"Communicating with Tehran is challenging due to the nature of the Iranian political system, which is led by the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei."
"It is a country that is difficult to conduct diplomacy with when you cannot speak directly to the person responsible for the state, which makes the situation very strange."
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍3
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👎2👍1
Why does Lebanon not suspend its commitment to an agreement that is violated daily?
Why does it not formally protest to the states sponsoring the agreement instead of settling for documentation statements?
Who will stop these violations, and who bears responsibility for protecting the south and its people before it is too late?
Is Lebanon expected merely to record crimes—or to defend its sovereignty before the south is turned into an environmental and humanitarian disaster zone?
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬3
Western liberal discourse often treats the environment as a luxury, dismissing its destruction during wartime as "collateral damage." However, those who till the soil and resist upon it know that nature is the artery of resistance and the sanctuary of existence. When colonialism fails to break human will, it turns to poisoning the land that sustains them.
The "Ecocide" Doctrine
What we are witnessing today in South Lebanon—specifically the occupation's use of agricultural aircraft to spray chemical agents over border areas under the pretext of "clearing the terrain"—is not a technical security measure. It is a direct continuation of the scorched-earth policy formulated by imperialism in Vietnam.
In the 1960s, the U.S. sprayed over 70 million liters of Agent Orange over Vietnamese forests. The overt goal was to "deprive the resistance of cover," but the true objective was to destroy food sovereignty, shatter ecological balance, and leave carcinogenic scars in the DNA of future generations. Today, the Zionist entity repeats this crime in Lebanon, utilizing the "ceasefire" period to conduct a silent chemical aggression.
South Lebanon: The Land as an Enemy
Field reports indicate that the substances released by the occupation’s drones and aircraft are not mere herbicides; they are carcinogenic compounds that ruin soil fertility. Targeting the lush vegetation of the southern spring aims to:
1. Strip Biological Cover: Turning border villages into barren, exposed zones to facilitate the targeting of any human movement.
2. Economic Destruction: Poisoning the soil and groundwater to strike the agricultural sector—the backbone of resilience for the people of the South.
3. Environmental Displacement:
Rendering life health-hazardous by spreading chronic diseases and contaminating essential life sources.
Colonial Logic: If I Can’t Own It, I’ll Ruin It
This behavior exposes the core of the Zionist logic: land that resists does not deserve to live. When the tank fails to stabilize an occupational reality, chemistry is deployed to finish the task. They fear the trees as they fear the people; they fear the "woods" of the South because they cradle the spirit of resistance.
International Silence: An Old Complicity
The silence of the "international community" regarding the ecocide in Lebanon and Palestine mirrors its complicity in Vietnam. It seems environmental destruction becomes an "acceptable face" of warfare when the victims are those who refuse subjugation.
Targeting Lebanese soil with carcinogenic agents is a full-fledged war crime and a violation of all international laws prohibiting collective punishment. But the resistance that sprouted from this land knows how to protect its roots. If the enemy believes that poisoning the trees will halt the march of history, they are ignorant of a land—and a people—that have survived much worse.
The question remains:
Will the world wait decades to acknowledge the environmental holocaust in Lebanon and Palestine, as it did with Vietnam? Or does the destruction of our planet become secondary when it serves the security of the occupation?
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬2👍1
President Donald Trump addressed the 74th National Prayer Breakfast on Thursday the 5th of February, 2026 , using his sixth appearance at the bipartisan event to announce a Department of Justice task force led by Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate "anti-Christian bias."
The Gospel According to Donald: The 74th National Prayer Breakfast
Nothing says "humility and faith" like a prayer breakfast turned into a campaign rally. At the 74th National Prayer Breakfast, the "least perfect candidate" graced us with his presence to remind God that He’s lucky to have him.
• The Gates of Heaven:
Trump is confident he’ll "probably make it" into heaven. Why? Because he did a "hell of a lot of good for perfect people." Finally, a theology that rewards the flawless with the help of the "most religious president in history."
• Alternative Arithmetic:
Forget the records; Trump claimed, "We won the popular vote by a lot." Apparently, math is now a matter of faith, not facts.
• The Holy Inquisition:
To combat "anti-Christian bias," he’s launching a task force under AG Pam Bondi. Because nothing screams "Sermon on the Mount" like using the Justice Department to "get even"—which he totally doesn't do, but "wouldn't I have a right to?"
• Foreign Policy & Fleets:
Between thanking El Salvador for taking back deportees and claiming he killed the Johnson Amendment (he didn't), he reminded us that Iran is "negotiating" because "we have a big fleet going over" there.
Truly, a "tremendous success.
" If you’re a person of faith voting Democrat, Donald "don't know how" you do it. Just ask him—he’s done more for religion than any president, including the ones who actually knew the prayers.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👻3
The End of New START: A "Grave Moment" for Global Security
Today, February 5, 2026, marks a historic and dangerous turning point in international relations. The New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START), the final bilateral agreement regulating the nuclear arsenals of the United States and Russia, has officially expired.
For the first time since 1972, the world’s two largest nuclear powers—possessing roughly 90% of the world's nuclear warheads—are operating without any legally binding limits on their strategic forces.
Key Consequences of Expiration
The lapse of New START removes the "guardrails" that have prevented an all-out nuclear competition for decades:
• Removal of Caps: The treaty limited each side to 1,550 deployed warheads and 700 deployed delivery systems (missiles and bombers). Both nations are now legally free to expand these numbers indefinitely.
• Loss of Transparency: The end of mutual on-site inspections and data exchanges means intelligence agencies will now rely on "worst-case scenario" estimates. This lack of certainty significantly increases the risk of miscalculation during crises.
• Strain on the NPT: The expiration undermines the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Non-nuclear states may now question the commitment of major powers to disarmament, potentially fueling nuclear ambitions in regions like the Middle East and East Asia( and perhaps this is a good decision! ) .
A New Triple Arms Race?
The vacuum left by New START doesn’t just affect Washington and Moscow. We are entering a "polycrisis" in nuclear stability:
1. US vs. Russia: Both nations have the technical capacity to "upload" stored warheads onto existing missiles. Reports suggest the US could double its deployed forces within a few years if it chooses to match potential Russian increases.
2. The China Factor: A major hurdle in negotiations was the US demand to include China, which is rapidly expanding its arsenal. Beijing has consistently refused to join limits until the US and Russia reduce their stockpiles to Chinese levels.
3. The Technological Edge: Unlike the Cold War, this new race involves Hypersonic Missiles and Artificial Intelligence, which compress decision-making times and make traditional arms control frameworks nearly obsolete.
The Current Stance
• Russia: President Putin proposed an informal one-year adherence to the limits in late 2025, but the offer was not formalized. Moscow maintains that any future deal must include UK and French arsenals.
• United States: The Trump administration has signaled a preference for a "better agreement" over an extension, emphasizing the need for a multilateral framework that includes China.
• United Nations: Secretary-General António Guterres has labeled this a "grave moment," warning that the risk of nuclear use is at its highest in decades.
The international community now faces a choice: innovate a new, trilateral arms control architecture or brace for an era of unpredictable, high-stakes nuclear competition.
☑️ Our website
🔵 Link to the article in Arabic
🖋 @observer_5
Today, February 5, 2026, marks a historic and dangerous turning point in international relations. The New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START), the final bilateral agreement regulating the nuclear arsenals of the United States and Russia, has officially expired.
For the first time since 1972, the world’s two largest nuclear powers—possessing roughly 90% of the world's nuclear warheads—are operating without any legally binding limits on their strategic forces.
Key Consequences of Expiration
The lapse of New START removes the "guardrails" that have prevented an all-out nuclear competition for decades:
• Removal of Caps: The treaty limited each side to 1,550 deployed warheads and 700 deployed delivery systems (missiles and bombers). Both nations are now legally free to expand these numbers indefinitely.
• Loss of Transparency: The end of mutual on-site inspections and data exchanges means intelligence agencies will now rely on "worst-case scenario" estimates. This lack of certainty significantly increases the risk of miscalculation during crises.
• Strain on the NPT: The expiration undermines the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Non-nuclear states may now question the commitment of major powers to disarmament, potentially fueling nuclear ambitions in regions like the Middle East and East Asia( and perhaps this is a good decision! ) .
A New Triple Arms Race?
The vacuum left by New START doesn’t just affect Washington and Moscow. We are entering a "polycrisis" in nuclear stability:
1. US vs. Russia: Both nations have the technical capacity to "upload" stored warheads onto existing missiles. Reports suggest the US could double its deployed forces within a few years if it chooses to match potential Russian increases.
2. The China Factor: A major hurdle in negotiations was the US demand to include China, which is rapidly expanding its arsenal. Beijing has consistently refused to join limits until the US and Russia reduce their stockpiles to Chinese levels.
3. The Technological Edge: Unlike the Cold War, this new race involves Hypersonic Missiles and Artificial Intelligence, which compress decision-making times and make traditional arms control frameworks nearly obsolete.
The Current Stance
• Russia: President Putin proposed an informal one-year adherence to the limits in late 2025, but the offer was not formalized. Moscow maintains that any future deal must include UK and French arsenals.
• United States: The Trump administration has signaled a preference for a "better agreement" over an extension, emphasizing the need for a multilateral framework that includes China.
• United Nations: Secretary-General António Guterres has labeled this a "grave moment," warning that the risk of nuclear use is at its highest in decades.
The international community now faces a choice: innovate a new, trilateral arms control architecture or brace for an era of unpredictable, high-stakes nuclear competition.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🌚3
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬3
Graham ends meeting with Lebanese Army Commander over stance on Hezbollah
U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham announced the termination of a "very short" meeting with Lebanese Army Commander General Rudolph Haikal, following a sharp disagreement over the classification of Hezbollah.
Graham stated that he asked Haikal directly whether he considers
According to Graham, the Lebanese Army Commander replied,
which prompted Graham to end the meeting immediately.
The U.S. Senator asserted that Hezbollah is "clearly a terrorist organization," emphasizing that it has "American blood on its hands," referring to the targeting of U.S. Marines in Lebanon. He added that the group has been on U.S. terror lists since 1997 by both Republican and Democratic administrations "for good reason."
Graham argued that the Lebanese Army's continued stance raises questions about its status as a "reliable partner" to the United States. He criticized what he described as "double-talk in the Middle East," stating that "too much is at stake and there is no room for pleasantries."
☑️ Our website
🔵 Link to the article in Arabic
🖋 @observer_5
U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham announced the termination of a "very short" meeting with Lebanese Army Commander General Rudolph Haikal, following a sharp disagreement over the classification of Hezbollah.
Graham stated that he asked Haikal directly whether he considers
Hezbollah a "terrorist organization."
According to Graham, the Lebanese Army Commander replied,
"
No, not in the context of the Lebanese situation,"
which prompted Graham to end the meeting immediately.
The U.S. Senator asserted that Hezbollah is "clearly a terrorist organization," emphasizing that it has "American blood on its hands," referring to the targeting of U.S. Marines in Lebanon. He added that the group has been on U.S. terror lists since 1997 by both Republican and Democratic administrations "for good reason."
Graham argued that the Lebanese Army's continued stance raises questions about its status as a "reliable partner" to the United States. He criticized what he described as "double-talk in the Middle East," stating that "too much is at stake and there is no room for pleasantries."
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬2❤1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
In a notable move, the U.S. State Department has called on its citizens to leave Iran "by any means possible," including departing by land via Armenia or Turkey. This directive comes while the Iranian negotiating delegation is in the Omani capital, Muscat, for indirect talks.
This American step recalls events from last June, when the United States not only provided political cover for Israel during the course of Iranian-American negotiations but also actively participated in military action. This behavior reflected Washington’s use of the diplomatic track as a cover for escalation rather than a path to a solution.
Observers believe this timing raises serious questions regarding U.S. credibility in the negotiation process. It reinforces suspicions that Washington is adopting a dual policy: keeping negotiation channels open for appearance's sake, while simultaneously pursuing security and military pressure and escalation.
In this context, statements made by the Leader of the Islamic Revolution in Iran last year have been circulating widely. He emphasized that "negotiating with such a government is irrational, lacks wisdom, is not honorable, and must be avoided," referring to what Tehran considers a U.S. record based on broken commitments and double standards.
According to informed sources, these developments reflect Washington's continued policy of sending contradictory messages at a time when the region is experiencing escalating tension and extreme sensitivity in both political and security tracks.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍2🤔1
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤯1👀1
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬3
The unsealing of the Epstein documents (2024–2026) has provided more than just a list of names; it has provided a forensic map of the Atlanticist power structure. While the files are saturated with the names of U.S. Presidents, British royalty, and Zionist power brokers, there is a glaring absence of the leaders currently architecting the Multipolar World.
This absence is not a coincidence of geography—it is a structural firewall created by the pursuit of national sovereignty.
1. The Blackmail-Based Order
The Epstein network was never merely a tabloid scandal; it was a functional infrastructure for the Western ruling class. It served as a nexus where finance, intelligence, and high-level politics merged to ensure institutional loyalty through kompromat (compromising material) and shared liability.
To be "integrated" into the Western-led "Rules-Based International Order" often required entry into these elite social circuits. The figures missing from these files—Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping, Kim Jong Un, and Imran Khan—exist entirely outside this circuit because they have fundamentally decoupled their states from the Western social and financial ecosystem.
2. Sovereignty as a Shield
The leaders of the emerging multipolar hubs have been subjected to decades of "maximum pressure," sanctions, and character assassination. Paradoxically, this isolation served as a sanctuary of sovereignty.
• The Russian and Chinese Wall: Epstein’s recorded attempts to facilitate meetings with Vladimir Putin (2011–2014) were met with total failure. Putin’s Russia and Xi Jinping’s China have spent the last decade building indigenous financial and social infrastructures. By being locked out of the West’s "elite" circles, they remained immune to the specific brand of systemic corruption and social engineering used to manage Western puppet states.
• The Case of Imran Khan: As a disruptive populist, Khan’s absence from these files is telling. Unlike the traditional Pakistani political elite who are deeply integrated into Western real estate and financial markets, Khan’s refusal to serve as a client-state proxy led to his removal via a 2022 parliamentary maneuver—widely attributed to U.S. pressure. His lack of "files" meant he could not be managed; he had to be deposed.
• Intellectual Independence: The rejection of the network by Professor Norman Finkelstein illustrates the price of intellectual sovereignty. While other prominent academics were caught in the web, Finkelstein’s status as a pariah for his critique of the Zionist project made him unreachable.
3. The List of the "Un-compromised"
The following figures share a common trait: they are the primary targets of Western aggression, yet they are the only global power players absent from the Empire’s most infamous ledger:
• Vladimir Putin: Endured relentless sanctions and 2016 election interference claims; Epstein’s attempts to reach him were rebuffed.
• Xi Jinping: Targeted by Xinjiang, Hong Kong, and South China Sea sanctions; no direct social or financial links to the Epstein circuit.
• Kim Jong Un: Subjected to the most extreme isolation in modern history; Epstein’s documented interest in North Korean "summits" never materialized into access.
• Imran Khan: Ousted and jailed after refusing to provide military bases and pursuing an independent foreign policy; no ties to Western elite scandals.
4. Conclusion: A Question of Survival
The Epstein files prove that to be a "friend" of the Empire is to be a participant in its decay. The "International Community" is a club where membership is bought with complicity.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍3
The Observer
Is it a coincidence that those most hostile to Western domination are also the ones missing from its most infamous corruption networks? Or is it the consequence of true independence? As the Western order fumbles through its internal rot, a new world is being built by those who were never on "the list"—because they refused to pay the entry price.
☑️ Our website
🔵 Link to the article in Arabic
🖋 @observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍2
The United States announced a new package of sanctions on Iran on Friday evening, targeting 15 entities and 14 oil tankers linked to the export of oil and petrochemical products. According to Reuters, these measures come just hours after the conclusion of the first round of indirect talks between Tehran and Washington in Muscat.
The U.S. State Department stated that the sanctioned tankers are part of what it described as a "ghost fleet" used to circumvent sanctions and illegally transport Iranian oil. State Department spokesperson Tommy Pigott confirmed that these actions are part of the Trump administration's "maximum pressure" policy aimed at reducing Iranian oil exports.
For its part, the U.S. Treasury Department announced additional sanctions on two individuals linked to the Iranian oil trade, freezing their assets within the United States and prohibiting any financial dealings with them by U.S. individuals or companies.
According to the U.S. statement, the sanctions included companies operating in several countries, including Turkey, the UAE, China, India, and Hong Kong. Details were also released on 14 oil tankers said to have played a direct role in transporting Iranian oil.
Washington emphasized that the listing of these entities, individuals, and vessels on the sanctions lists means the freezing of any potential assets they hold within the United States and the imposition of a total ban on any cooperation with them by U.S. parties.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👎3
On Friday, Pakistan’s capital Islamabad witnessed a terrorist bombing targeting the Al-Khadija al-Kubra Mosque during Friday prayers, leaving at least 31 people dead and around 169 others wounded, in one of the deadliest attacks in the city in more than a decade.
The explosion occurred in the Tarlai area on the outskirts of Islamabad inside a crowded Shia mosque, resulting in scenes of destruction and chaos as the wounded were rushed to hospitals, with expectations that the death toll may rise.
So far, no group has officially claimed responsibility for the attack, but security sources point to possible involvement of armed groups such as Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan or Islamic State – Khorasan Province, both of which have previously targeted Shia communities.
This operation reflects the escalation of violence and extremism in Pakistan in recent months, following a series of attacks in different provinces amid ongoing conflict between armed groups and the state.
The bombing comes just days after popular demonstrations in Pakistan in support of the Leader of the Islamic Revolution in Iran, at a time of rising regional tensions and increasing cross-border violence.
As investigations continue, Pakistani authorities and the international community have called for the perpetrators to be pursued and brought to justice, while Islamabad’s government has pledged to intensify security efforts to curb the growing wave of violence.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬2
Intelligence Update: February 2026
As the old global order fractures, the real war is being fought in the shadows. Here is the strategic reality the mainstream refuses to clarify.
• NATO’s Breaking Point: Internal intelligence sharing has reached a functional collapse. Following unilateral moves by Washington that prioritized US hegemony over "allied" interests, European trust is at an all-time low. Denmark’s emergency advisory for officials to disable Bluetooth is a stark admission: in the West, your "ally" is your primary eavesdropper.
• The Shadow War in Moscow: Lt. Gen. Vladimir Alexeyev of the GRU survived an assassination attempt in Moscow. While the West uses proxies for terror, Russia is securing its future in the Arctic. The aggressive expansion of Arctic LNG infrastructure is Moscow’s definitive answer to economic warfare—energy sovereignty is the new frontline.
• Implosion at the DNI: The US Office of the Director of National Intelligence is gutting its staff by 40%. This isn't just restructuring; it is a purge. The American intelligence apparatus is cannibalizing itself as internal political factions struggle for control of the collapsing empire.
• Iran’s Resilience: Western media is saturated with reports of "damaged" Iranian nuclear sites. The reality? Tehran has mastered the art of rapid recovery and strategic hardening. Their ballistic priority remains the ultimate deterrent against any regional miscalculation by the Zionist entity or its backers.
• The Cost of Treason: Cuba has delivered a life sentence to former Economy Minister Alejandro Gil for espionage. A clear message from Havana: at this stage of the global struggle, there is no room for those who sell their nation to the "enemy."
• AI & Moral Decay: UK regulators are now scrambling to contain the fallout from Grok AI’s generation of non-consensual deepfakes. The very tools designed for cognitive warfare are now eroding the social fabric of the societies that unleashed them.
History is accelerating. We know who is built to survive the crash.
☑️ Our website
🔵 Link to the article in Arabic
🖋 @observer_5
As the old global order fractures, the real war is being fought in the shadows. Here is the strategic reality the mainstream refuses to clarify.
• NATO’s Breaking Point: Internal intelligence sharing has reached a functional collapse. Following unilateral moves by Washington that prioritized US hegemony over "allied" interests, European trust is at an all-time low. Denmark’s emergency advisory for officials to disable Bluetooth is a stark admission: in the West, your "ally" is your primary eavesdropper.
• The Shadow War in Moscow: Lt. Gen. Vladimir Alexeyev of the GRU survived an assassination attempt in Moscow. While the West uses proxies for terror, Russia is securing its future in the Arctic. The aggressive expansion of Arctic LNG infrastructure is Moscow’s definitive answer to economic warfare—energy sovereignty is the new frontline.
• Implosion at the DNI: The US Office of the Director of National Intelligence is gutting its staff by 40%. This isn't just restructuring; it is a purge. The American intelligence apparatus is cannibalizing itself as internal political factions struggle for control of the collapsing empire.
• Iran’s Resilience: Western media is saturated with reports of "damaged" Iranian nuclear sites. The reality? Tehran has mastered the art of rapid recovery and strategic hardening. Their ballistic priority remains the ultimate deterrent against any regional miscalculation by the Zionist entity or its backers.
• The Cost of Treason: Cuba has delivered a life sentence to former Economy Minister Alejandro Gil for espionage. A clear message from Havana: at this stage of the global struggle, there is no room for those who sell their nation to the "enemy."
• AI & Moral Decay: UK regulators are now scrambling to contain the fallout from Grok AI’s generation of non-consensual deepfakes. The very tools designed for cognitive warfare are now eroding the social fabric of the societies that unleashed them.
History is accelerating. We know who is built to survive the crash.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍2🤔1
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬2👍1
Operational Warning:
Includes Sadaf-2, smart mines (acoustic/magnetic sensors), and mobile "creeping" mines.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍3
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬2