Not Housebroken
1 subscriber
151 links
Download Telegram
Channel created
In my original argument that the Second Amendment protects a collective, that is, government, right to bear arms, not any individual right, I pointed to several reasons:
1. Militia, as described in Article I, Section 8, of the U.S. Constitution,[1] resembles the National Guard—under the jurisdiction of the states. The vagueness of the second amendment in also referring to a militia[2] permits the same interpretation.
2. There appears to be no upper limit in the second amendment to the arms that may be borne. I argued that an individual right to bear arms implied an individual right to nuclear arms.
Well, here we are, with the U.S. Department of Justice under Donald Trump refusing to rule out that the individual right to bear arms includes, yes, nuclear arms.[3]

[1] U.S. Const., Art. I, §8.
[2] U.S. Const., Amend. 2.
[3] Tess M. Fardon and Shira Lauren Feldman, “Trump DOJ Refuses to Rule Out Second Amendment Right to Nuclear Weapons,” Slate, March 27, 2026, https://apple.news/ASh6aIVpqTyC2U142YjbazA
“You do not actually oppose the Iran War if you support unconditional offensive military aid to [Binyamin] Netanyahu. Don't led the Democratic Congressional leadership pretend otherwise.”[1]
[1] Stephen Zunes, “March 28, 2026 (Saturday),” March 29, 2026, https://stephenzunes962006.substack.com/p/march-28-2026-saturday
If even a fraction of what “Penfist” warns of were to manifest, Donald Trump’s already enormously malicious and venal stupidity would be the merest tip of the iceberg. It won’t happen—the backlash even from among the U.S. political and economic elite would be swift and brutal. It would lead to a collapse of the U.S. federal government.
But that we even have this scenario to contemplate illustrates just how unhinged Trump is.
https://dyingempire.org/p/the-longest-undefended-border-in