🔴Hezbollah Deputy Secretary-General Naim Qassem delivers a decisive speech against Trump’s global greed – A call for resistance unity!

💬 In his powerful speech today, Hezbollah Deputy Secretary-General Naim Qassem exposed Trump’s schemes and U.S. imperial ambitions:


🌕 “Trump wants to interfere in all regions of the world to suppress democratic, Islamic, and free life, to seize money, resources, and oil, and to dominate people.”

👍 “Since 1979, the Islamic Republic has been an independent state relying on the talents of its people, and it has supported noble resistance, especially the resistance against Israeli occupation.”

🌕 “We stand with Iran—its people, leadership, and revolution—and we regard it as steadfast and strong.”


👍 “They covet Venezuela’s resources and oil, seeking to annex it to the United States.”


🌕 “Trump is not satisfied with Venezuela alone; he also wants Greenland, Cuba, Canada, and the European Union. All of Trump’s actions aim at domination.”

👍 “We call for a global movement of nations and peoples to say to America: Stop.”

🌕 “With the conclusion of the ‘War of the Strong,’ we face two matters: a new phase of struggle, and a new era in Lebanon.”

🗒Qassem’s words are a rallying cry for the Axis of Resistance—bold, unwavering, and visionary. We firmly stand with this speech, echoing his call for a global challenge to U.S.-Zionist hegemony! 🇱🇧🇮🇷🇵🇸

#AxisOfResistance #Hezbollah #IranStrong #StopTrump


🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴 China Sets the Rules: From Tech War Target to Gatekeeper

🗒For years, Washington’s “small yard, high fence” strategy sought to choke Beijing’s access to cutting-edge tech—especially Nvidia’s AI chips.

💬But 2026 marks a turning point. Beijing is no longer playing defense—it’s building its own fence:

🌕 Capping Nvidia imports: Chinese firms are instructed to sideline Nvidia’s H200 chips, reserving server space for homegrown alternatives.
🌕 Probing Meta’s deal: Authorities launch a review of Meta’s acquisition of Manus, a Chinese-founded AI start-up.

📌 Why this matters:

✌ China is signaling it can set the rules, not just follow them.

👋 By restricting US tech and boosting domestic players, Beijing accelerates self-reliance in AI and semiconductors.

✌ This transforms the “tech war” into a two-way battlefield—where both sides erect barriers, shaping the future of global innovation.

👌 For the Global South, it opens the possibility of alternative tech ecosystems outside US control.


📰Analysts note: “The offensive and defensive roles have shifted.” China is no longer reacting—it’s actively driving decoupling, turning the contest into a strategic duel of enforcement and control.

🌕In a major escalation of the global tech war, Chinese authorities have ordered domestic companies to cease using cybersecurity software from roughly a dozen U.S. and Israeli firms. The ban targets major industry players, including Broadcom-owned VMware, Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet, and Israel’s Check Point Software Technologies, causing pre-market stock dips for these companies.

👍Beijing cites "national security concerns" and the risk of espionage as the primary drivers, fearing that these foreign tools could collect and transmit confidential data abroad. This move aligns with China's broader "Document 79" strategy to replace Western technology with domestic alternatives like 360 Security Technology and Neusoft, further decoupling the world's two largest economies ahead of President Trump's expected visit to Beijing in April.


🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴The United States Publicly Announces the Recruitment of Spies Inside Iran

The U.S. Department of State has announced its readiness to receive information regarding the activities of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, offering financial rewards of up to $15 million for information related to its financial networks, along with the possibility of relocation programs.

This announcement is not merely an “informational offer,” but a political and moral indictment in itself. The United States is openly declaring the recruitment of spies inside a sovereign state and seeking to strangle its economy by targeting what it calls its “financial arteries,” using money and relocation in exchange for betrayal. This constitutes a clear act of economic and intelligence warfare, not diplomacy. By turning espionage into an official, funded policy, Washington reinforces a strategy based on coercion, destabilization, and disregard for sovereignty rather than any genuine pursuit of peace.

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴 Iraqi factions threaten U.S. interests and the embassy in Baghdad

📄 Islamic Resistance factions in Iraq issued two simultaneous statements affirming their readiness to target U.S. interests and bases in the event of any attack on Iran.

👌 Saraya Awliya al-Dam declared that they are “at the forefront of striking U.S. interests,” considering the defense of Iran a religious duty.
👌 Kataib Sakhra al-Quds – Ashab al-Kahf warned of a “seismic and comprehensive response,” stressing that the U.S. embassy and its associated bases would be treated as military targets, and urged Iraqi forces to stay away from them.

🌕 This marks the first direct public threat against U.S. interests and the embassy in Baghdad since the Flood of al-Aqsa operation, refuting analyses that suggested the factions had abandoned armed action.

🤔 Observers, however, caution against hasty conclusions about the next phase, noting that the factions’ early withdrawal from the support front during Flood of al-Aqsa—under internal and external pressures—requires careful consideration of political and security dynamics in any potential confrontation.

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴 UNRWA Erases Palestine from Geography Textbook – Outrage in Lebanon

📄 A geography book for 6th graders in UNRWA schools replaced Palestine with “West Bank & Gaza.”
🤔 Palestinian students in Lebanon burned all copies, calling it a national crime, not a mistake.

🔽Key points:

👌 UNRWA claims the change was to “enhance thinking,” but civil society calls it a deliberate erasure of identity.
🫶 Ali Huwaidi (General Director of Association 302) stresses this violates Article 29 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, which protects national identity in education.
✌ Demands: official withdrawal of the book, public apology, and accountability from Lebanon’s Ministry of Education.
✌ Observers warn this aligns with Israeli efforts to strip UNRWA curricula of national content, undermining the right of return.


✏️ Analysis – al‑muraqeb:
This is not a textbook error but a dangerous precedent. Erasing “Palestine” equals erasing history and rights. Lebanon’s silence is troubling, and Palestinian factions vow peaceful protests if UNRWA does not act.


🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Capitalism and economic globalization have no shortage of critics. As Cassidy shows, their criticisms have remained strikingly consistent over the centuries. His narrative begins with attacks on the British East India Company’s monopoly power in the eighteenth century and runs through the contemporary “de-growth” movement’s lament about the environmentally destructive effects of economic growth.

🔹 Cassidy’s cast includes Adam Smith, who found fault with colonialism and the slave trade, John Maynard Keynes, who highlighted the market system’s instability and lack of self-correcting mechanisms, the Hungarian scholar Karl Polanyi, who warned of the incompatibility of capitalism and democracy, and the economists Joseph Stiglitz and Dani Rodrik, who have pointed to the dangers of excessive financialization and hyperglobalization.

🔹Some of these critics went beyond identifying flaws in the capitalist system to offering remedies. But reforms can be difficult to pull off. Fixing the capitalist system, Cassidy observes, requires not only political will but also the ability to act at the right time. This often means mobilizing a political movement in the midst of a crisis, a task that is easier said than done.


🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴If 2024 – with over half of the world’s population voting – was the year of democracy, then 2025 threatens to be the year of the tyrant. Flawed and outright rigged elections were seen in numerous parts of the globe this year, while repression and brutality has continued to stifle dissent. Elsewhere, leaders with authoritarian tendencies have gained power. Populations have consequently found themselves hostages to the often destructive whims of dictators and their elites.

🖊In this outstanding book, Dirsus examines the fragility behind the image of invincibility projected by tyrannical leaders, and how their downfalls occur. He examines disfunctions in autocratic systems, the mechanisms by which they collapse, and the grizzly end they typically meet.

📄This book is essential reading for analysts of autocratic systems, and their interactions with global geopolitics.


🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴 Trump’s Greenland Gambit: Tariffs as Blackmail

🤔 President Trump threatens a 25% tariff on Europe unless Denmark sells Greenland to the U.S. Global markets wobble as trade war rhetoric expands.

🤔President Trump has consistently signaled that military occupation remains a possibility if a deal isn’t reached.

• Public demonstrations opposing a US invasion have been held in Greenland and Copenhagen
• A White House summit with a joint Denmark-Greenland delegation failed to defuse tensions.
• Denmark announced that it would increase its military footprint in Greenland; a small European ‘ was also deployed consisting of Germany, Sweden, Norway, Finland, the Netherlands, and the UK.


👍 The Observer’s Analysis:

This is not about Greenland alone. It reveals:

🤲 Washington’s willingness to weaponize trade against allies.

🤲 The merging of economic war with territorial ambitions.

🤲 A system where markets are held hostage to imperial bargaining.

🌕 Regardless of what happens next, we’re seeing a normalization of anti-NATO politics (which President Macron has embraced as per French tradition) and a normalization of territorial annexation by force, once the central taboo of the post-WWII global order. Both will continue to resonate in trans-Atlantic relations whatever the outcome in Greenland and whoever eventually succeeds President Trump.

📄 The real lesson: When “allies” are treated like colonies, the mask of partnership slips, exposing raw imperial greed.

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴 Zarif’s Office Denies Israeli Media Allegations of Contacts with Anti-Iran Entities

🫶The office of former Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, in an official statement, denied allegations broadcast by Israeli media regarding supposed contacts with groups hostile to Iran, stressing that such reports are “false” and part of attempts aimed at undermining the country’s security.

🌕Israel’s Channel 14 had claimed that Zarif held talks with Reza Pahlavi and alleged that he was arrested along with former President Hassan Rouhani.
It is worth noting that we previously reported, quoting a member of the Iranian parliament, that Rouhani and Zarif had either been arrested or placed under surveillance, though no official confirmation was issued.

🤔It should also be noted that Hassan Rouhani’s name had earlier been linked to the Iran–Contra negotiations during the 1980s, where he was present in some of the unofficial communication tracks at the time—an association now resurfacing amid ongoing political and media controversy.


🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Davos 2026: The Mask of Hypocrisy Falls

🫶As global leaders gather in Switzerland to debate collapsing supply chains, energy turmoil, and rising economic nationalism, the World Economic Forum exposes its true face: Iran canceled for alleged “violence,” while Israel is welcomed despite 71,000 martyrs in Gaza.

✌Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi denounced this “blatant double standard,” noting that his invitation was revoked while Israeli war criminals — including President Herzog, facing genocide charges in Switzerland — remain honored guests at Davos.

🔽On X, Araghchi wrote:

🌕“We had to defend our people against armed terrorists and ISIS-style killings openly backed by Mossad… This blatant double standard only reflects moral depravity and intellectual bankruptcy.”

✏️Almuraqeb reminds its audience: Davos is not a forum for global dialogue, but a stage for whitewashing Western and Zionist crimes while silencing voices of resistance.


🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴 Al‑Shaddadi Prison Break: Who Freed the Terrorists?

🫶In Syria’s Hasakah countryside, the Al‑Shaddadi prison witnessed the largest ISIS escape in years: around 120 detainees fled from SDF‑controlled custody.

✌Syrian Army units launched sweeping operations around Al‑Shaddadi, while Damascus accused the US‑backed SDF of deliberately facilitating the breakout as political blackmail.... The SDF, in turn, blamed the Syrian government — a blame game that underscores the fractures and contradictions in the battlefield.

🌕Iraq’s Defense Minister Thabit al‑Abbasi reassured the public that borders are secured and the Iraqi Army is on high alert to prevent any spillover Iraqi News.

🤔Yet the deeper question remains:

⚪️Who benefits from unleashing ISIS once again?

💳Almuraqeb’s analysis: This is no coincidence. The Al‑Shaddadi escape is part of a wider scheme to recycle terrorism as a pressure tool against the Resistance Axis, especially amid escalating battles in Gaza, Iraq, and Syria.

🖊 Bottom Line:
The prison break exposes the US‑Zionist project to perpetuate chaos in the region — reviving ISIS whenever their proxies face defeat.


🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴 Western Media Whitewashes Iran Riots

💳As Iranian cities faced violent riots — arson attacks on mosques, lynchings of guards, shootings of police, and millions in damages — Western outlets ignored the evidence. Instead, they relied on U.S.-funded NGOs tied to the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), while Mossad openly urged regime‑change from its Farsi account.
This distorted coverage fuels Trump’s threats of renewed strikes on Tehran, even as millions of Iranians rally against the chaos and in defense of their sovereignty.



👌 Almuraqeb’s line: These riots are not “peaceful protests” — they are a foreign‑backed insurrection, recycled to destabilize Iran and the Resistance Axis.

📎Source ( Consortium News )

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴 The War Ledger (1)

Bombs & Accountability: Countries Targeted by the United States Since WWII

From Hiroshima and Nagasaki to drone strikes in the Middle East, the record is long and devastating. This is not opinion — it is history written in firepower. Below is a documented list of countries bombed or attacked by the United States after 1945.

🌍 Countries Bombed by the U.S. (1945–2025)

• Japan — Hiroshima & Nagasaki, August 6 and 9, 1945
• China & Korea — 1950–1953 (Korean War)
• Guatemala — 1954, 1960, 1967–1969
• Indonesia — 1958
• Cuba — 1959–1961
• Congo — 1964
• Peru — 1965
• Laos — 1964–1973
• Vietnam — 1961–1973
• Cambodia — 1969–1970
• Grenada — 1983
• Lebanon & Syria — 1983–1984
• Libya — 1986, 2011, 2015
• El Salvador — 1980s
• Nicaragua — 1980s
• Iran — 1987
• Panama — 1989
• Iraq — 1991 (Gulf War), 1991–2003, 2003–2015
• Kuwait — 1991
• Somalia — 1993, 2007–2008, 2010–2011
• Bosnia — 1994–1995
• Sudan — 1998
• Afghanistan — 1998, 2001–2015
• Yugoslavia — 1999
• Yemen — 2002, 2009, 2011
• Pakistan — 2003–2015
• Palestine (Gaza) — 2010
• Syria — 2014–2015

Core Countries (2014–2020)

These nations saw sustained US bombing campaigns starting or continuing post-2014:
• Iraq (2014–ongoing, Operation Inherent Resolve).
• Syria (2014–ongoing, against ISIS).
• Afghanistan (until 2021, escalating strikes).
• Somalia (drone/airstrikes vs. al-Shabaab).
• Yemen (vs. AQAP and Houthis).
• Pakistan (drone strikes until mid-2010s).
• Libya (intermittent post-2011).

Recent Additions :

(2020–2026)
Under the current Trump administration, bombings expanded:
• Iran (2020; major strikes June 2025).
•Nigeria (2025, vs. ISIS targets).
• Venezuela (late 2025).

⚖️ The Numbers Speak

• More than 30 countries bombed since 1945
• Represents one-third of humanity living under U.S. firepower
• Conflicts span Asia, Africa, Latin America, and the Middle East.

We must never forget who the real threat to global peace is.

This is The War Ledger: facts, numbers, accountability.

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴Erdoğan Hints at Turkish–Syrian Understanding Against the SDF, Blames It for Escalation

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan said that the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) have failed to abide by the March 10 agreement and have not handed over the areas under their control to the Syrian government, stressing Ankara’s rejection of any separatist entity that threatens Turkey’s national security. He described the Syrian army’s operations against the SDF as “legitimate,” calling on the group to lay down its arms and comply with the agreements.

Erdoğan’s remarks clearly reveal an undeclared Turkish–Syrian understanding in confronting the SDF, as Ankara has effectively granted the Syrian offensive a political green light. This stance reflects a convergence of interests between Turkey and Syria in ending the self-administration project in northern Syria, and sends a direct message to the SDF that betting on U.S. support is no longer sufficient amid shifting regional balances.

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴HyperSonic Weapons : untraceable and yet lethal!?

The recent revelations about the U.S. raid that killed 32 Cuban soldiers serving as Maduro’s bodyguards in Venezuela expose not only the brutality of imperial warfare but also the disturbing use of experimental weapons. The fact that their remains were returned to Havana in small boxes, smaller than coffins, raises urgent questions about the nature of the weapons deployed and the deliberate humiliation of Cuba’s sacrifice.



⚔️ The Weaponization of Secrecy

• Reports confirm that a “sonic weapon” was used during the raid, a technology openly acknowledged by Donald Trump as something “nobody else has.” Latin Times
• Such weapons bypass conventional battlefields, targeting human bodies in ways that leave mutilated remains unrecognizable.
• This is not just military aggression—it is psychological warfare, meant to send a message of dominance and terror to Cuba, Venezuela, and the wider axis of resistance.


🇨🇺 The Return in Boxes

• The Cuban soldiers—colonels, majors, captains—were returned in boxes smaller than coffins, paraded through Havana with military honors. Yahoo New... +1
• Thousands lined the streets to salute them, but the symbolism of their reduced remains cannot be ignored.
• Was this a logistical necessity, or a deliberate act to diminish their dignity? Why were men who gave their lives defending an ally reduced to fragments in containers?


❗️ Critical Questions

• What exactly did these weapons do to the human body? The fact that remains could not fill a coffin suggests disintegration or destruction beyond conventional explosives.
• Why is the U.S. experimenting with such weapons in Latin America? Is Venezuela the testing ground for technologies meant to be used against resistance movements elsewhere?
• What does this say about imperial arrogance? The U.S. flaunts its ability to annihilate without accountability, while allies of resistance are expected to absorb the humiliation.


🌍 Wider Implications

• The raid was not just about Maduro—it was a message to Cuba, Iran, Hezbollah, and all movements aligned against U.S. hegemony.
• By reducing soldiers to fragments, Washington seeks to reduce nations to submission.
• Yet, the Cuban leadership framed the tragedy as proof of dignity: “Imperialism may possess sophisticated weapons, but it will never buy the dignity of the Cuban people.” Latin Times




Conclusion:
This episode must be documented as part of the ongoing ledger of imperial crimes. The use of sonic weapons and the return of Cuban soldiers in small boxes is not just a military incident—it is a symbolic act of dehumanization. For the axis of resistance, the lesson is clear: imperialism is advancing into new, more insidious forms of warfare, and exposing these crimes is as vital as resisting them on the battlefield.

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴ISIS on the Borders: A Renewed Threat

Despite its military defeat, ISIS has not disappeared. Instead, it has reorganized itself into small cells along the Syria–Iraq and Syria–Lebanon borders. These cells carry out limited operations: bombings, assassinations, and roadside attacks in remote areas such as the Syrian desert, Deir ez‑Zor, and eastern Hasakah. The goal is not to seize territory but to prove existence and test local security capabilities.

Iraqi and Syrian Prisons: Time Bombs

• In January 2026, Hasakah witnessed a major security breach at al‑Shaddadi prison, where dozens of ISIS members escaped. Eighty‑one were recaptured, but others remain at large.

• At the same time, the United States began transferring up to 7,000 ISIS detainees from Syria to Iraq, under the pretext of ensuring their detention in “secure” facilities. Yet this move raises suspicions: is it truly about enhancing security, or recycling the threat inside Iraq?


ISIS Flag in Raqqa: Reality or Deception?

Reports of ISIS raising its flag in Raqqa are claimed by the Syrian state to be media disinformation. In reality, on January 18, 2026, the Syrian government raised its official flag in the city center after the withdrawal of “SDF” forces and the advance of the Syrian army. Any talk of ISIS returning its banner there is seen as part of psychological warfare aimed at exaggerating the group’s threat and justifying foreign interventions.

⚔️ Critical Reading

• The threat persists but has shifted: ISIS no longer controls cities, but exploits security gaps and rugged border terrain.

• Prisons as leverage: Whether through mass escapes or prisoner transfers, prisons remain a tool of blackmail in the hands of major powers.

• Western and Israeli media: They amplify stories of “ISIS resurgence” to justify their military presence in the region, while ignoring that the axis of resistance is the one actually confronting the group on the ground.


📝 Conclusion

Portraying ISIS as if it has raised its flag again in Raqqa may not simply be a media lie, since the Syrian state insists it has regained control there. The real danger lies in sleeper cells along the borders and in the prison file, which could become a new source of explosion if used as a political card. For the axis of resistance, the task is to expose these falsehoods and continue the field confrontation against the remnants of the group, with the understanding that the war on ISIS is not only military but also informational and psychological.


🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴From Official Figures to Propaganda War: A Shock the Iranian Society Has Not Overcome

With the passing of the main wave of unrest in Iran, official figures released by the relevant authorities showed that the number of deaths reached nearly three thousand. Although these figures are far lower than the fantastical numbers promoted by Western propaganda campaigns and opposition networks in their frantic race to inflate the toll, they nonetheless delivered a profound shock to Iranian society. The losses recorded in just a few days exceeded the casualties of the twelve‑day war, reflecting the immense human cost of what occurred.

In the early days, the absence of a coherent official narrative opened the door to a psychological and media war, in which fabricated images, AI‑generated content, and inflated numbers were deployed—not to convey reality as it was, but to entrench an image of chaos and strip the state of legitimacy.

On the ground, some protests quickly lost their peaceful character, giving way to patterns of organized violence that cannot be separated from networks of incitement and external support. This scene recalls the experience of ISIS in Iraq and Syria, where the project was built on recruitment from within society itself and the exploitation of division and disorder to serve foreign agendas.

Meanwhile, official institutions appeared confused in managing the first phase of the crisis. Security forces were sent into the streets without sufficient preparation for the scale of the scenario, leading to a large number of casualties among both civilians and security personnel, leaving a deep wound in the collective consciousness.

Although the most dangerous scenario—toppling the state from within—failed due to the cohesion of a broad segment of society, the confrontation is far from over. External pressures are escalating, military threats have become more overt, and the economic crisis—the main driver of the protests—remains unresolved, alongside the extensive damage inflicted on infrastructure during the unrest.

Conclusion

Collapse did not occur, but Iran emerged from these events heavily scarred. The war of attrition continues across the media, economic, and political fronts, in a struggle whose chapters have yet to be closed.


🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴The U.S. has escalated its military posture in the region: F‑15E Strike Eagles were deployed to Jordan’s Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in January 2026, supported by KC‑135 refueling aircraft, while the carrier USS Abraham Lincoln entered the Arabian Sea. Washington frames this as deterrence, but in reality it is a dangerous provocation aimed at Iran and the axis of resistance.

☑️Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5

🔴American War Drums in the Region: Escalation or Desperation?

⚪️Introduction

✌The latest U.S. military deployments in West Asia—F‑15E Strike Eagles to Jordan, the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group to the Arabian Sea, and Pentagon aircraft landing in the UAE—are not routine maneuvers. They are calculated signals of escalation, wrapped in the language of deterrence but dripping with provocation. Israeli media amplifies these moves with open calls for an attack on Tehran, while Washington pretends to be reluctant. The reality is far more dangerous: this is psychological warfare, economic pressure, and military brinkmanship rolled into one.



⚪️ The Deployment Pattern

👌 Jordan: The arrival of F‑15E Strike Eagles at Muwaffaq Salti Air Base marks a significant escalation. These aircraft are designed for deep‑strike missions against hardened targets, not for “patrols.” Their presence signals preparation for offensive scenarios.

🙌 UAE: The landing of a C‑37A, used to transport senior Pentagon officials, suggests high‑level coordination and planning. This is not a symbolic gesture—it is a logistical step toward command and control in case of escalation.

✌ Arabian Sea: The USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group’s entry into the region is a classic show of force. Carriers are floating bases of war, capable of launching dozens of sorties per day. Their presence is meant to intimidate Iran and reassure Israel.




⚪️ Trump’s Calculated Threats

👋President Trump’s statements—boasting of “a massive fleet heading toward Iran” and “many ships on the way”—are not off‑the‑cuff remarks. They are deliberate signals, designed to create a sense of inevitability. This is the same playbook used before the Iraq invasion: deploy overwhelming force, talk of “options,” and let the media manufacture consent.



🎨 Consequences of Escalation

🔢 Regional Destabilization:
Any strike on Iran will not remain contained. Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and the Gulf will all be dragged into the fire. U.S. bases across the region will become legitimate targets for retaliation.

🔢 Axis of Resistance Response:
Iran has already raised air defense readiness. Hezbollah, Iraqi resistance factions, and Yemeni forces are prepared for asymmetric retaliation. The U.S. cannot assume immunity—its forces are exposed across multiple fronts.

🔢 Psychological Warfare:
Israeli media’s claim that “Tehran could be destroyed in days” is not a military assessment. It is propaganda, meant to sow fear and justify aggression. The reality is that Iran’s defense network and resistance allies make such fantasies impossible.

🔢 Economic Pressure:
Maintaining carriers and strike aircraft in the region costs millions per day. This is not sustainable. It signals desperation rather than strength, especially as America faces internal economic strain.




📌 Conclusion

🔘The deployment of F‑15Es to Jordan and the arrival of the Abraham Lincoln in the Arabian Sea are not defensive moves—they are provocations. Washington and Tel Aviv want to project inevitability, but history shows that wars against Iran and the axis of resistance do not end in quick victories. They end in drawn‑out conflicts, regional chaos, and the erosion of U.S. credibility.

🔘The real question is not whether America can strike Iran—it is whether it can survive the consequences of such reckless escalation. For the axis of resistance, the task is clear: expose the propaganda, prepare for confrontation, and remind the world that the battlefield is not only military but also psychological and informational.

☑️Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5