The Observer
65 subscribers
1.65K photos
233 videos
1.56K links
🔻 "In-depth geopolitical analyses from the heart of the Resistance Axis to global conflict zones."
Download Telegram
🔴Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters:


🔻 During the past two days and following the US President's announcement of the end of the war, the terrorist army of the Zionist entity violated the ceasefire in southern Lebanon 84 times, and continues its crimes and massacres against the oppressed Lebanese people.


🔻 It is warned that if the child-killing army of the Zionist entity does not stop its criminality in southern Lebanon, it should expect a harsh response from the powerful armed forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran.


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔴The New Damascus Balances: Street Governance, Deportation of "ISIS" Detainees, and Trump's Proxy-Alternative Gamble


🔘Eighteen months after the fall of the Ba'athist regime in December 2024, Syria's transitional administration, led by President Ahmed al-Sharaa (formerly known as Abu Mohammad al-Julani), is striving to transition from an armed faction into a sovereign central authority.

🔘This transition faces complex field tests centered on containing "ISIS" cells, reshaping the relationship with Kurdish forces, and dealing with international attempts to utilize Damascus against regional powers.

⚪️The "ISIS" Front and the Detainees File

👍Despite divergent ideological origins within the Islamist spectrum, the clash between al-Sharaa's government and "ISIS" is a zero-sum conflict.

👍The transitional Ministry of Interior, headed by Anas Khattab, continues its security and military operations to dismantle the group's cells in the Badia (desert) and central regions.
In a strategic development in early 2026, as government forces advanced eastward to take over detention centers and prisons in Raqqa and Deir ez-Zor, and to avoid mass escape scenarios that could destabilize the fragile stability, the US military intervened directly. In coordination with the authorities in Damascus, US forces executed a large-scale transfer of thousands of high-risk "ISIS" members and commanders from prisons in northeastern Syria to secured detention facilities inside Iraqi territory.

👍This measure removed an imminent security burden from al-Sharaa's government, while reflecting a level of operational pragmatism between Damascus and US Central Command.
Integrating the "SDF" and Ending Separated Identity
On the domestic front, following sharp military clashes in early January 2026 around Aleppo and its eastern countryside—which displaced approximately 148,000 civilians—the two sides moved toward a settlement forced by facts on the ground:

🔻On January 16, 2026: President Ahmed al-Sharaa issued a decree recognizing Kurds as an "essential component of the Syrian people" and adopting Kurdish as a national language.

🔻On January 30, 2026: Through indirect coordination sponsored by US envoy Tom Barrack, a comprehensive integration agreement was signed, ending the Autonomous Administration framework. The Ministry of Defense began integrating the brigades and units of the "Syrian Democratic Forces" (including the Kurdish Women's Protection Units - YPJ) as full regular blocs within the structures of the Hasakah and Aleppo military divisions of the Syrian Army.


⚪️The Hejaz Railway: Bypassing Closed Maritime Passages

Diplomatically and economically, Damascus seeks to establish its regional position through cross-border infrastructure projects. On June 10, 2026, Turkey and Saudi Arabia signed a memorandum of understanding to revive the historic "Hejaz Railway." The project aims to connect Saudi Arabia by land via Jordan and Syria (passing through Damascus and Aleppo) to Turkey, and from there to Europe. This logistical corridor, presented by Ankara and Riyadh as an alternative to maritime routes disrupted by the ongoing closure of the Strait of Hormuz and shipping tensions, grants Syrian geography a vital role as an economic link between the Gulf and Europe.

⚪️Trump's G7 Statements: An Attempt to Impose a "Proxy" Against the Resistance

Confirming this rising shift in Damascus's regional weight, US President Donald Trump’s statements at the G7 summit in France on June 16, 2026, clearly revealed the new American vision. Trump, expressing dissatisfaction with the pace of Israeli operations against Hezbollah in Lebanon, openly called for leaving this task to Damascus.

"Israel has been fighting Hezbollah for a very long time, and many people are being killed... I suggested to Israel that they let Syria take care of Hezbollah. Because to be honest with you, I think they would do a better job at it."


🎙 US President Donald Trump, G7 Summit (June 16, 2026)
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🌕This American reading reveals a clear desire to exploit the experienced military capabilities of al-Sharaa's forces to besiege and contain the "Axis of Resistance." This proposition aligns with Damascus's recent security steps; on May 5, the Syrian Ministry of Interior announced the dismantling of a network linked to Hezbollah in several governorates, noting that it was planning to target high-ranking government figures.


⚪️Analytical Perspective and Outcomes


🙌Ahmed al-Sharaa's leadership faces a genuine dilemma in managing contradictions. On one hand, it benefits from operational coordination with Washington to secure the east of the Euphrates and manage the file of extremist organization detainees, and relies on Turkish-Gulf logistical support to rebuild infrastructure through mega-projects like the Hejaz line. On the other hand, the US push to drag Damascus into a direct, open conflict with Hezbollah and the Axis components represents a real minefield.


🙌The attempt to turn the new Syria into a functional tool to strike the depth of the resistance could rupture its fragile internal stability, especially in light of a suffocating economic crisis where 90% of Syrians live below the poverty line, along with a severe funding deficit for UN humanitarian response plans.

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔴Daily Summary: Latest Developments in Lebanon

🗒(June 16, 2026)

🔘Field Updates: The Israeli enemy continues to violate the ceasefire in the south, targeting civilians near Kafr Tibnit and Mayfadoun with artillery fire, resulting in casualties. Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya Center reported 84 Israeli violations over the past two days, warning of a harsh military response if the attacks do not cease.

🔘 Israeli Media Reaction:

Dissatisfaction grows in Israel over the ceasefire ending without achieving military objectives. Reports indicate that Beirut has become a "no-go zone" for the Israeli army, and that PM Netanyahu and DM Katz ordered the latest strike on Dahiyeh despite military warnings of potential Iranian ballistic missile retaliation.

🔘Casualty Toll:

The Lebanese Ministry of Health updated the total toll of the Israeli aggression to 3,826 martyrs (including 247 children, 364 women, and 133 paramedics) and 11,851 wounded.

🔘Political Stances:

👍Hezbollah Sec-Gen Sheikh Naim Qassem:

Sent a letter to Iranian officials expressing gratitude for Tehran's unwavering support in forcing a cessation of military operations, stating that Iran gave everything to the resistance without demanding anything in return.

👍Speaker Nabih Berri:

Stated to Al-Joumhouria that Tel Aviv does not have freedom of movement under the understanding, demanding an immediate Israeli withdrawal and rejecting prolonged "trial phases." This was echoed in a call with Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, emphasizing the need to stop village demolitions and respect Lebanese sovereignty.

🔘Local Affairs:

🤲The Islamic Health Authority denied social media rumors regarding its rescue teams recovering a large number of bodies from southern towns.

🤲The Ministry of Education leaned toward canceling official exams, with the final decision deferred to the Cabinet.

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Observer
🔴The Unfinished Crime: Camp Speicher, Twelve Years Later 👌The Road to the River 🌕The heat on the asphalt road outside Tikrit on June 12, 2014, was already suffocating by early morning, but it was the silence that terrified Ali. 🌕Ali, a nineteen-year-old…
🔴Part 2 :

🤔Speicher: A stain of shame on the forehead of the Tikrit tribes

🤔Speicher: The massacre of the century and an unforgivable crime

✍️From the report of the investigative committee on the #Speicher_Massacre:


1️⃣ The total number of martyrs is approximately more than 2,500. Regarding the (1,700), they were new soldiers at the training center, while the air force cadets numbered (157).


2️⃣ It was not ISIS that captured the soldiers and transferred them to the presidential palaces. Instead, this was carried out exclusively by those termed the "Tribal Revolutionaries," specifically the (Tikrit tribes), because ISIS had not yet entered Tikrit on the day the soldiers were captured. These tribes promised the soldiers that they would transport them to their families, which is why no soldier put up any resistance. The tribes that deceived the soldiers are:

🌕The Al-Bu Nasir tribe, "Al-Bejat" clan (Saddam Hussein’s clan), led by one of Saddam’s cousins, the son of Muzahim Abdullah Al-Humoud.

🌕The Al-Bu Nasir tribe, "Al-Bu Khattab" clan (the clan of Sabawi, Barzan, and Watban), led by Ibrahim, the son of Sabawi.

🌕A faction of the Al-Bu Nasir tribe, "Al-Bu Khattab" clan (relatives of Abid Hamid), led by Fares, the nephew of Abid Hamid.

🌕A large faction of the Al-Bu Ajil tribe.

🌕 A faction of the Al-Jubour tribe in Tikrit.

🌕Scattered individuals from other tribes residing in Tikrit and Al-Awja.


3️⃣ The victim soldiers were deceived by these tribes, who claimed they would protect them and return them to their families. Consequently, the soldiers trusted them and offered no resistance until the tribes gained full control over them and transferred them to the presidential palaces on June 11, 2014, at 2:00 PM.


4️⃣ On the afternoon of June 11, 2014, most of the Tikriti tribes gathered at the "Presidential Palaces" complex, led by the clan of the deceased (Saddam Hussein), to deliberate on the fate of the "soldiers." The tribes held differing views regarding what to do with such a large number of soldiers, and the deliberations went as follows:


👌 A- Some tribes proposed using them as bargaining chips with the government to secure the release of their imprisoned sons and certain Ba'ath party figures.


🤲 B- Others proposed releasing them in exchange for money and ransom, arguing that executing them was useless.


🙌 C- Another group—which included the Al-Bu Ajil tribe and the Al-Bu Nasir tribe with its clans (Al-Bejat, Al-Bu Khattab, and Al-Bu Muslat)—held the decision-making power as they were the clan of Saddam, Abid Hamid, Barzan, Sabawi, and Watban. They stated verbatim: "These are the vengeance for Saddam Hussein and our people whom the Shias executed. We will accept nothing less than killing them all, and strictly inside Saddam's palaces." The consensus finally settled on approving the proposal of Saddam Hussein’s tribe (Al-Bu Nasir with all its clans: Bejat, Al Khattab, Al Muslat, and Al Ghafour).


5️⃣ The massacre and execution operations began on the night of June 11, 2014, after the tribes concluded their consultations and decided to execute them all. The executions took place in multiple batches without differentiation between (Sunni or Shia), and each tribe received a quota of soldiers.


6️⃣ ISIS elements arrived in Tikrit from Mosul on the morning of June 12, 2014, after finalizing their control over Mosul. The "Caliph" issued a pardon for the remaining "Sunni" soldiers, ordering their release on the condition of "repentance." Consequently, the process of separating Sunni soldiers from Shia soldiers began, and they were released via the "Sharia Court" established by ISIS.


7️⃣ The Shia soldiers were distributed among the tribes, passing individuals, and the "houses of Al-Awja" to be executed as a means to prove loyalty to the "Islamic State" (ISIS).


8️⃣ Some tribes were not present at the presidential palaces when the betrayed soldiers arrived or during the meeting.

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔴Who Is the Aggressor? Turning Obstacles into Threats

✍️ Joe Lauria
🗒June 17, 2026

🌕Establishment media and education systematically misportray geopolitical victims and resistance forces as "threats" to justify Western and Israeli imperial aggression. Throughout history—from Ancient Rome to Nazi Germany—empires have provoked adversaries to create pretexts for war, framing defensive obstacles to their expansion as existential dangers. Today, groups and nations like Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, Russia, and China are labeled as aggressors simply for defending their sovereignty against U.S. global hegemony and expansionist policies.

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔴 Yedioth Ahronoth (Hebrew Newspaper):

Iran emerges from this war stronger, at least in the eyes of the Arab states, particularly the Arabian Gulf countries. In their view, Iran succeeded in confronting the greatest military power in the world, the United States, and the greatest military power in the Middle East, "Israel."


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔴Netanyahu hints at PERMANENT OCCUPATION of southern Lebanon 🇱🇧

“We will remain in the various ‘security zones’ we have captured for as long as necessary in order to protect the state,”

🔘he said in a nationally televised statement.

🔘Reminder that Israel has illegally occupied parts of Syria for decades under a similar pretext.

🔘Iran has repeatedly stated that there can be no peace deal without Lebanon.

🔘Netanyahu now is trying to test that ultimatum to the limits.

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔴Israeli opposition vows to restart war with Iran if elected

“The countdown to regime change in Iran will begin once there is a change of government in Israel,” former Israeli PM and opposition leader Naftali Bennett declared.

👍Bennett and his political allies have repeatedly criticized Netanyahu for supposedly not being decisive enough in dealing with Iran, Hezbollah, and Hamas.

🔽The former Israeli PM has also argued that the Jewish state needs to adopt a more aggressive stance towards Turkey, whom he deemed has “the new Iran.”

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔴 A photo of a female demonstrator in Tehran, holding a banner on which a decisive stance of the martyr commander is written:

"Even if it were impossibly assumed that the government of the Islamic Republic would negotiate with the American regime, it would never negotiate with the current American government."


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔴An Iranian Government Plan to End the Nightly Gatherings of the "Mobilized Public" and Return to Normal Life


Leaks from a written plan drafted by the Iranian Vice President have revealed a governmental inclination and understanding of the need to end the continuous nightly gatherings and marches in the country. The plan's document stated:

"Following the conclusion of the first ten days of Muharram, or the solemn funeral of the martyr commander, preparing for a peaceful winding down of these gatherings, intelligently navigating through these special circumstances, and steering society toward a return to daily life is an absolute necessity to preserve the psychological health of society, safeguard political capital, and ensure the independence of the regime’s decision-making."


👍The government plan explained that the continuation of the post-crisis climate reflects negatively on development and the economy, and distracts the focus of executive bodies and public opinion away from construction and production.

👍The document also warned of security and strategic risks, including these emotional and enthusiastic gatherings turning into a tool that obstructs diplomacy and limits the regime's flexibility in making sensitive decisions, in addition to the emergence of subversive slogans targeting certain officials and leading to sharp internal polarization.

🔘The Context of Spontaneous Gatherings and Support for the New Leadership

🌕It is worth noting that these gatherings began spontaneously and organically in various areas of the capital, Tehran, as well as other Iranian cities and villages, immediately following the announcement of the martyrdom of the Leader of the Islamic Revolution. The primary demands of the crowds centered around "avenging the blood of the martyr commander" and offering "absolute support to the armed forces."
This popular movement received direct endorsement and encouragement from the new Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Sayyid Mojtaba Khamenei, who pointed out on several occasions the importance of this presence on the ground. Among the most prominent statements from his speeches on this matter:

🌕The government plan explained that the continuation of the post-crisis climate reflects negatively on development and the economy, and distracts the focus of executive bodies and public opinion away from construction and production.

🌕The document also warned of security and strategic risks, including these emotional and enthusiastic gatherings turning into a tool that obstructs diplomacy and limits the regime's flexibility in making sensitive decisions, in addition to the emergence of subversive slogans targeting certain officials and leading to sharp internal polarization.

🔘The Context of Spontaneous Gatherings and Support for the New Leadership

🌕It is worth noting that these gatherings began spontaneously and organically in various areas of the capital, Tehran, as well as other Iranian cities and villages, immediately following the announcement of the martyrdom of the Leader of the Islamic Revolution. The primary demands of the crowds centered around "avenging the blood of the martyr commander" and offering "absolute support to the armed forces."

🌕This popular movement received direct endorsement and encouragement from the new Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Sayyid Mojtaba Khamenei, who pointed out on several occasions the importance of this presence on the ground. Among the most prominent statements from his speeches on this matter:

"Undoubtedly, your chants in the squares influence the outcomes of negotiations; likewise, the staggering and growing numbers of millions in the 'Sacrifice for Iran' (Jan-fada) campaign are among the influential elements in this arena."


🗒April 8, 2026

🔽In another speech, he praised the continuation of this popular momentum, saying:
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Observer
🔴An Iranian Government Plan to End the Nightly Gatherings of the "Mobilized Public" and Return to Normal Life Leaks from a written plan drafted by the Iranian Vice President have revealed a governmental inclination and understanding of the need to end the…
"What steadfast power and steely resolve is this with which the Iranian people have risen and taken to the squares since the dawn of March 1st, remaining with full enthusiasm and lofty motives for more than three months to demand vengeance for the blood of their martyr commander and all the other martyrs, and to safeguard our Islamic regime and dear homeland? These millions-strong ranks of volunteers (feda'iyyeen) have formed the bedrock for achieving the aspirations of the martyr commander, establishing truth, and rising for the sake of God."

✍️ June 3, 2026

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔴 The Real Question: What Was the Point of the War Against Iran?

✍️In a highly critical analysis, economist and political commentator David Stockman argues that the U.S.-Israeli war against Iran achieved none of its stated objectives and ultimately exposed the weakness of the case that justified the conflict.

🤔Key Points:

🔹 The ceasefire prevented a regional catastrophe.
🌕The halt in fighting averted a wider war that could have engulfed the Persian Gulf’s energy infrastructure, disrupted global oil supplies, and triggered severe economic consequences worldwide.

🔹 Iran was not on the verge of building a nuclear weapon.
🌕Stockman notes that even U.S. intelligence assessments repeatedly stated that Iran had not resumed a nuclear weapons program and was not actively pursuing a bomb.

🔹 The regime-change project failed.
🌕Despite public calls from Washington encouraging Iranians to overthrow their government, no uprising materialized. The new understanding reportedly includes a commitment by Washington not to interfere in Iran’s internal affairs and to respect Iranian sovereignty.

🔹 The “Axis of Resistance” was not dismantled.
🌕One of the major arguments used by Israel and its allies before the war was the need to weaken Iran’s regional allies, including Hezbollah and the Houthis. Yet the reported agreement contains no provisions forcing Iran to abandon or disarm its regional partners.

🔹 Iran’s missile capabilities remain untouched.
🌕Israel had long demanded limits on Iran’s missile program. According to Stockman, the new framework is largely silent on the issue, meaning one of Israel’s key strategic demands was not achieved.

🔹 The war may end with reconstruction payments to Iran.
🌕A reported proposal would require Gulf states and U.S. allies to contribute more than $300 billion toward rebuilding damage caused by the conflict, creating the paradox of the side that launched the war effectively helping pay for reconstruction.

🔹 The JCPOA nuclear deal was working.
🌕The article dedicates significant space to reviewing the 2015 nuclear agreement, arguing that it imposed unprecedented restrictions and inspections on Iran’s nuclear program. International inspectors repeatedly confirmed Iranian compliance before the U.S. withdrawal in 2018.

🔹 Stockman’s conclusion:
🌕The author argues that the war was launched on false premises, failed to produce regime change, failed to eliminate Iran’s missile capabilities, failed to break the Axis of Resistance, and ultimately brought Washington back toward negotiations resembling the same nuclear agreement it abandoned years earlier.

✍️Strategic Assessment

👍From a geopolitical perspective, the article’s central argument is that military pressure did not achieve the strategic transformation sought by Israel and its allies. Instead, Iran preserved its state structure, maintained its regional alliances, retained its deterrence capabilities, and returned to negotiations from a position stronger than many expected.

👍The article portrays the conflict as another example of the limits of military force when confronting deeply rooted regional power structures and political movements.

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔴 Key Messages from Hezbollah Secretary-General Sheikh Naim Qassem’s Ashura Address

🔹 Sheikh Naim Qassem commemorated Ashura at the shrine of Martyr of the Nation Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, describing him as the inspiration, builder, and founder whose presence continues to guide the resistance.

🔹 He reaffirmed this year’s slogan, “Hussein Is Our Path,” emphasizing that Karbala remains a symbol of sacrifice, steadfastness, and resistance against oppression.

🔹 Qassem congratulated Iran, the resistance movements, and all peoples seeking independence and freedom on what he described as a historic victory over the Israeli-American project.

🔹 He argued that the primary objective of the war against Iran was regime change and the destruction of the Islamic Republic, stressing that this objective failed and that American and Israeli plans suffered a major setback.

🔹 On Lebanon, he warned that Israel seeks a weakened and submissive Lebanon that can be dominated politically, militarily, and socially, describing the confrontation as an existential struggle for Lebanon’s future.

🔹 He credited the resistance and its supporters with preventing the implementation of what he called the “Greater Israel” project and safeguarding Lebanon’s sovereignty and identity.

🔹 Highlighting Hezbollah’s military performance during the war, he stated that the resistance carried out 3,185 operations, targeted hundreds of Israeli military vehicles and aircraft, and inflicted significant losses on Israeli forces.

🔹 Qassem stressed that Hezbollah’s strength stems not only from military capabilities but from faith, determination, and a willingness to sacrifice, which he described as the foundation of resilience on the battlefield.

🔹 He declared that any negotiations with Israel must focus on ending aggression, securing Israeli withdrawal, restoring Lebanese sovereignty, returning detainees, and enabling displaced residents to return home.

🔹 He firmly rejected any proposal linked to disarming the resistance, stating that “any project under the title of disarmament will not pass.”

🔹 Domestically, he called for national dialogue, unity, and cooperation among Lebanese political forces while insisting that internal Lebanese issues must not be tied to negotiations with Israel.

🔹 Concluding his remarks, Qassem reaffirmed that the central objective remains the restoration of Lebanon’s full sovereignty and the eventual end of Israeli occupation and aggression.


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔴 [#1] Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding between the United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran

1️⃣ The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran and their allies in the current war by signing this MoU, declare the immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon, and undertake from now on not to initiate any war or any military operation against each other, and to refrain from the threat or use of force against each other, and ensuring the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Lebanon. Final deal will confirm the permanent termination of the war on all fronts, including in Lebanon, and other provisions of this paragraph. 

2️⃣ The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran undertake to respect each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity and to refrain from interfering in each other's internal affairs.

3️⃣ The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran commit to negotiating and achieving the final deal in maximum 60 days, extendable with mutual consent. 

4️⃣ Immediately upon the signing of this MoU, the United States of America will begin the removal of its naval blockade and any disturbances or impediments against the Islamic Republic of Iran, and will fully end the naval blockade within 30 days. During this period, the traffic of vessels will be in proportion to the numbers of pre-war traffic being restored by the Islamic Republic of Iran. The United States of America further undertakes to remove its forces from the proximity of the Islamic Republic of Iran within 30 days after the final deal. 

5️⃣ Upon the signing of this MoU, the Islamic Republic of Iran will make arrangements using its best efforts for the safe passage of commercial vessels with no charge for 60 days only from the Persian Gulf to the Sea of Oman and vice versa. The traffic of commercial vessels will immediately start, and considering the need for removing the technical and military obstacles and demining by the Islamic Republic of Iran, will be instated within 30 days. The Islamic Republic of Iran will conduct dialogue with the Sultanate of Oman to define the future administration and maritime services in the Strait of Hormuz in discussion with other Persian Gulf littoral states in line with the applicable international law and the sovereign rights of coastal states of the Strait of Hormuz. 

6️⃣ The United States of America undertakes with regional partners to develop a definitive, mutually agreed plan with at least $300 billion for the reconstruction and economic development of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The mechanism for the implementation of this plan will be finalized as part of a final deal within 60 days. All required licenses, waivers and permissions needed for the relevant financial transactions will be granted by the United States of America. 

7️⃣ The United States of America undertakes to terminate all types of sanctions against the Islamic Republic of Iran, including the United Nations Security Council resolutions, i.e. IAEA Board of Governors resolutions and all unilateral US sanctions, primary and secondary, in an agreed-upon schedule as part of the final deal. The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America acknowledge the critical importance of the sanctions-termination issue abovementioned, and expressed their intentions to immediately address these issues in the negotiations, in order to achieve mutual agreement on them. ⏭️

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔴 [#2] Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding between the United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran

8️⃣ The two parties also agreed to discuss the issue of enrichment and other mutually agreed matters related to the Islamic Republic of Iran's nuclear needs based on a satisfactory framework being agreed upon in the final deal. The final deal will confirm the provisions of this paragraph. The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran acknowledge the critical importance of the nuclear issues abovementioned and express their intention to immediately address these issues in the negotiations in order to achieve mutual agreement on them. 

9️⃣ Pending the final deal, the United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran agree to maintain the status quo. The Islamic Republic of Iran will maintain the current status quo of its nuclear program, and the United States of America will not impose any new sanctions and will not deploy additional forces in the region.

1️⃣ The United States of America undertakes that immediately upon the signing of this MoU until the termination of sanctions, the US Department of Treasury will issue waivers for the export of Iranian crude oil, petroleum products and derivatives, and all associated services, including banking transactions, insurances, transportation, etc.

1️⃣ The United States of America undertakes to make fully available for use the frozen or restricted funds and assets of the Islamic Republic of Iran upon the implementation of this MoU. The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran will mutually agree on the procedures related to the release of these funds during the negotiations. Such funds, either retained in the original account or transferred, shall be made fully usable for payment to any ultimate beneficiary designated by the Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The United States of America undertakes to issue all necessary licenses and authorizations accordingly.

1️⃣ The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran agree that an executive mechanism will be established to monitor the successful implementation of this MoU and the future compliance of the final deal. 

1️⃣ After signing this MoU and subject to the beginning of the implementation of Paragraphs 1, 4, 5, 10 and 11 of this MoU and the continuing implementation of these measures, the United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran will start negotiations regarding the final deal exclusively on the other paragraphs.

1️⃣ The final deal will be endorsed by a binding [UN Security Council] resolution. 

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM