When I’ve got some free time, I run cash events my longtime subscribers always get priority eligibility to win. Good night everyone, and best of luck to you all.

This is false advertising. Durov is obviously bald

My friend just got a new puppy named Fugui. I suggested that he rename it Durov, but he refused 🤣

Uh-oh, the magic’s fading. Time for a Viagra reload.

Everything Pavel Durov has done was leading to this. TON already exploded, and now people are too distracted by the hype to see how dangerous the gambling side really is. That was the plan all along.

Unfortunately, Durov likes men more

meow doruv 🤓

There’s a Chinese guy who calls himself a “Telegram master” every day, and he just got scammed out of hundreds of thousands of dollars. The irony is unreal🤣

This case tells us one thing: don’t go around bragging about how powerful or smart you are. Keep a low profile and move carefully, or you’ll end up falling flat on your face.

Smart people are often ruined by their own cleverness, so maybe it’s better to just be an ordinary and humble person. After all, being too smart might make you go bald.

Personally, I don’t think Getgems should bear direct responsibility for this incident. The bidding feature on the platform is essentially open to everyone, meaning anyone can make an offer, and users are always free to ignore or reject those requests.

In many scam cases, the core issue is not that the platform forces users into transactions, but that some users authorize requests without carefully reviewing the transaction details, which ultimately leads to losses. From my perspective, many of these risks could be avoided if users took the time to properly verify what they are approving before confirming any transaction.

Of course, platforms should continue improving security warnings and user education, but overall, I think Getgems handled the PR response to this situation fairly well. That’s why I still support Getgems.

Let me give a simple example:

If a bank sends you a “confirm transfer” request, but you fail to carefully check the recipient address and the amount before entering your password and approving the transfer, and you end up getting scammed, then the responsibility lies more with the user’s own mistake rather than the bank itself.

The bank is simply providing a transfer tool. It didn’t force you to confirm the transaction, nor did it make the decision for you. Of course, the platform should improve risk warnings and security reminders, but it’s unreasonable to place all the blame on the platform just because the user failed to carefully review the transaction details.

Getgems works in a very similar way. The platform provides trading and authorization functions, but the final decision to approve or confirm a transaction is always in the user’s own hands.

However, I think Getgems will give some compensation to the victims, such as sending them 10 bears.