▪️ Zionist editor Barak Ravid reported in Axios that President Trump met on Wednesday with Saudi Defense Minister Prince Khalid bin Salman, according to a U.S. official and another source familiar with the meeting.
▪️ The meeting was added to the Saudi minister’s schedule after he met with Vice President Vance and conveyed that Saudi Arabia prefers to de-escalate tensions with Iran—despite the joint U.S.-Saudi military strike earlier this week against Iran-aligned factions in Iraq (as described by the report), according to a source familiar with the matter.
▪️ Ravid noted that the purpose of the meetings was to deliver a message from Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman regarding the war with Iran and the broader regional situation.
▪️ Prince Khalid, the Crown Prince’s close brother, had originally planned to visit Washington last week but postponed the trip because of the strikes in Iraq.
▪️ According to the informed source, the Saudi defense minister told Vance that the Iraqi factions’ attacks on Saudi infrastructure and energy facilities had crossed a “red line,” making a Saudi response unavoidable. He stressed that the strikes in Iraq do not signify Saudi support for further escalation but rather demonstrate the Kingdom’s readiness to defend itself if necessary.
▪️ Barak Ravid also noted that the Saudi defense minister visited the White House one day after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with President Trump.
▪️ In the same context, the report added that two weeks earlier, Trump had given his backing to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman for military action against the Houthis in Yemen, who responded by threatening to impose a naval blockade on Saudi ports and launch attacks on Saudi vessels in the Red Sea.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬2
🔴 The Fall of the Neutrality Mask: Why Saudi Arabia Must Pay the Full Price for Its Choices
History—both diplomatic and military—demonstrates that in moments of decisive geopolitical transformation and total war, no actor can escape the consequences of a new regional order behind the façade of “claimed neutrality” or the practice of playing both sides.
The military legacy of Napoleon Bonaparte offers a striking historical parallel. As he confronted traditional monarchies such as Prussia and Austria, each defeat was followed by professions of peace and diplomatic smiles toward France, while those same powers secretly conspired with his enemies behind the scenes.
Napoleon understood a fundamental strategic reality:
This historical principle, according to the argument presented here, is the key to understanding the dynamics of the current conflict and the conduct of Saudi Arabia.
These practices can be traced back to April 2025, two months before the outbreak of the Twelve-Day War, when Prince Khalid bin Salman traveled to Tehran on a high-profile visit that included meetings with senior Iranian officials and even a visit to the now-martyred commander.
At the time, some internal assessments embraced the illusion that diplomatic engagement had broken the cycle of hostility. Subsequent events, however, allegedly demonstrated the futility of that assumption. The visit, according to this interpretation, served instead as a carefully orchestrated intelligence and reconnaissance mission that helped prepare the ground for future American-Israeli military action.
Only two months later, the major war erupted, and the White House effectively delivered the final blow to any remaining prospects for a negotiated settlement.
Meanwhile, Khalid bin Salman and Riyadh’s role extended well beyond what was visible publicly. As journalist Barak Ravid reported in Axios in late January 2026—following unrest inside Iran and roughly one month before military operations began—the prince reportedly told U.S. officials that President Trump’s reluctance to carry out his threats against Tehran would only embolden Iran.
According to the report, they discussed the possibility of a direct American military strike, highlighting the sharp contrast between Riyadh’s cautious public rhetoric and its far more assertive private communications.
When a new phase of confrontation began in February, following the martyrdom of the Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Riyadh found itself exposed at the center of the storm. Iranian military forces—partially freed from centralized operational constraints—reportedly launched attacks against Saudi targets, while Iraqi resistance factions carried out heavy strikes against Saudi infrastructure.
Saudi Arabia nevertheless managed, through political maneuvering, to gain the confidence of certain Iranian circles, resulting in the Kingdom’s temporary removal from Iran’s target list. That situation changed, according to this account, when the Quds Force broke the aerial blockade imposed on Yemen under the pretext of facilitating the funeral ceremonies of the martyred commander, forcing Saudi Arabia into direct confrontation.
History—both diplomatic and military—demonstrates that in moments of decisive geopolitical transformation and total war, no actor can escape the consequences of a new regional order behind the façade of “claimed neutrality” or the practice of playing both sides.
The military legacy of Napoleon Bonaparte offers a striking historical parallel. As he confronted traditional monarchies such as Prussia and Austria, each defeat was followed by professions of peace and diplomatic smiles toward France, while those same powers secretly conspired with his enemies behind the scenes.
Napoleon understood a fundamental strategic reality:
“Whoever stands at the intersection of rival powers while claiming neutrality is either dangerously naïve or lying in wait for the moment to strike from behind. Therefore, the matter must be settled by forcing such actors into the heart of the conflict so they bear the full cost of betrayal and duplicity.”
This historical principle, according to the argument presented here, is the key to understanding the dynamics of the current conflict and the conduct of Saudi Arabia.
These practices can be traced back to April 2025, two months before the outbreak of the Twelve-Day War, when Prince Khalid bin Salman traveled to Tehran on a high-profile visit that included meetings with senior Iranian officials and even a visit to the now-martyred commander.
At the time, some internal assessments embraced the illusion that diplomatic engagement had broken the cycle of hostility. Subsequent events, however, allegedly demonstrated the futility of that assumption. The visit, according to this interpretation, served instead as a carefully orchestrated intelligence and reconnaissance mission that helped prepare the ground for future American-Israeli military action.
Only two months later, the major war erupted, and the White House effectively delivered the final blow to any remaining prospects for a negotiated settlement.
Meanwhile, Khalid bin Salman and Riyadh’s role extended well beyond what was visible publicly. As journalist Barak Ravid reported in Axios in late January 2026—following unrest inside Iran and roughly one month before military operations began—the prince reportedly told U.S. officials that President Trump’s reluctance to carry out his threats against Tehran would only embolden Iran.
According to the report, they discussed the possibility of a direct American military strike, highlighting the sharp contrast between Riyadh’s cautious public rhetoric and its far more assertive private communications.
When a new phase of confrontation began in February, following the martyrdom of the Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Riyadh found itself exposed at the center of the storm. Iranian military forces—partially freed from centralized operational constraints—reportedly launched attacks against Saudi targets, while Iraqi resistance factions carried out heavy strikes against Saudi infrastructure.
Saudi Arabia nevertheless managed, through political maneuvering, to gain the confidence of certain Iranian circles, resulting in the Kingdom’s temporary removal from Iran’s target list. That situation changed, according to this account, when the Quds Force broke the aerial blockade imposed on Yemen under the pretext of facilitating the funeral ceremonies of the martyred commander, forcing Saudi Arabia into direct confrontation.
Caught without full military preparedness, Riyadh responded by launching successive strikes against the headquarters of Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces, allegedly in direct coordination with U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), thereby deepening its involvement in the conflict.
Yet even as Barak Ravid later reported Riyadh’s current desire for de-escalation and efforts to cool the front in order to avoid further retaliation, the argument advanced here maintains that such calls amount to another attempt at strategic deception.
From this perspective, the Napoleonic lesson remains decisive: the task must never be left unfinished, nor should this conservative monarchy once again be allowed to survive behind the barricades of deception and political maneuvering. Unless the pillars of what is described here as a conspiratorial regional order are crippled and made to bear severe costs, it will continue pursuing the same course.
Within this framework, the steadfastness and battlefield capabilities demonstrated by Iraqi and Yemeni fighters are presented as evidence that they possess both the determination and the operational capacity to impose devastating costs on the Saudi system.
According to this viewpoint, that trajectory must be pursued to its conclusion in order to uproot what is characterized as an American instrument in the region and permanently end its influence.
☑️ Our website
🖋 @observer_5
Yet even as Barak Ravid later reported Riyadh’s current desire for de-escalation and efforts to cool the front in order to avoid further retaliation, the argument advanced here maintains that such calls amount to another attempt at strategic deception.
From this perspective, the Napoleonic lesson remains decisive: the task must never be left unfinished, nor should this conservative monarchy once again be allowed to survive behind the barricades of deception and political maneuvering. Unless the pillars of what is described here as a conspiratorial regional order are crippled and made to bear severe costs, it will continue pursuing the same course.
Within this framework, the steadfastness and battlefield capabilities demonstrated by Iraqi and Yemeni fighters are presented as evidence that they possess both the determination and the operational capacity to impose devastating costs on the Saudi system.
According to this viewpoint, that trajectory must be pursued to its conclusion in order to uproot what is characterized as an American instrument in the region and permanently end its influence.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Al-Muraqeb
The Observer | Geopolitical Intelligence & Analysis
In-depth geopolitical analysis, military intelligence, and strategic assessments.
👍1🫡1
The illusion of a quick victory is burning out. Washington thought it could dictate terms to Tehran—instead, it dragged itself into a costly war of attrition.
Strategic Deadlock
An analysis by Foreign Policy (July 2026) stresses that ending the conflict requires Trump to learn a skill he lacks:
the art of gracefully accepting a loss.
The administration built its position on flawed assumptions, treating the crisis as merely a matter of duration or scale. As the war drags on, US negotiating leverage is rapidly evaporating.
The impasse is causing severe internal friction. Israel's Channel 13 reports that Trump recently blew up at top security officials during a briefing—screaming, cursing, and venting his frustration over their failure to deliver a unified strategy.
Sources close to Trump reveal his anger stems directly from Tehran's absolute refusal to negotiate. He entered the conflict without a clear exit plan or timeline, never anticipating the Iranians would prove this resilient or that a deal would be this hard to reach.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤣1
The Observer
THE SAUDI-AMERICAN AGGRESSION DEMANDS ACCOUNTABILITY: WHEN WILL BAGHDAD SPEAK? 🚨 🚨 A stark historical contrast unfolds today as Iraq faces unprovoked hostility from abroad. ⚠️ When the late commander Abu Mahdi Al-Muhandis was asked about the boundaries and…
🎪 THE BAGHDAD PUPPET SHOW: TOTAL IMPOTENCE ON DISPLAY
The "Sovereignty" Farce
Flight Grounded: Prime Minister Ali Al-Zaidi’s trip to Saudi Arabia is suspended following recent strikes. Hard to play diplomat abroad when you don't even own your own sky.
: The government solemnly announced it gave zero authorization for attacks on targets inside Iraq. A fierce stance, except foreign forces and local militias don't bother asking Baghdad for permission anyway.
Completely Clueless: In a pathetic attempt at damage control, official spokesmen openly admitted
The Bottom Line
Baghdad isn't a government; it's a spectator. It learns about bombings in its own territory from Telegram channels just like everyone else, reduced to issuing toothless press releases while foreign powers treat Iraqi airspace like an open playground.
☑️ Our website
🖋 @observer_5
The "Sovereignty" Farce
Flight Grounded: Prime Minister Ali Al-Zaidi’s trip to Saudi Arabia is suspended following recent strikes. Hard to play diplomat abroad when you don't even own your own sky.
"We Didn't Allow This"
: The government solemnly announced it gave zero authorization for attacks on targets inside Iraq. A fierce stance, except foreign forces and local militias don't bother asking Baghdad for permission anyway.
Completely Clueless: In a pathetic attempt at damage control, official spokesmen openly admitted
the state had no prior knowledge of strikes executed on its own soil.
The Bottom Line
Baghdad isn't a government; it's a spectator. It learns about bombings in its own territory from Telegram channels just like everyone else, reduced to issuing toothless press releases while foreign powers treat Iraqi airspace like an open playground.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👎1
The Observer
🚨 The Times (UK): Hunting Khamenei — How the CIA and Mossad Are Trying to Track Sayyed Mojtaba According to a report published by The Times ( 28/7/2026 ) , the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and Israel’s Mossad have intensified efforts to locate and…
ANALYSIS & COMMENTARY
Legal & Intelligence Perspective:
The Illusion of "Norms"
This is not a "new norm"—it is simply the mask fully slipping off. Historically, foreign intelligence services conducted espionage against foreign heads of state in the shadows, maintaining a degree of plausible deniability to protect global diplomatic decorum.
Western intelligence agencies now operate, target, and openly broadcast their intent to track down and eliminate the sitting leadership of sovereign nations in broad daylight.
From an international law standpoint, spying on a head of state with the implicit or explicit goal of targeted assassination utterly shreds the UN Charter and basic principles of state sovereignty. Yet, intelligence apparatuses now brag about hacking civil infrastructure—like municipal traffic cameras and civilian telecom networks—to run high-tech hit lists.
The ongoing failure to locate Sayyed Mojtaba Khamenei exposes the fundamental flaw of the CIA's modern doctrine: technological over-reliance mixed with institutional arrogance.
For decades, the CIA has thrown billions at bloated tech initiatives, assuming that algorithms, spyware, and stolen camera feeds can replace real tradecraft. They got comfortable operating in environments where targets used cell phones and laptops.
The moment an adversary throws away their electronics, goes completely dark, and reverts to basic, analog security—couriers, paper notes, zero digital footprint—the CIA's multi-billion-dollar surveillance apparatus becomes functionally useless.
The CIA acts less like an elite intelligence agency and more like a lawless cyber-militia with no strategic depth. When high-tech trickery fails to yield instant results, they are left empty-handed, utterly baffled that an adversary had the discipline to turn off a phone.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👎1
The Observer
Early this morning, the ground beneath southern Lebanon didn't just shake—it was detonated.
In a massive, early-morning operation, the Israeli military detonated 700 tons of explosives to obliterate a major Hezbollah subterranean command network under the historic Beaufort Ridge. The sheer force of the blast sent secondary shockwaves ripping through nearby Hadatha, Deir Mimas, and Arnoun.
Prime Minister Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz quickly claimed the massive demolition was direct retaliation for an alleged Hezbollah drone attack that breached ceasefire terms.
What is the International Community doing besides watching?
Since when does a "ceasefire" allow detonating nearly a kiloton of explosives right next to historic civilian areas? What does international law even mean if a military can drop seismic-level payloads, wave around a legal justification, and carry on as usual? Is the UN Security Council completely toothless, or just waiting for the entire region to flatten before issuing another diplomatic statement?
What is the Lebanese Government actually going to say about this? 🇱🇧
How much longer can Beirut pretend it governs a sovereign state? When a foreign power detonates hundreds of tons of explosives inside your borders, is the official plan just to issue a press release and go back to sleep? Where is the state accountability to protect its own land and citizens?
Law, treaties, and humanity have completely failed.
The international community has degenerated into a gallery of silent spectators, writing empty press releases while kinetic force rewrites the map. The Lebanese government exists only on paper—incapable of defending its soil, incapable of enforcing its laws, and totally failing its people.
When 700 tons of high explosives become the routine language of a "ceasefire," the global order isn't just broken. It's dead.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬1
🔴 Hamas and the Palestinian Factions Issue a Press Statement on the Developments in the Second-Phase Ceasefire Negotiations
In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful
🔻 The Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) and the Palestinian factions have engaged with the negotiation process and the mediators’ proposals for completing the implementation of the second phase of the ceasefire agreement in a responsible and constructive manner. This was carried out within the framework of national consensus among the Palestinian factions, reflecting a spirit of partnership and shared responsibility, driven by our commitment to protecting our people, addressing their humanitarian needs, and safeguarding their national rights.
🔻 The occupation’s commitment to halting the killing and ending its aggression constitutes the essential gateway and the first step toward moving forward with implementation, including establishing the framework and timetable for the agreed measures. We reaffirm that implementation of the second phase of the agreement remains contingent upon the occupation fulfilling all provisions of the first phase.
🔻 Approval to include the issue of heavy weapons within the framework of the agreement was expressly conditioned upon a complete cessation of all forms of aggression, the withdrawal from the Gaza Strip, the achievement of early recovery, the entry of the administrative committee, the deployment of international protection forces, the dismantling of armed gangs and militias established by the occupation, the commencement of reconstruction, guarantees for the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination, the establishment of an independent Palestinian state, and the protection of citizens’ rights.
🔻 Hamas and the Palestinian factions extend their deepest appreciation and salute to our steadfast people in the Gaza Strip, reaffirming their commitment to continue working together along this path in service of our people and in defense of all their rights.
Islamic Resistance Movement – Hamas
Friday, July 31, 2026
17 Safar 1448 AH
☑️ Our website
🖋 @observer_5
In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful
🔻 The Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) and the Palestinian factions have engaged with the negotiation process and the mediators’ proposals for completing the implementation of the second phase of the ceasefire agreement in a responsible and constructive manner. This was carried out within the framework of national consensus among the Palestinian factions, reflecting a spirit of partnership and shared responsibility, driven by our commitment to protecting our people, addressing their humanitarian needs, and safeguarding their national rights.
🔻 The occupation’s commitment to halting the killing and ending its aggression constitutes the essential gateway and the first step toward moving forward with implementation, including establishing the framework and timetable for the agreed measures. We reaffirm that implementation of the second phase of the agreement remains contingent upon the occupation fulfilling all provisions of the first phase.
🔻 Approval to include the issue of heavy weapons within the framework of the agreement was expressly conditioned upon a complete cessation of all forms of aggression, the withdrawal from the Gaza Strip, the achievement of early recovery, the entry of the administrative committee, the deployment of international protection forces, the dismantling of armed gangs and militias established by the occupation, the commencement of reconstruction, guarantees for the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination, the establishment of an independent Palestinian state, and the protection of citizens’ rights.
🔻 Hamas and the Palestinian factions extend their deepest appreciation and salute to our steadfast people in the Gaza Strip, reaffirming their commitment to continue working together along this path in service of our people and in defense of all their rights.
Islamic Resistance Movement – Hamas
Friday, July 31, 2026
17 Safar 1448 AH
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😢1
The Observer
🔴 Hamas and the Palestinian Factions Issue a Press Statement on the Developments in the Second-Phase Ceasefire Negotiations In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful 🔻 The Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) and the Palestinian factions…
Key points in the draft:
🔹 Inventory and Storage of Weapons:
A gradual process will begin to inventory and store heavy weapons, weapons production sites, storage facilities, and tunnels, with the participation of all Palestinian factions. The draft explicitly rejects the transfer or surrender of any weapons to Israel or to any non-Palestinian party.
🔹 Responsible Authority:
The “National Committee” will be the sole body responsible for managing, storing, and controlling weapons in Gaza after the completion of Clauses (7–10) of the roadmap.
🔹 Conditions and Operational Linkages:
• The inventory process will begin only after the commitments of the Sharm el-Sheikh Protocol have been fulfilled, the National Committee has entered Gaza, and the International Stabilization Force has been deployed.
• Each phase of the inventory process will be linked to Israel’s gradual withdrawal from the Gaza Strip.
• The weapons file is considered part of a broader process to implement the peace plan and establish a credible path toward Palestinian self-determination and the creation of a Palestinian state.
🔹 Implementation Mechanism and Oversight:
• An implementation timetable will be prepared within 14 days, with the possibility of an extension by decision of the Verification Committee and the approval of all parties.
• The International Verification Committee will oversee and monitor the process, with support from the International Stabilization Force.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤨1
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬1
🔴 The Double Game: Between Netanyahu’s Warnings and the European Border Trap
📍Ceuta – The Gateway to the Strait of Gibraltar
▪️A striking connection is emerging between political rhetoric and developments on the ground, revealing the contours of a broader strategy based on mutual pressure and coercive signaling within the Western sphere.
▪️During his interview with Sean Hannity on Fox News, Benjamin Netanyahu delivered a message of both reproach and implicit warning to Europe. He questioned the continent’s ability—and willingness—to confront the Iranian threat or safeguard its own security, arguing that Europe is undergoing a “rapid decline” because it has lost control of its borders and its demographic identity. He pointed to Israel’s strict border policies as the model Europe should follow.
▪️The message did not remain merely rhetorical. It was quickly accompanied by tangible developments on the ground, as political warnings appeared to translate into concrete security challenges affecting the heart of Europe—particularly Spain—through a sudden and large-scale influx of migrants into the Spanish enclave of Ceuta.
▪️This surge is closely linked to sensitive geopolitical developments. While Spain recently refused to receive ships carrying weapons destined for Israel, Morocco—which has been deepening its military cooperation with Tel Aviv—accepted those same shipments.
▪️The apparent activation of the migration card at Spain’s border enclave sends a direct message of deterrence and political pressure, aimed at reshaping the balance of control over critical strategic crossings, particularly the Strait of Gibraltar, amid broader efforts to realign regional influence following the effective closure of the Red Sea to Israeli shipping.
▪️It reflects a comprehensive model of crisis engineering: a preemptive political narrative that lays the groundwork for pressure, followed by operational measures at the border that demonstrate the consequences for those who choose to break ranks.
☑️ Our website
🖋 @observer_5
📍Ceuta – The Gateway to the Strait of Gibraltar
▪️A striking connection is emerging between political rhetoric and developments on the ground, revealing the contours of a broader strategy based on mutual pressure and coercive signaling within the Western sphere.
▪️During his interview with Sean Hannity on Fox News, Benjamin Netanyahu delivered a message of both reproach and implicit warning to Europe. He questioned the continent’s ability—and willingness—to confront the Iranian threat or safeguard its own security, arguing that Europe is undergoing a “rapid decline” because it has lost control of its borders and its demographic identity. He pointed to Israel’s strict border policies as the model Europe should follow.
▪️The message did not remain merely rhetorical. It was quickly accompanied by tangible developments on the ground, as political warnings appeared to translate into concrete security challenges affecting the heart of Europe—particularly Spain—through a sudden and large-scale influx of migrants into the Spanish enclave of Ceuta.
▪️This surge is closely linked to sensitive geopolitical developments. While Spain recently refused to receive ships carrying weapons destined for Israel, Morocco—which has been deepening its military cooperation with Tel Aviv—accepted those same shipments.
▪️The apparent activation of the migration card at Spain’s border enclave sends a direct message of deterrence and political pressure, aimed at reshaping the balance of control over critical strategic crossings, particularly the Strait of Gibraltar, amid broader efforts to realign regional influence following the effective closure of the Red Sea to Israeli shipping.
▪️It reflects a comprehensive model of crisis engineering: a preemptive political narrative that lays the groundwork for pressure, followed by operational measures at the border that demonstrate the consequences for those who choose to break ranks.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤔1
📰 A summary of a notable article published last April on the Israeli news website Ynet by Amin Ayoub, outlining the strategic dynamics behind current developments:
▪️ The Geopolitical Earthquake
Escalating tensions between Washington and Madrid—driven by Spain’s refusal to allow the United States to use the Rota and Morón air bases for operations against Iran, its failure to meet NATO spending commitments, and Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez’s opposition to President Trump—have created significant cracks in Spain’s strategic position regarding Ceuta and Melilla.
▪️ Growing Support from Washington 🇺🇸
In March 2026, Michael Rubin of the American Enterprise Institute urged the Trump administration to recognize Ceuta and Melilla as Moroccan territories under Spanish occupation, describing Spain as a “colonial power.” He was later joined by Congressman Mario Díaz-Balart, who argued that the two enclaves lie outside Spain’s geographical territory and that their future should be resolved among allies.
▪️ Spain’s Legal Vulnerability
The Pentagon reportedly threatened to suspend Spain’s NATO membership over its position on Iran, while President Trump directed the termination of economic dealings with Madrid.
Most significantly, Article 6 of the Washington Treaty excludes African territories from NATO’s collective defense obligations, leaving Ceuta and Melilla legally exposed and outside the Alliance’s automatic security umbrella.
▪️ The Expanding Military Partnership
The Abraham Accords have significantly strengthened military cooperation between Israel and Morocco, culminating in the adoption of a joint action plan in January 2026.
This growing partnership gives Israel a direct strategic interest in Morocco’s regional success. 📈
Three Ways Israel Could Support Morocco 🇮🇱🇲🇦
Recognize that Spain’s continued control of African territories undermines Madrid’s credibility and transforms Ceuta and Melilla into a broader issue of regional governance.
Highlight Morocco’s strategic role in securing the Western Mediterranean and the Strait of Gibraltar to encourage greater U.S. support for Rabat’s claims.
Emphasize the inconsistency of Madrid recognizing a Palestinian state while maintaining African colonial enclaves that predate Israel by four centuries.
The argument presented is that no military adventure is required—only sustained diplomatic pressure. Supporting Morocco’s efforts to reclaim Ceuta and Melilla would, in this analysis, penalize what is portrayed as an obstructive NATO member while advancing U.S.-Israeli strategic interests by strengthening influence over one of the world’s most vital maritime chokepoints.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Observer
🔴 In the First Official Israeli Comment on the Developments in Spain, Israeli Ambassador Danny Danon Posted on X: 🇮🇱🇪🇸
⚠️
☑️ Our website
🖋 @observer_5
“Spain, which never misses an opportunity to lecture Israel, has declared a state of emergency in Ceuta due to the consequences of its own migration policy.
Perhaps before continuing to lecture us, it is time for Spain to explain to the world why it still maintains colonial enclaves in Africa.”
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Observer
🔴 In the First Official Israeli Comment on the Developments in Spain, Israeli Ambassador Danny Danon Posted on X: 🇮🇱🇪🇸 “Spain, which never misses an opportunity to lecture Israel, has declared a state of emergency in Ceuta due to the consequences of its…
🔴 In Another Official Israeli Statement, Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir Posted on X: 🇮🇱📱
Since you have shown such great concern for Hamas and the residents of Gaza, I invite you to turn your words into action: open Spain’s doors and grant asylum to the people of Gaza who wish to emigrate. 🚪🇪🇸
This would be an excellent opportunity to contribute a little more to Spain’s ‘human diversity.’”⚠️
“I extend my sincere congratulations to Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez on his unwavering commitment to welcoming migration and promoting ‘human diversity.’
Since you have shown such great concern for Hamas and the residents of Gaza, I invite you to turn your words into action: open Spain’s doors and grant asylum to the people of Gaza who wish to emigrate. 🚪🇪🇸
This would be an excellent opportunity to contribute a little more to Spain’s ‘human diversity.’”
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Al-Monitor: The United States has begun withdrawing its remaining forces from Iraq ahead of the September 30 deadline, alongside the withdrawal of Patriot air defense systems from Erbil. Sources said the move was driven by limited Patriot missile stockpiles and the redeployment of these systems toward the Gulf region and Jordan, despite continued Iranian and militia attacks targeting the Kurdistan Region. The decision has raised concerns over a weakening of the U.S. defensive umbrella over the region.
In 2014, while Iraq was facing one of its most dangerous battles against ISIS, U.S. contractors responsible for supporting and maintaining Abrams tanks left for Dubai, citing the deteriorating security situation, after ammunition and equipment related to their operations had been withdrawn. They left Iraq to face its fate despite the existence of dozens of military contracts and the Strategic Framework Agreement with the United States.
Today, the same pattern is repeating in a different form: Patriot systems are being withdrawn from Iraq, priorities are being shifted elsewhere, and Iraqi airspace is becoming increasingly exposed—sending a message that U.S. interests ultimately take precedence over any commitment or agreement.
“Welcome to your second home”…
A country for contracts and profits, not for commitments and guarantees.
When priorities change, the Patriots leave first, then the contractors depart, and Iraq is left alone to bear the consequences.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This came especially as Iraqi Prime Minister Ali Al-Zaidi had met with U.S. President Donald Trump shortly beforehand, and had also held a meeting with a Hezbollah delegation on the eve of his visit to Washington. 🇮🇶🇺🇸
▪️ An Iraqi official reportedly proposed that Hezbollah host a dialogue with Washington, but the proposal was rejected in Beirut’s southern suburbs for two reasons: ⚠️
It relates to Hezbollah’s view of the U.S. administration and its complete lack of trust in it.
It is linked to a decision that authorizes President Nabih Berri to negotiate with the Americans when necessary. 🇱🇧🤝🇺🇸
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😢1
🔴🇺🇸 Alhurra: Washington and Riyadh Claimed They Warned Baghdad in Advance… But Their Own Narrative Suggests the Killings Were Premeditated
According to a report published by the U.S.-funded outlet Alhurra, Iraqi security and political sources revealed that the strikes targeting seven locations across Iraq early last Wednesday were not random, but part of a coordinated operation aimed at three Iraqi factions:
🎯 The Badr Organization
🎯 Harakat al-Nujaba
🎯 Kataib Hezbollah
The report states that the strikes were geographically divided, with:
✈️ Saudi aircraft conducting operations in southern Iraq, and
✈️ U.S. aircraft targeting sites in eastern and northern Iraq.
According to the report:
🔹 The Badr Organization was placed on the target list over attacks allegedly launched toward Jordan.
🔹 Harakat al-Nujaba was targeted over attacks on the Kurdistan Region.
🔹 Kataib Hezbollah was targeted over attacks allegedly directed at Kuwait and Saudi Arabia.
📌 The report further claims that the Iraqi government had received U.S. intelligence four days earlier, identifying the headquarters from which the attacks had allegedly originated. However, Baghdad reportedly took no operational action, prompting Washington and Riyadh—according to the account—to carry out the strikes themselves.
⚠️ The report also states that the United States and Saudi Arabia informed the Iraqi government in advance that strikes would be carried out against several headquarters and requested that they be evacuated to avoid casualties.
❗ However, they did not disclose which headquarters would be targeted, exposing a clear contradiction in the narrative:
❓ How can facilities be evacuated if their locations are never identified?
This inconsistency undermines the claim that the objective was to prevent casualties and instead reinforces the impression that casualties among the personnel were anticipated and accepted as part of executing the operation.
📄 This account aligns with the statement issued by the Iraqi National Security Council, which noted that the attack occurred
🇺🇸 U.S. President Donald Trump also stated that the strikes were carried out in coordination with the Iraqi government, adding to the political pressure on Iraqi Prime Minister Ali Falih Al-Zaidi.
☑️ Our website
🖋 @observer_5
According to a report published by the U.S.-funded outlet Alhurra, Iraqi security and political sources revealed that the strikes targeting seven locations across Iraq early last Wednesday were not random, but part of a coordinated operation aimed at three Iraqi factions:
🎯 The Badr Organization
🎯 Harakat al-Nujaba
🎯 Kataib Hezbollah
The report states that the strikes were geographically divided, with:
✈️ Saudi aircraft conducting operations in southern Iraq, and
✈️ U.S. aircraft targeting sites in eastern and northern Iraq.
According to the report:
🔹 The Badr Organization was placed on the target list over attacks allegedly launched toward Jordan.
🔹 Harakat al-Nujaba was targeted over attacks on the Kurdistan Region.
🔹 Kataib Hezbollah was targeted over attacks allegedly directed at Kuwait and Saudi Arabia.
This inconsistency undermines the claim that the objective was to prevent casualties and instead reinforces the impression that casualties among the personnel were anticipated and accepted as part of executing the operation.
📄 This account aligns with the statement issued by the Iraqi National Security Council, which noted that the attack occurred
“while the Iraqi government was in communication with the concerned parties to verify and address all issues raised by the Saudi and American sides.”
🇺🇸 U.S. President Donald Trump also stated that the strikes were carried out in coordination with the Iraqi government, adding to the political pressure on Iraqi Prime Minister Ali Falih Al-Zaidi.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬1