The Observer
45 subscribers
415 photos
70 videos
446 links
🔻 "In-depth geopolitical analyses from the heart of the Resistance Axis to global conflict zones."
Download Telegram
🔴 Reuters: Arrest of Maduro Ally Alex Saab in Venezuela… Venezuelan Sources Deny the Report

📄 Reuters reported that Alex Saab, a businessman close to Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, was arrested on Wednesday in Venezuela as part of a joint operation between U.S. and Venezuelan authorities. Saab, 54, was previously arrested in Cape Verde in 2020 and spent more than three years in the United States on bribery charges, before receiving a pardon in exchange for the release of Americans detained in Venezuela.

🔽 He is expected to be extradited to the United States in the coming days.

🤔 However, his lawyer and several pro-government Venezuelan journalists denied the report, and no official confirmation has been issued by the Venezuelan government, raising questions about the accuracy of the news.

🌕 The United States had previously accused Saab of laundering approximately $350 million of Venezuelan state funds through the U.S. financial system as part of a bribery scheme—an allegation Saab denied prior to receiving the pardon.


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👎2👍1
🔴Israeli Chemical Spraying in Southern Lebanon… the State Settles for Documenting Violations

🌕The Israeli army continues its attacks on southern Lebanon by spraying chemical substances and toxic herbicides over border areas, in a dangerous move aimed at displacing residents and causing widespread destruction to the environment and agriculture in the south, amid the absence of any firm response from the Lebanese state—no summoning of the guarantor ambassadors of the ceasefire agreement, no suspension of negotiations, and not even a field response by the Lebanese army.

🔘This operation coincided with similar actions carried out by the Israeli army along the Syrian border adjacent to the occupied Golan Heights, pointing to a systematic approach that relies on environmental destruction as a security and military tool across border areas.

💳As the gravity of these actions escalates, the Lebanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced that it has begun documenting Israeli violations involving the spraying of toxic substances and pesticides on agricultural lands and orchards in several southern villages. The ministry said it is coordinating with the Ministries of Environment, Agriculture, and Health, under directives from President Joseph Aoun and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, to prepare a comprehensive legal file documenting what it described as “serious violations.”

💬The current attack is not the first of its kind. Israel has previously used internationally prohibited weapons against Lebanon, most notably toxic white phosphorus munitions. Lebanese authorities have documented and submitted official complaints to the UN Security Council since the outbreak of confrontations on October 8, 2023, through the 66-day war that ended with a ceasefire brokered by the United States and France—without any real accountability.

🔴Meanwhile, Israel’s Channel 15 reported, citing security sources in the Israeli army, that the chemical spraying aims to eliminate vegetation cover near the border fence, under the pretext of preventing armed individuals or “undesirable persons” from approaching the border—justification that reflects a policy of collective punishment and systematic destruction of land and livelihoods.

📄In light of this reality, unanswered questions continue to mount:
Why does Lebanon not suspend its commitment to an agreement that is violated daily?
Why does it not formally protest to the states sponsoring the agreement instead of settling for documentation statements?
Who will stop these violations, and who bears responsibility for protecting the south and its people before it is too late?
Is Lebanon expected merely to record crimes—or to defend its sovereignty before the south is turned into an environmental and humanitarian disaster zone?


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬3
🔴Environmental Warfare: From Vietnam to South Lebanon—Poisoning the Land as a Colonial Doctrine

Western liberal discourse often treats the environment as a luxury, dismissing its destruction during wartime as "collateral damage." However, those who till the soil and resist upon it know that nature is the artery of resistance and the sanctuary of existence. When colonialism fails to break human will, it turns to poisoning the land that sustains them.

The "Ecocide" Doctrine

What we are witnessing today in South Lebanon—specifically the occupation's use of agricultural aircraft to spray chemical agents over border areas under the pretext of "clearing the terrain"—is not a technical security measure. It is a direct continuation of the scorched-earth policy formulated by imperialism in Vietnam.
In the 1960s, the U.S. sprayed over 70 million liters of Agent Orange over Vietnamese forests. The overt goal was to "deprive the resistance of cover," but the true objective was to destroy food sovereignty, shatter ecological balance, and leave carcinogenic scars in the DNA of future generations. Today, the Zionist entity repeats this crime in Lebanon, utilizing the "ceasefire" period to conduct a silent chemical aggression.

South Lebanon: The Land as an Enemy

Field reports indicate that the substances released by the occupation’s drones and aircraft are not mere herbicides; they are carcinogenic compounds that ruin soil fertility. Targeting the lush vegetation of the southern spring aims to:

1. Strip Biological Cover: Turning border villages into barren, exposed zones to facilitate the targeting of any human movement.

2. Economic Destruction: Poisoning the soil and groundwater to strike the agricultural sector—the backbone of resilience for the people of the South.

3. Environmental Displacement:
Rendering life health-hazardous by spreading chronic diseases and contaminating essential life sources.

Colonial Logic: If I Can’t Own It, I’ll Ruin It

This behavior exposes the core of the Zionist logic: land that resists does not deserve to live. When the tank fails to stabilize an occupational reality, chemistry is deployed to finish the task. They fear the trees as they fear the people; they fear the "woods" of the South because they cradle the spirit of resistance.

International Silence: An Old Complicity

The silence of the "international community" regarding the ecocide in Lebanon and Palestine mirrors its complicity in Vietnam. It seems environmental destruction becomes an "acceptable face" of warfare when the victims are those who refuse subjugation.
Targeting Lebanese soil with carcinogenic agents is a full-fledged war crime and a violation of all international laws prohibiting collective punishment. But the resistance that sprouted from this land knows how to protect its roots. If the enemy believes that poisoning the trees will halt the march of history, they are ignorant of a land—and a people—that have survived much worse.

The question remains:

Will the world wait decades to acknowledge the environmental holocaust in Lebanon and Palestine, as it did with Vietnam? Or does the destruction of our planet become secondary when it serves the security of the occupation?


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬2👍1
🔴News Report:

President Donald Trump addressed the 74th National Prayer Breakfast on Thursday the 5th of February, 2026 , using his sixth appearance at the bipartisan event to announce a Department of Justice task force led by Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate "anti-Christian bias."

The Gospel According to Donald: The 74th National Prayer Breakfast


Nothing says "humility and faith" like a prayer breakfast turned into a campaign rally. At the 74th National Prayer Breakfast, the "least perfect candidate" graced us with his presence to remind God that He’s lucky to have him.

The Gates of Heaven:

Trump is confident he’ll "probably make it" into heaven. Why? Because he did a "hell of a lot of good for perfect people." Finally, a theology that rewards the flawless with the help of the "most religious president in history."

Alternative Arithmetic:

Forget the records; Trump claimed, "We won the popular vote by a lot." Apparently, math is now a matter of faith, not facts.

The Holy Inquisition:

To combat "anti-Christian bias," he’s launching a task force under AG Pam Bondi. Because nothing screams "Sermon on the Mount" like using the Justice Department to "get even"—which he totally doesn't do, but "wouldn't I have a right to?"

Foreign Policy & Fleets:

Between thanking El Salvador for taking back deportees and claiming he killed the Johnson Amendment (he didn't), he reminded us that Iran is "negotiating" because "we have a big fleet going over" there.
Truly, a "tremendous success.

" If you’re a person of faith voting Democrat, Donald "don't know how" you do it. Just ask him—he’s done more for religion than any president, including the ones who actually knew the prayers.


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👻3
The End of New START: A "Grave Moment" for Global Security


Today, February 5, 2026, marks a historic and dangerous turning point in international relations. The New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START), the final bilateral agreement regulating the nuclear arsenals of the United States and Russia, has officially expired.
For the first time since 1972, the world’s two largest nuclear powers—possessing roughly 90% of the world's nuclear warheads—are operating without any legally binding limits on their strategic forces.


Key Consequences of Expiration

The lapse of New START removes the "guardrails" that have prevented an all-out nuclear competition for decades:

Removal of Caps: The treaty limited each side to 1,550 deployed warheads and 700 deployed delivery systems (missiles and bombers). Both nations are now legally free to expand these numbers indefinitely.

Loss of Transparency: The end of mutual on-site inspections and data exchanges means intelligence agencies will now rely on "worst-case scenario" estimates. This lack of certainty significantly increases the risk of miscalculation during crises.

Strain on the NPT: The expiration undermines the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Non-nuclear states may now question the commitment of major powers to disarmament, potentially fueling nuclear ambitions in regions like the Middle East and East Asia( and perhaps this is a good decision! ) .


A New Triple Arms Race?
The vacuum left by New START doesn’t just affect Washington and Moscow. We are entering a "polycrisis" in nuclear stability:

1. US vs. Russia: Both nations have the technical capacity to "upload" stored warheads onto existing missiles. Reports suggest the US could double its deployed forces within a few years if it chooses to match potential Russian increases.

2. The China Factor: A major hurdle in negotiations was the US demand to include China, which is rapidly expanding its arsenal. Beijing has consistently refused to join limits until the US and Russia reduce their stockpiles to Chinese levels.

3. The Technological Edge: Unlike the Cold War, this new race involves Hypersonic Missiles and Artificial Intelligence, which compress decision-making times and make traditional arms control frameworks nearly obsolete.

The Current Stance
Russia: President Putin proposed an informal one-year adherence to the limits in late 2025, but the offer was not formalized. Moscow maintains that any future deal must include UK and French arsenals.

United States: The Trump administration has signaled a preference for a "better agreement" over an extension, emphasizing the need for a multilateral framework that includes China.


United Nations: Secretary-General António Guterres has labeled this a "grave moment," warning that the risk of nuclear use is at its highest in decades.

The international community now faces a choice: innovate a new, trilateral arms control architecture or brace for an era of unpredictable, high-stakes nuclear competition.


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🌚3
🔴 Syrian government forces led by Ahmed al-Sharaa (al-Golani) have deliberately cut off one of the tributaries of the Euphrates River in Deir ez-Zor Governorate, a vital tributary that flows into Iraqi territory.


🔘 This action is considered a blatant assault on Iraqi sovereign rights and a flagrant violation of international laws and norms governing transboundary rivers. It also reveals a dangerous escalatory approach adopted by Damascus, signaling political and security repercussions that cannot be ignored.


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬3
Graham ends meeting with Lebanese Army Commander over stance on Hezbollah


U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham announced the termination of a "very short" meeting with Lebanese Army Commander General Rudolph Haikal, following a sharp disagreement over the classification of Hezbollah.

Graham stated that he asked Haikal directly whether he considers
Hezbollah a "terrorist organization."

According to Graham, the Lebanese Army Commander replied,
"
No, not in the context of the Lebanese situation,"

which prompted Graham to end the meeting immediately.

The U.S. Senator asserted that Hezbollah is "clearly a terrorist organization," emphasizing that it has "American blood on its hands," referring to the targeting of U.S. Marines in Lebanon. He added that the group has been on U.S. terror lists since 1997 by both Republican and Democratic administrations "for good reason."

Graham argued that the Lebanese Army's continued stance raises questions about its status as a "reliable partner" to the United States. He criticized what he described as "double-talk in the Middle East," stating that "too much is at stake and there is no room for pleasantries."

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬21
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔴Washington urges citizens to leave Iran as Iranian delegation arrives in Muscat


In a notable move, the U.S. State Department has called on its citizens to leave Iran "by any means possible," including departing by land via Armenia or Turkey. This directive comes while the Iranian negotiating delegation is in the Omani capital, Muscat, for indirect talks.


This American step recalls events from last June, when the United States not only provided political cover for Israel during the course of Iranian-American negotiations but also actively participated in military action. This behavior reflected Washington’s use of the diplomatic track as a cover for escalation rather than a path to a solution.

Observers believe this timing raises serious questions regarding U.S. credibility in the negotiation process. It reinforces suspicions that Washington is adopting a dual policy: keeping negotiation channels open for appearance's sake, while simultaneously pursuing security and military pressure and escalation.

In this context, statements made by the Leader of the Islamic Revolution in Iran last year have been circulating widely. He emphasized that "negotiating with such a government is irrational, lacks wisdom, is not honorable, and must be avoided," referring to what Tehran considers a U.S. record based on broken commitments and double standards.

According to informed sources, these developments reflect Washington's continued policy of sending contradictory messages at a time when the region is experiencing escalating tension and extreme sensitivity in both political and security tracks.

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍2🤔1
🔴 General Closure of Commercial Markets in Iraq in Protest Against New Customs Tariffs

🤔 The Baghdad Chamber of Commerce announced a complete shutdown of commercial markets across Iraq starting Sunday, in protest against Government Decision No. 957 of 2025 regarding increased customs tariffs on imports. The decision was ratified in late October 2025 and came into effect in January 2026.

🖊 The decision raises tariffs to between 5% and 30%, covering most imported goods. However, implementation was sudden, without a gradual schedule or exemptions for essential goods. This led to a halt in the movement of goods at customs, affected market prices, and sparked a wave of anger among traders.

💬 The Chamber of Commerce stated that the closure aims to pressure the government to amend or postpone the application of the new tariffs, especially since the abrupt implementation caused immediate losses for traders and disrupted supplies in the markets.

📌 Background: The decision was issued by the central government before the new parliament had full authority. Since then, parliament has not made any amendments to the decision, despite repeated protests from traders.


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤯1👀1
🔴 The Commander of U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) alongside Witkoff and Kushner as part of the American delegation in the Iran–United States negotiations in Muscat.

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬3
🔴The Sovereign Void: Why the Architects of the Multipolar World Are Missing from the Empire’s Files


The unsealing of the Epstein documents (2024–2026) has provided more than just a list of names; it has provided a forensic map of the Atlanticist power structure. While the files are saturated with the names of U.S. Presidents, British royalty, and Zionist power brokers, there is a glaring absence of the leaders currently architecting the Multipolar World.

This absence is not a coincidence of geography—it is a structural firewall created by the pursuit of national sovereignty.

1. The Blackmail-Based Order
The Epstein network was never merely a tabloid scandal; it was a functional infrastructure for the Western ruling class. It served as a nexus where finance, intelligence, and high-level politics merged to ensure institutional loyalty through kompromat (compromising material) and shared liability.

To be "integrated" into the Western-led "Rules-Based International Order" often required entry into these elite social circuits. The figures missing from these files—Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping, Kim Jong Un, and Imran Khan—exist entirely outside this circuit because they have fundamentally decoupled their states from the Western social and financial ecosystem.

2. Sovereignty as a Shield
The leaders of the emerging multipolar hubs have been subjected to decades of "maximum pressure," sanctions, and character assassination. Paradoxically, this isolation served as a sanctuary of sovereignty.

The Russian and Chinese Wall: Epstein’s recorded attempts to facilitate meetings with Vladimir Putin (2011–2014) were met with total failure. Putin’s Russia and Xi Jinping’s China have spent the last decade building indigenous financial and social infrastructures. By being locked out of the West’s "elite" circles, they remained immune to the specific brand of systemic corruption and social engineering used to manage Western puppet states.

The Case of Imran Khan: As a disruptive populist, Khan’s absence from these files is telling. Unlike the traditional Pakistani political elite who are deeply integrated into Western real estate and financial markets, Khan’s refusal to serve as a client-state proxy led to his removal via a 2022 parliamentary maneuver—widely attributed to U.S. pressure. His lack of "files" meant he could not be managed; he had to be deposed.

Intellectual Independence: The rejection of the network by Professor Norman Finkelstein illustrates the price of intellectual sovereignty. While other prominent academics were caught in the web, Finkelstein’s status as a pariah for his critique of the Zionist project made him unreachable.

3. The List of the "Un-compromised"
The following figures share a common trait: they are the primary targets of Western aggression, yet they are the only global power players absent from the Empire’s most infamous ledger:

Vladimir Putin: Endured relentless sanctions and 2016 election interference claims; Epstein’s attempts to reach him were rebuffed.

Xi Jinping: Targeted by Xinjiang, Hong Kong, and South China Sea sanctions; no direct social or financial links to the Epstein circuit.

Kim Jong Un: Subjected to the most extreme isolation in modern history; Epstein’s documented interest in North Korean "summits" never materialized into access.

Imran Khan: Ousted and jailed after refusing to provide military bases and pursuing an independent foreign policy; no ties to Western elite scandals.

4. Conclusion: A Question of Survival
The Epstein files prove that to be a "friend" of the Empire is to be a participant in its decay. The "International Community" is a club where membership is bought with complicity.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍3
The Observer
🔴The Sovereign Void: Why the Architects of the Multipolar World Are Missing from the Empire’s Files The unsealing of the Epstein documents (2024–2026) has provided more than just a list of names; it has provided a forensic map of the Atlanticist power structure.…
Is it a coincidence that those most hostile to Western domination are also the ones missing from its most infamous corruption networks? Or is it the consequence of true independence? As the Western order fumbles through its internal rot, a new world is being built by those who were never on "the list"—because they refused to pay the entry price.

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍2
🔴Hours After Muscat Talks: Washington Imposes New Sanctions on Iranian Oil Exports

The United States announced a new package of sanctions on Iran on Friday evening, targeting 15 entities and 14 oil tankers linked to the export of oil and petrochemical products. According to Reuters, these measures come just hours after the conclusion of the first round of indirect talks between Tehran and Washington in Muscat.

The U.S. State Department stated that the sanctioned tankers are part of what it described as a "ghost fleet" used to circumvent sanctions and illegally transport Iranian oil. State Department spokesperson Tommy Pigott confirmed that these actions are part of the Trump administration's "maximum pressure" policy aimed at reducing Iranian oil exports.

For its part, the U.S. Treasury Department announced additional sanctions on two individuals linked to the Iranian oil trade, freezing their assets within the United States and prohibiting any financial dealings with them by U.S. individuals or companies.

According to the U.S. statement, the sanctions included companies operating in several countries, including Turkey, the UAE, China, India, and Hong Kong. Details were also released on 14 oil tankers said to have played a direct role in transporting Iranian oil.

Washington emphasized that the listing of these entities, individuals, and vessels on the sanctions lists means the freezing of any potential assets they hold within the United States and the imposition of a total ban on any cooperation with them by U.S. parties.

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👎3
🔴 Pakistan: 200 people killed or injured in a terrorist attack linked to US- and Saudi-backed armed movements

On Friday, Pakistan’s capital Islamabad witnessed a terrorist bombing targeting the Al-Khadija al-Kubra Mosque during Friday prayers, leaving at least 31 people dead and around 169 others wounded, in one of the deadliest attacks in the city in more than a decade.

The explosion occurred in the Tarlai area on the outskirts of Islamabad inside a crowded Shia mosque, resulting in scenes of destruction and chaos as the wounded were rushed to hospitals, with expectations that the death toll may rise.

So far, no group has officially claimed responsibility for the attack, but security sources point to possible involvement of armed groups such as Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan or Islamic State – Khorasan Province, both of which have previously targeted Shia communities.

This operation reflects the escalation of violence and extremism in Pakistan in recent months, following a series of attacks in different provinces amid ongoing conflict between armed groups and the state.

The bombing comes just days after popular demonstrations in Pakistan in support of the Leader of the Islamic Revolution in Iran, at a time of rising regional tensions and increasing cross-border violence.

As investigations continue, Pakistani authorities and the international community have called for the perpetrators to be pursued and brought to justice, while Islamabad’s government has pledged to intensify security efforts to curb the growing wave of violence.

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔴 U.S. Treasury Secretary Reveals Strategy to Create Economic Unrest in Iran

🤔U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated that the measures taken by the Treasury Department led to the creation of a dollar shortage inside Iran, forcing the Iranian central bank to print money, which resulted in the collapse of the national currency and a sharp rise in inflation.

📄Bessent added:

🌕 “We will continue monitoring all our partners, all our Iranian partners,”
🌕 emphasizing Washington’s ongoing surveillance of actors connected to Iran’s economy.

🖊These remarks reflect the existence of a U.S. economic strategy aimed at generating economic instability in countries such as Iran, relying on what the United States consistently refers to as its “partners,” with potential repercussions extending to other countries in the region, including Iraq.


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬2
Intelligence Update: February 2026


As the old global order fractures, the real war is being fought in the shadows. Here is the strategic reality the mainstream refuses to clarify.

NATO’s Breaking Point: Internal intelligence sharing has reached a functional collapse. Following unilateral moves by Washington that prioritized US hegemony over "allied" interests, European trust is at an all-time low. Denmark’s emergency advisory for officials to disable Bluetooth is a stark admission: in the West, your "ally" is your primary eavesdropper.

The Shadow War in Moscow: Lt. Gen. Vladimir Alexeyev of the GRU survived an assassination attempt in Moscow. While the West uses proxies for terror, Russia is securing its future in the Arctic. The aggressive expansion of Arctic LNG infrastructure is Moscow’s definitive answer to economic warfare—energy sovereignty is the new frontline.

Implosion at the DNI: The US Office of the Director of National Intelligence is gutting its staff by 40%. This isn't just restructuring; it is a purge. The American intelligence apparatus is cannibalizing itself as internal political factions struggle for control of the collapsing empire.

Iran’s Resilience: Western media is saturated with reports of "damaged" Iranian nuclear sites. The reality? Tehran has mastered the art of rapid recovery and strategic hardening. Their ballistic priority remains the ultimate deterrent against any regional miscalculation by the Zionist entity or its backers.

The Cost of Treason: Cuba has delivered a life sentence to former Economy Minister Alejandro Gil for espionage. A clear message from Havana: at this stage of the global struggle, there is no room for those who sell their nation to the "enemy."

AI & Moral Decay: UK regulators are now scrambling to contain the fallout from Grok AI’s generation of non-consensual deepfakes. The very tools designed for cognitive warfare are now eroding the social fabric of the societies that unleashed them.

History is accelerating. We know who is built to survive the crash.

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍2🤔1
🔴Masks Off in Washington: Incompetent Staff or Calculated Bigotry?


💳Donald Trump is once again at the center of a racial firestorm after sharing a video depicting Barack and Michelle Obama as apes. While the White House attempts to bury the scandal under the guise of a "staffing error," the incident exposes the deep-seated decay at the heart of the American political establishment.

🔘 The "I Didn't See It" Defense: Trump claims he only watched the beginning of the 62-second clip—focusing on his usual election fraud rhetoric—and missed the racist caricature at the end. The White House initially doubled down, dismissing the backlash as "fake outrage" before forced deletion following internal Republican pressure.

🔘 Fractures in the GOP: Even loyal allies like Senator Tim Scott couldn't ignore the blatant imagery, calling it "the most racist thing" he’s seen from this administration. This isn't an isolated "mistake"; it is a continuation of a decades-long pattern of birtherism and dehumanizing rhetoric used to galvanize a specific base.

🔘 Weaponized Memetics: By portraying high-profile political opponents as animals, the Trump apparatus is signaling a total abandonment of civil discourse in favor of primitive tribalism. Whether intentional or "erroneous," the message is clear: in the pursuit of power, no trope is too vile and no history too painful to exploit.

🔘While the Empire lectures the world on human rights, its own leadership remains tethered to the most regressive and hateful caricatures of the past.


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬2👍1
🔴 The Silent Killer: Iran’s Naval Mine Strategy in the Persian Gulf
Operational Warning:


🤔The Iranian Navy has unveiled advanced minelaying tactics as a direct deterrent to the U.S. Fleet.

🔘 Asymmetric Advantage: The narrow geography of the Persian Gulf and Strait of Hormuz turns naval mines into high-impact military and economic weapons.

🔘 Multi-Layered Defense: Strategy integrates coastal radar, drones, and underwater sensors to create a precise operational map before deployment.

🔘 High-Risk Zones: Strategic minefields in vital corridors force enemy vessels to slow down or alter course into "kill zones."

🔘 Tactical Integration: Mines work in tandem with coastal missiles, fast boats, and electronic warfare.

🔘 The Arsenal:
Includes Sadaf-2, smart mines (acoustic/magnetic sensors), and mobile "creeping" mines.

🔘 Innovation: Recent drills (Great Prophet 19) demonstrated rapid minelaying via Fajr-5 rockets launched from the coast, eliminating the need for vulnerable minelaying ships.

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍3
🔴 Netanyahu flies to Washington with a “Zero Deal” agenda

🔽total nuclear rollback, zero enrichment, missile range limits, dismantling the Shi’a Axis, and heavy enforcement on Iran. As Trump tries to salvage talks in Muscat, Jerusalem’s maximalist push could break the diplomatic track.


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬2
Zero Deal: Netanyahu’s Ultimatum to Trump — War, Diplomacy, and Iran’s Future

Executive Summary

At a pivotal juncture in the Middle Eastern conflict, Benjamin Netanyahu heads to Washington with a Zero Deal blueprint for Trump: total dismantlement of Iran’s nuclear program, restraints on missile range, the dismantling of the so-called “Shi’a Axis,” and harsh controls over the Islamic Republic. These demands come as the Trump administration resumes negotiations with Iran — talks that have so far been limited and inconclusive.

Netanyahu’s agenda is not technical bargaining; it is strategic reshaping, at once diplomatic and military, of the regional order.



The Context: Why Now?

After months of indirect U.S.–Iran negotiations in Muscat that largely focused on nuclear limits — not missiles or regional proxies — Jerusalem fears a diplomatic package that might cap only one dimension of Iran’s capabilities. The region hasn’t forgotten the strategic effects of past Israeli and U.S. airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, nor Tehran’s retaliatory warnings.

Netanyahu’s trip, moved forward amid pressure to include missile limits, comes at a moment when Tehran officially rejects capping its missile program as a negotiation point. This signals a divergence between U.S. approaches focused narrowly on nuclear rollback and Israeli demands for sweeping strategic containment.



What Netanyahu Will Demand — Reframed

Based on Israeli press summaries and diplomatic signaling from Channel 14 and allied reporting:

Netanyahu will push for a “Zero Deal”:
1.
Total dismantlement of Iran’s nuclear capacities, not incremental rollback.

2.
Zero Uranium enrichment anywhere inside Iran.

3.
Blocking any future enrichment capability — not just current stockpiles.

4.
Removal of all enriched uranium from Iranian territory.

5.
Ceiling on ballistic missile ranges — a demand aimed at neutralizing reach.

6.
Dismantling the Iran-backed network from Lebanon to Yemen.

7.
Stringent, enforceable monitoring beyond standard inspections.

This package goes far beyond nuclear talks and asserts Israeli strategic priorities as preconditions for any future deal.



Dilemmas: Diplomacy vs. Escalation

For Trump and Washington, the art of negotiation has been trying to balance pressure with incentives. Past U.S. attempts at peace initiatives have faltered under military escalation — as analysis in Western press affirms — and pushing Israel toward unilateral strikes may damage negotiations with Tehran rather than smooth them.

Iran, for its part, insists on its sovereign right to peaceful enrichment — a position Washington cites as non-negotiable within the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty framework. This creates a collision between Israeli demands for zero enrichment and Iranian assertions of sovereign rights.


Possible Outcomes and Strategic Implications

1. A Hard-Line U.S.–Israel Unified Front

If Trump backs Netanyahu’s zero demands, negotiations could collapse, potentially triggering military escalation or proxy confrontations.

2. Diplomatic Continuity with Partial Compromises

If Washington tempers Israeli ambitions to achieve a diplomatic framework focusing on nuclear limits alone, Tehran may feel less threatened — but Jerusalem will see this as a betrayal.

3. Broader Regional Shifts

Netanyahu’s emphasis on missile range ceilings and dismantling the “Shi’a Axis” suggests a future reduced Iranian conventional footprint — a strategic objective that can reshape alliances and spheres of influence.