Trump is immense:

• Senator Graham: "Retreat is a historical disaster—worse than Afghanistan!"

• Netanyahu: "We are on the verge of an inevitable confrontation."

Yet, Trump suddenly announced: the resumption of negotiations in Oman, with a final round in Geneva this Thursday.
Why the sudden retreat? The nightmare scenario the Pentagon presented to Trump:

• Zero Hour: 60 F-35s enter Iranian airspace to destroy nuclear facilities.

• Zero + 5 Minutes: Iranian EMPs are launched from dozens of sites. Engines cut mid-air; dozens of jets fall instantly. Pilots eject over hostile territory.

• Zero + 30 Minutes: Iran announces: "More than a dozen American pilots captured."
The Pentagon's bitter truth to Trump: "We may destroy 60% of their program, but we will lose 40% of our fleet in one day." A president returning flag-draped coffins and lost jets does not win elections.

Trump returned to the table not because of "wisdom," but because hard science proved that war on Iran is premeditated technological suicide. Iran has turned America's greatest strength into its most lethal vulnerability.

The Day After:
• Congress Summons Trump for Accountability.
• Opposition Demands Impeachment: "The greatest military disaster since Vietnam."

• Trump Forfeits All Electoral Prospects.
The New Equation That Forced Trump’s Retreat:

• U.S. Mobilization: 500 aircraft.
• Iranian Capability: Capacity to down 100+ aircraft via Electronic Warfare (EW) without firing a single missile.

• The Result: The largest American aerial disaster since WWII.
Therefore, Trump retreated—not out of wisdom or ethics—but out of a justified, scientific fear of a real technological catastrophe.

Fourth: Iran’s Triple Capability—Deterrence through Science, Not Slogans

The Iranian leadership does not speak through emotions, but through physical and strategic facts:

First Capability: Comprehensive Decentralization
• 500 alternative command sites spread across 1.6 million km^2.
• Thousands of missile tunnels dug at depths of 200+ meters.
• Mobile launch platforms that change positions every 4–6 hours.

• Result: The total destruction of Tehran \neq paralyzing the capacity to retaliate.

Second Capability: Electronic Warfare Superiority
• Disrupting Starlink and blinding U.S. satellites (January 13).
• Downing two AWACS and spy planes (February).
• The proven ability to "blind" America electronically at the decisive moment.

Third Capability: The Mathematical Deterrence Equation
• Striking Iran = 3,000 missiles on Israel + destruction of 6 U.S. bases + closure of Hormuz + targeting aircraft carriers.
• Inevitable Result: A U.S. tactical victory = a total strategic defeat.

Summary:

When Technological Superiority Becomes a Trap and Science a Deterrent Weapon
The undeniable physical reality terrifying the Pentagon:
Modern U.S. aircraft—no matter how advanced—rely 90% on digital electronic systems. Whoever controls these electronics controls the aircraft entirely. Iran has proven in the field that it possesses this capability.


Consequently:

Pentagon Generals told Trump the bitter truth:
"We might succeed in destroying 60% of the Iranian nuclear program—but we will lose 40% of our air fleet in a single day."

A president who loses dozens of jets and returns pilots in coffins will not win any election. Senator Graham shouts rhetoric, but physics does not lie, and mathematics offers no compliments.

Trump returned to negotiations in Oman—not because he became "wise" or "peaceful"—but because hard science proved to him:

War on Iran = Clear technological suicide.
Iran turned advanced American technology from a point of strength into a fatal point of weakness, transforming science from a tool of offense into a strategic deterrent that forces the militarily "strongest" to the negotiating table.

This is not a victory of brute force—it is a victory of pure scientific intelligence.

Dr. Wassim Jaber | 23.02.2026


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴U.S. Air Power Surge: The Mechanics of Coercive Diplomacy

🖊The News:

👌On Tuesday, a squadron of F-22 Raptor stealth jets arrived in Israel, marking a critical peak in U.S. military mobilization. Washington has now deployed approximately 50% of its global air combat power to the Middle East, placing over 300 aircraft under CENTCOM’s direct command. This massive buildup coincides with President Trump’s ultimatum of "very bad consequences" should the upcoming Geneva talks fail to yield a breakthrough.

🔴 Strategic Analysis:

✌The deployment of 300+ advanced aircraft is a definitive shift from deterrence to theater preparation.

👌Historically, such a concentration of air assets echoes the precursor to the 2003 invasion of Iraq. By saturating the region with stealth technology and high-sortee capabilities, the U.S. aims to project a "total dominance" doctrine. This is an attempt to neutralize the Axis of Resistance's strategic depth through the threat of a massive, multi-vector aerial campaign designed to decapitate command structures and disrupt energy infrastructure.

🔴 Position & Evidence:

✌The U.S. strategy relies on the outdated assumption that air superiority equates to geopolitical surrender. Documented military outcomes over the last two decades demonstrate that high-tech air power faces diminishing returns against asymmetric adversaries. The Axis of Resistance has spent years hardening its missile capabilities and refining drone saturation tactics specifically designed to counter a concentrated aerial threat. Trump’s rhetoric is a tactical bluff intended to force concessions in Geneva; however, history shows that the Resistance does not negotiate under direct military blackmail.

🔴 Geopolitical Predictions:

🔢 Overextension:

Maintaining 50% of global air assets in one theater is unsustainable and will create strategic vulnerabilities for the U.S. in the Indo-Pacific.

🔢 Diplomatic Gridlock:

The heavy-handed military pressure is likely to backfire in Geneva, as Tehran and its allies view concessions under duress as a strategic defeat.

🔢 Asymmetric Counter-Response:

✌Expect an increase in "gray zone" activities across the region as the Axis seeks to demonstrate that U.S. air assets cannot protect fixed bases or maritime corridors from low-cost, high-impact strikes.

#AxisOfResistance #MiddleEast #USMilitary #Geopolitics #CENTCOM #TheObserver


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Modi in Israel: The Mirage of the "Hexagon Axis"

🖊The News:

✌Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi landed in Israel today for a landmark two-day state visit. Following a high-profile meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu, Modi is set to address the Knesset. Netanyahu has utilized this platform to announce the formation of a "Hexagon Axis"—a strategic partnership involving India, Greece, and Cyprus—aimed at reshaping the security architecture of the Eastern Mediterranean and the Indian Ocean.

🔴 Strategic Analysis:

👌This visit marks the definitive abandonment of India’s historical "non-alignment" in favor of a transactional alliance with the Zionist entity. Over the last decade, India has emerged as the primary consumer of Israeli military hardware, accounting for nearly 40% of Israel's defense exports. The "Hexagon Axis" is a calculated geopolitical maneuver designed to counter Chinese influence (BRI) and create a pro-Western corridor. By linking New Delhi with Mediterranean outposts like Greece and Cyprus, Washington and Tel Aviv are attempting to consolidate a naval and logistical chain that bypasses traditional regional powers.

🔴 Position & Evidence:

✌The emergence of this "axis" is a direct challenge to the sovereignty of regional actors and the stability of the Global South. Modi’s ideological alignment with Netanyahu ignores the shifting sands of global power; while Israel provides surveillance and missile technology, it cannot provide the regional legitimacy India requires to lead in Asia. This partnership is built on the fragile ground of shared Islamophobia and military procurement, rather than genuine economic synergy. Data shows that such exclusive security blocs often trigger counter-alliances, potentially neutralizing India’s influence in the energy-rich West Asia region.

🔴 Geopolitical Predictions:

🔢 Strategic Friction:

India’s pivot toward this "Hexagon" will inevitably strain its relations with Tehran and Moscow, complicating its role within the BRICS framework.

🔢 Security Vulnerability:

Reliance on Israeli defense systems creates a "kill-switch" dependency, where New Delhi’s tactical autonomy becomes contingent on Israeli geopolitical interests.

🔢 Logistical Failure:

✌The proposed trade corridors associated with this axis remain militarily vulnerable.

🫶Without an accommodation with the Axis of Resistance, these routes pass through contested waters that cannot be secured by stealth jets alone.


#India #Modi #Israel #HexagonAxis #TheObserver #Geopolitics


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Geneva Talks: U.S.–Iran Enter Third Round

💬Tomorrow, February 26, U.S. and Iranian envoys meet in Geneva for the third round of negotiations, following earlier sessions in Muscat and Geneva that ended without agreement. The talks unfold under heavy pressure: Washington has deployed the nuclear-powered USS Gerald R. Ford to the eastern Mediterranean, while Tehran signals it will not yield to military intimidation and is exploring advanced defense cooperation with China.

🔴 Strategic Context:

✌This confrontation is rooted in decades of nuclear disputes, dating back to the 1970s when the U.S. itself supplied Iran’s first research reactor. Today, Washington leverages military escalation as bargaining leverage, while Iran positions itself within an emerging multipolar axis—China, Russia, and regional allies—to resist unilateral dictates.

🔴 Position:

👌Evidence shows that military coercion has historically failed to break Iran’s resolve. The U.S. seeks a deal on its own terms, but Iran insists on sovereign rights to peaceful nuclear technology and defense autonomy. The balance of power favors resilience over capitulation.

🔴 Outlook:

✌A comprehensive breakthrough is unlikely in Geneva. Partial understandings—particularly on oil sanctions—remain possible. Yet failure could accelerate militarization in the Mediterranean and Gulf, while Iran deepens its eastern defense partnerships.

#Iran #US #GenevaTalks #ResistanceAxis #MiddleEast


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴ADNOC’s Power Play: Abu Dhabi Challenges Riyadh From Within OPEC


👌ADNOC, Abu Dhabi’s state oil giant, is aggressively expanding — targeting 5 million barrels per day by 2027 — positioning the UAE as a direct rival to Saudi Arabia within OPEC . This isn’t modernization for its own sake. It’s strategic repositioning dressed in corporate language.

🌕The calculus is deliberate:

🌕Abu Dhabi is racing to maximize hydrocarbon revenues before any meaningful energy transition narrows the window. And unlike Riyadh, the UAE has anchored its ambitions firmly within the normalization framework — aligning with Washington and Tel Aviv while projecting soft power through petrodollars.

✌The UAE-Saudi friction inside OPEC is not a technical quota dispute. It is a contest over who shapes the Arab Gulf’s political gravity in the post-unipolar order.


🤔Forecast:

👌Abu Dhabi will continue exceeding production agreements when strategically advantageous — fracturing OPEC cohesion from within. This serves those who benefit from a divided Gulf, not those who seek regional sovereignty.


#ADNOC #OPEC #UAE #GeopoliticsOfOil #TheObserver

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Trump’s Record Address: “Golden Age” Rhetoric, Tariffs, and Iran in the Crosshairs

🫶On the night of February 25, 2026, Donald Trump delivered the longest State of the Union address in American history — 1 hour and 48 minutes. The themes: economic nationalism, sweeping new tariffs, and a pointed strategic focus on Iran.

🔴 Strip away the spectacle and the message is unambiguous:

🌕Trump is rebuilding American hegemony through economic coercion, and Iran remains the central target of his regional doctrine. But this is not a new playbook — it is Maximum Pressure 2.0, recycled from a first term that failed to break Tehran, failed to stop the Axis of Resistance, and ultimately accelerated multipolarity rather than halting it.

🌕The Iran reference in a domestic address is deliberate signaling — to allies in Tel Aviv and Riyadh, and to markets dependent on Gulf stability. It is pressure politics, not policy depth.


🔴 Forecast: Expect intensified economic warfare against Iran, but no direct military confrontation — Washington’s appetite for open conflict is constrained by overextension and domestic fractures. The Resistance Axis has weathered this before. It will adapt again.


#Trump #StateOfTheUnion #Iran #MaximumPressure #TheObserver


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Putin’s Tech Doctrine: Industrial Sovereignty as Strategic Survival


🌕On February 25, 2026, President Vladimir Putin addressed the Future Technologies Forum in Moscow, declaring “industrial sovereignty” and bioeconomy leadership as core strategic priorities for Russia’s next developmental phase.


✌Read this clearly: this is not an aspirational speech — it is a war economy adapting in real time. Since Western sanctions escalated following 2022, Russia has systematically redirected investment toward domestic technology, artificial intelligence, and bio-industrial capacity, decoupling from Western supply chains that were weaponized against it.

🖊The precedent matters beyond Russia’s borders. Every state that has faced Western economic warfare — Iran, Venezuela, Cuba — understands that sovereignty begins with production, not consumption. Moscow is institutionalizing that lesson at scale.


Forecast: Russia will deepen technology-sharing frameworks with China, Iran, and Global South partners, accelerating the construction of a parallel technological order that progressively erodes the coercive leverage of Western sanctions regimes.

#Putin #Russia #IndustrialSovereignty #Bioeconomy #TheObserver


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Provocation in Wazzani: Israel’s "Namer" Manuever Amid Naqoura Talks


🌕The News:

✌While military representatives of the "Mechanism Committee" were convening in Ras al-Naqoura, a hostile Israeli force conducted a provocative incursion. Moving from Al-Hamamis Hill toward the "Al-Amra" area on the western outskirts of the Wazzani orchards, the force included a high-tech "Namer" Armored Personnel Carrier (APC) and GMC logistics vehicles.


🌕Strategic Analysis:

👌The deployment of the "Namer"—the IDF’s most heavily armored infantry vehicle based on the Merkava chassis—into the Wazzani sector is a calculated tactical signal. By conducting this maneuver during technical military talks in Naqoura, Tel Aviv is attempting to establish a "new normal" on the ground through intimidation. Historically, the Zionist entity utilizes these "reconnaissance-by-force" missions to test the resilience of the Resistance’s red lines and to exploit gaps in international monitoring mechanisms.


👍Position and Assessment:

✌This incursion is a blatant violation of sovereignty and a testament to the futility of relying solely on bureaucratic coordination committees. The presence of heavy armor in a civilian agricultural zone confirms that the occupation only understands the language of force. The "Mechanism Committee" meetings often serve as a diplomatic smokescreen for the IDF to improve its tactical positioning under the guise of routine movement.


🔽Geopolitical Outlook:

🫶Expect a continuation of these "creeping" incursions as the IDF seeks to secure vantage points overlooking the Litani basin. However, these maneuvers are likely to trigger a calculated response from the Axis of Resistance to restore the balance of power. The Naqoura talks will likely reach a stalemate if the occupation continues to prioritize field expansion over diplomatic protocols.


#Lebanon #Naqoura #Wazzani #AxisOfResistance #IDF #Geopolitics #TheObserver


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴The Architecture of Hegemonic Deception: A Strategic Critique of the 2026 State of the Union Address regarding Iran


The 2026 State of the Union address by Donald Trump represents a predictable yet dangerous escalation in the rhetorical warfare directed at the Islamic Republic of Iran. Viewed through the lens of the Axis of Resistance, the speech is not merely a collection of falsehoods, but a calculated instrument of psychological warfare designed to manufacture consent for continued economic terrorism and potential military adventurism. By dissecting the contradictions, factual vacuum, and neo-imperial logic of the address, we expose a superpower attempting to mask its declining regional influence with hyperbole.


1. The Nuclear Myth and the "Obliteration" Fantasy

The central pillar of the address—the claim that previous U.S. strikes or "pressure" had "obliterated" the Iranian nuclear program—is a fabrication that ignores both physics and geopolitical reality. Trump’s assertion that Iran is now "starting all over again" is a double-edged lie. First, Iran’s nuclear program, which remains under the most intrusive monitoring regime in history via the IAEA (despite the U.S. withdrawal from the JCPOA), has never been "obliterated." Civilian enrichment is a sovereign right under the NPT, and the infrastructure is deeply indigenous and decentralized.
Second, the claim that Iran is seeking a "nuclear weapon" remains an unsubstantiated intelligence trope used to justify illegal sanctions. By framing the issue as a binary of "American permission," the U.S. ignores the Fatwa against nuclear weapons and the strategic reality that Iran’s deterrence is built on conventional precision and regional alliances, not mass destruction. Trump’s rhetoric seeks to transform a legal civilian program into a phantom existential threat to the U.S. homeland—a geographical absurdity given the current range and intent of Iranian capabilities.


2. The Missile Threat: Technical Inflation as Political Tool

The address cites an "imminent missile threat" to Europe and the United States. This is a gross distortion of ballistic data. Iran’s missile doctrine is explicitly defensive and regionally focused, designed to deter the very "military buildup" Trump paradoxically touted in the same speech. No independent strategic assessment confirms an Iranian intent or capability to strike the U.S. mainland.
By inflating these capabilities, the administration seeks to justify the continued "encirclement" of Iran with Aegis Ashore systems and carrier strike groups. This creates a closed loop of escalation: the U.S. builds up forces in the Persian Gulf, Iran enhances its defensive deterrence to counter those forces, and the U.S. then points to that deterrence as "aggression."


3. The "Sponsor of Terror" Label: A Projection of Failure

Trump’s branding of Iran as the "world’s number one sponsor of terror" is a tired piece of political theater. From the perspective of the regional resistance, the true "sponsorship of terror" is found in the U.S.-backed devastation of Yemen, the support for extremist proxies in Syria, and the unconditional arming of the Zionist entity’s occupation of Palestine.
The label is used to criminalize the "Axis of Resistance"—a legitimate sovereign and popular alliance against foreign intervention. By framing support for Hezbollah or Ansarullah as "terrorism," the U.S. attempts to delegitimize indigenous movements that have successfully checked Western hegemony. This narrative serves domestic electoral politics by providing a simplified "villain" to distract from the failure of the "Maximum Pressure" campaign, which has failed to achieve a single strategic concession from Tehran.


4. Human Rights as an Imperial Pretext

The use of inflated figures regarding internal Iranian protests—claiming "thousands" killed without verifiable data—follows the historical pattern of "human rights" being used as a precursor to intervention. While the U.S.