The Observer
65 subscribers
1.66K photos
235 videos
1.56K links
πŸ”» "In-depth geopolitical analyses from the heart of the Resistance Axis to global conflict zones."
Download Telegram
πŸ”΄The Illusion of Understanding: Trump Barters with an Unsecured Memorandum


πŸ’¬On June 14, 2026, U.S. President Donald Trump announced the signing of a preliminary Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), mediated by Pakistan, to end the three-month-old war raging with Iran. In a succession of statements, Trump claimed the agreement guarantees Iran will not possess a nuclear weapon, threatening to open
"the gates of hell" if Tehran seeks to do so

πŸŒ•. He also described the war in Lebanon as "
secondary

πŸŒ•" and revealed his proposal to Israel that Syria take care of Hezbollah, while leveling sharp criticism at Benjamin Netanyahu by stating that the attack on Beirut does not appeal to him, reminding him: "
Without me, there would be no Israel."

πŸ”½From an analytical and critical geopolitical perspective, this memorandum is not a strategic settlement, but rather a fragile tactical truce in which Washington has squandered its leverage. Trump is driven by domestic pressures and the approaching U.S. midterm elections, seeking to lower oil prices and declare a swift diplomatic victory.

πŸ”˜However, the memorandum deferred the most complex filesβ€”chief among them the Iranian nuclear program and Tehran's stockpiling of more than 400 kilograms of highly enriched uranium close to military-grade purityβ€”to technical negotiations set to begin in Geneva on June 19, 2026.
From the perspective of the Axis of Resistance, this agreement is not read as a shift in American intentions, but rather as a forced retreat dictated by battlefield equations and the steadfastness of the fronts. This was translated by official state media in Tehran under the headline: "America Was Forced to End the War."

πŸ”˜Nevertheless, the memorandum opens the door to existential contradictions and difficult questions facing the regional public today:


πŸ”’ Can Trump be trusted?

πŸ‘ŒWe are talking about the exact same president who, with the stroke of a pen in 2018, overturned the internationally fortified 2015 nuclear deal (JCPOA). If formal international treaties did not bind Washington, what is the actual value of a temporary memorandum of understanding?


πŸ”’ The Sovereign and Historical Contradiction:

πŸ‘ŒHow can Tehran sign a memorandum of understanding with the very person who issued the assassination order of the martyr leader Qassem Soleimani in January 2020, the architect of the resistance's regional strategy? Furthermore, how does it align to conclude a treaty with an administration that provides intelligence, logistical support, and political cover for systematic Israeli assassinations targeting top military and political leadership in Iranβ€”most notably the assassination of the martyr Ayatollah Sayyed Ali Khamenei (Leader of the Iranian Republic)? Can political pragmatism coexist with an ongoing, direct campaign aimed at undermining the leadership structure of the Axis? How can political pragmatism align with blood that has not yet dried?


πŸ”’ The Commodification of the Lebanese Front:

πŸ‘ŒWhen Trump describes the war in Lebanon as "secondary" and attempts to bargain over the weapon of the resistance, he confirms the obvious: in the eyes of Washington, regional fronts are nothing more than bargaining chips in the grand game of nations.
With Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz explicitly declaring that Tel Aviv will not abide by the American framework and is continuing its occupation of southern
Lebanon, the most important question becomes: Does Trump actually possess the ability to bind anyone to this agreement, or is he selling an illusion to secure his electoral interests?

β˜‘οΈ Our website

πŸ”΅Link to the article in Arabic

πŸ–‹@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
πŸ”΄The Abraham Accords Framework Reborn: How the Trump-Iran MOU Betrays the Axis Infrastructure


πŸŒ•The preliminary Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) announced on June 14, 2026, between Donald Trump and Iran is not a standalone diplomatic breakthrough; it is the direct structural expansion of the Abraham Accords framework designed to neutralize the Axis of Resistance through transactional isolation.


βšͺ️The Structural Connection and Proofs

πŸ‘The core philosophy of the 2020 Abraham Accords was to build a regional security architecture that integrates Israel while bypassing the core political rights and resistance fronts of the region. The 2026 MOU applies this exact transactional model directly to Tehran.
The proofs lie within the operational details of the deal:

βšͺ️The Pakistan-Geneva Pipeline:

πŸ‘By utilizing Pakistani mediation to secure a tactical freeze on Iran's 400kg stockpile of near-weapons-grade uranium ahead of the June 19 Geneva talks, Trump is replicating the exact back-channel diplomacy used to secure the normalization deals with the UAE and Morocco.


βšͺ️The Containment Outsource:

πŸ‘Trump’s public statement that he suggested Syria "take care" of Hezbollah proves the underlying logic of the Abraham Accordsβ€”treating regional liberation movements as security liabilities to be traded away or managed by third parties to guarantee Israeli security.


βšͺ️The Maritime Trade-Off:

πŸ‘Lifting the U.S. naval blockade on the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for nuclear concessions mirrors the economic incentives used during the initial normalization waves, treating strategic maritime choke points as corporate bargaining chips rather than sovereign red lines.


βšͺ️Impact on the Resistance Fronts (Lebanon, Yemen, Iraq)

πŸŒ•By separating the nuclear file from the regional defense architecture, the MOU aims to strategically isolate the operational arenas of the Axis of Resistance:

πŸ€”Lebanon:

πŸŒ•Trump explicitly labeled the devastating war in Lebanon as "secondary." This rhetoric gives a green light to Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz to reject the U.S. framework openly, maintaining the occupation of southern Lebanon and intensifying strikes on Beirut without fear of broader regional escalation.

πŸ€”Yemen & Iraq:

πŸŒ•For the popular mobilization forces in Iraq and Ansarallah in Yemen, the MOU serves as an institutional attempt to cut the logistical and political lines linking Tehran to the shared operational fronts. It isolates these arenas, leaving them exposed to concentrated U.S.-Israeli kinetic strikes under the guise of "local counter-terrorism."


βšͺ️The Sovereign Contradiction and the Silence of Leadership

πŸŒ•For the regional street and the resistance cadres, this creates a profound, painful historical and systemic contradiction. Entering into an MOU with Donald Trumpβ€”the political architect who ripped up the 2015 JCPOA and ordered the assassination of General Qassem Soleimani and the iraqi leader Abu Mahdi Al Mohandis in 2020β€”presents an existential crisis for the credibility of revolutionary diplomacy.

πŸŒ•How can formal understandings be reached with an empire that systematically funds, tracks, and provides intelligence cover for the continuous decapitation strikes against top-tier military and political leadership across the region?


πŸŒ•Significantly, amidst this strategic friction, the current Leader of Iran, Sayyed Mojtaba Khamenei, has notably maintained absolute silence and has still not given any comment on the MOU. This silence from the highest echelon of the Islamic Republic speaks volumes. It highlights a deep institutional friction and a calculated refusal to endorse a transactional arrangement that undermines the very regional defense doctrine built over decades of sacrifice.

β˜‘οΈ Our website

πŸ”΅Link to the article in Arabic

πŸ–‹@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
πŸ”΄Message from His Eminence Hujjat al-Islam wal-Muslimeen, Secretary-General of Hezbollah, Sheikh Naim Qassem, to the Speaker of the Islamic Consultative Assembly, Dr. Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf

πŸ”ΉIn the Name of Allah, the Most Compassionate, the Most Merciful

πŸ™ŒHis Excellency the Speaker of the Islamic Consultative Assembly, Dr. Mohammad Reza Ghalibaf, may God support and protect you.

πŸ‘ŒPeace, mercy, and blessings of Allah be upon you.

πŸ”˜Words fail to adequately express our profound gratitude for your strong and supportive positions toward Lebanon, its people, and its resistance, and for your efforts to compel the Israeli entity to immediately and permanently cease military operations on all fronts, including Lebanon, in connection with ending the war against the Islamic Republic of Iran, as the primary and foundational condition of any agreement between Iran and the United States.

πŸ”˜You transformed the only effective ray of hope capable of restraining Israeli-American aggression against Lebanon into a tangible reality. In doing so, you demonstrated to the world that Iran stands as a champion of justice, resistance, and the oppressed. Had others followed its path, neither the United States nor Israel would have become so arrogant, nor would the Zionist occupation still be entrenched on the land of Palestine and Jerusalem.

πŸ”˜We have always said that Iran has given Hezbollah, the resistance, and the people of Lebanon everything, while taking nothing in return. It has supported us in our choices and strengthened us so that we could liberate our land, heal the wounds of our society, and assist our people. Today, Iran is offering its blood as well. It confronts the Zionist entity by striking it in response to its bombardment of Beirut’s southern suburb, bearing consequences that threaten to draw it into war and entail immense sacrifices.

πŸ”˜I say this openly and unequivocally: Iran is an icon of dignity and honor.

πŸ”˜I thank you on behalf of Hezbollah and its Islamic Resistance; on behalf of the people of Lebanon who have asked us to convey their gratitude to you; and on behalf of the martyrsβ€”foremost among them the Master of the Martyrs of the Nation, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah (may Allah be pleased with him)β€”as well as the wounded and the prisoners.

πŸ”˜I also thank you in your capacity as chief negotiator, together with your direct team, including Foreign Minister Dr. Abbas Araghchi. I ask that you convey our gratitude and appreciation to the Leader, Ayatollah Sayyed Mojtaba Khamenei (may his shadow endure), who has enveloped us with his care and revived among us the blessings and guidance of the martyred Imam Khamenei (may Allah sanctify his soul); to President Dr. Pezeshkian, who is devoted to the resistance; to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, this luminous force that altered the balance through its strength and determination; and to the army, the intellectual elite, and all official and popular institutions and organizations.

πŸ”˜I wish to make special mention of the great Iranian people. We saw them gathered in the squares of Iranian cities, and we heard their calls expressing their readiness to sacrifice their lives to save the resistance and its people.

πŸŒ•Thank you.

πŸŒ•Thank you to loyal Iran.

πŸŒ•Peace, mercy, and blessings of Allah be upon you.

πŸ”° Sheikh Naim Qassem

🌟 Secretary-General of Hezbollah

πŸ—’1 Muharram 1448 AH
πŸ‘Œ16 June 2026

β˜‘οΈ Our website

πŸ”΅Link to the article in Arabic

πŸ–‹@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
πŸ”΄Samarra Returns to Calm After Detention of Former Operations Commander; Saraya al-Salam Demonstrates That β€œState Monopoly on Arms” Was Only a Temporary Slogan

πŸŒ•The city of Samarra witnessed significant security tensions yesterday following a decision by the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) Commission to remove the current commander of Samarra Operations, Ali Abdullah Lafta al-Aqili, and appoint Sheikh Yusuf Mazban Nasif Raghif as his replacement.

πŸŒ•The decision was immediately rejected by the leadership of Saraya al-Salam, which viewed the move as an attempt to alter the security balance in favor of other armed factions. In response, Saraya al-Salam fighters blocked the entrances to the city, deployed armed personnel throughout the streets, and clashes erupted, including exchanges of gunfire with another armed faction.

πŸŒ•Saraya al-Salam later issued a statement affirming its determination to remain in Samarra to protect the holy shrines and rejecting any directives that would alter the existing security arrangement. The group insisted that responsibility for the security file should only be transferred to the Iraqi Army and Federal Police, away from political rivalries and factional competition.

πŸ‘The escalation came only days after Saraya al-Salam had begun symbolic procedures to separate itself from the Sadrist Movement, in apparent response to calls for restricting weapons exclusively to state institutions. However, the events quickly demonstrated the fragility of that commitment. It was not long before the group reasserted its military presence and imposed its will on the ground, suggesting that the slogan of β€œstate monopoly on arms” may have been little more than a temporary political position.

πŸ‘Direct intervention by Muqtada al-Sadr through Hassan al-Hamidawi, as well as intervention by PMF leadership through Yasser al-Issawi, brought the armed standoff to an end. The former commander, who is affiliated with the Sadrist Movement, was detained, while the newly appointed commander officially assumed his duties.

πŸ‘The situation gradually returned to stability, although Saraya al-Salam brigades will remain temporarily in place until their formal integration process is completed or the entire security file is transferred to the Ministries of Defense and Interior.

πŸ“ŒConclusion:

πŸ”½The same force that only days ago was publicly endorsing the transfer of authority to the state was among the first to take up arms when faced with a direct challenge. The episode underscores the extent to which the issue of limiting weapons to state control in Iraq remains dependent on power balances among armed actors rather than on official decisions or public declarations.

#Iraq #StateMonopolyOnArms #MuqtadaAlSadr #SarayaAlSalam #PopularMobilizationForces
#observer_5

β˜‘οΈ Our website

πŸ”΅Link to the article in Arabic

πŸ–‹@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
πŸ”΄Israeli military analyst Yossi Yehoshua:

πŸ”˜β€œThe sense of loss currently being experienced by the Israeli public is greater than the feeling that followed the Second Lebanon War in 2006.”

πŸ”˜Yehoshua explained that in 2006, the frustration stemmed from disappointment with the performance of the Israeli military, which entered the war unprepared and concluded the campaign poorly. As a result, then-Chief of Staff Dan Halutz and Prime Minister Ehud Olmert paid a heavy political and public price.

πŸ”˜β€œThis time, however, the frustration runs much deeper. The Air Force, Military Intelligence (Aman), and the army’s forces delivered what can only be described as an exceptional and highly effective performance that cannot be dismissed or minimized. Yet despite these operational achievements, the final outcome in terms of β€˜Israeli deterrence’ is considered far worse.”

According to Yehoshua, the paradox lies in the fact that strong military and intelligence performance has not translated into a corresponding strategic deterrence outcome, making the current sense of disappointment more profound than that experienced after the 2006 war.

β˜‘οΈ Our website

πŸ”΅Link to the article in Arabic

πŸ–‹@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
πŸ”΄ Summary of attacks from midnight until now:

πŸŒ•The enemy carried out a demolition operation in the town of Rachaf.

πŸŒ•An enemy drone dropped a sound bomb in the town of Haris.

πŸŒ•The enemy is carrying out a demolition operation in the town of Haddatha.

πŸŒ•The enemy is carrying out a demolition operation in the city of Khiam.

πŸŒ•A drone strike targeted Kfar Tibnit.


πŸ”˜Artillery shelling targeted the following towns:

πŸŒ•Nabatieh al-Faouqa
πŸŒ• Kfar Remen
πŸŒ•Ali al-Taher
πŸŒ•Mayfadoun
πŸŒ•Zoutar
πŸŒ• Kfar Tibnit

β˜‘οΈ Our website

πŸ”΅Link to the article in Arabic

πŸ–‹@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
πŸ”΄Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters:


πŸ”» During the past two days and following the US President's announcement of the end of the war, the terrorist army of the Zionist entity violated the ceasefire in southern Lebanon 84 times, and continues its crimes and massacres against the oppressed Lebanese people.


πŸ”» It is warned that if the child-killing army of the Zionist entity does not stop its criminality in southern Lebanon, it should expect a harsh response from the powerful armed forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran.


β˜‘οΈ Our website

πŸ”΅Link to the article in Arabic

πŸ–‹@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
πŸ”΄The New Damascus Balances: Street Governance, Deportation of "ISIS" Detainees, and Trump's Proxy-Alternative Gamble


πŸ”˜Eighteen months after the fall of the Ba'athist regime in December 2024, Syria's transitional administration, led by President Ahmed al-Sharaa (formerly known as Abu Mohammad al-Julani), is striving to transition from an armed faction into a sovereign central authority.

πŸ”˜This transition faces complex field tests centered on containing "ISIS" cells, reshaping the relationship with Kurdish forces, and dealing with international attempts to utilize Damascus against regional powers.

βšͺ️The "ISIS" Front and the Detainees File

πŸ‘Despite divergent ideological origins within the Islamist spectrum, the clash between al-Sharaa's government and "ISIS" is a zero-sum conflict.

πŸ‘The transitional Ministry of Interior, headed by Anas Khattab, continues its security and military operations to dismantle the group's cells in the Badia (desert) and central regions.
In a strategic development in early 2026, as government forces advanced eastward to take over detention centers and prisons in Raqqa and Deir ez-Zor, and to avoid mass escape scenarios that could destabilize the fragile stability, the US military intervened directly. In coordination with the authorities in Damascus, US forces executed a large-scale transfer of thousands of high-risk "ISIS" members and commanders from prisons in northeastern Syria to secured detention facilities inside Iraqi territory.

πŸ‘This measure removed an imminent security burden from al-Sharaa's government, while reflecting a level of operational pragmatism between Damascus and US Central Command.
Integrating the "SDF" and Ending Separated Identity
On the domestic front, following sharp military clashes in early January 2026 around Aleppo and its eastern countrysideβ€”which displaced approximately 148,000 civiliansβ€”the two sides moved toward a settlement forced by facts on the ground:

πŸ”»On January 16, 2026: President Ahmed al-Sharaa issued a decree recognizing Kurds as an "essential component of the Syrian people" and adopting Kurdish as a national language.

πŸ”»On January 30, 2026: Through indirect coordination sponsored by US envoy Tom Barrack, a comprehensive integration agreement was signed, ending the Autonomous Administration framework. The Ministry of Defense began integrating the brigades and units of the "Syrian Democratic Forces" (including the Kurdish Women's Protection Units - YPJ) as full regular blocs within the structures of the Hasakah and Aleppo military divisions of the Syrian Army.


βšͺ️The Hejaz Railway: Bypassing Closed Maritime Passages

✌Diplomatically and economically, Damascus seeks to establish its regional position through cross-border infrastructure projects. On June 10, 2026, Turkey and Saudi Arabia signed a memorandum of understanding to revive the historic "Hejaz Railway." The project aims to connect Saudi Arabia by land via Jordan and Syria (passing through Damascus and Aleppo) to Turkey, and from there to Europe. This logistical corridor, presented by Ankara and Riyadh as an alternative to maritime routes disrupted by the ongoing closure of the Strait of Hormuz and shipping tensions, grants Syrian geography a vital role as an economic link between the Gulf and Europe.

βšͺ️Trump's G7 Statements: An Attempt to Impose a "Proxy" Against the Resistance

✌Confirming this rising shift in Damascus's regional weight, US President Donald Trump’s statements at the G7 summit in France on June 16, 2026, clearly revealed the new American vision. Trump, expressing dissatisfaction with the pace of Israeli operations against Hezbollah in Lebanon, openly called for leaving this task to Damascus.

"Israel has been fighting Hezbollah for a very long time, and many people are being killed... I suggested to Israel that they let Syria take care of Hezbollah. Because to be honest with you, I think they would do a better job at it."


πŸŽ™ US President Donald Trump, G7 Summit (June 16, 2026)
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
πŸŒ•This American reading reveals a clear desire to exploit the experienced military capabilities of al-Sharaa's forces to besiege and contain the "Axis of Resistance." This proposition aligns with Damascus's recent security steps; on May 5, the Syrian Ministry of Interior announced the dismantling of a network linked to Hezbollah in several governorates, noting that it was planning to target high-ranking government figures.


βšͺ️Analytical Perspective and Outcomes


πŸ™ŒAhmed al-Sharaa's leadership faces a genuine dilemma in managing contradictions. On one hand, it benefits from operational coordination with Washington to secure the east of the Euphrates and manage the file of extremist organization detainees, and relies on Turkish-Gulf logistical support to rebuild infrastructure through mega-projects like the Hejaz line. On the other hand, the US push to drag Damascus into a direct, open conflict with Hezbollah and the Axis components represents a real minefield.


πŸ™ŒThe attempt to turn the new Syria into a functional tool to strike the depth of the resistance could rupture its fragile internal stability, especially in light of a suffocating economic crisis where 90% of Syrians live below the poverty line, along with a severe funding deficit for UN humanitarian response plans.

β˜‘οΈ Our website

πŸ”΅Link to the article in Arabic

πŸ–‹@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
πŸ”΄Daily Summary: Latest Developments in Lebanon

πŸ—’(June 16, 2026)

πŸ”˜Field Updates: The Israeli enemy continues to violate the ceasefire in the south, targeting civilians near Kafr Tibnit and Mayfadoun with artillery fire, resulting in casualties. Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya Center reported 84 Israeli violations over the past two days, warning of a harsh military response if the attacks do not cease.

πŸ”˜ Israeli Media Reaction:

Dissatisfaction grows in Israel over the ceasefire ending without achieving military objectives. Reports indicate that Beirut has become a "no-go zone" for the Israeli army, and that PM Netanyahu and DM Katz ordered the latest strike on Dahiyeh despite military warnings of potential Iranian ballistic missile retaliation.

πŸ”˜Casualty Toll:

The Lebanese Ministry of Health updated the total toll of the Israeli aggression to 3,826 martyrs (including 247 children, 364 women, and 133 paramedics) and 11,851 wounded.

πŸ”˜Political Stances:

πŸ‘Hezbollah Sec-Gen Sheikh Naim Qassem:

✌Sent a letter to Iranian officials expressing gratitude for Tehran's unwavering support in forcing a cessation of military operations, stating that Iran gave everything to the resistance without demanding anything in return.

πŸ‘Speaker Nabih Berri:

✌Stated to Al-Joumhouria that Tel Aviv does not have freedom of movement under the understanding, demanding an immediate Israeli withdrawal and rejecting prolonged "trial phases." This was echoed in a call with Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, emphasizing the need to stop village demolitions and respect Lebanese sovereignty.

πŸ”˜Local Affairs:

🀲The Islamic Health Authority denied social media rumors regarding its rescue teams recovering a large number of bodies from southern towns.

🀲The Ministry of Education leaned toward canceling official exams, with the final decision deferred to the Cabinet.

β˜‘οΈ Our website

πŸ”΅Link to the article in Arabic

πŸ–‹@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Observer
πŸ”΄The Unfinished Crime: Camp Speicher, Twelve Years Later πŸ‘ŒThe Road to the River πŸŒ•The heat on the asphalt road outside Tikrit on June 12, 2014, was already suffocating by early morning, but it was the silence that terrified Ali. πŸŒ•Ali, a nineteen-year-old…
πŸ”΄Part 2 :

πŸ€”Speicher: A stain of shame on the forehead of the Tikrit tribes

πŸ€”Speicher: The massacre of the century and an unforgivable crime

✍️From the report of the investigative committee on the #Speicher_Massacre:


1️⃣ The total number of martyrs is approximately more than 2,500. Regarding the (1,700), they were new soldiers at the training center, while the air force cadets numbered (157).


2️⃣ It was not ISIS that captured the soldiers and transferred them to the presidential palaces. Instead, this was carried out exclusively by those termed the "Tribal Revolutionaries," specifically the (Tikrit tribes), because ISIS had not yet entered Tikrit on the day the soldiers were captured. These tribes promised the soldiers that they would transport them to their families, which is why no soldier put up any resistance. The tribes that deceived the soldiers are:

πŸŒ•The Al-Bu Nasir tribe, "Al-Bejat" clan (Saddam Hussein’s clan), led by one of Saddam’s cousins, the son of Muzahim Abdullah Al-Humoud.

πŸŒ•The Al-Bu Nasir tribe, "Al-Bu Khattab" clan (the clan of Sabawi, Barzan, and Watban), led by Ibrahim, the son of Sabawi.

πŸŒ•A faction of the Al-Bu Nasir tribe, "Al-Bu Khattab" clan (relatives of Abid Hamid), led by Fares, the nephew of Abid Hamid.

πŸŒ•A large faction of the Al-Bu Ajil tribe.

πŸŒ• A faction of the Al-Jubour tribe in Tikrit.

πŸŒ•Scattered individuals from other tribes residing in Tikrit and Al-Awja.


3️⃣ The victim soldiers were deceived by these tribes, who claimed they would protect them and return them to their families. Consequently, the soldiers trusted them and offered no resistance until the tribes gained full control over them and transferred them to the presidential palaces on June 11, 2014, at 2:00 PM.


4️⃣ On the afternoon of June 11, 2014, most of the Tikriti tribes gathered at the "Presidential Palaces" complex, led by the clan of the deceased (Saddam Hussein), to deliberate on the fate of the "soldiers." The tribes held differing views regarding what to do with such a large number of soldiers, and the deliberations went as follows:


πŸ‘Œ A- Some tribes proposed using them as bargaining chips with the government to secure the release of their imprisoned sons and certain Ba'ath party figures.


🀲 B- Others proposed releasing them in exchange for money and ransom, arguing that executing them was useless.


πŸ™Œ C- Another groupβ€”which included the Al-Bu Ajil tribe and the Al-Bu Nasir tribe with its clans (Al-Bejat, Al-Bu Khattab, and Al-Bu Muslat)β€”held the decision-making power as they were the clan of Saddam, Abid Hamid, Barzan, Sabawi, and Watban. They stated verbatim: "These are the vengeance for Saddam Hussein and our people whom the Shias executed. We will accept nothing less than killing them all, and strictly inside Saddam's palaces." The consensus finally settled on approving the proposal of Saddam Hussein’s tribe (Al-Bu Nasir with all its clans: Bejat, Al Khattab, Al Muslat, and Al Ghafour).


5️⃣ The massacre and execution operations began on the night of June 11, 2014, after the tribes concluded their consultations and decided to execute them all. The executions took place in multiple batches without differentiation between (Sunni or Shia), and each tribe received a quota of soldiers.


6️⃣ ISIS elements arrived in Tikrit from Mosul on the morning of June 12, 2014, after finalizing their control over Mosul. The "Caliph" issued a pardon for the remaining "Sunni" soldiers, ordering their release on the condition of "repentance." Consequently, the process of separating Sunni soldiers from Shia soldiers began, and they were released via the "Sharia Court" established by ISIS.


7️⃣ The Shia soldiers were distributed among the tribes, passing individuals, and the "houses of Al-Awja" to be executed as a means to prove loyalty to the "Islamic State" (ISIS).


8️⃣ Some tribes were not present at the presidential palaces when the betrayed soldiers arrived or during the meeting.

β˜‘οΈ Our website

πŸ”΅Link to the article in Arabic

πŸ–‹@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
πŸ”΄Who Is the Aggressor? Turning Obstacles into Threats

✍️ Joe Lauria
πŸ—’June 17, 2026

πŸŒ•Establishment media and education systematically misportray geopolitical victims and resistance forces as "threats" to justify Western and Israeli imperial aggression. Throughout historyβ€”from Ancient Rome to Nazi Germanyβ€”empires have provoked adversaries to create pretexts for war, framing defensive obstacles to their expansion as existential dangers. Today, groups and nations like Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, Russia, and China are labeled as aggressors simply for defending their sovereignty against U.S. global hegemony and expansionist policies.

β˜‘οΈ Our website

πŸ”΅Link to the article in Arabic

πŸ–‹@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
πŸ”΄ Yedioth Ahronoth (Hebrew Newspaper):

Iran emerges from this war stronger, at least in the eyes of the Arab states, particularly the Arabian Gulf countries. In their view, Iran succeeded in confronting the greatest military power in the world, the United States, and the greatest military power in the Middle East, "Israel."


β˜‘οΈ Our website

πŸ”΅Link to the article in Arabic

πŸ–‹@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
πŸ”΄Netanyahu hints at PERMANENT OCCUPATION of southern Lebanon πŸ‡±πŸ‡§

β€œWe will remain in the various β€˜security zones’ we have captured for as long as necessary in order to protect the state,”

πŸ”˜he said in a nationally televised statement.

πŸ”˜Reminder that Israel has illegally occupied parts of Syria for decades under a similar pretext.

πŸ”˜Iran has repeatedly stated that there can be no peace deal without Lebanon.

πŸ”˜Netanyahu now is trying to test that ultimatum to the limits.

β˜‘οΈ Our website

πŸ”΅Link to the article in Arabic

πŸ–‹@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
πŸ”΄Israeli opposition vows to restart war with Iran if elected

β€œThe countdown to regime change in Iran will begin once there is a change of government in Israel,” former Israeli PM and opposition leader Naftali Bennett declared.

πŸ‘Bennett and his political allies have repeatedly criticized Netanyahu for supposedly not being decisive enough in dealing with Iran, Hezbollah, and Hamas.

πŸ”½The former Israeli PM has also argued that the Jewish state needs to adopt a more aggressive stance towards Turkey, whom he deemed has β€œthe new Iran.”

β˜‘οΈ Our website

πŸ”΅Link to the article in Arabic

πŸ–‹@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
πŸ”΄ A photo of a female demonstrator in Tehran, holding a banner on which a decisive stance of the martyr commander is written:

"Even if it were impossibly assumed that the government of the Islamic Republic would negotiate with the American regime, it would never negotiate with the current American government."


β˜‘οΈ Our website

πŸ”΅Link to the article in Arabic

πŸ–‹@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
πŸ”΄An Iranian Government Plan to End the Nightly Gatherings of the "Mobilized Public" and Return to Normal Life


Leaks from a written plan drafted by the Iranian Vice President have revealed a governmental inclination and understanding of the need to end the continuous nightly gatherings and marches in the country. The plan's document stated:

"Following the conclusion of the first ten days of Muharram, or the solemn funeral of the martyr commander, preparing for a peaceful winding down of these gatherings, intelligently navigating through these special circumstances, and steering society toward a return to daily life is an absolute necessity to preserve the psychological health of society, safeguard political capital, and ensure the independence of the regime’s decision-making."


πŸ‘The government plan explained that the continuation of the post-crisis climate reflects negatively on development and the economy, and distracts the focus of executive bodies and public opinion away from construction and production.

πŸ‘The document also warned of security and strategic risks, including these emotional and enthusiastic gatherings turning into a tool that obstructs diplomacy and limits the regime's flexibility in making sensitive decisions, in addition to the emergence of subversive slogans targeting certain officials and leading to sharp internal polarization.

πŸ”˜The Context of Spontaneous Gatherings and Support for the New Leadership

πŸŒ•It is worth noting that these gatherings began spontaneously and organically in various areas of the capital, Tehran, as well as other Iranian cities and villages, immediately following the announcement of the martyrdom of the Leader of the Islamic Revolution. The primary demands of the crowds centered around "avenging the blood of the martyr commander" and offering "absolute support to the armed forces."
This popular movement received direct endorsement and encouragement from the new Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Sayyid Mojtaba Khamenei, who pointed out on several occasions the importance of this presence on the ground. Among the most prominent statements from his speeches on this matter:

πŸŒ•The government plan explained that the continuation of the post-crisis climate reflects negatively on development and the economy, and distracts the focus of executive bodies and public opinion away from construction and production.

πŸŒ•The document also warned of security and strategic risks, including these emotional and enthusiastic gatherings turning into a tool that obstructs diplomacy and limits the regime's flexibility in making sensitive decisions, in addition to the emergence of subversive slogans targeting certain officials and leading to sharp internal polarization.

πŸ”˜The Context of Spontaneous Gatherings and Support for the New Leadership

πŸŒ•It is worth noting that these gatherings began spontaneously and organically in various areas of the capital, Tehran, as well as other Iranian cities and villages, immediately following the announcement of the martyrdom of the Leader of the Islamic Revolution. The primary demands of the crowds centered around "avenging the blood of the martyr commander" and offering "absolute support to the armed forces."

πŸŒ•This popular movement received direct endorsement and encouragement from the new Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Sayyid Mojtaba Khamenei, who pointed out on several occasions the importance of this presence on the ground. Among the most prominent statements from his speeches on this matter:

"Undoubtedly, your chants in the squares influence the outcomes of negotiations; likewise, the staggering and growing numbers of millions in the 'Sacrifice for Iran' (Jan-fada) campaign are among the influential elements in this arena."


πŸ—’April 8, 2026

πŸ”½In another speech, he praised the continuation of this popular momentum, saying:
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM