The Observer
@observer_5
66 subscribers
1.66K photos
241 videos
1.56K links
🔻 "In-depth geopolitical analyses from the heart of the Resistance Axis to global conflict zones."
Download Telegram
About
Blog
Apps
Platform
Join
The Observer
66 subscribers
The Observer
🔴 Summary of Israeli Attacks on Lebanese Territories - Date: 11/06/2026:


⚠️ Airstrikes Conducted by Hostile Warplanes:

⚪️ South Lebanon:

🌕Outskirts of Aarrayhane, Khirbet Selem, Jebchit, Deir Kifa, Zibqine, El Mansouri, El Qatrange, Choukine, Kfar Jaouz, Tyre (Sour), Habouch, Teir Debba, Kfar Tebnit, El Abbassiyeh, Toura, Deir Qanoun El Nahr, El Souaneh, Majdal Zoun, Yater, Chaqra, Nabatieh, Nabatieh El Faouqa, Qalaouiyeh.

⚪️ Bekaa:

🌕Sohmor, Jroud Nahle.


🛫 Airstrikes Conducted by Hostile Drones:

🌕Nabatieh, Habouch, El Chehabiyeh, Machghara, Kfar Sir, Jouaiya, Aarrayhane, Ain El Mizrab, El Haouch, Sohmor.

🔥 Hostile Artillery Shelling:

🌕Nabatieh City, Nabatieh El Faouqa, Kfar Roumâne, Kfar Chouba, Wadi Zibqine, Sohmor, Srifa, Ali El Taher, Jebchit, El Mansouri, El Haniyeh, Braachit, Safad El Battikh, Khirbet Selem, Touline, Borj Qalaouiyeh.

✍️Military Analysis

👌The geographic spread and intensity of these strikes on June 11, 2026, reveal a distinct tactical pattern. This is not routine border friction; it is a coordinated, multi-tier interdiction and pressure campaign.


🤔Deep and Mid-Tier Targeting (The Hubs):

✌Striking urban and semi-urban centers like Nabatieh (city, El Faouqa, and Kfar Roumâne) alongside Tyre (Sour) and Choukine represents an attempt to disrupt the logistics, command infrastructure, and civilian support base of the resistance. Nabatieh functions as a critical administrative and logistical node for the southern front.


⚪️Squeezing the Operational Spine:

🫶The heavy focus on the Nabatieh ridge, Habouch, Kfar Tibnit, and Kfar Sir is designed to sever the lines connecting the deep Bekaa/Nabatieh supply lines to the immediate frontline sectors.


⚪️The Second Line Frontage (Mid-South):

🫶Hits on Khirbet Selem, Deir Kifa, Jouaiya, and Chaqra target the secondary defensive echelons. These areas house tactical headquarters and immediate reserve forces that reinforce the forward edge.


⚪️The Litani/Coastal Flank:

🫶Targeting Mansouri, Majdal Zoun, and Zibqine blocks the western coastal axis, aiming to isolate the coastal rocket launch sectors.


⚪️Strategic Depth (The Bekaa Link):

🫶Strikes on Sohmor and Machghara in the Western Bekaa, alongside the Jroud Nahle near Baalbek, show an ongoing effort to cut off the strategic interior pipelines feeding materials from the northern/eastern borders down to the southern operations room.
The Geopolitical Link: US-Iran Negotiations
From a strategic perspective, this escalation is directly linked to the current negotiation tracks between Tehran and Washington.


⚪️Firepower as Diplomatic Leverage:

🫶Israel is using maximum destructive leverage to alter the terms on the table. The objective is to pressure Iran by showing that its primary regional deterrent—Hizbollah's northern front—can be subjected to systematic attrition unless Tehran concedes to specific regional border arrangements or security guarantees.


⚪️Separation of Fronts:

🫶The US and Israel are attempting to force a decoupling between the Lebanese front and the broader regional negotiations. By hitting deep and widening the target bank, they are testing the threshold of Iran’s strategic patience, gambling that Tehran will pressure the resistance in Lebanon to scale back to salvage the broader diplomatic or sanctions-relief packages being negotiated with Washington.


⚪️The Resistance Response:

🫶The tactical reality on the ground dictates that the resistance will not accept a formula where diplomacy is conducted under fire without a counter-response. Every strike inside Lebanese depth expands the resistance’s target matrix inside occupied Palestine. The field directly dictates the negotiation terms; stability will not be bought with unilateral concessions, and the resilience of the southern front remains Iran's strongest card on the diplomatic table in Washington.


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
6 views
The Observer
🔴 Hebrew Newspaper Israel Hayom - Yoav Limor:


🌟 Hezbollah fired in a calculated and deliberate manner at the beginning of the battle, and in "Israel" they rushed to exploit the event to attack it, as they had hoped to do for months with the aim of weakening it and disrupting its rehabilitation.


🔘It was supposed to be a perfect strategic trap:


👍Hezbollah makes a small mistake, and pays a heavy price. But in reality, it turned into a strategic trap for "Israel." Instead of being granted the freedom of action to crush Hezbollah, it found itself besieged and restricted in southern Lebanon. And instead of Hezbollah feeling afraid, it found itself free to act, including inside "Israeli territory."

🔘This commentary highlights several key points regarding the strategic reality of the conflict:

⚪️Calculated Escalation:

🌕Limor suggests Hezbollah's initial fire was deliberate and intended to test Israel's responses rather than being a careless error.

⚪️The "Trap" Reversal:

🌕While Israel hoped to seize the opportunity to severely degrade Hezbollah, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) found themselves restricted and facing prolonged constraints in southern Lebanon.

⚪️Operational Freedom:

🌕Instead of being deterred, Hezbollah retained the capacity to launch drones and rockets, complicating Israel's security efforts and preventing a decisive victory.

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
9 viewsedited  
The Observer
🔴The Unfinished Crime: Camp Speicher, Twelve Years Later

👌The Road to the River

🌕The heat on the asphalt road outside Tikrit on June 12, 2014, was already suffocating by early morning, but it was the silence that terrified Ali.

🌕Ali, a nineteen-year-old military cadet from the city of Diwaniyah, had arrived at Camp Speicher only a few weeks earlier. He was part of a class numbering in the thousands—young men, most of them from Iraq’s predominantly Shiite south, who had answered the call to military service in search of a stable salary and out of a sense of national duty.

👌By dawn, their commanders had vanished.

🔽Senior officers removed their military uniforms, changed into civilian clothes, and left through the base’s secured rear gates. Orders filtered down through the ranks like a death sentence:

Leave your weapons. Remove your uniforms. Exit through the main gate. Return home.


✌Thousands of young men poured onto the highway connecting Tikrit to Baghdad, wearing sandals and civilian clothes, completely unarmed. They believed local tribal leaders had guaranteed them safe passage.

✌Instead, they walked directly into an ambush.

💬Years later, Ali recalled the moment with a trembling voice:

“We saw the vehicles coming—white pickup trucks carrying black flags. They told us they had come to protect us and transport us to Baghdad. But the moment we climbed into the trucks, they began beating us with cables. They tied our hands behind our backs. At that moment, we knew we had been sold.”


⚪️Anatomy of a Collapse

👍The Camp Speicher disaster was not an isolated incident. It was the inevitable consequence of a structural collapse within the Iraqi state and military institution.

👍After the fall of Mosul on June 10, 2014, the Islamic State (ISIS) advanced rapidly along the Tigris River Valley.

👍The swift disintegration of security forces in Nineveh and Salah al-Din provinces exposed deep institutional fractures:

⚪️The “Ghost Soldiers” Phenomenon

✌Rampant corruption created military units that existed only on paper. Commanders collected salaries for soldiers who did not actually exist.

⚪️Loyalty-Based Purges

🫶Professional and competent officers were replaced by individuals selected according to political and sectarian loyalties rather than tactical competence.

⚪️Command Breakdown

👌The military leadership failed to establish a coherent defensive plan around Camp Speicher despite possessing geographical and military advantages that could have allowed the base to withstand siege for weeks.

👌Twelve years later, one fundamental question remains unanswered:

⚪️Who issued the evacuation order?

🫶Investigations and testimony presented before the Iraqi Parliament indicate that the cadets were explicitly told that the road to Baghdad was secure and that they should leave the base.

🫶Disarming thousands of recruits and ordering them into an active combat zone controlled by hostile forces transformed a fortified defensive position into a human slaughterhouse.

🌕This was not merely military negligence.

🌕It was a criminal abandonment of command responsibility.


⚪️Reconstructing the Events: June 12–14, 2014

✌Over a period of approximately forty-eight hours, ISIS militants, aided by local collaborators and tribal elements that joined the organization, systematically executed approximately 2,000 military cadets and recruits.

✌The massacre became one of the most extensively documented atrocities of the digital age because the perpetrators themselves recorded the killings in meticulous detail for propaganda and intimidation purposes.

✌Many of these videos were later circulated online, including during Eid al-Adha, coinciding symbolically with the anniversary period surrounding the execution of former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein.

⚪️The mass killings occurred primarily at:

🤔The Presidential Palaces Complex in Tikrit
🤔Houses belonging to participating tribal members
🤔The banks of the Tigris River
🤔Newly dug trenches inside Camp Speicher itself
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
9 viewsedited  
The Observer
The Observer
🔴The Unfinished Crime: Camp Speicher, Twelve Years Later 👌The Road to the River 🌕The heat on the asphalt road outside Tikrit on June 12, 2014, was already suffocating by early morning, but it was the silence that terrified Ali. 🌕Ali, a nineteen-year-old…
👌The perpetrators—consisting of ISIS fighters, tribal participants, and individuals linked to former Ba’athist networks—followed a systematic sorting procedure.

👌Victims were ordered to line up and surrender identification cards.

👌Shiite cadets were deliberately separated from Sunni cadets.

✌After segregation, victims were bound, transported to execution sites, and forced to lie face-down in shallow trenches where they were shot from behind.

✌Others were taken to the edge of the Presidential Palaces overlooking the Tigris River, executed at close range, and thrown directly into the water.

✌Forensic specialists who later participated in exhumation efforts described horrifying scenes inside the mass graves.

🗂One forensic anthropologist involved in the recovery operations stated:

“The soil was saturated with layers of clothing, identity cards, and bone fragments. Many victims still had plastic restraints around their wrists. The scale of the operation indicates a high level of logistical coordination.”



⚪️The Sectarian Dimension and Legal Classification

✌The Speicher massacre was not simply a military operation designed to eliminate opponents.

✌It was a sectarian exterminatory campaign.

✌ISIS sought to construct a terror narrative rooted in religious identity through the systematic targeting of Shiite cadets.

✌In the years that followed, international investigative bodies collected evidence indicating that the massacre meets the legal criteria for multiple categories of international crimes:

🔢 War Crimes

👌The execution of unarmed and surrendered individuals constituted a grave violation of Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions.

🔢 Crimes Against Humanity

👌The killings were carried out as part of a widespread and systematic attack directed against civilians and defenseless recruits.

🔢 Potential Genocidal Elements

👌The deliberate identification, segregation, and targeting of victims based on religious affiliation demonstrated an intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a specific religious group.


⚪️The Mirage of Accountability

🌕Although Iraqi courts sentenced and executed dozens of captured ISIS members following the liberation of Tikrit, many victims’ families regard these proceedings as incomplete justice.

✌Major structural gaps remain:

🔘Absence of Senior Accountability

👍No senior military commander or government official has been criminally convicted for the negligence, failures, or orders that led to the evacuation of the base.

🔘Judicial Shortcomings

👍International human rights organizations have noted that many convictions relied heavily on confessions obtained during expedited trials that often fell short of internationally recognized due-process standards.

🔘The Amnesty Question

👍In practice, numerous individuals once accused in connection with the events were later released under broader amnesty measures, further deepening the families’ sense of injustice.

🔘Compensation Crisis

🌕Despite repeated government promises of pensions, land grants, and employment opportunities for victims’ relatives, bureaucracy and corruption have left thousands of families without the support guaranteed by law.

🌕Umm Mohammed, the mother of a victim from Nasiriyah who waited seven years for DNA confirmation of her son’s remains, summarized the anguish of many families:

🌕“They executed the men who pulled the trigger. But what about the ones who handed my son over to them? What about the generals who ran away?”


🔘The Geopolitical Aftermath: The Popular Mobilization Forces and the Transformation of Iraq

🇮🇶 The Speicher massacre altered the course of modern Iraqi history.

🗂On June 13, 2014—just one day after the massacre began—Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani issued the famous fatwa of al-Jihad al-Kifa’i (Collective Defense).
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
6 viewsedited  
The Observer
The Observer
👌The perpetrators—consisting of ISIS fighters, tribal participants, and individuals linked to former Ba’athist networks—followed a systematic sorting procedure. 👌Victims were ordered to line up and surrender identification cards. 👌Shiite cadets were deliberately…
✌The ruling laid the foundation for the formation of the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), as tens of thousands of volunteers mobilized to stop ISIS’s advance toward Baghdad.

✌While this mobilization proved decisive in defeating ISIS militarily, it also reshaped Iraq’s geopolitical landscape.

🔘Multiple Security Structures

👌The war produced parallel security institutions that added new complexities to questions of state sovereignty and governance.

🔘Regional Realignment

👌The conflict deepened Iraq’s integration into regional security networks and intensified existing geopolitical rivalries across the Middle East.

🔘Politicization of Memory

👌Twelve years later, Speicher remains a powerful political symbol employed by competing actors, while the actual needs of victims’ families often remain marginalized.


🔘The Endless Question

🌕What does justice mean when thousands lie in mass graves while those who made the decisive decisions remain beyond accountability?

🌕What does accountability mean when grieving mothers still carry faded photographs instead of receiving clear institutional answers?

🌕Can a nation truly heal while the wounds of Speicher continue to be exploited politically and neglected legally?

🤔The tragedy of Camp Speicher is not unique in its suffering. Rather, it represents part of a broader regional pattern of impunity that has characterized many modern Middle Eastern conflicts.

🤔The institutional failures that allowed approximately 1,700 young men to be massacred near Tikrit are the same failures that continue to shield powerful actors from accountability elsewhere.

🤔The mothers of Speicher are still waiting.

🤔Their grief has outlived governments, military campaigns, and political promises.

🤔Across the Middle East, other mothers now join them in the same endless vigil—holding photographs, demanding truth, and asking a question that still echoes unanswered:

If the dead cannot return, who will finally be held responsible for their deaths?

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
8 viewsedited  
The Observer
🔴Pragmatism Over Entanglement: Decoding Al-Sharaa’s Strategic Distance from the Lebanese Theater

🔘Analysis & Geopolitical Critique:

🎙The recent declarations by Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa before a delegation from the Damascus countryside represent a calculated exercise in strategic restraint and pragmatic state-building. By explicitly dismissing rumors of a Syrian military entry into Lebanon as "nothing but speculation," Damascus is sending a clear, multi-layered message to both Western capitals and regional actors. 

🗂This comes at a highly sensitive diplomatic juncture. Following the March 2, 2026 escalation between Israel and Hezbollah, and the fragile April 17 ceasefire, Washington has consistently pressured the new Syrian administration to play an active security role in eastern Lebanon to curb supply lines. U.S. President Donald Trump’s recent assertions that Damascus might assist in "regional security efforts" were a direct attempt to draw Syria into a policing role targeting Lebanese factions. Al-Sharaa’s firm stance draws a definitive line:
Syria supports the concept of state sovereignty and the monopoly of arms by the Lebanese Army (LAF), but it will absolutely not act as a military proxy for Western-engineered regional security frameworks. 


👌Damascus understands that any cross-border military movement would instantly revive the historical ghosts of the pre-2005 security era, disrupting its current drive for international legitimacy, reconstruction funds, and sanctions relief. 

✌Furthermore, by deprioritizing the highly politicized file of border demarcation, Al-Sharaa is shifting the focus back to the primary structural burden pulling at both nations: the humanitarian crisis. According to UN and Lebanese institutional data, Lebanon still hosts roughly 1.4 million displaced Syrians (with approximately 716,000 officially registered by UNHCR). Although the recent conflict triggered the cross-border movement of over 418,000 individuals back into Syria between March and June 2026, the sustainable, organized mechanism for repatriation remains the true structural priority for Damascus. For the new Syrian leadership, internal stability, economic recovery, and the logistical challenges of domestic reintegration supersede any premature diplomatic arrangements or foreign military adventures. 

🔰The Axis of Resistance Perspective:

🔻From the perspective of the Axis of Resistance, Al-Sharaa’s statements must be read as a refusal to take the bait of a Western-orchestrated regional trap. The continuous American and Israeli pressure on the new Syrian government—aimed at utilizing Damascus to choke or police Lebanese resistance components—is fundamentally neutralized by this stance.

🤔By declaring that Syria’s objective is strictly to "stop the war in Lebanon, not expand or engage in it," Damascus rejects the role of an enforcement agent against regional resistance forces. While the political landscape in Syria has undergone profound shifts since late 2025, the strategic geography remains unchanged. Damascus recognizes that a fragmented, destabilized Lebanon under direct Western or Israeli dictation poses a direct national security threat to Syria’s western flank. Refusing to embroil the under-reconstruction Syrian army in a localized conflict preserves what remains of regional equilibrium and thwarts the dynamic of "divide and rule" that Washington seeks to enforce through economic carrots and sanctions-relief promises


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
9 viewsedited  
The Observer
🔴Prominent Republican Senator Lindsey Graham in a tweet:

▪️"I’m very glad to hear from @POTUS that Iranian media reports about the so-called deal are fake because a bad deal would be a disaster for American national security.

▪️Any deal that allows Iran to continue its enrichment program or provides billions of dollars in sanctions relief without permanent, verifiable dismantling of their nuclear ambitions is a dangerous mistake. We cannot afford to give the regime in Tehran a financial lifeline while they continue to threaten our allies, particularly Israel, and fund terrorism across the region.

▪️Congress must have a say in any final agreement, and we will hold this administration accountable to ensure American interests are protected."

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
10 viewsedited  
The Observer
⭕"Vice Chairman of the National Security Committee in Parliament:


After reviewing the text of the agreement, I must declare that compared to the two previous versions, this agreement is more catastrophic (a greater loss) and the scale of Iran's concessions in it is larger."

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
12 viewsedited  
The Observer
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔘 Anchor: Do you believe that our circumstances in this round of negotiations differ from the two previous phases that led to war or ended in war?

🎙 Araqchi: It is good that you asked this question, I must clarify this matter; look, in the past two wars, it was not the negotiations that led to war... rather, it was the resistance that ended in war!

⚠️ This is the logic of the exact same person whose previous negotiations brought nothing but an absolute disaster that led to war.

📌 It has come to the point where these failed individuals sit in front of the cameras, and instead of taking responsibility, revealing the facts, and clearing the ambiguity surrounding what is happening today behind the scenes of the negotiations, they impudently evade failure and blame the 'resistance'—which was the approach and ideology of the Leader—holding it responsible for the outbreak of war!

#Iran #America #Negotiations #Araqchi

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
8 viewsedited  
The Observer
🔴 JD Vance, Vice President of the United States, in a tweet:

🔹 I see a lot of fake (false) information circulating around a potential agreement to reopen the Strait and end the Iranian nuclear weapons program.

🔹 First, the Iranians will not receive any cash, and no funds will be released simply for signing an agreement or attending a meeting. The structure of this agreement is designed to ensure that the concerns of the United States and its allies are prioritized. If the Islamic Republic of Iran fulfills its obligations, only then will economic benefits flow to them and to the entire region.

🔹 This agreement has the potential to reshape the region and lead it toward a lasting peace.

🔹 I have noticed some strange things in the news reports over the past few hours; first, that the people who said (and rightly so) a month ago that Donald Trump was a historic president are now criticizing an agreement based on unconfirmed media reports.

🔹 Second, that the people who say not a single word coming from the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) can be trusted now seem to believe social media posts quoting anonymous sources.

🔹 The President will secure a good result for us, one way or another.

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
8 viewsedited  
The Observer
🔴Gaby Issa, former Lebanese Ambassador to America:


🔽The Lebanese Forces:


✌ Refused the removal of sanctions on Lebanon

✌Exerted pressure to prevent the arming of the Lebanese Army

✌Obstructed the gas extraction/import process

✌ Refused the return of Syrian displaced persons to Syria.


🤔For the widest circulation
🌕So that all Lebanese people know the truth and some do not remain misled by the Forces and their allies.

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
8 viewsedited  
The Observer
🔴How Trump failed every single goal in the Iran war

🔽At the beginning of US-Israel strikes on Iran, Donald Trump claimed victory was achieved “in the first hour”. Yet three and a half months later, both sides continue to exchange blows amid low-trust talk of negotiations.

👍The Trump administration has steadily changed its narrative to hide failures and unfulfilled objectives, The Intercept reports.

⚪️Bringing peace to the Middle East and beyond – Failed

🤔 Instead of peace, the strikes triggered a wider conflict by drawing in over a dozen nations, including Bahrain, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE

🤔 An estimated 149,000 civilian buildings damaged; 400,000 people affected by housing damage

⚪️Wiping out Iran's missiles and navy – Failed

🌕 Leaked US intelligence found Iran has restored 30 of 33 missile sites along the Strait of Hormuz and retained 70% of its prewar missile stockpile and mobile launchers

🌕 CENTCOM continues to report activity by the IRGC Navy. Marco Rubio himself referenced Iranian "Boston Whalers with machine guns" – clear proof the navy is still operational

⚪️Destroying Iran's nuclear program – Failed

👍 Iran still possesses its stockpile of enriched uranium

👍 Rubio admitted Iran's "nuclear program" is still active and even hinted that Iran might be allowed to continue enrichment under certain restrictions

⚪️Forcing unconditional surrender – Failed

🔘 Trump's initial demand for total capitulation has softened into vague talk of "delineated negotiations" aimed at "an outcome acceptable to us, and something they would be able to do as well"

⚪️Reopening the Strait of Hormuz – Failed

🌕 Before the war, over 120 ships crossed daily. Now only a fraction pass through (Trump boasted of 200 ships per month, compared to a normal 3,000)

🌕 Oil prices have climbed to around $95 a barrel, and US inflation has accelerated, fueled by a 3.9% jump in energy costs

⚪️Reaching a peace deal – Failed (so far)

👍 Trump has repeatedly announced that a deal was "two weeks away," that Iran was "begging," had "agreed to everything," and that they were "very close"

👍 Yet no final agreement has been signed. Both sides continue to trade strikes and threats despite back‑channel talks

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
7 views
The Observer
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔴Israeli Violations and Aggression Against Lebanon (June 13, 2026)


👍From 12:00 AM until the morning hours of today, June 13, 2026, the Israeli enemy continued its intense escalation across Lebanon, focusing heavy fire on the south and the Western Beqaa.


⚪️Airstrikes:

👍Intense aerial bombardments targeted the southern towns of Kafartibnin, Kfar Jouz, Majdal Zoun, Al-Mansouri, Abba, Deir Qanoun Al-Nahr, and Toura.


⚪️Deep Strikes:

👍The aggression expanded toward the Western Beqaa, hitting Sahmar, Zelaya, Yohmor, and Labaia, in addition to the outskirts of Al-Qatrani in the Jezzine district.


⚪️Artillery and Demolitions:

🌕Heavy artillery shelling blanketed the surroundings of the Ali Taher hills overlooking Nabatieh, accompanied by large-scale engineering and demolition activities conducted by enemy forces along the border axis.

⚪️Tactical Breakdown: The Battle for Kafartibnin


🌕The strategic area of Kafartibnin and the nearby Zaffata axis (situated between Kafartibnin and the Khardali River) are currently witnessing a critical ground confrontation. From a military standpoint, the enemy is attempting a dangerous push toward the outskirts of Nabatieh Al-Fawqa to secure a foothold overlooking the region.


⚪️The Enemy's Objective:

🌕The Israeli military is deploying high-density armored movements and intensive combat engineering tools to clear pathways, aiming to sever communication lines between Nabatieh and its eastern outskirts.


⚪️The Defensive Strategy:

🌕Resistance fighters are leveraging the rugged topography and pre-prepared defensive lines to blunt this advance. Specialized anti-armor units and field artillery groups have locked down the Zaffata axis, turning the open corridors into absolute kill zones.


⚪️Tactical Engagement:

🌕The Islamic Resistance has fiercely engaged the advancing armored columns using short-range artillery, heavy mortar barrages, and direct-fire weapons. Simultaneously, guided-missile squads are hunting enemy supply vehicles and engineering units trying to establish forward logistics points, successfully halting their momentum and preventing the enemy from stabilizing its positions on the approaches to Nabatieh Al-Fawqa.

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
11 viewsedited  
The Observer
🔴Youssef Reggi’s Diplomacy of Illusion: Marketing the Western Narrative and Isolating the Lebanese Foreign Ministry from the Realities of the Field



🎙The recent statements made by the Minister of Foreign Affairs and Emigrants, Youssef Reggi, to the French newspaper Le Figaro (June 13, 2026) reflect the deep chasm between official diplomatic rhetoric and the actual equations of power on the ground. Reggi’s claim that the resistance is "militarily defeated" yet controls the "deep state" does not merely represent a misreading of the strategic landscape; it places the Lebanese Foreign Ministry in a position of compliance with intense Western-American pressures pushing for direct negotiations that serve the interests of the Israeli occupation.



✍️Analytical and Critical Reading from the Axis of Resistance Perspective


🌕Minister Reggi’s attempt to depict the resistance’s weaponry as a "rebellion," while ignoring that it is the primary pillar of deterrence against Israeli ambitions, reveals a desire to invoke foreign leverage to achieve domestic balances that the state is incapable of enforcing. Reggi is betting on Washington's negotiations, forgetting that Lebanon’s diplomatic strength has historically stemmed from the strength of its field.


🌕In a related context, the response from the Iranian Embassy in Beirut came to put an end to Minister Reggi’s short-sighted bets and assessments regarding the Axis. Via the "X" platform, the embassy recalled political realism, pointing to the continuous popular crowds for over 100 days across the Iranian geography—which spans 1,648,195 square kilometers—in solidarity with the regime, confirming that betting on the fall or retreat of the resistance's allies is a bet on a mirage. The Iranian Embassy also requested that the minister not misunderstand Iran.


🌕In our view, the embassy erred when it addressed the minister using the logic of the defender. It is well known that this minister harbors open hatred toward the people of the South, the Shia community, and Iran in particular, due to his long history with the Lebanese Forces.


📌Questions Addressed to the Readers:


👌When the Foreign Minister of Lebanon speaks through French media platforms in a language that mirrors the rhetoric of Washington and Tel Aviv, does he truly represent the interests and national security of the Lebanese people, or is he paving the way to impose defeatist dictates under the guise of "the constitution and the law"?


👌If the resistance is "militarily defeated" as Reggi claims, why is the United States panting after complex and direct foreign negotiation arrangements to change the reality on the border?


👌Can a veteran diplomatic minister claim to care for sovereignty while downplaying the danger of internal clash, attempting to strip away the elements of strength that protect Lebanon’s wealth and borders?


#Lebanon #Youssef_Reggi #LeFigaro #Axis_of_Resistance #Beirut #Tehran #Foreign_Policy #observer_5


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
10 viewsedited  
The Observer
🔴Paper Peace vs. Fire on the Ground: The Gaps Exploited by Washington's New MoU Gamble


👍The synchronized announcements from Washington, Islamabad, and Tehran regarding an imminent, U.S.-led Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signal a frantic attempt to freeze a regional conflagration that hard power failed to resolve. U.S. President Donald Trump’s declaration of a weekend breakthrough in Europe—coupled with Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s confirmation of an agreed-upon text—aims to establish a 60-day interim window to address deeply complex issues: the unfreezing of up to $24 billion in Iranian assets, international sanctions relief, and long-term uranium enrichment caps. 


✍️The Geopolitical Reality

💬However, a critical look at the geopolitical map on June 13, 2026, reveals that this proposed diplomatic de-escalation operates entirely detached from the active theaters of war. While diplomats talk in Islamabad, the kinetic reality remains unyielding:


🔘The Strait of Hormuz:

🌕Despite the optimistic political framework, U.S. Central Command reported downing multiple Iranian one-way attack drones targeting commercial shipping lines early Saturday morning. This vital economic artery—responsible for 20% of global energy flows—remains an active zone of naval friction, rendering Western declarations of an "immediate reopening" highly premature. 


🔘The Lebanon and Gaza Fronts:

👍Demonstrating the systemic fragility of a U.S.-brokered truce, the Israeli military today issued urgent evacuation orders for 20 southern Lebanese localities, including the regional hub of Nabatieh, immediately followed by heavy airstrikes on Rihan and Sujud. The continued loss of life on the ground in both Lebanon and Gaza underscores a stark disconnect: Washington is attempting to market a grand bargain while permitting its primary regional ally to violently alter the parameters on the ground before any implementation begins. 

👍The continued loss of life on the ground in both Lebanon and Gaza underscores a stark disconnect: Washington is attempting to market a grand bargain while permitting its primary regional ally to violently alter the parameters on the ground before any implementation begins. 


🔘Questions for Our Readers:

🤲If the Axis of Resistance is facing terminal pressure as Western media maintains, why is Washington relying on high-level delegations—led by Vice President JD Vance and Jared Kushner—to secure a negotiated exit ramp?

🤲Can a 60-day interim MoU genuinely hold when Israel continues to launch preemptive strikes in southern Lebanon and Gaza during the exact hours the deal is being finalized?

🤲Does a temporary halt to hostilities serve long-term regional sovereignty, or is it a strategic pause designed to relieve global oil pressures while leaving the fundamental causes of the conflict unaddressed?


#USA #Iran #Lebanon #StraitOfHormuz #AxisOfResistance #Diplomacy #Geopolitics #observer_5

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5 viewsedited  
The Observer
🔴The Judicial Entrapment of Baghdad: Whose Sovereignty Writes Iraq's Counter-Terrorism Mandate?


🔘The circulated screenshot from the Telegram channel Saeb Khalil's Publications tone in Iraq's post-war judicial landscape:

🔘the President of the Supreme Judicial Council, Judge Dr. Faiq Zidan, signing a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on judicial and legal cooperation. Ostensibly designed to enhance counter-terrorism mechanisms and facilitate the exchange of judicial data regarding extremist networks, the bilateral agreement opens a dangerous backdoor for foreign intelligence interference under the guise of institutional capacity building. 


✍️The Analytical and Critical Reality


👍From a critical geopolitical perspective, the core issue with Anglo-Iraqi counter-terrorism pacts lies in the weaponization of the term "terrorism" itself. Historically, the British legal system defines terrorism via broad geopolitical lenses that consistently criminalize legitimate regional resistance forces while shielding Western state actors from accountability.


👍By tying Iraqi criminal and investigation courts to judicial frameworks managed by the UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO), Baghdad risks importing a highly politicized, Eurocentric legal standard. Under such a system, the definition of an insurgent or a terrorist is not derived from national defense priorities, but is instead synchronized with the security requirements of Washington, London, and—by extension—Tel Aviv. This compromises local sovereignty and sets a dangerous precedent where state-sanctioned resistance assets could be judicially targeted using foreign-drafted criteria. 


📌Questions for Our Readers:


🌕When the Iraqi judiciary signs a counter-terrorism MoU with a founding architect of the 2003 occupation, which definition of terrorism will govern the cooperation: the Iraqi legal text or the British security mandate?



🌕By aligning data-sharing protocols with London, is Baghdad protecting its national borders, or is it inadvertently delivering operational intelligence to an intelligence apparatus fundamentally hostile to the Axis of Resistance?


🌕If the baseline for defining "extremism" is outsourced to foreign capitals, how long before national defense groups and anti-imperialist factions are classified as outlaws under Iraq's own judicial signature?


#Iraq #UK #FaiqZidan #CounterTerrorism #Sovereignty #Geopolitics #AxisOfResistance #observer_5

☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
4 viewsedited  
The Observer
🔴The post by Alon Mizrahi reflects a core geopolitical thesis common within the Axis of Resistance and anti-imperialist frameworks regarding Western diplomacy, particularly concerning the reported U.S.–Iran breakthrough.


🔽His reasoning breaks down into four main analytical drivers:


1⃣ Structural Untrustworthiness of Western Diplomacy

👌Mizrahi's first two points—that the Americans will either not sign or not respect the deal—stem from a long history of diplomatic precedents.

🤲From this perspective, Washington utilizes treaties not as instruments of lasting peace, but as tactical maneuvers to de-escalate pressures when its allies are in a weak position or to "buy time" to regroup militarily. The primary historical baseline for this view is the 2015 JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action), which the U.S. unilaterally abandoned in 2018 despite full Iranian compliance, proving to analysts like Mizrahi that American signatures lack institutional permanence across administrations.


2⃣ The Weaponization of the Global Financial System

🙌His assertion that "Iran will never get its stolen money back" reflects an analysis of how economic hegemony operates. In the logic of global sanctions regimes, frozen assets are rarely fully returned; instead, they are held permanently as geopolitical leverage. Even during temporary thaws, the bureaucratic, legal, and banking hurdles imposed by the U.S. Treasury ensure that total sanctions relief remains an illusion, keeping target states under perpetual economic siege regardless of what is written on paper.


3⃣ Anti-Colonial Theory and Armed Deterrence

🌕Mizrahi’s final point ("Violence is the only way to get rid of colonial infestation") shifts from diplomatic critique to structural anti-colonial theory. This viewpoint argues that Western hegemony and its regional outposts function as colonial systems that only respond to the cost of hard power. Within this framework:

👍 Diplomacy without kinetic leverage is viewed as a form of submission.
Real sovereignty and the extraction of concessions (such as lifting blockades or stopping bombardments) are only achieved when the cost of war becomes unsustainable for the occupying or colonial power.


✌Therefore, he views the ongoing kinetic actions in the Strait of Hormuz, Lebanon, and Gaza not as obstacles to a deal, but as the only actual guarantees of regional leverage.


☑️ Our website

🔵Link to the article in Arabic

🖋@observer_5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5 viewsedited