🔗 Bypassing the Gulf Chokepoints: The Geopolitics of the Iraq-Syria-Lebanon Oil Corridor
The recent high-level talks in Baghdad on July 26, 2026, between Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam and Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi—following Iraq’s cabinet approval of a new pipeline framework—signal a major shift in Eastern Mediterranean energy geopolitics. Reported by The National, Baghdad’s proposal to extend crude pipelines through Syria to the Lebanese port of Tripoli is far more than an energy transaction; it is a strategic restructuring of land-based trade corridors across West Asia.
1. Breaking Maritime Hegemony and Vulnerability
Historically, Iraq’s crude exports (exceeding 3.4 million barrels per day) have been constrained by two geopolitical choke points: the Persian Gulf / Strait of Hormuz—vulnerable to US naval coercion and regional escalation—and the northern Ceyhan pipeline through Turkey, subject to perpetual political bargaining with Ankara. Reviving and expanding the historic 928-kilometer Kirkuk-Tripoli corridor (historically rated at 410,000 bpd) provides Baghdad with an independent, direct overland gateway to the Eastern Mediterranean.
2. The Resistance Corridor as an Economic Fortress
From a critical regional perspective, connecting Baghdad, Damascus, and Beirut via pipeline infrastructure cements the geography of the Axis of Resistance into an integrated economic fortress.
Syria gains crucial transit revenues and domestic fuel access, directly undercutting the impact of Western Caesar Act sanctions.
Lebanon secures a stable crude supply for its starved power grid and positions the Tripoli Oil Facilities as a vital Mediterranean export hub.
Iraq diversifies its sovereign export options away from NATO-controlled transit routes and Gulf maritime bottlenecks.
3. Structural Obstacles and Western Sanctions
While technical assessments and multi-stage proposals target initial storage and partial operations between 2027 and 2030, the real battleground will be geopolitical.
Washington and its regional allies will view a functional Baghdad-Damascus-Tripoli energy axis as a direct challenge to Western financial leverage over the Levant. The ultimate success of this pipeline will depend on the sovereign political will of Baghdad, Damascus, and Beirut to withstand external pressure and secure their economic borders.
☑️ Our website
🖋 @observer_5
The recent high-level talks in Baghdad on July 26, 2026, between Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam and Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi—following Iraq’s cabinet approval of a new pipeline framework—signal a major shift in Eastern Mediterranean energy geopolitics. Reported by The National, Baghdad’s proposal to extend crude pipelines through Syria to the Lebanese port of Tripoli is far more than an energy transaction; it is a strategic restructuring of land-based trade corridors across West Asia.
1. Breaking Maritime Hegemony and Vulnerability
Historically, Iraq’s crude exports (exceeding 3.4 million barrels per day) have been constrained by two geopolitical choke points: the Persian Gulf / Strait of Hormuz—vulnerable to US naval coercion and regional escalation—and the northern Ceyhan pipeline through Turkey, subject to perpetual political bargaining with Ankara. Reviving and expanding the historic 928-kilometer Kirkuk-Tripoli corridor (historically rated at 410,000 bpd) provides Baghdad with an independent, direct overland gateway to the Eastern Mediterranean.
2. The Resistance Corridor as an Economic Fortress
From a critical regional perspective, connecting Baghdad, Damascus, and Beirut via pipeline infrastructure cements the geography of the Axis of Resistance into an integrated economic fortress.
Syria gains crucial transit revenues and domestic fuel access, directly undercutting the impact of Western Caesar Act sanctions.
Lebanon secures a stable crude supply for its starved power grid and positions the Tripoli Oil Facilities as a vital Mediterranean export hub.
Iraq diversifies its sovereign export options away from NATO-controlled transit routes and Gulf maritime bottlenecks.
3. Structural Obstacles and Western Sanctions
While technical assessments and multi-stage proposals target initial storage and partial operations between 2027 and 2030, the real battleground will be geopolitical.
Washington and its regional allies will view a functional Baghdad-Damascus-Tripoli energy axis as a direct challenge to Western financial leverage over the Levant. The ultimate success of this pipeline will depend on the sovereign political will of Baghdad, Damascus, and Beirut to withstand external pressure and secure their economic borders.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍1
🚨 The Subversion of American Sovereignty: NDAA Section 219 (formerly Sec. 224)
The latest push to merge the U.S. and Israeli military-industrial complexes is moving through Congress as Section 219 (originally Section 224) of the FY2027 National Defense Authorization Act.
Who Engineered This?
It originated as the U.S.-Israel FUTURES Act, introduced by Senators Ted Budd (R-NC) and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) along with Rep. Ronny Jackson (R-TX). When it stalled as a standalone bill, House Armed Services Committee leadership—Reps. Mike Rogers (R-AL) and Adam Smith (D-WA)—smuggled its core provisions directly into the defense budget to guarantee passage.
How It Changes Future Wars?
This is not standard foreign aid; it is systemic institutional fusion.
Data & AI Integration: Mandates "network integration" and "data fusion" across artificial intelligence, autonomous systems, cyber defense, and targeting architecture.
Automated Entanglement: U.S. military hardware and command systems will run on shared code and intelligence streams with Israel.
Bypassing Congress: By embedding integration into the Pentagon’s acquisition apparatus, future wars will no longer require explicit Congressional debate or annual aid approvals. American intelligence and logistical pipelines will automatically drag the U.S. into regional escalations.
Can the Federal Government Retract It?
Legally, yes. Practically, almost impossible.
Congress can always repeal a law or defund an initiative in future legislative cycles. However, once military hardware architectures, software pipelines, intelligence databases, and joint industrial supply chains are fused, untangling them takes years and billions of dollars. It creates a permanent operational dependency that future administrations cannot simply turn off with an executive order.
Why People Are Calling This Treason?
Critique across both sides of the political spectrum centers on national sovereignty:
Surrender of Military Command: Subordinating American data infrastructure and military R&D to a foreign nation strips the Commander-in-Chief and Congress of unilateral control over U.S. forces.
Erosion of the Constitution: Article I, Section 8 gives Congress sole authority over war powers. Handing foreign entities real-time access to military networks delegates American war-making capabilities to a foreign capital.
Foreign Influence Over Defense Jobs: Establishing joint domestic manufacturing operations locks U.S. defense jobs into foreign policy decisions, turning American industrial policy into a hostage of foreign interests.
☑️ Our website
🖋 @observer_5
The latest push to merge the U.S. and Israeli military-industrial complexes is moving through Congress as Section 219 (originally Section 224) of the FY2027 National Defense Authorization Act.
Who Engineered This?
It originated as the U.S.-Israel FUTURES Act, introduced by Senators Ted Budd (R-NC) and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) along with Rep. Ronny Jackson (R-TX). When it stalled as a standalone bill, House Armed Services Committee leadership—Reps. Mike Rogers (R-AL) and Adam Smith (D-WA)—smuggled its core provisions directly into the defense budget to guarantee passage.
How It Changes Future Wars?
This is not standard foreign aid; it is systemic institutional fusion.
Data & AI Integration: Mandates "network integration" and "data fusion" across artificial intelligence, autonomous systems, cyber defense, and targeting architecture.
Automated Entanglement: U.S. military hardware and command systems will run on shared code and intelligence streams with Israel.
Bypassing Congress: By embedding integration into the Pentagon’s acquisition apparatus, future wars will no longer require explicit Congressional debate or annual aid approvals. American intelligence and logistical pipelines will automatically drag the U.S. into regional escalations.
Can the Federal Government Retract It?
Legally, yes. Practically, almost impossible.
Congress can always repeal a law or defund an initiative in future legislative cycles. However, once military hardware architectures, software pipelines, intelligence databases, and joint industrial supply chains are fused, untangling them takes years and billions of dollars. It creates a permanent operational dependency that future administrations cannot simply turn off with an executive order.
Why People Are Calling This Treason?
Critique across both sides of the political spectrum centers on national sovereignty:
Surrender of Military Command: Subordinating American data infrastructure and military R&D to a foreign nation strips the Commander-in-Chief and Congress of unilateral control over U.S. forces.
Erosion of the Constitution: Article I, Section 8 gives Congress sole authority over war powers. Handing foreign entities real-time access to military networks delegates American war-making capabilities to a foreign capital.
Foreign Influence Over Defense Jobs: Establishing joint domestic manufacturing operations locks U.S. defense jobs into foreign policy decisions, turning American industrial policy into a hostage of foreign interests.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👎1
🚨 The Times (UK): Hunting Khamenei — How the CIA and Mossad Are Trying to Track Sayyed Mojtaba
According to a report published by The Times ( 28/7/2026 ) , the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and Israel’s Mossad have intensified efforts to locate and monitor Iran’s new Supreme Leader, Sayyed Mojtaba Khamenei, after he disappeared from public view and has avoided any public appearances or audio recordings since his appointment on March 8.
Key points from the report:
Complete digital blackout: Sayyed Mojtaba has reportedly cut off all electronic communications, including mobile phones and portable devices, severely limiting the aerial surveillance and cyber-monitoring capabilities previously relied upon by Washington and Tel Aviv.
Shift to Human Intelligence (HUMINT): Intelligence agencies have increasingly turned to tracking handwritten messages and multi-layered courier networks in an effort to penetrate the small inner circle surrounding him.
Suspected hiding locations: Analysts believe he may be sheltering in deep underground tunnel complexes beneath Tehran or in heavily fortified military facilities near the city of Qom.
Operational challenges and security measures: Intelligence assessments suggest he may have suffered a serious facial injury during the February 28 airstrike. He is reportedly under strict protection by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), with only two or three individuals aware of his exact location. The report also raises the possibility that body doubles are being used to complicate tracking efforts.
Strategic dilemma: Washington and Tel Aviv are said to be weighing the consequences of targeting him if his location is confirmed, while also questioning what type of leadership could emerge in his place and whether his continued absence may, paradoxically, contribute to regional stability.
☑️ Our website
🖋 @observer_5
According to a report published by The Times ( 28/7/2026 ) , the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and Israel’s Mossad have intensified efforts to locate and monitor Iran’s new Supreme Leader, Sayyed Mojtaba Khamenei, after he disappeared from public view and has avoided any public appearances or audio recordings since his appointment on March 8.
Key points from the report:
Complete digital blackout: Sayyed Mojtaba has reportedly cut off all electronic communications, including mobile phones and portable devices, severely limiting the aerial surveillance and cyber-monitoring capabilities previously relied upon by Washington and Tel Aviv.
Shift to Human Intelligence (HUMINT): Intelligence agencies have increasingly turned to tracking handwritten messages and multi-layered courier networks in an effort to penetrate the small inner circle surrounding him.
Suspected hiding locations: Analysts believe he may be sheltering in deep underground tunnel complexes beneath Tehran or in heavily fortified military facilities near the city of Qom.
Operational challenges and security measures: Intelligence assessments suggest he may have suffered a serious facial injury during the February 28 airstrike. He is reportedly under strict protection by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), with only two or three individuals aware of his exact location. The report also raises the possibility that body doubles are being used to complicate tracking efforts.
Strategic dilemma: Washington and Tel Aviv are said to be weighing the consequences of targeting him if his location is confirmed, while also questioning what type of leadership could emerge in his place and whether his continued absence may, paradoxically, contribute to regional stability.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬1
Global marine insurers led by Lloyd’s of London (Ascot, Navium) have pulled war-risk coverage for Saudi-linked shipping in the Red Sea following targeted strikes on Saudi crude tankers (Encelia, Layla).
Strategic Strike: The strikes render Riyadh's East-West Pipeline to Yanbu useless as an alternative route to the Strait of Hormuz.
Insurance Collapse: War-risk premiums spiked above 3% before underwriters outright canceled coverage for Saudi-linked cargo.
Economic Deterrence: Sana'a weaponized financial underwriting, forcing carriers like Bahri into dark-sailing or taking expensive diversions around the Cape of Good Hope.
Ansar Allah proves that economic blockades no longer require traditional navies—only the ability to break the adversary's financial safety net. 🚢
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍1
🇮🇶🔥🇺🇦 UKRAINIANS COMMITTING TERRORISM IN IRAQ!!
🗣️ Iraq’s National Security Advisor Qasim al‑Aboudi reveals: Ukrainian intelligence cells are active across Iraq, staging false‑flag attacks on government facilities.
📂 “
.”
⚠️ He added the probe is complex and ongoing, with arrested members confessing to working for Ukraine.
🤡 Vanilla ISIS strikes again.
☑️ Our website
🖋 @observer_5
🗣️ Iraq’s National Security Advisor Qasim al‑Aboudi reveals: Ukrainian intelligence cells are active across Iraq, staging false‑flag attacks on government facilities.
📂 “
A new file shows clear UKRAINIAN INTERFERENCE. We’ve uncovered groups carrying out limited bombings—cells tied directly to Ukraine
.”
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬1
▪️Amid escalating regional tensions, the Saudi Ministry of Defense announced that it had intercepted drones targeting oil facilities in Riyadh and the Eastern Province, claiming they were launched from Iraqi territory. According to the Saudi narrative, the attack bypassed the Yemeni theater of operations, citing the geographical proximity of Iraq’s border to the targeted sites.
▪️Satellite imagery and footage released following the statement showed massive fires and towering flames at Saudi Aramco’s Abqaiq refinery in eastern Saudi Arabia. The strikes reportedly caused extensive damage to fuel storage facilities and critical infrastructure linked to oil refining operations.
▪️In response, the Islamic Resistance in Iraq categorically denied the accusations in a strongly worded statement, arguing that the claims were intended to justify Saudi security failures and obscure the true nature of the ongoing conflict.
▪️Meanwhile, Iraq’s domestic political scene saw leaders of the Coordination Framework reaffirm their rejection of using Iraqi territory to launch attacks against other countries, while expressing support for efforts to consolidate the state’s monopoly over arms.
▪️Caught between competing narratives and the undeniable reality of burning infrastructure, Iraq once again emerges as a critical fault line in the broader struggle over regional influence and energy security.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🫡1
The Observer
From a practical and technical standpoint, the Saudi claim appears to rest on geographical considerations, arguing that the targeted site is significantly closer to Iraq than to Yemen. This has created a sharp divergence between the competing narratives.
Rather than rushing to accuse either side of outright deception, it is important to recognize that, if these strikes did occur, they would reflect an evolution in operational capabilities. Even if the Iraqi Resistance was not responsible, the very act of directing accusations toward Iraq highlights the psychological and political dimensions of the conflict, positioning Iraq itself as a central arena in the regional confrontation.
These accusations are not isolated incidents but part of a much broader geopolitical struggle. Whether or not the Iraqi Resistance carried out the attack, it remains engaged in what it views as an existential conflict, mobilizing all available resources.
If the Saudi account is accurate, the incident falls squarely within the ongoing energy war engulfing the region. If not, Iraq’s inclusion in the narrative still underscores the intensity of the intelligence and psychological warfare being waged, demanding a clear understanding of the conflict’s true nature.
The current atmosphere recalls the events of 2019 following the attacks on Aramco facilities, when those incidents were widely seen as contributing to political instability and heightened tensions inside Iraq.
The latest statement from the Saudi Ministry of Defense reinforces the perception that Riyadh has openly adopted a confrontational posture toward Iraq and is prepared to use any pretext to increase pressure on the country. This reality requires preparedness for a wide range of potential security scenarios.
The Iraqi Resistance is now facing one of its most difficult and sensitive phases. It is operating amid diminishing support, while many political and official actors have chosen de-escalation over confrontation.
This is reflected in the repeated accusations directed against the Resistance and the growing political and media pressure surrounding it. Similar claims surfaced only days ago when Masrour Barzani alleged that drones targeting sites in Erbil had been launched from Mosul, calling on Baghdad to take action against what he described as “outlaws.”
The recurrence of such accusations, combined with comparable precedents, evokes the security climate that preceded 2011, highlighting the scale of the current challenge. Under these circumstances, the Resistance faces mounting pressure to strengthen its security readiness and prepare calculated responses capable of preserving its deterrence and responding to threats against Iraq’s security.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤨1
⚔️ Spokesman for the Khatam al-Anbiya (PBUH) Central Headquarters:
🇺🇸 Following what it described as U.S. acts of aggression and Washington’s continued efforts to destabilize the region, the U.S. President announced that compensation would be provided for ships damaged during the imposed war against the Islamic Republic of Iran.
“illegal and unsafe route”
south of the Strait of Hormuz — using frozen Iranian assets.
The headquarters warned the U.S. President of the consequences of what it described as an unlawful measure.
🚢🌊 It further stated that all companies and countries supporting Trump’s proposal and using Iran’s frozen assets under this pretext should be aware that, from this moment onward, the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran 🇮🇷 will not allow any of their vessels to pass through the Strait of Hormuz.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥1
🏛️ The Trump-Netanyahu Diplomatic Track
U.S. Summit
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has arrived in the United States for a high-stakes meeting with Donald Trump. Netanyahu declared that countering Iran remains his top priority during the discussions.
Regional Pressure & F-35 Friction
Regional Settlement Calls: Hundreds of former Israeli security and diplomatic officials are actively pressuring Trump to push for a sustainable, comprehensive regional settlement.
F-35 Dispute: Trump publicly dismissed internal Israeli opposition regarding a potential U.S. F-35 fighter jet sale to Türkiye. Responding to Israeli concerns over regional air balance, Trump emphasized
U.S. autonomy in defense sales and praised Türkiye as a key ally.
The Observer will continue to provide updates as further details and developments emerge.
☑️ Our website
🖋 @observer_5
U.S. Summit
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has arrived in the United States for a high-stakes meeting with Donald Trump. Netanyahu declared that countering Iran remains his top priority during the discussions.
Regional Pressure & F-35 Friction
Regional Settlement Calls: Hundreds of former Israeli security and diplomatic officials are actively pressuring Trump to push for a sustainable, comprehensive regional settlement.
F-35 Dispute: Trump publicly dismissed internal Israeli opposition regarding a potential U.S. F-35 fighter jet sale to Türkiye. Responding to Israeli concerns over regional air balance, Trump emphasized
U.S. autonomy in defense sales and praised Türkiye as a key ally.
The Observer will continue to provide updates as further details and developments emerge.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🌚1
The Observer
🏛️ The Trump-Netanyahu Diplomatic Track U.S. Summit Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has arrived in the United States for a high-stakes meeting with Donald Trump. Netanyahu declared that countering Iran remains his top priority during the discussions.…
🔹 Discussions will also cover:
🇱🇧 The framework agreement on Lebanon
🇵🇸 The situation in Gaza
🕊️ Trump is reportedly pushing for a temporary diplomatic pause to create room for negotiations, while Netanyahu continues to favor sustained military pressure.
🇺🇸 Trump faces mounting political and economic challenges ahead of the November midterm elections.
Netanyahu is balancing shifting regional realities with increasing internal political demands.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤨1
The Observer
Channel 13:
The meeting between Trump and Netanyahu took place in an expanded format and without a private meeting between them as was customary !
☑️ Our website
🖋 @observer_5
The meeting between Trump and Netanyahu took place in an expanded format and without a private meeting between them as was customary !
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😐1
Today’s Israeli attacks across southern Lebanon included:
• Hadatha
• Al-Tayri
• Taybeh
• Kfar Tebnit
• Majdal Zoun
• Between Al-Mansouri and Majdal Zoun
• Markaba
• Between Markaba and Tallousa
• Outskirts of Aitaroun
• Ali Al-Taher Hill
• Outskirts of Shebaa
• Outskirts of Tallousa–Markaba
• Ali Al-Taher Hill
🔊 Stun Grenades:
• Al-Mansouri
🚨 Illumination Flares:
• Zawtar Al-Sharqiya
• Heavy bursts of gunfire directed toward the town of Majdal Zoun
• Beit Yahoun – Residential homes
• Al-Qantara – Homes and agricultural land
🌋 Fires Reported:
• Ali Al-Taher Hill following the dropping of explosive materials
• Markaba–Tallousa outskirts as a result of Israeli attacks
🚑 Humanitarian Update:
The Lebanese Red Cross, supported by a unit of the Lebanese Army, successfully recovered the body of Shadi Hussian Al-Darwish from the Al-Mansouri–Al-Bayyada road.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💔1
Pakistan is expected to earn up to $20 billion through its newly ratified defense agreement with Kuwait, originally signed in 2023.
🛡 Military training
🛰 Intelligence sharing
🚚 Logistics
⚙️ Defense technology cooperation
✈️ $3B for fighter aircraft
🛡 $2B for air defense systems
🔧 $700M for maintenance and repair facilities
🛢 Beyond defense, Kuwait has reportedly committed:
⛽ $2B for strategic oil reserves
🚛 $3B in diesel supply contracts
🔹 The agreement follows the Saudi–Pakistan Strategic Defense Pact signed in September 2025, under which an attack on either country is treated as an attack on both. That deal was also backed by major Saudi financial support, including deferred oil payments and billions in central bank deposits.
Are we witnessing the gradual emergence of a Sunni strategic axis centered around Saudi Arabia, Türkiye, Pakistan, and Kuwait—one built on integrated defense, energy security, and financial leverage? Or are these still separate bilateral arrangements rather than a coherent geopolitical bloc?
🧭 The answer could reshape the balance of power across the Middle East and South Asia.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👎1
Four Horsemen of the Ash Heap – One Less, Three to Go
Lindsey Graham’s funeral was a rogues’ gallery of blood-soaked egos. The Christian Zionist who spent his career sermonizing for Gaza’s obliteration, Lebanon’s flattening, and Iran’s incineration is finally worm-food. Good riddance.
Netanyahu clutched a psalm book while mentally redrawing maps.
His demon: apocalyptic land-grabbing – using Graham’s theological cover to ethnically cleanse with a clean conscience.
Trump delivered a eulogy full of "great warriors" and "beautiful bombs."
His demon: transactional sociopathy – he’d incinerate any capital city if the resort deal was right.
Zelensky stood there in combat chic, playing the plucky underdog – yet his drones hit Belgorod and Kursk daily, his missiles strike Crimean ports every sunrise.
His demon: hypocritical escalation – demanding Western pity while waging his own offensive war, indifferent to the corpses piling on both sides.
Four men. One scripture: total war, zero limits. Genocide isn't a crime to them – it's a shared PowerPoint slide. Graham's buried. The other three are still writing the body count. 💀
☑️ Our website
🖋 @observer_5
Lindsey Graham’s funeral was a rogues’ gallery of blood-soaked egos. The Christian Zionist who spent his career sermonizing for Gaza’s obliteration, Lebanon’s flattening, and Iran’s incineration is finally worm-food. Good riddance.
Netanyahu clutched a psalm book while mentally redrawing maps.
His demon: apocalyptic land-grabbing – using Graham’s theological cover to ethnically cleanse with a clean conscience.
Trump delivered a eulogy full of "great warriors" and "beautiful bombs."
His demon: transactional sociopathy – he’d incinerate any capital city if the resort deal was right.
Zelensky stood there in combat chic, playing the plucky underdog – yet his drones hit Belgorod and Kursk daily, his missiles strike Crimean ports every sunrise.
His demon: hypocritical escalation – demanding Western pity while waging his own offensive war, indifferent to the corpses piling on both sides.
Four men. One scripture: total war, zero limits. Genocide isn't a crime to them – it's a shared PowerPoint slide. Graham's buried. The other three are still writing the body count. 💀
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤡1