Nassim Nicholas Taleb's Tweets
153 subscribers
24.1K links
All tweets by @nntaleb. Created by @adolfont
Download Telegram
The reason:filtering. I don't take chances; I block quickly. The minute I smell sloppy reasoning. https://t.co/UUGvRO7Xp5— Nassim Nicholas Taleb (@nntaleb) February 18, 2020

February 18, 2020 at 09:13AM
via Twitter https://twitter.com/nntaleb
For others... Cleans up the thread.— Nassim Nicholas Taleb (@nntaleb) February 18, 2020

February 18, 2020 at 09:42AM
via Twitter https://twitter.com/nntaleb
Sam Harris, to repeat, is not a scholar --he is a charlatan.
To understand these subtelties requires rigor, erudition & scholarship.— Nassim Nicholas Taleb (@nntaleb) February 18, 2020

February 18, 2020 at 10:03AM
via Twitter https://twitter.com/nntaleb
Note: shukran is not Levantine but Arabic.— Nassim Nicholas Taleb (@nntaleb) February 18, 2020

February 18, 2020 at 10:09AM
via Twitter https://twitter.com/nntaleb
I did not podcast in 2019;
will do 1 in 2020 w/ @EconTalker on "Uninformative (less politely, "BS") metrics in social science" (stat under fat tails, correlation BS, IQ, etc.), largely bec. of long private 2-way conversations.
Will cover the new tech book.https://t.co/5JCWy84VU3— Nassim Nicholas Taleb (@nntaleb) February 18, 2020

February 18, 2020 at 11:00AM
via Twitter https://twitter.com/nntaleb
2) My heuristic: if a podcast has had someone like Sam Harris @SamHarrisOrg on, I avoid both listening to & participating in, it. It may be imperfect but the trick cleans up scientism, BS, & absence of scholarship.
My allergic reactions to BS have been exacerbated with time.— Nassim Nicholas Taleb (@nntaleb) February 18, 2020

February 18, 2020 at 12:09PM
via Twitter https://twitter.com/nntaleb
How you *will* eventually go bust on a fair bet: Explaining the Kelly/Shannon/Thorp result & beyond.

(& why nudgeboy Richard Thaler @R_Thaler has a serious, serious problem, aside from his other mistakes ). https://t.co/v1Axi7TwMu— Nassim Nicholas Taleb (@nntaleb) February 18, 2020

February 18, 2020 at 01:05PM
via Twitter https://twitter.com/nntaleb
You don't block because a person is wrong but because a person produces sophistry.— Nassim Nicholas Taleb (@nntaleb) February 18, 2020

February 18, 2020 at 03:12PM
via Twitter https://twitter.com/nntaleb
actually joe there are 2 sweet spots
1) Kelly l=1-2p
2) Go bust for sure:
{l: Log[1-l]/Log[1+l] = p/(p-1)}, which seems to have no explicit solutions.
Any familiarity with Log[1-l]/Log[1+l], 0<=p,l<1 ? Could map to some special funtion— Nassim Nicholas Taleb (@nntaleb) February 18, 2020

February 18, 2020 at 03:46PM
via Twitter https://twitter.com/nntaleb
The people I follow. Problem is that I don't want to single out one of them.— Nassim Nicholas Taleb (@nntaleb) February 18, 2020

February 18, 2020 at 04:21PM
via Twitter https://twitter.com/nntaleb