The Observer
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Indicators suggest they will likely be assigned to the army, given the aging state of its combat helicopter fleet and the urgent need to strengthen its offensive capabilities—ensuring a measure of military balance with the Revolutionary Guard.
This comes at a time when the Revolutionary Guard enjoys clear superiority in missiles, drones, and artillery. Supporting the army’s capabilities, particularly in its aviation wing (Havanirooz), is seen as a necessary step to achieve relative equilibrium between the two forces.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍4
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍3
An Israeli security source: “Abu Shabab militias” are tasked with escorting Palestinians entering from Rafah crossing up to the Israeli checkpoint before reaching Gaza.
This is how crossings are managed: local militias turned into subcontractors of occupation, playing the role of forced intermediaries between Palestinians and the Israeli military.
The irony is that Israel projects an image of “security control,” while in reality it outsources repression to groups whose only function is to facilitate domination.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬3
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🌚2👍1
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍2
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🎉2👍1
The recurring American playbook has begun once again. Washington resorts to a "maximum pressure" policy to force Iran to the negotiating table, only to pursue unilateral negotiations aimed at dictating and imposing all its terms. When this fails, it deliberately sabotages the negotiating track by leaking information and launching an intensive media campaign against Iran—placing the blame internally while mounting escalating economic and psychological pressure in coordination with oligarchic networks.
This is accompanied by a deliberate surge in Dollar and Gold prices and intensified psychological warfare against the people, all to pave the way for an operational opportunity.
In this context, the past 24 hours have witnessed a striking military escalation reflecting the diplomatic dead-end. Squadrons of U.S. strategic aircraft were spotted taking off, including:
* B-52 and B-1 Bombers: Heavy strategic bombers; tools of mass destruction.
* RC-135 and E-3B Aircraft: Spy and early warning planes; the eyes of the battlefield.
* E-6 Aircraft: Nuclear command and communications relay.
* "Doomsday Plane" (E-4B): The total war command center, deployed only during existential threats or preparation for major strikes.
When this fleet moves in unison, it is not a traditional show of force, but a step aimed at calibrating coordinates for the post-collapse phase. It appears Washington has decided to replace the negotiation papers—burned by American intransigence—with "wings of destruction."
The message is no longer coded: the era of talking in closed rooms is over, and the era of engines above the clouds has begun.
However, what the U.S. administration fails to realize is that the rules of the game have changed, and calculations built above the clouds may shatter against the rock of regional reality. As Imam Khamenei warned on Sunday:
"If America ignites a war, this time it will be regional."
In light of this scene, betting on negotiation ploys is no longer an option. Hands must remain on the trigger; steadfastness is a duty, without wavering or being deceived by the noise of false diplomacy.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍1
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👀1
"Communicating with Tehran is challenging due to the nature of the Iranian political system, which is led by the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei."
"It is a country that is difficult to conduct diplomacy with when you cannot speak directly to the person responsible for the state, which makes the situation very strange."
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍3
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👎2👍1
Why does Lebanon not suspend its commitment to an agreement that is violated daily?
Why does it not formally protest to the states sponsoring the agreement instead of settling for documentation statements?
Who will stop these violations, and who bears responsibility for protecting the south and its people before it is too late?
Is Lebanon expected merely to record crimes—or to defend its sovereignty before the south is turned into an environmental and humanitarian disaster zone?
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬3
Western liberal discourse often treats the environment as a luxury, dismissing its destruction during wartime as "collateral damage." However, those who till the soil and resist upon it know that nature is the artery of resistance and the sanctuary of existence. When colonialism fails to break human will, it turns to poisoning the land that sustains them.
The "Ecocide" Doctrine
What we are witnessing today in South Lebanon—specifically the occupation's use of agricultural aircraft to spray chemical agents over border areas under the pretext of "clearing the terrain"—is not a technical security measure. It is a direct continuation of the scorched-earth policy formulated by imperialism in Vietnam.
In the 1960s, the U.S. sprayed over 70 million liters of Agent Orange over Vietnamese forests. The overt goal was to "deprive the resistance of cover," but the true objective was to destroy food sovereignty, shatter ecological balance, and leave carcinogenic scars in the DNA of future generations. Today, the Zionist entity repeats this crime in Lebanon, utilizing the "ceasefire" period to conduct a silent chemical aggression.
South Lebanon: The Land as an Enemy
Field reports indicate that the substances released by the occupation’s drones and aircraft are not mere herbicides; they are carcinogenic compounds that ruin soil fertility. Targeting the lush vegetation of the southern spring aims to:
1. Strip Biological Cover: Turning border villages into barren, exposed zones to facilitate the targeting of any human movement.
2. Economic Destruction: Poisoning the soil and groundwater to strike the agricultural sector—the backbone of resilience for the people of the South.
3. Environmental Displacement:
Rendering life health-hazardous by spreading chronic diseases and contaminating essential life sources.
Colonial Logic: If I Can’t Own It, I’ll Ruin It
This behavior exposes the core of the Zionist logic: land that resists does not deserve to live. When the tank fails to stabilize an occupational reality, chemistry is deployed to finish the task. They fear the trees as they fear the people; they fear the "woods" of the South because they cradle the spirit of resistance.
International Silence: An Old Complicity
The silence of the "international community" regarding the ecocide in Lebanon and Palestine mirrors its complicity in Vietnam. It seems environmental destruction becomes an "acceptable face" of warfare when the victims are those who refuse subjugation.
Targeting Lebanese soil with carcinogenic agents is a full-fledged war crime and a violation of all international laws prohibiting collective punishment. But the resistance that sprouted from this land knows how to protect its roots. If the enemy believes that poisoning the trees will halt the march of history, they are ignorant of a land—and a people—that have survived much worse.
The question remains:
Will the world wait decades to acknowledge the environmental holocaust in Lebanon and Palestine, as it did with Vietnam? Or does the destruction of our planet become secondary when it serves the security of the occupation?
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬2👍1
President Donald Trump addressed the 74th National Prayer Breakfast on Thursday the 5th of February, 2026 , using his sixth appearance at the bipartisan event to announce a Department of Justice task force led by Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate "anti-Christian bias."
The Gospel According to Donald: The 74th National Prayer Breakfast
Nothing says "humility and faith" like a prayer breakfast turned into a campaign rally. At the 74th National Prayer Breakfast, the "least perfect candidate" graced us with his presence to remind God that He’s lucky to have him.
• The Gates of Heaven:
Trump is confident he’ll "probably make it" into heaven. Why? Because he did a "hell of a lot of good for perfect people." Finally, a theology that rewards the flawless with the help of the "most religious president in history."
• Alternative Arithmetic:
Forget the records; Trump claimed, "We won the popular vote by a lot." Apparently, math is now a matter of faith, not facts.
• The Holy Inquisition:
To combat "anti-Christian bias," he’s launching a task force under AG Pam Bondi. Because nothing screams "Sermon on the Mount" like using the Justice Department to "get even"—which he totally doesn't do, but "wouldn't I have a right to?"
• Foreign Policy & Fleets:
Between thanking El Salvador for taking back deportees and claiming he killed the Johnson Amendment (he didn't), he reminded us that Iran is "negotiating" because "we have a big fleet going over" there.
Truly, a "tremendous success.
" If you’re a person of faith voting Democrat, Donald "don't know how" you do it. Just ask him—he’s done more for religion than any president, including the ones who actually knew the prayers.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👻3
The End of New START: A "Grave Moment" for Global Security
Today, February 5, 2026, marks a historic and dangerous turning point in international relations. The New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START), the final bilateral agreement regulating the nuclear arsenals of the United States and Russia, has officially expired.
For the first time since 1972, the world’s two largest nuclear powers—possessing roughly 90% of the world's nuclear warheads—are operating without any legally binding limits on their strategic forces.
Key Consequences of Expiration
The lapse of New START removes the "guardrails" that have prevented an all-out nuclear competition for decades:
• Removal of Caps: The treaty limited each side to 1,550 deployed warheads and 700 deployed delivery systems (missiles and bombers). Both nations are now legally free to expand these numbers indefinitely.
• Loss of Transparency: The end of mutual on-site inspections and data exchanges means intelligence agencies will now rely on "worst-case scenario" estimates. This lack of certainty significantly increases the risk of miscalculation during crises.
• Strain on the NPT: The expiration undermines the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Non-nuclear states may now question the commitment of major powers to disarmament, potentially fueling nuclear ambitions in regions like the Middle East and East Asia( and perhaps this is a good decision! ) .
A New Triple Arms Race?
The vacuum left by New START doesn’t just affect Washington and Moscow. We are entering a "polycrisis" in nuclear stability:
1. US vs. Russia: Both nations have the technical capacity to "upload" stored warheads onto existing missiles. Reports suggest the US could double its deployed forces within a few years if it chooses to match potential Russian increases.
2. The China Factor: A major hurdle in negotiations was the US demand to include China, which is rapidly expanding its arsenal. Beijing has consistently refused to join limits until the US and Russia reduce their stockpiles to Chinese levels.
3. The Technological Edge: Unlike the Cold War, this new race involves Hypersonic Missiles and Artificial Intelligence, which compress decision-making times and make traditional arms control frameworks nearly obsolete.
The Current Stance
• Russia: President Putin proposed an informal one-year adherence to the limits in late 2025, but the offer was not formalized. Moscow maintains that any future deal must include UK and French arsenals.
• United States: The Trump administration has signaled a preference for a "better agreement" over an extension, emphasizing the need for a multilateral framework that includes China.
• United Nations: Secretary-General António Guterres has labeled this a "grave moment," warning that the risk of nuclear use is at its highest in decades.
The international community now faces a choice: innovate a new, trilateral arms control architecture or brace for an era of unpredictable, high-stakes nuclear competition.
☑️ Our website
🔵 Link to the article in Arabic
🖋 @observer_5
Today, February 5, 2026, marks a historic and dangerous turning point in international relations. The New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START), the final bilateral agreement regulating the nuclear arsenals of the United States and Russia, has officially expired.
For the first time since 1972, the world’s two largest nuclear powers—possessing roughly 90% of the world's nuclear warheads—are operating without any legally binding limits on their strategic forces.
Key Consequences of Expiration
The lapse of New START removes the "guardrails" that have prevented an all-out nuclear competition for decades:
• Removal of Caps: The treaty limited each side to 1,550 deployed warheads and 700 deployed delivery systems (missiles and bombers). Both nations are now legally free to expand these numbers indefinitely.
• Loss of Transparency: The end of mutual on-site inspections and data exchanges means intelligence agencies will now rely on "worst-case scenario" estimates. This lack of certainty significantly increases the risk of miscalculation during crises.
• Strain on the NPT: The expiration undermines the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Non-nuclear states may now question the commitment of major powers to disarmament, potentially fueling nuclear ambitions in regions like the Middle East and East Asia( and perhaps this is a good decision! ) .
A New Triple Arms Race?
The vacuum left by New START doesn’t just affect Washington and Moscow. We are entering a "polycrisis" in nuclear stability:
1. US vs. Russia: Both nations have the technical capacity to "upload" stored warheads onto existing missiles. Reports suggest the US could double its deployed forces within a few years if it chooses to match potential Russian increases.
2. The China Factor: A major hurdle in negotiations was the US demand to include China, which is rapidly expanding its arsenal. Beijing has consistently refused to join limits until the US and Russia reduce their stockpiles to Chinese levels.
3. The Technological Edge: Unlike the Cold War, this new race involves Hypersonic Missiles and Artificial Intelligence, which compress decision-making times and make traditional arms control frameworks nearly obsolete.
The Current Stance
• Russia: President Putin proposed an informal one-year adherence to the limits in late 2025, but the offer was not formalized. Moscow maintains that any future deal must include UK and French arsenals.
• United States: The Trump administration has signaled a preference for a "better agreement" over an extension, emphasizing the need for a multilateral framework that includes China.
• United Nations: Secretary-General António Guterres has labeled this a "grave moment," warning that the risk of nuclear use is at its highest in decades.
The international community now faces a choice: innovate a new, trilateral arms control architecture or brace for an era of unpredictable, high-stakes nuclear competition.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🌚3
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬3
Graham ends meeting with Lebanese Army Commander over stance on Hezbollah
U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham announced the termination of a "very short" meeting with Lebanese Army Commander General Rudolph Haikal, following a sharp disagreement over the classification of Hezbollah.
Graham stated that he asked Haikal directly whether he considers
According to Graham, the Lebanese Army Commander replied,
which prompted Graham to end the meeting immediately.
The U.S. Senator asserted that Hezbollah is "clearly a terrorist organization," emphasizing that it has "American blood on its hands," referring to the targeting of U.S. Marines in Lebanon. He added that the group has been on U.S. terror lists since 1997 by both Republican and Democratic administrations "for good reason."
Graham argued that the Lebanese Army's continued stance raises questions about its status as a "reliable partner" to the United States. He criticized what he described as "double-talk in the Middle East," stating that "too much is at stake and there is no room for pleasantries."
☑️ Our website
🔵 Link to the article in Arabic
🖋 @observer_5
U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham announced the termination of a "very short" meeting with Lebanese Army Commander General Rudolph Haikal, following a sharp disagreement over the classification of Hezbollah.
Graham stated that he asked Haikal directly whether he considers
Hezbollah a "terrorist organization."
According to Graham, the Lebanese Army Commander replied,
"
No, not in the context of the Lebanese situation,"
which prompted Graham to end the meeting immediately.
The U.S. Senator asserted that Hezbollah is "clearly a terrorist organization," emphasizing that it has "American blood on its hands," referring to the targeting of U.S. Marines in Lebanon. He added that the group has been on U.S. terror lists since 1997 by both Republican and Democratic administrations "for good reason."
Graham argued that the Lebanese Army's continued stance raises questions about its status as a "reliable partner" to the United States. He criticized what he described as "double-talk in the Middle East," stating that "too much is at stake and there is no room for pleasantries."
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬2❤1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
In a notable move, the U.S. State Department has called on its citizens to leave Iran "by any means possible," including departing by land via Armenia or Turkey. This directive comes while the Iranian negotiating delegation is in the Omani capital, Muscat, for indirect talks.
This American step recalls events from last June, when the United States not only provided political cover for Israel during the course of Iranian-American negotiations but also actively participated in military action. This behavior reflected Washington’s use of the diplomatic track as a cover for escalation rather than a path to a solution.
Observers believe this timing raises serious questions regarding U.S. credibility in the negotiation process. It reinforces suspicions that Washington is adopting a dual policy: keeping negotiation channels open for appearance's sake, while simultaneously pursuing security and military pressure and escalation.
In this context, statements made by the Leader of the Islamic Revolution in Iran last year have been circulating widely. He emphasized that "negotiating with such a government is irrational, lacks wisdom, is not honorable, and must be avoided," referring to what Tehran considers a U.S. record based on broken commitments and double standards.
According to informed sources, these developments reflect Washington's continued policy of sending contradictory messages at a time when the region is experiencing escalating tension and extreme sensitivity in both political and security tracks.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍2🤔1
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤯1👀1
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬3