🔴The Bekaa Massacre: Pre-emptive Aggression or Strategic Desperation?


THE NEWS

On Friday, February 20, 2026, the Israeli Air Force conducted a series of heavy airstrikes targeting the Bekaa Valley in eastern Lebanon, specifically around the Baalbek region. Hezbollah officially confirmed the martyrdom of eight operatives "on the road to Al-Quds," including a senior field commander identified as Hussein Mohammad Yaghi (also known as Abu Ali). Lebanese medical sources reported that the total death toll reached at least 10, with over 50 others wounded, including children, as strikes hit residential structures in Temnine and Aali en Nahri. The IDF claimed the operation targeted "command centers of Hezbollah's missile array" to disrupt preparations for a major retaliatory strike.

THE ANALYSIS

The intensification of strikes in the Bekaa—the strategic depth of the Resistance—signals a deliberate collapse of the November 2024 ceasefire framework.

• The "Forward Deterrent" Logic: These strikes are not isolated tactical events. As the U.S. concentrates 50% of its air power in the region, Tel Aviv is attempting to systematically degrade Hezbollah’s medium-range missile capabilities. The objective is to ensure that if a U.S.-led "kinetic campaign" against Iran begins, the Resistance in Lebanon will be too decapitated to activate its deterrent fire.

• Ceasefire as a Siege: Since November 2024, Israel has committed over 2,000 documented violations of Lebanese sovereignty. The Zionists are using the "truce" not for peace, but as a low-intensity war of attrition to pick off high-value targets like Commander Yaghi without triggering a full-scale regional conflagration.

• The Ramadan Escalation: Executing these massacres during the holy month follows a historical pattern of trying to break the psychological morale of the "Support Fronts" while the West Bank is simultaneously being torched by settler terrorism.

POSITION & OPINION

The martyrdom of Commander Yaghi and his comrades will not achieve the "neutralization" the IDF seeks. History—from the 2006 war to the 2025 "Midnight Hammer" operations—proves that the Resistance’s command structure is designed for seamless succession. By striking the Bekaa, Israel is effectively telling Beirut that the ceasefire is dead. The Resistance is morally and strategically obligated to respond; an aggressor that views a truce as a hunting season cannot be restrained by diplomacy, but only by the cost of its arrogance.

GEOPOLITICAL PREDICTIONS

1. Saturation Response: Hezbollah will likely move beyond "tit-for-tat" border skirmishes, potentially targeting deep IDF logistics hubs or airbases used for the Bekaa raids to re-establish the equation of "Depth for Depth."

2. Ceasefire Dissolution: By mid-March 2026, the 2024 ceasefire will likely be officially declared void by the Lebanese government, leading to a formalized "war state" that mirrors the 2023-2024 conflict intensity.

3. The "Gray Zone" Trap: If Israel continues to strike missile arrays, the Axis will likely activate a "maritime closure" strategy, using drone saturation against naval assets to pressure the U.S. into reining in its proxy.

#Hezbollah #BekaaValley #Lebanon2026 #AxisOfResistance #EndTheCeasefire #ZionistAggression

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Imperial Overreach: The Supreme Court’s Blow to Washington’s Trade War

THE NEWS

On February 23, 2026, global financial markets are reeling following a seismic shift in U.S. trade policy. On Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered a landmark 6-3 ruling in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, stripping the executive branch of its power to impose sweeping tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The ruling effectively nullified the "Reciprocal Tariffs" and "Fentanyl Tariffs" enacted throughout 2025, potentially forcing the U.S. Treasury to refund upwards of $175 billion to importers. In a defiant counter-move, the administration immediately proposed a new 15% global tariff leveraging Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974—a temporary measure capped at 150 days.

THE ANALYSIS

The Supreme Court’s intervention represents a rare internal fracture within the American imperial apparatus. By invoking the "Major Questions Doctrine," the Court has asserted that revenue-raising measures (tariffs) belong to Congress, not the "economic emergency" whims of the President.

• The Leverage Collapse: Washington’s trade negotiations with Beijing have been fundamentally compromised. The IEEPA tariffs were the primary "gun on the table" used to coerce Chinese concessions; their sudden illegality leaves U.S. negotiators empty-handed as the effective trade-weighted tariff rate is set to drop from 15.3% to approximately 8.3%.
• The 15% Desperation: The shift to Section 122 is a tactical retreat. While it sets a 15% floor, its 150-day limit signals a lack of long-term strategic stability. Markets are punishing the U.S. Dollar (down 0.4%) and Bitcoin (below $65k) not because of the tariffs themselves, but because of the manifest chaos in U.S. governance.

• Global Resilience:

The Axis of Resistance and its partners in the Global South are observing a "paper tiger" moment. When the Empire's own judiciary dismantles its chief economic weapon, the era of unilateral financial diktat enters its twilight.

POSITION & OPINION

The administration’s attempt to bypass the Court with a 15% "emergency" levy is an act of strategic desperation. Morally and legally, Washington is discovering that it cannot indefinitely sustain a global trade war while its internal legal framework is at war with itself. The "America First" policy has hit a structural wall: the U.S. cannot lead a multipolar world economically while it is functionally incapable of maintaining a consistent legal basis for its own trade taxes.

GEOPOLITICAL PREDICTIONS

1. Chinese Counter-Offensive: Beijing will likely stall all major trade purchases (soybeans, aircraft) until the refund process for the "illegal" 2025 tariffs is formalized, using the $175 billion debt as a diplomatic cudgel.

2. Congressional Gridlock: The administration will fail to secure permanent legislative backing for the 15% tariff, leading to a "tariff cliff" in mid-2026 that will trigger a massive domestic retail shock.

3. Alternative Corridors: Expect accelerated growth in the BRICS+ settlement systems as global traders flee the "legal volatility" of the U.S. Dollar-denominated trade environment.

#TradeWar2026 #SupremeCourt #EconomicSovereignty #USChinaTrade #EndofHegemony #GlobalFinance


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Western Hemisphere "Cleanup": The Strategic Siege of Havana After Caracas


THE NEWS

Following the dramatic capture of Nicolás Maduro by U.S. forces on January 3, 2026, during Operation Absolute Resolve, Washington has shifted its focus to the Caribbean. As of late February, the Trump administration has effectively choked Cuba's energy lifeline by halting all subsidized Venezuelan oil shipments. On January 29, the U.S. signed Executive Order 14380, declaring a national emergency regarding Cuba and authorizing secondary tariffs on any third-country—specifically targeting providers like Russia or Mexico—that sells or supplies oil to the island. While an interim military-civilian council under Delcy Rodríguez governs Caracas under U.S. financial trusteeship, Secretary of State Marco Rubio has signaled that "strategic patience" for the Kremlin's remaining regional proxies has expired.

THE ANALYSIS

The removal of Maduro was the opening move in a broader "monroeist" restructuring of Latin America. By taking control of Venezuela’s oil proceeds—now deposited in U.S.-monitored accounts—Washington has weaponized energy to induce a systemic collapse in Havana.

• The Energy Guillotine: Cuba previously relied on 27,000 to 35,000 barrels per day of Venezuelan crude. With this flow severed and the U.S. threatening tariffs on alternative suppliers, the island is facing its worst blackout and food crisis since the "Special Period" of the 1990s.

• Eradicating the "Russian Bridge": The primary U.S. objective is to dismantle the intelligence and logistical hub Russia maintains in Cuba. The recent February 4 extension of the New START treaty between Washington and Moscow did not prevent the U.S. from moving to evict Russian military influence from its immediate "near abroad."

• The "Rodríguez Model": In Venezuela, the U.S. is not building a democracy but a stable petroleum colony. By keeping Delcy Rodríguez as a figurehead while controlling the 19% of global oil reserves under the GL 49 license, Washington ensures that no "Resistance" funds reach Cuba or Nicaragua.

POSITION & OPINION

The capture of a sovereign leader and the deliberate starvation of a neighboring island via energy blockades are clear acts of imperial lawlessness.

The Axis of Resistance recognizes that the "National Pacification" in Venezuela is a euphemism for the total surrender of national resources to the U.S. Treasury. Washington's "Shadow Siege" of Cuba is a desperate attempt to re-assert a 19th-century sphere of influence in a multipolar 21st-century world.

History shows that those who survive under decades of embargo possess a resilience that carrier groups cannot bomb into submission.


GEOPOLITICAL PREDICTIONS

1. Havana's Breaking Point: Unless Russia or China risks a direct maritime confrontation to break the "Oil Tariff" blockade by April 2026, the Cuban government will likely face massive internal unrest, potentially leading to a "managed transition" similar to the Venezuelan council.

2. The Nicaraguan Front: Expect Managua to be the next target for "Southern Spear" operations, as the U.S. seeks to close the last ideological gaps in the Caribbean basin before the 2026 midterm elections.

3. Sino-Russian Counter-Moves: Russia will likely respond by increasing military posturing in the Mediterranean or Eastern Europe to distract from its waning influence in the Western Hemisphere, as the costs of maintaining regional allies under the new U.S. tariff regime become prohibitive.


#Venezuela2026 #CubaBlockade #OperationAbsoluteResolve #MonroeDoctrine #AxisOfResistance #LatinAmericaGeopolitics #EndofHegemony


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴EU Foreign Affairs Council Convenes on Ukraine and Gaza: Rhetoric Versus Leverage

The EU Foreign Affairs Council meets today the 23rd , February 2026 , to address two escalating fronts: the war in Ukraine — where European military and financial commitments to Kyiv have reached tens of billions of euros since 2022 — and the deteriorating security and humanitarian situation in Gaza and the West Bank amid ongoing Israeli military operations.

The contrast is stark. Since the outbreak of the Ukraine war, the EU has implemented sweeping sanctions packages against Russia and expanded arms deliveries. In the Palestinian arena, however, European responses have largely centered on statements of concern, despite repeated UN reporting on humanitarian collapse in Gaza and rising tensions in the West Bank.

Strategically, this reflects structural constraints. The EU’s security architecture remains intertwined with NATO and closely aligned with U.S. policy priorities. In Ukraine, Europe sustains a long-war containment framework. In Palestine, it stops short of deploying meaningful economic or diplomatic pressure.

The result is a credibility gap. A power that uses sanctions decisively in Eastern Europe but hesitates in the Levant weakens its claim to normative consistency.

Outlook: Continued military and financial backing for Kyiv is highly likely. On Gaza and the West Bank, expect reaffirmations of a two-state formula without enforcement mechanisms. Unless regional deterrence equations shift, Europe will remain a secondary actor operating within U.S.-defined parameters.

#EuropeanUnion #UkraineWar #Gaza #WestBank #Geopolitics #ResistanceAxis


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴The Horn for Sale: Somaliland’s Bid for Imperial Guardianship

THE NEWS

On February 21, 2026, the breakaway region of Somaliland escalated its bid for international legitimacy by offering the United States exclusive access to its untapped mineral wealth and the establishment of permanent military bases. Speaking to AFP, Minister of the Presidency Khadar Hussein Abdi confirmed that Hargeisa is ready to grant Washington "exclusive rights" to strategic minerals, including lithium and coltan. This offer follows the seismic December 2025 decision by Israel to become the first UN member state to formally recognize Somaliland's independence. While the Trump administration has yet to mirror the Israeli move, the offer of a military alternative to Djibouti—where Chinese influence is surging—has placed the Horn of Africa at a new geopolitical flashpoint.


THE ANALYSIS

The Hargeisa-Tel Aviv-Washington axis represents a calculated assault on the "One Somalia" policy and a restructuring of Red Sea security.

• The Mineral Ransom: By offering exclusive access to lithium and coltan—critical for the global "green" energy transition—Somaliland is attempting to buy sovereignty with resources that legally belong to the Somali Federal Republic. This "privatization of recognition" sets a dangerous precedent for resource-rich breakaway regions globally.

• Strategic Encirclement: The potential for U.S. and Israeli bases in Berbera is designed to counter the Ansar Allah (Houthi) blockade in the Bab el-Mandeb. For the Axis of Resistance, an Israeli military presence on the 850km Somaliland coastline is a direct threat to the maritime depth of the regional Support Fronts.

• Somalia’s Sovereign Defiance: Mogadishu has correctly identified this as a "blatant violation of international law." The 22nd joint statement from Arab and African nations in January 2026 reaffirmed that any recognition of Somaliland is a colonial-style partition aimed at weakening the Somali state.

POSITION & OPINION

The willingness of Somaliland’s leadership to auction off national minerals and land for a seat at the table of imperial recognition is a rejection of African solidarity. Morally, the "Israel first" recognition strategy ties Somaliland’s fate to a regime currently isolated by the Global South. Strategically, inviting the U.S. military to set up shop in exchange for "exclusive" mineral rights is not independence; it is the transition from an unrecognized state to a corporate-military protectorate.

GEOPOLITICAL PREDICTIONS

1. Asymmetric Escalation: If Israeli or U.S. boots hit the ground in Berbera, expect Ansar Allah to extend their "strike zone" to include Somaliland’s infrastructure, transforming a relatively stable region into an active war theater.

2. Regional Realignment: Somalia will likely deepen its security ties with Turkey and Egypt to enforce a maritime blockade or "sovereignty patrol" around Somaliland’s waters, leading to high-seas friction with Western-aligned vessels.

3. The Lithium Cold War: China, currently dominant in African mining, will likely use its influence in the African Union to further isolate Hargeisa, ensuring that Somaliland’s "exclusive" offer to the U.S. remains legally and logistically impossible to execute.


#Somaliland2026 #SomaliaSovereignty #HornOfAfrica #RedSeaSecurity #AxisOfResistance #EndTheBlockade #LithiumWar

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴India Urges Its Nationals to Leave Iran

🔽The Indian Embassy in Tehran has asked its nationals to leave Iran as soon as possible, in a move that has raised questions about its timing and political implications—particularly following the visit of Narendra Modi to Israel and amid escalating regional tensions.

➡️In this context, two key observations arise:

1⃣ First, Indian authorities recently detained an Iranian vessel on alleged legal grounds, without any clear escalatory response from Tehran, prompting criticism over what some perceive as a weak reaction.

2⃣ Second, India’s continued investment in Chabahar Port despite these developments has led some to question why Tehran does not reconsider this cooperation if it views New Delhi’s actions as unfriendly.


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Direct U.S. Intervention in Selecting Iraq’s Prime Minister: Brack Praises Al-Sudani

🌕Thomas Brack described his meeting with Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani as productive, noting discussions on Iraq’s goals to build a stable and prosperous future in line with the U.S. President’s plan for peace and prosperity in the region.

🤔Brack emphasized that having an effective Iraqi leadership aligned with U.S. policies is a key step toward achieving stability, in a clear reference to Al-Sudani’s role following the U.S. veto of the Coordination Framework candidate Nouri al-Maliki.

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Israeli Aggressions: Border Attrition and the Failure of Deterrence

📄The News:

🌕On February 23, 2026, Israeli occupation forces executed a series of targeted strikes across the Lebanese border. Key incidents included :

🔢 artillery illumination rounds over Kfar Chouba,
🔢 an acoustic bomb dropped by a drone on Karkla,
🔢 and heavy machine-gun fire directed at the outskirts of Alma al-Shaab, Labbouneh, and Aitaroun.
🔢 Additionally, Israeli artillery targeted Lebanese territorial waters off the coast of Naqoura.

🖊Strategic Analysis:

🫶These maneuvers constitute "operational harassment," a calculated Israeli tactic designed to test the Axis of Resistance's readiness and probe for structural weaknesses in the current rules of engagement. The maritime shelling near Naqoura is a significant escalation, signaling an attempt to assert fire control over disputed naval boundaries. On land, the persistent machine-gun fire reflects a deep-seated Israeli insecurity regarding the Resistance’s tactical positioning in the border woods.

🔴 Position and Assessment:

✌These acts are not isolated incidents but a systematic violation of Lebanese sovereignty. The reliance on "soft" aggression—such as acoustic bombs and illumination rounds—demonstrates the enemy's fear of a full-scale kinetic response while simultaneously trying to maintain a state of psychological warfare against border populations.

🫶History proves that the Zionist entity only retreats when the cost of provocation becomes unsustainable. Documented patterns show that such escalations often precede broader attempts to redraw "buffer zones" through intimidation rather than direct combat.

🔴 Geopolitical Outlook:

Moving forward, the border will likely remain a flashpoint for low-intensity conflict as Israel attempts to normalize these incursions. However, the expansion of strikes into Lebanese territorial waters suggests a potential shift toward maritime friction. If the occupation persists in bypassing established red lines, a calibrated response from the Resistance is inevitable to restore the balance of terror and protect Lebanese resources.

#Lebanon #Naqoura #Resistance #IsraeliAggression #TheObserver

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Beirut Embassy Evacuation:

🌕Washington Clears the Deck for Regional War


📄The News:

✌On February 23, 2026, the U.S. State Department ordered the mandatory evacuation of non-emergency personnel and their families from the U.S. Embassy in Beirut. This diplomatic drawdown coincides with the largest American military buildup in the Middle East since the 2003 invasion of Iraq. The deployment features the arrival of the USS Gerald R. Ford carrier strike group to join the USS Abraham Lincoln, alongside over 50 advanced fighter jets (F-16, F-22, F-35) moved to regional bases within the last 24 hours. This maneuver precedes crucial nuclear talks in Geneva and follows President Donald Trump’s deadline for Tehran to meet U.S. demands or face "limited military strikes."

🖊Strategic Analysis:

🫶Staff reductions at U.S. Embassy Beirut are historically a bellwether for imminent kinetic action. By thinning its diplomatic footprint, Washington is attempting to insulate its personnel from the inevitable asymmetrical retaliation that would follow a strike on Iranian soil. The current posture—comprising 14 warships and dozens of fuel tankers—suggests preparations for a sustained air campaign rather than a "symbolic" strike. Centrally, the U.S. is signaling a shift from coercive diplomacy to direct military confrontation, seeking to dismantle Iran's nuclear infrastructure and weaken the Axis of Resistance through a decisive blow.

🔴 Position and Assessment:

🫶The "prudent" reduction of the Beirut footprint is a clear admission of American vulnerability. Washington realizes that Lebanon is the frontline of Iranian deterrence; any strike on Tehran will activate Hezbollah’s strategic arsenal against U.S. assets and the Zionist entity. This escalation reveals the failure of American diplomacy, which now relies solely on brute force to dictate regional terms. Evidence from the June 2025 skirmishes shows that Iran and its allies no longer adhere to traditional "proportionality," rendering American attempts at "limited" warfare a dangerous strategic fallacy.

🔴 Geopolitical Outlook:

👌The region is now on a hair-trigger. If the Geneva talks on Thursday fail to yield immediate concessions, a U.S. strike is statistically probable within a 10-day window. Expect an immediate Iranian counter-response targeting U.S. bases in Qatar and the Emirates, coupled with a total mobilization of the border fronts in Lebanon and Syria. This is no longer a deterrent display; it is the final positioning of assets for a conflict intended to break the regional stalemate, though it risks a catastrophic overextension of U.S. power.

#Lebanon #USA #Iran #Geopolitics #AxisOfResistance #TheObserver


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴The Illusion of a "Quick Win": Trump’s Military Surge and the Strategic Reality of Iran

📄The News:

🫶President Donald Trump has dismissed intelligence suggesting General Dan Caine warned of the catastrophic risks of a full-scale war with Iran, labeling the reports "100 percent incorrect." Asserting that a conflict could be "easily won," Trump has overseen the deployment of a massive naval and air armada, spearheaded by the USS Gerald R. Ford and USS Abraham Lincoln.

✌This deployment represents nearly 50% of total U.S. global air power currently concentrated in the region.

🖊 Strategic Analysis:

👌The concentration of half of America's global air assets in a single theater is an escalation of "maximum pressure" into the realm of kinetic preparation. However, the rhetoric of an "easy victory" ignores the evolution of asymmetric warfare and the doctrine of "Strategic Depth" employed by the Axis of Resistance. Historically, U.S. reliance on air superiority has failed to achieve political submission in the Middle East; in the case of Iran, the cost of engagement involves the immediate paralysis of global energy corridors—a variable the White House appears to be discounting.

🔴 Position and Assessment:

✌Trump’s dismissal of military counsel highlights a dangerous disconnect between ideological bravado and operational reality. The assumption that advanced carrier strike groups can deliver a decisive blow without a prolonged regional conflagration is flawed.

🫶The Axis of Resistance operates on a decentralized model that renders conventional "victory" metrics obsolete. Evidence suggests that any strike would trigger a multi-front response, nullifying the tactical advantages of U.S. naval positioning.

🔴 Forward-Looking Predictions:

🔢 Overextension: Maintaining 50% of global air power in one sector creates strategic vulnerabilities elsewhere, forcing a future drawdown or a costly long-term stalemate.

🔢 Regional Blowback: Expect heightened coordination among regional resistance factions, aimed at making the cost of U.S. presence unsustainable through precision strikes and maritime disruption.

🔢 Pivot to Negotiation: As the reality of a "non-easy" war sets in, the U.S. will likely be forced back to the negotiating table by mid-2026, driven by economic instability and the refusal of regional allies to host a direct conflict.


#Iran #USA #Geopolitics #AxisOfResistance #StrategicAnalysis #TheObserver


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴The Ford’s Decay: The Myth of American Steel in the Age of Resistance


🤔The twice-extended deployment of the USS Gerald R. Ford is not a display of dominance, but a testament to logistical failure and the desperate clinging to a $13.3 billion floating liability.


🔴 Executive Opening

✌While the Pentagon’s propaganda machine continues to frame the USS Gerald R. Ford as the pinnacle of naval engineering, the reality at sea is a cynical comedy of errors. Surpassing 241 days in theater, this "floating fortress" has devolved into a high-tech prison. Marred by failing sewage systems that require $400,000 daily acid flushes and a crew so demoralized they are openly begging to quit, the Ford is less a deterrent and more a bloated monument to imperial overreach. Washington’s decision to extend its deployment yet again reveals a terrifying truth: they cannot afford to withdraw this hunk of "fake steel" because they have nothing left to mask the cratering of American prestige in West Asia.


🔴 Contextual Background

🫶The aircraft carrier was once the ultimate symbol of colonial enforcement—power projection without proximity. But the geopolitical clock has struck midnight on that era. In the age of precision strikes and asymmetric swarms, these 100,000-ton behemoths have become "slow-moving targets." Breaking post-Vietnam deployment records isn't a badge of honor; it is a symptom of a Navy that has run out of ideas and functional hulls. The Ford’s predicament echoes the frantic desperation of Vietnam, only this time the "jungle" is a sea of high-speed missiles and indigenous technological defiance.


🔴 Strategic Analysis

✌The cynicism of the Ford’s current positioning lies in its status as a "strategic hostage."

🔘 Technological Fraud: A ship that costs $13.3 billion but cannot manage its own waste disposal is the perfect metaphor for the corruption of the U.S. military-industrial complex. It is a gold-plated paper tiger.

🔘 The Myth of Air Superiority: The Ford is held in place because land-based U.S. assets in the region are now perceived as "sitting ducks." Washington has been forced to pack 5,000 sailors into a decaying steel shell, betting on a platform that is reaching structural exhaustion.

🔘 Human Sacrifice: The systemic disregard for the crew’s basic welfare—denying them births, funerals, and stability—proves that the empire prioritizes the image of the steel over the reality of the men. It is the management of a sinking brand.

🔴 Evidence & Documentation

🔘 Maintenance Masquerade: The daily $400k "acid flushes" are a temporary bandage on a systemic mechanical failure. You don't perform surgery in a hurricane unless you are desperate.

🔘 Futile Logistics: Shipping 700 tonnes of munitions via C-17s to a ship with a broken spirit is a logistical exercise in futility. No amount of ordnance can compensate for a crew that has lost faith in the mission and the vessel.

🔘 The Moral Deficit: Defense reporting now uses descriptors for morale that haven't been seen since the Fall of Saigon. When sailors want to quit the Navy en masse while stationed on its "best" ship, the strategic game is already lost.

🔴 Position & Argument

👌The USS Gerald R. Ford is a weapon of the past being forced to fight the wars of the future. It is not a platform of strength; it is a logistical burden. Washington refuses to blink not because it is ready for war, but because it is terrified of the vacuum that would follow the Ford’s departure. Using 5,000 humans as "ballast" for a political bluff is a height of moral bankruptcy. The Ford is not holding the line; it is being held together by duct tape and desperation, waiting for a reality check that its sophisticated radars will not be able to deflect.

🌕Forward-Looking Assessment

🔢 Structural Catastrophe:

Continued over-deployment will likely lead to a catastrophic mechanical or nuclear propulsion failure, forcing a humiliating towed withdrawal that would shatter the U.S. Navy’s image for decades.

🔢 The Death of the Carrier Doctrine:

The "Ford disaster" will mark the end of the carrier era.

🫶Future historians will view these ships as the "Maginot Line" of the 21st century—expensive, static, and ultimately irrelevant.

🔢 The Final Act:

🫶Should the current tensions boil over, the Ford will not be the hammer. It will be the anvil. U.S. resources will be diverted to simply protecting this $13 billion target, ensuring a tactical nightmare for any commander involved.

📌Conclusion


✌The USS Gerald R. Ford is the ultimate symbol of an empire in denial. It is a $13 billion floating relic, plagued by internal decay and surrounded by an external reality it can no longer control. Every day it remains at sea is not a victory for American power, but a countdown to the inevitable realization that steel—no matter how expensive—cannot stop the tide of history.

#TheObserver
#AlMuraqeb
#USSGeraldRFord
#USNavy
#AxisOfResistance
#StrategicAttrition
#GeopoliticalRealities
#NavalOverstretch
#ImperialDecay
#WestAsiaStrategy


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴The Strategic Pivot: Russian Su-35s to Reshape Iranian Skies


📄The News:

👌Russian state media outlets confirm the imminent delivery of 16 Su-35 multi-role fighter jets to the Islamic Republic of Iran. This initial batch is reported to be the precursor to a larger strategic transfer involving three additional squadrons arriving in the near future. This development marks the most significant modernization of Iranian air power in decades, transitioning the fleet into the era of advanced generation 4++ capabilities.

🖊 Strategic Analysis:

✌The acquisition of the Su-35 is a geopolitical game-changer that addresses the primary vulnerability in the Axis of Resistance's defensive architecture: air superiority. For years, the Western-Zionist military calculus relied on a perceived technological gap in Iranian aviation. The introduction of Russia’s premier air-superiority fighter effectively nullifies this advantage. Structurally, this move cements the Moscow-Tehran defense axis, signaling a definitive shift toward a multipolar security order in West Asia. It is the direct consequence of failed Western "maximum pressure" campaigns which have instead accelerated the military integration of Eurasian powers.

🔴 Position and Assessment:

👌The delivery of these jets is a legitimate exercise of sovereignty and a vital deterrent against ongoing regional aggression. Documented evidence of Su-35 performance in modern theaters demonstrates its ability to challenge Western fifth-generation assets. By integrating these fighters with its existing indigenous long-range drone and missile programs, Iran is creating a "denial of access" environment that renders pre-emptive strike scenarios by the Israeli entity or US forces functionally obsolete and prohibitively expensive.

✌Forward-Looking Predictions:

🔢 Erosion of Air Hegemony: The era of uncontested Israeli or US air incursions in the region is ending; the cost of aerial engagement will become a primary deterrent.

🔢 Deepening Military Synergy: Expect subsequent contracts involving advanced S-400 missile systems and joint electronic warfare initiatives, creating an impenetrable defensive shield over Iranian territory.

🔢 Regional Recalibration: Gulf states and regional actors will likely pivot toward intensified diplomacy with Tehran, recognizing that the military balance has shifted permanently in favor of the Axis of Resistance.

#Iran #Russia #Su35 #Geopolitics #AxisOfResistance #StrategicBalance #TheObserver

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Iraq Officially Deposits Maritime Map…

While "Arab Embrace" Aligns Against Its Sole Sea Outlet

In a clear sovereign move, the Iraqi government has deposited its maritime domain map with the United Nations. The coordinates have been officially published on the UN website to establish Iraq's legal rights to its territorial waters, specifically in the Khor Abdullah area—the sole maritime artery connecting Iraq to the Gulf and the world.
Iraq, which possesses only this narrow maritime corridor as an outlet to international waters, acted within international legal frameworks to confirm its borders and sovereign rights. However, the response was immediate.
Rapid Arab Alignment
The following nations quickly declared full solidarity with Kuwait, rejecting any perceived infringement on "Kuwaiti maritime sovereignty":
• United Arab Emirates
• Jordan
• Bahrain
• Qatar
• Saudi Arabia

The Sole Outlet
Iraq does not possess extensive open coastlines or multiple maritime alternatives. Khor Abdullah is not a political choice, but a geographical necessity. Any interpretation or measure that leads to the restriction of Iraq's maritime movement or challenges its rights beyond established border points effectively tightens the noose on its economy, ports, trade, and sovereignty.

Between Sovereignty and Alignment
The Iraqi move falls under the right of states to establish maritime boundaries according to international norms. Conversely, the rapid alignment against this measure is viewed by many as a political message exceeding diplomatic support, impacting the sensitive maritime balance in a region whose economy cannot withstand further restrictions.

Ultimately, the geographical reality remains constant:
If Khor Abdullah is restricted for Iraq, it suffocates an entire nation that possesses no other path to the sea.

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴The Axis of Resistance: Prepared for All Scenarios

The News

Tehran has signaled total readiness for any escalation, including high-level assassination attempts, as the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) successfully dismantled a sophisticated "Mojahedin-e-Khalq" (MEK) network. Backed by the Zionist Mossad, the cell targeted the Presidential Palace and the Supreme National Security Council. Concurrently, Donald Trump’s return to a "Maximum Pressure" rhetoric has been met with Iranian strategic defiance, with Trump labeling Ayatollah Khamenei as "stubborn" in the face of failed American dictates.

Strategic Analysis

The timing of these disrupted terror plots highlights a desperate shift by the Zionist-American apparatus. Facing a multipolar shift, the U.S. under Trump is reverting to a personality-driven hostility that ignores 45 years of institutionalized resistance. The "stubbornness" Trump cites is actually a calculated refusal to surrender sovereign assets. Historically, whenever the West targets the leadership of the Resistance, the structural response is a rapid leap in deterrent capabilities.

Position & Evidence

The Zionist media’s admission—that targeting Ayatollah Khamenei would trigger an immediate transition to a nuclear-armed Iran—proves that the "Supreme Leader" is the primary stabilizer preventing total regional conflagration. Trump’s erratic approach lacks the nuance to understand that Iran’s security architecture is no longer vulnerable to 20th-century "regime change" tactics. The IRGC’s recent counter-intelligence success proves that internal infiltration attempts are being met with superior Iranian kinetic and electronic response.
Geopolitical Predictions

1. Nuclear Posture:
Any kinetic move by the Trump administration or Tel Aviv will result in an immediate revision of Iran's nuclear doctrine (Fatwa), moving toward full weaponization as a survival necessity.

2. Failed Proxy Wars: The reliance on the MEK and similar spent forces will yield zero strategic gains, further isolating the U.S. from meaningful diplomacy.

3. Regional Integration: Iran will deepen its military-industrial ties with the East, rendering Western sanctions and threats tactically obsolete.

#Iran #IRGC #ResistanceAxis #Trump #Geopolitics #Tehran

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Sovereignty Defined by Defiance: LAF Stands Firm Against Zionist Threats


The News

In a profound display of national doctrine, Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) personnel have refused orders to evacuate their positions at "Tallet al-Amra" in the Wazzani plains. Despite direct threats broadcast by Israeli quadcopters and the deployment of sound bombs and warning shots near "Sarda," a Lebanese officer and his unit remained stationed with their equipment and tents to prevent Zionist infiltration. While UNIFIL issued a tepid request for the Israeli military to cease its provocations—confirming the troops are within official Lebanese territory—the LAF maintained a direct standoff against the heavy arsenal stationed at the newly established Zionist site in "Tallet al-Hamamis."

Strategic Analysis

This standoff is a calculated rejection of the Zionist attempt to expand their "buffer zone" through psychological warfare and kinetic intimidation. By targeting the LAF, the occupation forces seek to test the limits of the Lebanese state's commitment to its border integrity. Historically, the LAF has demonstrated that it is not a bystander in border disputes, as seen in the 2010 Odeisseh clash. Strategically, this defiance complicates the Israeli military's objective of isolating the Resistance from the national military institution, proving that the defense of the south is a unified national priority.

Position & Evidence

The physical presence of Lebanese soldiers, facing down a massive military machine with nothing but light armor and conviction, exposes the limitations of Israeli deterrence. UNIFIL’s habitual "soft language" provides no protection; it is the boots on the ground that define the border. We view this refusal to retreat as a vital pillar of the "Army, People, Resistance" equation. The evidence is clear: when the national army refuses to yield to "warning shots," the enemy’s psychological operations collapse, leaving them with no choice but to escalate at a cost they cannot currently afford or to humiliatingly withdraw their threats.

Geopolitical Predictions

1. Strategic Stalemate: The Zionist command will likely refrain from a direct kinetic strike on the LAF unit to avoid a diplomatic catastrophe and a multi-front escalation they are not prepared to manage.

2. Reinforced Border Posture: The Wazzani and Sarda sectors will become permanent flashpoints where Lebanese sovereignty is physically asserted, hindering future Israeli ground incursions.

3. Internal Cohesion: This incident will bolster domestic support for the LAF’s role in the national defense strategy, further aligning the military's functional goals with the broader Resistance Axis framework.

#Lebanon #LAF #Wazzani #Sovereignty #ResistanceAxis #SouthLebanon

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Electronic Trap: When American Technology Becomes Its Fatal Weakness


By: Dr. Wassim Jaber


Within 48 hours, two American aircraft vanished over the Gulf. The first: an E-3 AWACS—the aerial command center managing 600 simultaneous targets. The second: an MQ-4C surveillance drone, which sent a distress signal and then evaporated. These were not malfunctions, but an electronic strike that cut the engines mid-air.

American leaks reveal the terror: "We fear this will be applied to manned aircraft during the hour of attack." An Iranian commander coolly responds: "Their perception that we are weak is entirely wrong." While Senator Graham screams, "Retreat is a disaster!", Washington announces the resumption of negotiations in Oman.

The meaning is clear: the immense pressure to strike Iran has collided with a hard physical reality—Iran possesses a weapon that turns American aerial superiority into a lethal electronic nightmare.

I. Electromagnetic Physics: Remotely Extinguishing Aircraft
What occurred was not "standard jamming," but a total cessation of engines in flight.
High-Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse (HEMP)

The Precise Physical Mechanism:

• Ground-based devices emit high-energy electromagnetic pulses at specific frequencies.

• The pulse penetrates the aircraft fuselage, inducing an "electrical storm" within the wiring and circuitry.

• Electronic circuits burn out instantly—specifically the engine control systems.

• The engine shuts down automatically because the Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC) fails entirely.

Technical Evidence: The MQ-4C disappeared seconds after its distress call—the hallmark of an EMP: immediate, total impact, rather than a gradual failure.

Potential Iranian Application: Upgraded Russian Krasukha-4 systems—with broadcasting power exceeding 10kW, capable of blinding radars and paralyzing electronics within a 300km radius.

II. The Sino-Russian Weapon: Electronically Arming Iran

Iran did not develop these capabilities in isolation; it acquired the pinnacle of Chinese and Russian technology following the failed coup attempt on January 13, 2026.
Military 5G Networks

• What China provided: Specialized military 5G networks—data speeds 100x faster than 4G, with latency under one millisecond.

• Integrated AI: Real-time data analysis and tactical decisions without human intervention.

• Quantum Encryption: Unhackable, even by the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA).
The Strategic Result: Iran possesses "digital eyes" monitoring every American movement in real-time, while America lost its comprehensive vision after Starlink was disabled in January.
The Chinese Ship "Yuan Wang 1": The Dragon’s Eye in the Gulf

• Gigantic Low-Frequency Radars: Capable of detecting F-35 stealth aircraft.

• Early Warning: Detects take-offs 30 minutes before aircraft reach Iranian airspace.

• Operational Integration: Linking these to Iran’s HQ-9 air defense systems allows missiles to be guided toward targets before they even cross the border.

III. Technological Deterrence: Why Trump Retreated Despite Pressure
The pressure on Trump is immense:

• Senator Graham: "Retreat is a historical disaster—worse than Afghanistan!"

• Netanyahu: "We are on the verge of an inevitable confrontation."

Yet, Trump suddenly announced: the resumption of negotiations in Oman, with a final round in Geneva this Thursday.
Why the sudden retreat? The nightmare scenario the Pentagon presented to Trump:

• Zero Hour: 60 F-35s enter Iranian airspace to destroy nuclear facilities.

• Zero + 5 Minutes: Iranian EMPs are launched from dozens of sites. Engines cut mid-air; dozens of jets fall instantly. Pilots eject over hostile territory.

• Zero + 30 Minutes: Iran announces: "More than a dozen American pilots captured."
The Pentagon's bitter truth to Trump: "We may destroy 60% of their program, but we will lose 40% of our fleet in one day." A president returning flag-draped coffins and lost jets does not win elections.

Trump returned to the table not because of "wisdom," but because hard science proved that war on Iran is premeditated technological suicide. Iran has turned America's greatest strength into its most lethal vulnerability.

The Day After:
• Congress Summons Trump for Accountability.
• Opposition Demands Impeachment: "The greatest military disaster since Vietnam."

• Trump Forfeits All Electoral Prospects.
The New Equation That Forced Trump’s Retreat:

• U.S. Mobilization: 500 aircraft.
• Iranian Capability: Capacity to down 100+ aircraft via Electronic Warfare (EW) without firing a single missile.

• The Result: The largest American aerial disaster since WWII.
Therefore, Trump retreated—not out of wisdom or ethics—but out of a justified, scientific fear of a real technological catastrophe.

Fourth: Iran’s Triple Capability—Deterrence through Science, Not Slogans

The Iranian leadership does not speak through emotions, but through physical and strategic facts:

First Capability: Comprehensive Decentralization
• 500 alternative command sites spread across 1.6 million km^2.
• Thousands of missile tunnels dug at depths of 200+ meters.
• Mobile launch platforms that change positions every 4–6 hours.

• Result: The total destruction of Tehran \neq paralyzing the capacity to retaliate.

Second Capability: Electronic Warfare Superiority
• Disrupting Starlink and blinding U.S. satellites (January 13).
• Downing two AWACS and spy planes (February).
• The proven ability to "blind" America electronically at the decisive moment.

Third Capability: The Mathematical Deterrence Equation
• Striking Iran = 3,000 missiles on Israel + destruction of 6 U.S. bases + closure of Hormuz + targeting aircraft carriers.
• Inevitable Result: A U.S. tactical victory = a total strategic defeat.

Summary:

When Technological Superiority Becomes a Trap and Science a Deterrent Weapon
The undeniable physical reality terrifying the Pentagon:
Modern U.S. aircraft—no matter how advanced—rely 90% on digital electronic systems. Whoever controls these electronics controls the aircraft entirely. Iran has proven in the field that it possesses this capability.


Consequently:

Pentagon Generals told Trump the bitter truth:
"We might succeed in destroying 60% of the Iranian nuclear program—but we will lose 40% of our air fleet in a single day."

A president who loses dozens of jets and returns pilots in coffins will not win any election. Senator Graham shouts rhetoric, but physics does not lie, and mathematics offers no compliments.

Trump returned to negotiations in Oman—not because he became "wise" or "peaceful"—but because hard science proved to him:

War on Iran = Clear technological suicide.
Iran turned advanced American technology from a point of strength into a fatal point of weakness, transforming science from a tool of offense into a strategic deterrent that forces the militarily "strongest" to the negotiating table.

This is not a victory of brute force—it is a victory of pure scientific intelligence.

Dr. Wassim Jaber | 23.02.2026


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴U.S. Air Power Surge: The Mechanics of Coercive Diplomacy

🖊The News:

👌On Tuesday, a squadron of F-22 Raptor stealth jets arrived in Israel, marking a critical peak in U.S. military mobilization. Washington has now deployed approximately 50% of its global air combat power to the Middle East, placing over 300 aircraft under CENTCOM’s direct command. This massive buildup coincides with President Trump’s ultimatum of "very bad consequences" should the upcoming Geneva talks fail to yield a breakthrough.

🔴 Strategic Analysis:

✌The deployment of 300+ advanced aircraft is a definitive shift from deterrence to theater preparation.

👌Historically, such a concentration of air assets echoes the precursor to the 2003 invasion of Iraq. By saturating the region with stealth technology and high-sortee capabilities, the U.S. aims to project a "total dominance" doctrine. This is an attempt to neutralize the Axis of Resistance's strategic depth through the threat of a massive, multi-vector aerial campaign designed to decapitate command structures and disrupt energy infrastructure.

🔴 Position & Evidence:

✌The U.S. strategy relies on the outdated assumption that air superiority equates to geopolitical surrender. Documented military outcomes over the last two decades demonstrate that high-tech air power faces diminishing returns against asymmetric adversaries. The Axis of Resistance has spent years hardening its missile capabilities and refining drone saturation tactics specifically designed to counter a concentrated aerial threat. Trump’s rhetoric is a tactical bluff intended to force concessions in Geneva; however, history shows that the Resistance does not negotiate under direct military blackmail.

🔴 Geopolitical Predictions:

🔢 Overextension:

Maintaining 50% of global air assets in one theater is unsustainable and will create strategic vulnerabilities for the U.S. in the Indo-Pacific.

🔢 Diplomatic Gridlock:

The heavy-handed military pressure is likely to backfire in Geneva, as Tehran and its allies view concessions under duress as a strategic defeat.

🔢 Asymmetric Counter-Response:

✌Expect an increase in "gray zone" activities across the region as the Axis seeks to demonstrate that U.S. air assets cannot protect fixed bases or maritime corridors from low-cost, high-impact strikes.

#AxisOfResistance #MiddleEast #USMilitary #Geopolitics #CENTCOM #TheObserver


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Modi in Israel: The Mirage of the "Hexagon Axis"

🖊The News:

✌Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi landed in Israel today for a landmark two-day state visit. Following a high-profile meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu, Modi is set to address the Knesset. Netanyahu has utilized this platform to announce the formation of a "Hexagon Axis"—a strategic partnership involving India, Greece, and Cyprus—aimed at reshaping the security architecture of the Eastern Mediterranean and the Indian Ocean.

🔴 Strategic Analysis:

👌This visit marks the definitive abandonment of India’s historical "non-alignment" in favor of a transactional alliance with the Zionist entity. Over the last decade, India has emerged as the primary consumer of Israeli military hardware, accounting for nearly 40% of Israel's defense exports. The "Hexagon Axis" is a calculated geopolitical maneuver designed to counter Chinese influence (BRI) and create a pro-Western corridor. By linking New Delhi with Mediterranean outposts like Greece and Cyprus, Washington and Tel Aviv are attempting to consolidate a naval and logistical chain that bypasses traditional regional powers.

🔴 Position & Evidence:

✌The emergence of this "axis" is a direct challenge to the sovereignty of regional actors and the stability of the Global South. Modi’s ideological alignment with Netanyahu ignores the shifting sands of global power; while Israel provides surveillance and missile technology, it cannot provide the regional legitimacy India requires to lead in Asia. This partnership is built on the fragile ground of shared Islamophobia and military procurement, rather than genuine economic synergy. Data shows that such exclusive security blocs often trigger counter-alliances, potentially neutralizing India’s influence in the energy-rich West Asia region.

🔴 Geopolitical Predictions:

🔢 Strategic Friction:

India’s pivot toward this "Hexagon" will inevitably strain its relations with Tehran and Moscow, complicating its role within the BRICS framework.

🔢 Security Vulnerability:

Reliance on Israeli defense systems creates a "kill-switch" dependency, where New Delhi’s tactical autonomy becomes contingent on Israeli geopolitical interests.

🔢 Logistical Failure:

✌The proposed trade corridors associated with this axis remain militarily vulnerable.

🫶Without an accommodation with the Axis of Resistance, these routes pass through contested waters that cannot be secured by stealth jets alone.


#India #Modi #Israel #HexagonAxis #TheObserver #Geopolitics


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Geneva Talks: U.S.–Iran Enter Third Round

💬Tomorrow, February 26, U.S. and Iranian envoys meet in Geneva for the third round of negotiations, following earlier sessions in Muscat and Geneva that ended without agreement. The talks unfold under heavy pressure: Washington has deployed the nuclear-powered USS Gerald R. Ford to the eastern Mediterranean, while Tehran signals it will not yield to military intimidation and is exploring advanced defense cooperation with China.

🔴 Strategic Context:

✌This confrontation is rooted in decades of nuclear disputes, dating back to the 1970s when the U.S. itself supplied Iran’s first research reactor. Today, Washington leverages military escalation as bargaining leverage, while Iran positions itself within an emerging multipolar axis—China, Russia, and regional allies—to resist unilateral dictates.

🔴 Position:

👌Evidence shows that military coercion has historically failed to break Iran’s resolve. The U.S. seeks a deal on its own terms, but Iran insists on sovereign rights to peaceful nuclear technology and defense autonomy. The balance of power favors resilience over capitulation.

🔴 Outlook:

✌A comprehensive breakthrough is unlikely in Geneva. Partial understandings—particularly on oil sanctions—remain possible. Yet failure could accelerate militarization in the Mediterranean and Gulf, while Iran deepens its eastern defense partnerships.

#Iran #US #GenevaTalks #ResistanceAxis #MiddleEast


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5