🔴The "Board of Peace" Illusion: Laundering Genocide with Football and Business


On February 19, 2026, Donald Trump convened the inaugural meeting of his "Board of Peace" in Washington, unveiling a multi-billion dollar partnership with FIFA to rebuild Gaza. The project aims to construct a 20,000-seat national stadium, a FIFA academy, and 50 mini-pitches. While Trump promised a $10 billion U.S. commitment, the plan hinges on a fatal political condition: the total disarmament of the Palestinian resistance. The board, chaired by Trump for life, includes figures like Jared Kushner, Tony Blair, and Israeli billionaire Yakir Gabay.

Geopolitical Analysis:


This is not reconstruction; it is "Anesthetic Urbanism." By involving FIFA President Gianni Infantino, the administration is attempting to privatize the occupation and replace sovereign political rights with consumerist distractions. The initiative seeks to bypass the United Nations—as noted by the absence of major powers like China and Russia from the board—to create a Washington-controlled administration (NCAG) in Gaza. It is a cynical attempt to treat a liberation struggle as a real estate development project while ignoring the 72,000 martyrs and the systemic destruction of life by the Zionist entity.

Strategic Context:


1. The Disarmament Delusion: The board's demand for Hamas to lay down its weapons in exchange for football pitches is a strategic absurdity. A population that has survived years of carpet bombing and siege will not trade its defensive deterrent for a FIFA membership.

2. Alternative Governance: The "Board of Peace" functions as a corporate shadow government designed to sideline UNRWA and international law, shielding the aggressor from reparations by rebranding aid as "investment."

3. Weaponizing Sport: Using the 2026 World Cup momentum to legitimize a colonial-style administration in Gaza is a betrayal of the universal values of sport, turning FIFA into a tool of imperial coercion.

Geopolitical
Predictions:


The "Board of Peace" is destined for the same dustbin of history as the "Deal of the Century." Without a political settlement that guarantees the right of return and the end of the blockade, these "investments" will fail to materialize or be rejected by the local population. Expect the Axis of Resistance to intensify its political and field coordination to ensure that Gaza’s reconstruction remains a sovereign Palestinian process, not a trophy for Trump’s legacy. History proves that those who survive the fire cannot be bought with the ashes.


#AxisOfResistance #GazaReconstruction #Trump #FIFA #Palestine #ImperialismFailed


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴The Mediterranean Graveyard: Eight Bodies in Libya and Greece—The Bloody Toll of "Fortress Europe"


Today, February 22, 2026, the grim reality of Western "border security" washed ashore again. Eight bodies were recovered: five near Tripoli, Libya (including two women and a child reclaimed by the waves), and three off the coast of Crete, Greece, after a wooden vessel carrying 50 people—mostly Egyptians and Sudanese—capsized. This follows the early February disaster off Zuwara that left 53 dead or missing, bringing the 2026 Mediterranean death toll to over 600 in less than eight weeks.


Geopolitical Analysis:

These are not "tragedies"; they are state-sponsored executions by omission. The "Board of Peace" rhetoric we see in Gaza or the "REsourceEU" mining initiatives in the Arctic are the same flipside of this coin: the West wants resources and control but views the people of the Global South as "disposable collateral." The militarization of the Mediterranean through Frontex and the criminalization of NGOs are deliberate strategic choices aimed at deterring the victims of Western-backed coups, economic hitmen, and proxy wars from seeking survival.


Strategic Context:

1. The Policy of Death: Greece’s conservative government, backed by Brussels, has institutionalized "pushbacks." By suspending asylum processing and expanding border walls, they have forced migrants onto more perilous routes, like the corridor between eastern Libya and Crete, which saw a 500% increase in traffic in 2025.

2. Imperial Harvest: The surge in Egyptian and Sudanese arrivals is a direct consequence of the geopolitical destabilization fueled by Western interventions and IMF-imposed debt traps. Washington and London break these nations, and the Mediterranean drowns the survivors.

3. The Racial Hierarchy of Compassion: The liberal-democratic world maintains a "hierarchy of grief." While billions are funneled into military aid for European borders, the Mediterranean is left without a proactive, state-led search-and-rescue mission.


Geopolitical
Predictions:

2026 is on track to be the deadliest year for the Mediterranean since 2014. As the U.S. and EU double down on exclusionary policies and offshore "return hubs" (like the Italy-Albania model), we will see an increase in "invisible shipwrecks." However, this pressure is unsustainable. The historical memory of the colonized is awakening; the West cannot maintain an oasis of wealth surrounded by a sea of blood. Eventually, the social and political consequences of this inhumanity will breach the walls of "Fortress Europe," proving that security built on genocide is merely a temporary illusion.


#AxisOfResistance #MediterraneanGraveyard #EuropeanHypocrisy #Libya #Greece #GlobalSouthResists


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴The "Third Term" Crisis: Intra-Coalition Strife and Washington’s Financial Blackmail


The Iraqi political landscape is fractured as the "Coordination Framework" (CF) struggles with Nouri al-Maliki’s bid for a third term as Prime Minister. Tensions spiked following explicit warnings from the Trump administration in early February 2026, threatening sanctions on the Central Bank of Iraq and the State Organization for Marketing of Oil (SOMO) if Maliki is appointed. This external pressure has emboldened internal dissent, with lawmakers from incumbent PM Mohammed Shia' al-Sudani’s bloc—supported by figures like Ammar al-Hakim—calling for a strategic "reassessment" of the nomination to avoid total economic isolation.

Geopolitical Analysis:

This is "Financial Imperialism" in its rawest form. Washington is leveraging Iraq’s dependence on the New York Federal Reserve to veto sovereign political choices. The standoff within the CF is no longer just about Maliki; it is a battle over the nature of the Iraqi state. While Maliki’s "State of Law" coalition insists on the constitutional right of the majority to name its candidate, Sudani’s camp fears a repetition of the 2014 collapse. The cancellation of the February 20th CF meeting signals a deep paralysis where "Sovereign Pride" meets "Economic Survival."

Strategic Context:

1. Weaponized Dollar: Trump is using the "Maliki Problem" to test the cohesion of the Shia political establishment. By threatening the Iraqi Dinar, Washington aims to force a leadership change that aligns with its regional containment policy against the Axis of Resistance.

2. Fragmentation of the Bloc: The emerging rift between the "Resistance Factions" (supporting a defiant stance) and the "Pragmatists" (fearing sanctions) is exactly what the U.S. seeks. A divided CF cannot effectively govern or resist external diktats.

3. The Sudani Factor: Sudani has positioned himself as a stabilizer. The proposal to extend his mandate for another year is a tactical retreat designed to freeze the crisis without surrendering to either Maliki’s ambition or Washington’s threats.

Geopolitical Predictions:

The most likely outcome is a "polite withdrawal" of Maliki’s candidacy in exchange for significant ministerial and security concessions for his party. The CF is heading toward a consensus figure—likely a security-background technocrat—or a caretaker extension for Sudani. Washington may gain a tactical victory by blocking Maliki, but it is fueling long-term resentment that will accelerate Iraq’s pivot toward the BRICS+ financial architecture. The East remembers: those who use the bread of a nation as a weapon eventually lose their seat at the table.


#AxisOfResistance #IraqCrisis #NouriAlMaliki #Sovereignty #Trump #Geopolitics


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Kirkuk’s Nowruz Raids: Military-Led Demographic Engineering Replaces Legal Process


Early Sunday, February 22, 2026, Iraqi Army units raided the Nowruz neighborhood in southern Kirkuk, forcibly evicting a Kurdish family under the pretext of reclaiming Ministry of Defense property. This operation, occurring during the first days of Ramadan, reignites the bitter dispute over 122 housing units—home to approximately 170 families—originally built for Ba'athist officers but inhabited and legally purchased by Kurds following the 2003 collapse.


Geopolitical Analysis:

This is not "property management"; it is the weaponization of the military to resolve Article 140 disputed territories. The recurring use of the 8th Division to settle land disputes that date back decades is a blatant attempt at demographic engineering. By targeting Kurdish residents in a city as volatile as Kirkuk, elements within the federal security apparatus are testing the limits of the central government’s control and the Kurds' strategic patience. The timing is a calculated provocation designed to stir ethnic tensions and distract from broader national sovereignty issues.

Strategic Context:

1. Constitutional Bypass: Article 140 mandates a political and census-based resolution for disputed areas. Military-led evictions are a direct violation of this framework and represent a dangerous return to "decree-based" governance that fueled decades of conflict.

2. The "Arabization" Ghost: Kurdish leaders view these raids as a continuation of the 2017 post-referendum policies. The eviction of families from homes they have occupied for over 22 years—backed by deeds and local recognition—suggests a systematic effort to erode the Kurdish presence in the "Jerusalem of Kurdistan."

3. Axis Stability: A destabilized Kirkuk serves no one within the Axis of Resistance. Ethnic strife only creates vacuums that foreign intelligence and extremist remnants exploit. The security of Kirkuk is the lynchpin for the stability of northern Iraq and the vital transit corridors between Baghdad and the north.

Geopolitical Predictions:

The forced evictions will likely trigger mass sit-ins and civil disobedience across Kirkuk’s Kurdish districts. Prime Minister Sudani will be forced to issue another "stay of execution" to prevent a total breakdown in PMF-Kurdish coordination. However, without a judicial transfer of these lands from the MoD to a civilian authority, Kirkuk remains a ticking time bomb. 2026 will be the year where Baghdad must decide: either enforce the law through the courts or face a grassroots insurrection in the disputed territories.

#AxisOfResistance #Kirkuk #NowruzNeighborhood #Iraq #KurdishRights #Sovereignty

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Total War Ultimatum: The Resistance Shadows the US Carrier as the Era of Hegemony Crumbles


Leading factions of the Iraqi Resistance, spearheaded by Kataib Hezbollah, have declared a state of maximum readiness, promising a "Total War" that will set the region ablaze if Iran is targeted. This strategic warning follows the provocative deployment of the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group toward the Gulf in late January 2026. As Washington ramps up its rhetoric, the Axis of Resistance has responded by activating its regional strike network, placing every Western military installation from the Mediterranean to the Arabian Sea in the crosshairs.


Geopolitical Analysis:

Washington is playing a dangerous game of 20th-century gunboat diplomacy in a 21st-century theater of asymmetric dominance. The movement of the Abraham Lincoln is a desperate attempt to regain "escalation dominance" after the humiliating failure of previous "Maximum Pressure" campaigns. However, the geopolitical map has shifted. The Resistance now possesses the capability to turn the Gulf into a "death trap" for capital ships. For the first time in history, a U.S. carrier is no longer a symbol of power, but a high-value liability vulnerable to hypersonic missiles and swarm-drone saturation.

Strategic Context:

1. The Sovereignty Shield: Kataib Hezbollah’s threat of "Total War" is the operational manifestation of the "Unity of Fronts" doctrine. It signals to Washington that any strike on Tehran is legally and militarily viewed as a strike on Baghdad, Sana’a, and Damascus.

2. Economic Deterrence: The Axis holds the "Energy Trigger." In a total war scenario, the closure of the Strait of Hormuz and the targeting of regional oil hubs would collapse the global economy. Trump’s "America First" agenda cannot survive a $200-per-barrel oil shock, making his military threats largely performative.

3. Evidentiary Grounding: Recent drills by the Resistance have demonstrated precision strikes on mock-ups of Tier-1 U.S. bases. With Iran’s nuclear core buried 100 meters deep under solid rock, the U.S. military realizes it can destroy the surface but cannot kill the soul of the Resistance.

Geopolitical Predictions:

Expect a period of intense "controlled friction." The U.S. will likely keep its carrier groups in the North Arabian Sea, fearing the narrow waters of the Gulf. The Resistance will maintain its "Total War" posture, effectively neutralizing Trump’s 15-day ultimatum through credible counter-threats. Ultimately, Washington will be forced to seek a back-channel de-escalation. The historical momentum is with the East: the era where an American carrier could dictate the fate of nations is dead. The Resistance is the new architect of regional order.

#AxisOfResistance #KataibHezbollah #TotalWar #USSCarrier #Iran #MiddleEast2026


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Strategic Retreat or War Footing? US Redeployments Reveal Fear of Iranian Retaliation


As of February 22, 2026, the United States has initiated a massive logistical reshuffle across the Middle East. Hundreds of personnel are being relocated from Al-Udeid (Qatar) and the 5th Fleet headquarters in Bahrain to more fortified or distant positions. In Iraq and Syria, forces are consolidating toward "Harier" in the Kurdistan region and shifting away from exposed outposts like Al-Tanf. This coincides with the arrival of the USS Gerald R. Ford and USS Abraham Lincoln strike groups, marking the largest U.S. air power concentration in the region since 2003.

Geopolitical Analysis:

This is not disengagement; it is "Damage Limitation." The Pentagon has internalized the hard lessons of the June 2025 Al-Udeid strikes: fixed land bases in the Gulf are now indefensible liabilities against Iran’s precision-guided missile and drone swarms. By thinning out personnel in Qatar and Bahrain—where 30,000 to 40,000 troops reside—Washington is attempting to de-risk its "prime targets" before Trump’s 15-day ultimatum expires. Moving assets to Iraqi Kurdistan is a desperate attempt to create a "safe zone" for prolonged operations, leveraging the KRG’s geography as a shield against the Axis of Resistance in central and southern Iraq.

Strategic Context:

1. The End of Fixed Base Supremacy: The deployment of F-22s and F-35s to Muwaffaq Salti (Jordan) and the withdrawal from the Gulf littoral confirm that U.S. "deterrence" now relies exclusively on mobile naval power and long-range aviation. Washington no longer trusts its ability to hold ground under the shadow of Iran’s "Fattah" hypersonic missiles.

2. The "Northward Shift" in Iraq: Re-positioning toward Harir is a strategic pivot to secure energy corridors and AI-infrastructure investments in northern Iraq, effectively attempting to partition Iraq’s security landscape. However, this creates a new frontline that the Resistance factions are already monitoring.

3. Tehran’s Strategic Depth: While the U.S. moves troops to avoid being hit, Iran is burying its strategic assets deeper. The "Pickaxe Mountain" fortifications render U.S. bunker-busters questionable, forcing Washington into a dilemma: a catastrophic ground-air invasion or a face-saving diplomatic climbdown.

Geopolitical Predictions:

The U.S. is preparing for a "weeks-long" aerial campaign but lacks the regional consensus to sustain it. As the March 2026 deadline approaches, we will likely see a series of "limited" provocations. However, the Axis of Resistance has already demonstrated that any strike on Iran will be met with a synchronized response across all theaters—from the Mediterranean to the Bab el-Mandeb. The U.S. redeployment to Kurdistan will not protect them; it only creates a more concentrated target. The historical tide is turning: the West is retreating to the fringes, while the regional powers are fortifying the core.


#AxisOfResistance #USRedeployment #IranConflict2026 #IraqSovereignty #TrumpUltimatum #EndofEmpire

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Witkoff: Washington wonders why Iran has not “surrendered” despite U.S. naval pressure

🫶In an interview with Fox News, U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff expressed the administration’s surprise at Iran’s lack of response to pressure, despite what he described as the superiority of American naval power in the region.

✌He noted that Washington is questioning why Tehran has not explicitly declared its abandonment of any pursuit of weapons, stressing that the United States has multiple alternatives for dealing with the issue.

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Al-Sudani: Strategic Continuity in an Accelerating History

The News:

Sources report a consensus within the Iraqi "Coordination Framework" to grant Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani a second term.

This move is presented as the primary solution to resolve the ongoing political deadlock and mitigate internal friction among major blocs and to prevent the pressures of the US .

Analysis:

This is not a decision born of political comfort; it is a pragmatic necessity dictated by a region on the brink. Al-Sudani has navigated the "Iraqi tightrope" by maintaining Iraq’s vital position within the Axis of Resistance while shielding the domestic front from Washington’s "Dollar Diplomacy"—the weaponization of the federal reserve against Baghdad’s sovereignty.

History is accelerating. The survivors of regional upheavals know that institutional stability is a weapon in itself. Al-Sudani’s administration has focused on "the legitimacy of achievement"—infrastructure and service projects—to bypass the paralysis of liberal-bureaucratic models.

By securing a second term, the Coordination Framework aims to prevent the "Libyanization" or "Lebanonization" of the Iraqi state, ensuring Baghdad remains a pillar of regional stability rather than a western-aligned proxy.

Geopolitical Perspective:

The West seeks a weak, fractured Iraq to sever the land bridge of the Resistance. A second Sudani term thwarts this objective. It signals that Iraq’s internal decision-making has matured beyond the immediate reach of foreign embassy dictates. The strategic focus will now shift toward total energy independence and the expulsion of foreign combat troops—goals that require a tested leadership rather than a novice experiment.

Predictions:


1. Consolidation of Sovereignty: A firmer stance against violations of Iraqi airspace, backed by upgraded non-Western defense acquisitions.

2. Economic Retaliation: Expect Washington to escalate "compliance" pressures on Iraqi banks as a desperate tool of political leverage.

3. Regional Integration: Iraq will move closer to a formal strategic partnership with the East (BRICS/SCO), further eroding the unipolar grip on Middle Eastern trade routes.


#Iraq #AlSudani #CoordinationFramework #AxisOfResistance #Geopolitics #Sovereignty

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴The Empire’s Last Gamble: Steel in the Gulf, Deception in Geneva


THE NEWS

The Biden-Trump transition era reaches a fever pitch as Washington concentrates its largest air and naval strike force in the Middle East since the 2003 invasion of Iraq. As of late February 2026, the USS Abraham Lincoln strike group is stationed in the Arabian Sea, while the USS Gerald R. Ford—the world’s most advanced supercarrier—has crossed the Strait of Gibraltar to take up positions in the Eastern Mediterranean. Simultaneously, indirect nuclear talks between Tehran and Washington are set to resume this Thursday in Geneva under Omani mediation.


THE ANALYSIS

History is accelerating, but the playbook remains stale. The U.S. has deployed over 120 combat aircraft—including F-22 Raptors, F-35A stealth fighters, and a massive fleet of KC-46 tankers—to regional hubs like Jordan’s Muwaffaq Salti Air Base. This is not "deterrence"; it is the structural preparation for a sustained, weeks-long kinetic campaign.
The duality of the "Geneva Table" and the "Carrier Strike Group" is a classic imperial pincer move. By demanding "zero enrichment" while pointing a gun at the room, Washington seeks a surrender, not a treaty. However, the strategic map has shifted since 2003:

• Sovereign Resistance: Unlike the Iraq era, regional powers like Saudi Arabia and the UAE have reportedly restricted their airspace for offensive strikes, forcing the U.S. to cluster its assets in Jordan and at sea.

• The Drone Factor: The February 3rd shoot-down of an Iranian Shahed-139 drone near the Lincoln group proves that the "Blue Water" advantage is being challenged by low-cost, high-lethal asymmetric tech.

• Historical Resilience: The Axis of Resistance has survived "Maximum Pressure" and the "Midnight Hammer" operations of 2025. Military concentration often masks political exhaustion.


THE PREDICTION

Expect the Geneva talks to stall as Tehran refuses to negotiate under the shadow of the Ford and Lincoln. The U.S. buildup will likely culminate in a "demonstration of force" rather than a full-scale invasion, as the American domestic front cannot sustain another multi-year quagmire. The Axis will likely respond not with a symmetrical naval fleet, but by activating "gray zone" maritime pressures and multi-front drone saturation to signal that every billion-dollar carrier is a floating target. The Empire is loud because it is losing its grip on the silent levers of regional geography.


#AxisOfResistance #Geopolitics #USNavy #Iran #MiddleEast2026 #EndofHegemony

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴The Security Cabinet Paradox: Strategic Panic Amidst Settler Savagery

THE NEWS

On Sunday evening, February 22, 2026, Benjamin Netanyahu convened the Israeli Security Cabinet to finalize military protocols ahead of a potential U.S. "kinetic campaign" against Iran. This meeting, originally postponed to avoid "Iranian miscalculation," focused on neutralizing Hezbollah and domestic fronts should a regional war erupt. Simultaneously, in the West Bank, Israeli settlers torched a mosque in the village of Tell, south of Nablus—part of a coordinated escalation since the start of Ramadan. This follows the 15 February cabinet decision to resume land registration in Area C, a move designed to accelerate de facto annexation while the world watches the Persian Gulf.

THE ANALYSIS

The Zionists are trapped in a strategic paradox. While they represent themselves as the "indispensable partner" for Washington’s massive naval buildup—which now includes the USS Gerald R. Ford and USS Abraham Lincoln strike groups—they are terrified of being the primary target of the Axis response.

• The Iranian Deterrent: Tehran’s warning of a "decisive and regret-inducing" response has forced the Security Cabinet to brief ministers on scenarios involving simultaneous saturation strikes from Lebanon, Yemen, and Iraq.

• Annexation under Fire: The torching of the Tell mosque is not a random act of vandalism. It is a tactical byproduct of the Smotrich-Ben Gvir policy to "bury the idea of a Palestinian state" by inciting a Third Intifada. This domestic arson serves to distract Palestinian resistance while the military prepares for a broader external confrontation.

• Diplomatic Divergence: Despite the military coordination, Minister Zeev Elkin’s recent refusal to fund Gaza reconstruction through Trump’s "Board of Peace" reveals a growing rift. Israel wants American bombs on Iran but refuses to pay for the political stability Washington demands.

OPINION & PREDICTION

History proves that empires and their proxies escalate domestic brutality when they feel most vulnerable externally. The Security Cabinet’s focus on "not appearing at the forefront" of a U.S. strike suggests a profound lack of confidence in their own missile defense systems against a multi-front Axis assault.


Predictions:

1. The West Bank Implosion: The settler attacks in Tell and the land-registration seizures will trigger a centralized resistance response in the West Bank by early March, forcing the IDF to divert elite units from the northern border.

2. The "Sacrifice" Play: Washington will likely demand Israel absorb the first "gray zone" retaliatory strikes from Iran’s allies to justify a full-scale U.S. intervention, a price Netanyahu is currently debating in the Cabinet.

3. Failed Containment: Any U.S. strike on Iran will not stay "kinetic" or "surgical"; the Axis will likely respond by targeting the energy infrastructure of regional U.S. allies, rendering the carrier groups strategically obsolete in a darkened region.

#AxisOfResistance #WestBank #IranCrisis2026 #SecurityCabinet #Geopolitics #Palestine

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴The Damascus Dilemma: Sovereignty Resurrected and the Idlib Shadow


SUBHEADING

As the Syrian state reasserts territorial integrity through the closure of the Al-Hol "incubator," the fragile transition in Damascus faces a structural threat from within: the friction between Idlib’s fundamentalist administrative model and the capital’s pluralistic social fabric.


EXECUTIVE OPENING

On Sunday, February 22, 2026, the Syrian central government officially announced the full evacuation and closure of the Al-Hol camp in Hasakah province. Fadi al-Qassem, the official overseeing the transition, confirmed that the last convoys departed the facility—once the world’s most dangerous concentration of ISIL-linked families. This follows the January 2026 military and political collapse of the US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), which ceded control of the northeast to Damascus. While the state celebrates this milestone of sovereign recovery, the capital is simultaneously gripped by a governance crisis. Tensions have reached a boiling point between the provisional administration and a "Shadow Government" consisting of religious hardliners who have migrated from Idlib to Damascus, clashing with the city's diverse and secular-leaning populace over the enforcement of conservative social codes.


CONTEXTUAL BACKGROUND

The fall of the Assad regime in December 2024 opened a vacuum that the Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS)-led alliance, headed by Ahmad al-Sharaa, sought to fill with a technocratic yet Islamist-leaning provisional government. Historically, Damascus has been a mosaic of religious and ethnic diversity—Sunnis, Christians, Druze, and Alawites—governed for sixty years by a secular Ba’athist framework. Conversely, Idlib functioned for seven years under the "Syrian Salvation Government," a model of rigid religious governance. The attempt to transplant the "Idlib Model" into the cosmopolitan heart of Damascus is the latest chapter in a century-long struggle between centralized urban pluralism and rural-based religious conservatism.


STRATEGIC ANALYSIS

The current Syrian landscape is defined by two contradictory movements:

• The End of the "Terror Incubator": The closure of Al-Hol is a masterstroke for the new authorities. By relocating residents to the Akhtarin camp in Aleppo and facilitating repatriations to Iraq, Damascus is stripping the West of its primary pretext for military intervention in the northeast.

• The Shadow Government Threat: The "religious conservatives" from Idlib represent a deep-state challenge to al-Sharaa’s attempt to gain international legitimacy. These elements are pushing for a "moral police" apparatus, causing significant capital flight and social unrest.

• Geopolitical Shifts: The February 2026 deal that integrated SDF units into the national military has effectively ended the US-led "de facto" partition of Syria. However, the internal cultural war in Damascus provides an opening for regional actors to exploit sectarian fault lines once again.

EVIDENCE & DOCUMENTATION

• Al-Hol Data: At its peak, the camp held 73,000 people. The final evacuation involved the relocation of the remaining 24,000 residents, including over 6,000 foreign nationals.

• Escape Crisis: Intelligence reports indicate that during the chaotic SDF withdrawal in January, at least 15,000 residents escaped, many with active ISIL ties, heading toward Idlib and Lebanon—fueling the very conservative surge now threatening Damascus.

• Public Dissent: Verified reports from February 12, 2026, detail protests in Damascus suburbs where residents openly called for a "civil state" (Dawla Madaniyya), directly defying the edicts of the Idlib-originating shadow councils.

POSITION & ARGUMENT

The Axis of Resistance has always maintained that Syria’s strength lies in its territorial unity and its resistance to sectarian fragmentation. The current crisis proves that while the "external enemy" (the Zionist-backed partition plans) has been largely neutralized, the "internal enemy"—religious extremism masquerading as governance—is the new frontline.

For Syria to survive as a sovereign power, the leadership in Damascus must dismantle the Shadow Government and prioritize the "Damascus Model" of pluralism over the "Idlib Model" of exclusion. Failing to do so will only invite a new cycle of foreign-sponsored "stabilization" missions.


FORWARD-LOOKING ASSESSMENT

• Short-term: Expect an increase in "security sweeps" in Damascus as the provisional government attempts to rein in unauthorized religious committees to preserve its fragile international recognition.

• Medium-term: If the al-Sharaa administration cannot provide a secular-legal framework that protects minorities (Alawites, Christians, Druze), we may see the emergence of "self-defense" militias in the south and coast, leading to a new, decentralized civil conflict.

• Escalation Threshold: The reintegration of the northeast’s oil fields into the state treasury by mid-2026 will be the deciding factor. If this wealth is used to fund a pluralistic reconstruction, the central government wins. If it is co-opted by the "Shadow Government" to fund an ideological state, the Syrian social contract will permanently shatter.

CONCLUSION

Syria has survived the total war of the last decade, but it may yet succumb to the peace. The closure of Al-Hol is a victory for sovereignty; the struggle for the soul of Damascus will determine if that sovereignty is worth the blood shed to reclaim it.

#Syria2026 #DamascusTransition #AlHolClosure #SovereigntyRestored #Geopolitics #AxisOfResistance #IdlibShadow #MiddleEastAnalysis #StateBuilding #Decolonization #RegionalSecurity #PostWarSyria #StrategicIntelligence #TheObserver #AlMuraqeb

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴The Bekaa Massacre: Pre-emptive Aggression or Strategic Desperation?


THE NEWS

On Friday, February 20, 2026, the Israeli Air Force conducted a series of heavy airstrikes targeting the Bekaa Valley in eastern Lebanon, specifically around the Baalbek region. Hezbollah officially confirmed the martyrdom of eight operatives "on the road to Al-Quds," including a senior field commander identified as Hussein Mohammad Yaghi (also known as Abu Ali). Lebanese medical sources reported that the total death toll reached at least 10, with over 50 others wounded, including children, as strikes hit residential structures in Temnine and Aali en Nahri. The IDF claimed the operation targeted "command centers of Hezbollah's missile array" to disrupt preparations for a major retaliatory strike.

THE ANALYSIS

The intensification of strikes in the Bekaa—the strategic depth of the Resistance—signals a deliberate collapse of the November 2024 ceasefire framework.

• The "Forward Deterrent" Logic: These strikes are not isolated tactical events. As the U.S. concentrates 50% of its air power in the region, Tel Aviv is attempting to systematically degrade Hezbollah’s medium-range missile capabilities. The objective is to ensure that if a U.S.-led "kinetic campaign" against Iran begins, the Resistance in Lebanon will be too decapitated to activate its deterrent fire.

• Ceasefire as a Siege: Since November 2024, Israel has committed over 2,000 documented violations of Lebanese sovereignty. The Zionists are using the "truce" not for peace, but as a low-intensity war of attrition to pick off high-value targets like Commander Yaghi without triggering a full-scale regional conflagration.

• The Ramadan Escalation: Executing these massacres during the holy month follows a historical pattern of trying to break the psychological morale of the "Support Fronts" while the West Bank is simultaneously being torched by settler terrorism.

POSITION & OPINION

The martyrdom of Commander Yaghi and his comrades will not achieve the "neutralization" the IDF seeks. History—from the 2006 war to the 2025 "Midnight Hammer" operations—proves that the Resistance’s command structure is designed for seamless succession. By striking the Bekaa, Israel is effectively telling Beirut that the ceasefire is dead. The Resistance is morally and strategically obligated to respond; an aggressor that views a truce as a hunting season cannot be restrained by diplomacy, but only by the cost of its arrogance.

GEOPOLITICAL PREDICTIONS

1. Saturation Response: Hezbollah will likely move beyond "tit-for-tat" border skirmishes, potentially targeting deep IDF logistics hubs or airbases used for the Bekaa raids to re-establish the equation of "Depth for Depth."

2. Ceasefire Dissolution: By mid-March 2026, the 2024 ceasefire will likely be officially declared void by the Lebanese government, leading to a formalized "war state" that mirrors the 2023-2024 conflict intensity.

3. The "Gray Zone" Trap: If Israel continues to strike missile arrays, the Axis will likely activate a "maritime closure" strategy, using drone saturation against naval assets to pressure the U.S. into reining in its proxy.

#Hezbollah #BekaaValley #Lebanon2026 #AxisOfResistance #EndTheCeasefire #ZionistAggression

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Imperial Overreach: The Supreme Court’s Blow to Washington’s Trade War

THE NEWS

On February 23, 2026, global financial markets are reeling following a seismic shift in U.S. trade policy. On Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered a landmark 6-3 ruling in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, stripping the executive branch of its power to impose sweeping tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The ruling effectively nullified the "Reciprocal Tariffs" and "Fentanyl Tariffs" enacted throughout 2025, potentially forcing the U.S. Treasury to refund upwards of $175 billion to importers. In a defiant counter-move, the administration immediately proposed a new 15% global tariff leveraging Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974—a temporary measure capped at 150 days.

THE ANALYSIS

The Supreme Court’s intervention represents a rare internal fracture within the American imperial apparatus. By invoking the "Major Questions Doctrine," the Court has asserted that revenue-raising measures (tariffs) belong to Congress, not the "economic emergency" whims of the President.

• The Leverage Collapse: Washington’s trade negotiations with Beijing have been fundamentally compromised. The IEEPA tariffs were the primary "gun on the table" used to coerce Chinese concessions; their sudden illegality leaves U.S. negotiators empty-handed as the effective trade-weighted tariff rate is set to drop from 15.3% to approximately 8.3%.
• The 15% Desperation: The shift to Section 122 is a tactical retreat. While it sets a 15% floor, its 150-day limit signals a lack of long-term strategic stability. Markets are punishing the U.S. Dollar (down 0.4%) and Bitcoin (below $65k) not because of the tariffs themselves, but because of the manifest chaos in U.S. governance.

• Global Resilience:

The Axis of Resistance and its partners in the Global South are observing a "paper tiger" moment. When the Empire's own judiciary dismantles its chief economic weapon, the era of unilateral financial diktat enters its twilight.

POSITION & OPINION

The administration’s attempt to bypass the Court with a 15% "emergency" levy is an act of strategic desperation. Morally and legally, Washington is discovering that it cannot indefinitely sustain a global trade war while its internal legal framework is at war with itself. The "America First" policy has hit a structural wall: the U.S. cannot lead a multipolar world economically while it is functionally incapable of maintaining a consistent legal basis for its own trade taxes.

GEOPOLITICAL PREDICTIONS

1. Chinese Counter-Offensive: Beijing will likely stall all major trade purchases (soybeans, aircraft) until the refund process for the "illegal" 2025 tariffs is formalized, using the $175 billion debt as a diplomatic cudgel.

2. Congressional Gridlock: The administration will fail to secure permanent legislative backing for the 15% tariff, leading to a "tariff cliff" in mid-2026 that will trigger a massive domestic retail shock.

3. Alternative Corridors: Expect accelerated growth in the BRICS+ settlement systems as global traders flee the "legal volatility" of the U.S. Dollar-denominated trade environment.

#TradeWar2026 #SupremeCourt #EconomicSovereignty #USChinaTrade #EndofHegemony #GlobalFinance


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Western Hemisphere "Cleanup": The Strategic Siege of Havana After Caracas


THE NEWS

Following the dramatic capture of Nicolás Maduro by U.S. forces on January 3, 2026, during Operation Absolute Resolve, Washington has shifted its focus to the Caribbean. As of late February, the Trump administration has effectively choked Cuba's energy lifeline by halting all subsidized Venezuelan oil shipments. On January 29, the U.S. signed Executive Order 14380, declaring a national emergency regarding Cuba and authorizing secondary tariffs on any third-country—specifically targeting providers like Russia or Mexico—that sells or supplies oil to the island. While an interim military-civilian council under Delcy Rodríguez governs Caracas under U.S. financial trusteeship, Secretary of State Marco Rubio has signaled that "strategic patience" for the Kremlin's remaining regional proxies has expired.

THE ANALYSIS

The removal of Maduro was the opening move in a broader "monroeist" restructuring of Latin America. By taking control of Venezuela’s oil proceeds—now deposited in U.S.-monitored accounts—Washington has weaponized energy to induce a systemic collapse in Havana.

• The Energy Guillotine: Cuba previously relied on 27,000 to 35,000 barrels per day of Venezuelan crude. With this flow severed and the U.S. threatening tariffs on alternative suppliers, the island is facing its worst blackout and food crisis since the "Special Period" of the 1990s.

• Eradicating the "Russian Bridge": The primary U.S. objective is to dismantle the intelligence and logistical hub Russia maintains in Cuba. The recent February 4 extension of the New START treaty between Washington and Moscow did not prevent the U.S. from moving to evict Russian military influence from its immediate "near abroad."

• The "Rodríguez Model": In Venezuela, the U.S. is not building a democracy but a stable petroleum colony. By keeping Delcy Rodríguez as a figurehead while controlling the 19% of global oil reserves under the GL 49 license, Washington ensures that no "Resistance" funds reach Cuba or Nicaragua.

POSITION & OPINION

The capture of a sovereign leader and the deliberate starvation of a neighboring island via energy blockades are clear acts of imperial lawlessness.

The Axis of Resistance recognizes that the "National Pacification" in Venezuela is a euphemism for the total surrender of national resources to the U.S. Treasury. Washington's "Shadow Siege" of Cuba is a desperate attempt to re-assert a 19th-century sphere of influence in a multipolar 21st-century world.

History shows that those who survive under decades of embargo possess a resilience that carrier groups cannot bomb into submission.


GEOPOLITICAL PREDICTIONS

1. Havana's Breaking Point: Unless Russia or China risks a direct maritime confrontation to break the "Oil Tariff" blockade by April 2026, the Cuban government will likely face massive internal unrest, potentially leading to a "managed transition" similar to the Venezuelan council.

2. The Nicaraguan Front: Expect Managua to be the next target for "Southern Spear" operations, as the U.S. seeks to close the last ideological gaps in the Caribbean basin before the 2026 midterm elections.

3. Sino-Russian Counter-Moves: Russia will likely respond by increasing military posturing in the Mediterranean or Eastern Europe to distract from its waning influence in the Western Hemisphere, as the costs of maintaining regional allies under the new U.S. tariff regime become prohibitive.


#Venezuela2026 #CubaBlockade #OperationAbsoluteResolve #MonroeDoctrine #AxisOfResistance #LatinAmericaGeopolitics #EndofHegemony


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴EU Foreign Affairs Council Convenes on Ukraine and Gaza: Rhetoric Versus Leverage

The EU Foreign Affairs Council meets today the 23rd , February 2026 , to address two escalating fronts: the war in Ukraine — where European military and financial commitments to Kyiv have reached tens of billions of euros since 2022 — and the deteriorating security and humanitarian situation in Gaza and the West Bank amid ongoing Israeli military operations.

The contrast is stark. Since the outbreak of the Ukraine war, the EU has implemented sweeping sanctions packages against Russia and expanded arms deliveries. In the Palestinian arena, however, European responses have largely centered on statements of concern, despite repeated UN reporting on humanitarian collapse in Gaza and rising tensions in the West Bank.

Strategically, this reflects structural constraints. The EU’s security architecture remains intertwined with NATO and closely aligned with U.S. policy priorities. In Ukraine, Europe sustains a long-war containment framework. In Palestine, it stops short of deploying meaningful economic or diplomatic pressure.

The result is a credibility gap. A power that uses sanctions decisively in Eastern Europe but hesitates in the Levant weakens its claim to normative consistency.

Outlook: Continued military and financial backing for Kyiv is highly likely. On Gaza and the West Bank, expect reaffirmations of a two-state formula without enforcement mechanisms. Unless regional deterrence equations shift, Europe will remain a secondary actor operating within U.S.-defined parameters.

#EuropeanUnion #UkraineWar #Gaza #WestBank #Geopolitics #ResistanceAxis


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴The Horn for Sale: Somaliland’s Bid for Imperial Guardianship

THE NEWS

On February 21, 2026, the breakaway region of Somaliland escalated its bid for international legitimacy by offering the United States exclusive access to its untapped mineral wealth and the establishment of permanent military bases. Speaking to AFP, Minister of the Presidency Khadar Hussein Abdi confirmed that Hargeisa is ready to grant Washington "exclusive rights" to strategic minerals, including lithium and coltan. This offer follows the seismic December 2025 decision by Israel to become the first UN member state to formally recognize Somaliland's independence. While the Trump administration has yet to mirror the Israeli move, the offer of a military alternative to Djibouti—where Chinese influence is surging—has placed the Horn of Africa at a new geopolitical flashpoint.


THE ANALYSIS

The Hargeisa-Tel Aviv-Washington axis represents a calculated assault on the "One Somalia" policy and a restructuring of Red Sea security.

• The Mineral Ransom: By offering exclusive access to lithium and coltan—critical for the global "green" energy transition—Somaliland is attempting to buy sovereignty with resources that legally belong to the Somali Federal Republic. This "privatization of recognition" sets a dangerous precedent for resource-rich breakaway regions globally.

• Strategic Encirclement: The potential for U.S. and Israeli bases in Berbera is designed to counter the Ansar Allah (Houthi) blockade in the Bab el-Mandeb. For the Axis of Resistance, an Israeli military presence on the 850km Somaliland coastline is a direct threat to the maritime depth of the regional Support Fronts.

• Somalia’s Sovereign Defiance: Mogadishu has correctly identified this as a "blatant violation of international law." The 22nd joint statement from Arab and African nations in January 2026 reaffirmed that any recognition of Somaliland is a colonial-style partition aimed at weakening the Somali state.

POSITION & OPINION

The willingness of Somaliland’s leadership to auction off national minerals and land for a seat at the table of imperial recognition is a rejection of African solidarity. Morally, the "Israel first" recognition strategy ties Somaliland’s fate to a regime currently isolated by the Global South. Strategically, inviting the U.S. military to set up shop in exchange for "exclusive" mineral rights is not independence; it is the transition from an unrecognized state to a corporate-military protectorate.

GEOPOLITICAL PREDICTIONS

1. Asymmetric Escalation: If Israeli or U.S. boots hit the ground in Berbera, expect Ansar Allah to extend their "strike zone" to include Somaliland’s infrastructure, transforming a relatively stable region into an active war theater.

2. Regional Realignment: Somalia will likely deepen its security ties with Turkey and Egypt to enforce a maritime blockade or "sovereignty patrol" around Somaliland’s waters, leading to high-seas friction with Western-aligned vessels.

3. The Lithium Cold War: China, currently dominant in African mining, will likely use its influence in the African Union to further isolate Hargeisa, ensuring that Somaliland’s "exclusive" offer to the U.S. remains legally and logistically impossible to execute.


#Somaliland2026 #SomaliaSovereignty #HornOfAfrica #RedSeaSecurity #AxisOfResistance #EndTheBlockade #LithiumWar

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴India Urges Its Nationals to Leave Iran

🔽The Indian Embassy in Tehran has asked its nationals to leave Iran as soon as possible, in a move that has raised questions about its timing and political implications—particularly following the visit of Narendra Modi to Israel and amid escalating regional tensions.

➡️In this context, two key observations arise:

1⃣ First, Indian authorities recently detained an Iranian vessel on alleged legal grounds, without any clear escalatory response from Tehran, prompting criticism over what some perceive as a weak reaction.

2⃣ Second, India’s continued investment in Chabahar Port despite these developments has led some to question why Tehran does not reconsider this cooperation if it views New Delhi’s actions as unfriendly.


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Direct U.S. Intervention in Selecting Iraq’s Prime Minister: Brack Praises Al-Sudani

🌕Thomas Brack described his meeting with Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani as productive, noting discussions on Iraq’s goals to build a stable and prosperous future in line with the U.S. President’s plan for peace and prosperity in the region.

🤔Brack emphasized that having an effective Iraqi leadership aligned with U.S. policies is a key step toward achieving stability, in a clear reference to Al-Sudani’s role following the U.S. veto of the Coordination Framework candidate Nouri al-Maliki.

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Israeli Aggressions: Border Attrition and the Failure of Deterrence

📄The News:

🌕On February 23, 2026, Israeli occupation forces executed a series of targeted strikes across the Lebanese border. Key incidents included :

🔢 artillery illumination rounds over Kfar Chouba,
🔢 an acoustic bomb dropped by a drone on Karkla,
🔢 and heavy machine-gun fire directed at the outskirts of Alma al-Shaab, Labbouneh, and Aitaroun.
🔢 Additionally, Israeli artillery targeted Lebanese territorial waters off the coast of Naqoura.

🖊Strategic Analysis:

🫶These maneuvers constitute "operational harassment," a calculated Israeli tactic designed to test the Axis of Resistance's readiness and probe for structural weaknesses in the current rules of engagement. The maritime shelling near Naqoura is a significant escalation, signaling an attempt to assert fire control over disputed naval boundaries. On land, the persistent machine-gun fire reflects a deep-seated Israeli insecurity regarding the Resistance’s tactical positioning in the border woods.

🔴 Position and Assessment:

✌These acts are not isolated incidents but a systematic violation of Lebanese sovereignty. The reliance on "soft" aggression—such as acoustic bombs and illumination rounds—demonstrates the enemy's fear of a full-scale kinetic response while simultaneously trying to maintain a state of psychological warfare against border populations.

🫶History proves that the Zionist entity only retreats when the cost of provocation becomes unsustainable. Documented patterns show that such escalations often precede broader attempts to redraw "buffer zones" through intimidation rather than direct combat.

🔴 Geopolitical Outlook:

Moving forward, the border will likely remain a flashpoint for low-intensity conflict as Israel attempts to normalize these incursions. However, the expansion of strikes into Lebanese territorial waters suggests a potential shift toward maritime friction. If the occupation persists in bypassing established red lines, a calibrated response from the Resistance is inevitable to restore the balance of terror and protect Lebanese resources.

#Lebanon #Naqoura #Resistance #IsraeliAggression #TheObserver

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Beirut Embassy Evacuation:

🌕Washington Clears the Deck for Regional War


📄The News:

✌On February 23, 2026, the U.S. State Department ordered the mandatory evacuation of non-emergency personnel and their families from the U.S. Embassy in Beirut. This diplomatic drawdown coincides with the largest American military buildup in the Middle East since the 2003 invasion of Iraq. The deployment features the arrival of the USS Gerald R. Ford carrier strike group to join the USS Abraham Lincoln, alongside over 50 advanced fighter jets (F-16, F-22, F-35) moved to regional bases within the last 24 hours. This maneuver precedes crucial nuclear talks in Geneva and follows President Donald Trump’s deadline for Tehran to meet U.S. demands or face "limited military strikes."

🖊Strategic Analysis:

🫶Staff reductions at U.S. Embassy Beirut are historically a bellwether for imminent kinetic action. By thinning its diplomatic footprint, Washington is attempting to insulate its personnel from the inevitable asymmetrical retaliation that would follow a strike on Iranian soil. The current posture—comprising 14 warships and dozens of fuel tankers—suggests preparations for a sustained air campaign rather than a "symbolic" strike. Centrally, the U.S. is signaling a shift from coercive diplomacy to direct military confrontation, seeking to dismantle Iran's nuclear infrastructure and weaken the Axis of Resistance through a decisive blow.

🔴 Position and Assessment:

🫶The "prudent" reduction of the Beirut footprint is a clear admission of American vulnerability. Washington realizes that Lebanon is the frontline of Iranian deterrence; any strike on Tehran will activate Hezbollah’s strategic arsenal against U.S. assets and the Zionist entity. This escalation reveals the failure of American diplomacy, which now relies solely on brute force to dictate regional terms. Evidence from the June 2025 skirmishes shows that Iran and its allies no longer adhere to traditional "proportionality," rendering American attempts at "limited" warfare a dangerous strategic fallacy.

🔴 Geopolitical Outlook:

👌The region is now on a hair-trigger. If the Geneva talks on Thursday fail to yield immediate concessions, a U.S. strike is statistically probable within a 10-day window. Expect an immediate Iranian counter-response targeting U.S. bases in Qatar and the Emirates, coupled with a total mobilization of the border fronts in Lebanon and Syria. This is no longer a deterrent display; it is the final positioning of assets for a conflict intended to break the regional stalemate, though it risks a catastrophic overextension of U.S. power.

#Lebanon #USA #Iran #Geopolitics #AxisOfResistance #TheObserver


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5