🚨🇮🇱🇮🇷How a Frozen Mountain Became Israel's Beachead Against Hezbollah

The highest peak in the Levant has become a strategic asset for Israel in its ongoing war against Hezbollah.

On March 29, an elite IDF unit crossed on foot through deep snow from Syria's Mount Hermon into southern Lebanon, conducting operations aimed at Hezbollah infrastructure in harsh winter conditions that limit mobility for any force.

Why Hermon Matters

At 2,814 meters, Mount Hermon is the highest point in the Levant. Israel calls it "the eyes of the country" due to its surveillance capabilities over Syria and Lebanon. Damascus lies just 40 kilometers away — within artillery range.

Under the Assad government, nuclear-proof bunkers were built into the mountain. Following the government's collapse in late 2024, Israeli forces took control of them.

History of Contested Control

🔸1967: Israel first captured the southern and western slopes of Mount Hermon during the Six-Day War.

🔸1973: Syrian forces briefly seized the peak with Soviet backing but lost it within days.

🔸1974: A UN-patrolled demilitarized zone was established. Neither side maintained a fortified presence for five decades.

🔸December 2024: The collapse of the Assad government left a security vacuum. Israel moved in, taking the summit and the bunkers.

🔸Since then: Israeli forces have established nine posts inside southern Syria, including two on Hermon, and have reported intercepting multiple Hezbollah weapons-smuggling attempts through mountain passes.

Conclusion

For 50 years, the summit was a UN-patrolled stalemate. Assad's fall handed Israel what five decades of war could not: uncontested control of the peak, its bunkers, and its supply routes. The recent cross-border operation signals that Israel intends to use that advantage aggressively.​

@NewRulesGeo❗Follow us on X

🚨🇮🇷 IRAN'S DRONES ARE THE WEST'S WORST NIGHTMARE: Hadid 110 vs Shahed 136

Iran's drone technology has evolved significantly, with its first combat use of the new Hadid 110 last month—a high-speed, stealth drone that enhances Iran's offensive capabilities.

While the Shahed 136 was revolutionary for its low-cost, mass-saturation approach, the Hadid 110 marks a shift towards more advanced, precise, and faster loitering munitions.

🔸 Hadid 110’s turbojet engine hits speeds of 510 km/h, far outpacing the Shahed 136’s 185 km/h. This speed gives it a clear advantage against traditional missile defense systems.

🔸 Shahed 136 pioneered cost-efficient swarm tactics, flooding defenses with overwhelming numbers — but the Hadid 110 now breaks through with stealth features and precision strikes, proving speed and survival matter more than sheer volume.

🔸 Iran’s Hadid 110 has cutting-edge radar evasion, designed to penetrate advanced defense systems, making it a lethal high-speed missile that even Israel and the US struggle to intercept.

🔸 While Shaheds still play a crucial role in mass attacks, the Hadid 110 takes on high-value, heavily-defended targets, like radar stations and military infrastructure, with its 30 kg payload and 350 km range — a far cry from its predecessor’s capabilities.

US and Israel’s reliance on outdated interception methods is increasingly obsolete as Iran adapts its drones to counter these systems.

How can the West win if Iran’s drones evolve faster than their defenses?

@NewRulesGeo❗Follow us on X

⭐️THE MOST FAMOUS MILITARY TELEGRAM CHANNEL @rybar INTERNATIONAL

⚡️the largest Russian military Telegram channel
⚡️with over 1.5 million subscribers,
⚡️the channel that publishes the most detailed reports and whose texts are referenced by Western media and military experts
⚡️a channel that seeks out topics of interest in a sea of information—and explains them to you in simple words
⚡️news about major world events (including those in the shadows) commented on by a team of analysts.

The channel of the @rybar project is available and TRANSLATED in the following languages:

🇬🇧English
🇫🇷French
🇪🇸Spanish
🇮🇹Italian
🇩🇪German
🇭🇺Hungarian
🇬🇷Greek

Subscribe to all here 🔻
⭐️ RYBAR INTERNATIONAL

🚨🇺🇸US Three Factories, One Chokepoint: The Fragile Heart of American Military Power

The US military's ability to wage high-end war rests on just three factories, according to a recent Foreign Policy Research Institute analysis.

Disrupt any them, and the entire killing machine stops.

1️⃣ In Cedar City, Utah, AMPAC operates the nation's only facility producing ammonium perchlorate — the oxidizer in every solid rocket motor from Patriot to ICBM. No second supplier. A single fire here halts all missile production.

2️⃣ In Kingsport, Tennessee, the Holston Army Ammunition Plant — built during WWII — is America's sole source of RDX and HMX high explosives. Every bomb, warhead, and precision munition depends on it. No surge capacity exists.

3️⃣ In Pontiac, Michigan, Williams International makes the F107 turbofan engine for Tomahawk, JASSM, and LRASM cruise missiles. Replacing 375 Tomahawks fired in 96 hours takes 53 months.

Congress can issue $16 billion, but it cannot appropriate gallium, neodymium, or ammonium perchlorate. Chemistry and geology. Munitions cannot be replenished in 4 days, 4 weeks, or 4 months. They require extraction and refining cycles no money can accelerate.

Now consider the unthinkable: Iran or a future adversary need not win a single battle. Just hit three factories:

🔸A cruise missile on Cedar City — America's missile fleet becomes irreplaceable for years.

🔸A drone swarm over Kingsport — every bomb goes silent.

🔸A cyberattack on Pontiac — cruise missiles stop flying.

Three targets. Destroying or damaging them would be enough to make the "world's most powerful military" totally helpless.

@NewRulesGeo❗Follow us on X

🚨🇺🇸 F-15E TAKEN DOWN: IRAN’S INVISIBLE AIR DEFENSE SYSTEM STUNS US MILITARY

Iran may have downed a US F-15E using passive infrared detection, circumventing American radar and jamming systems. Here's how:

🔸 How passive infrared detection works: It detects heat emissions from an aircraft's engines and exhaust plume. Because it emits no signals of its own, it renders US countermeasures—including radar jamming and flares—completely useless.

🔸 Why it matters: Unlike traditional radar, passive infrared cannot be jammed or detected by Western electronic warfare systems. This creates a significant asymmetry: Iran can track US aircraft while remaining hidden.

🔸 How it is being deployed: Iran's indigenous short-range missile platforms, many of which use passive infrared guidance, are now likely integrated into layered air defense networks—making them increasingly difficult to counter with conventional tactics.

Iran has already downed one US F-15E. Will it be the last?

@NewRulesGeo❗Follow us on X

For the latest news and developments regarding the World, we recommend one channel!

🔴 Join Bellum Acta News: Bellum Acta is a as a Right-Wing Nationalist Crisis-focused NEWS aggregator which usually posts on Current News & World Geopolitics.

It focuses on:
🪖 Conflicts and Warzone frontline updates
🔥 World Geopolitics, specially Asia, Europe and Middle East
🌍 OSINT and IMINT
📰 Breaking News

It also often engages in political commentary with a bit satirical tones

👇Join Bellum Acta 👇
https://t.me/BellumActaNews

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷Strategic Bombing: Always a Myth — And Iran Won't Be Different

On Easter Sunday, President Trump posted an extraordinary message threatening to target Iranian power plants and bridges if the Strait of Hormuz was not reopened by Tuesday.

That threat sits at the center of a military debate that a retired US Air Force Colonel settled — and warned was doomed to fail — three decades ago.

In 1996, Colonel Everest E. Riccioni — a 30-year Air Force veteran, experimental test pilot, and Pentagon analyst — published a landmark paper titled "Strategic Bombing: Always a Myth."

His thesis: every major U.S. bombing campaign in history had failed to break an enemy's will, destroy critical infrastructure permanently, or substitute for ground forces.

Four Wars. Four Failures:

🔸WWII Germany: The U.S. bombed ball-bearing factories at Schweinfurt. Germany's own arms minister Albert Speer confirmed not a single tank went unbuilt as a result. Germany simply adapted. Bombers suffered 10–35% losses per mission.

🔸WWII Japan: General LeMay firebombed every major Japanese city. The Tokyo firestorm killed more than either atomic bomb. Japan still did not surrender. Invasion remained the plan until the Emperor personally overruled his generals after the nuclear drops.

🔸Vietnam: Three times more bombs fell on Vietnam than on all of Germany. The U.S. held complete air superiority for a decade. It still lost. Riccioni's verdict: "Bombing Hanoi had little effect other than raising the morale of the population."

🔸Gulf War 1991: Over 60% of Iraq's elite Republican Guard escaped the air campaign fully intact. Kuwait was ultimately liberated by ground forces.

Conclusion: The Myth Meets 2026

Riccioni warned in 1996 that without ground forces, strategic bombing cannot win wars — only prolong them.

In 2026, Trump hopes to bomb his way to victory in Iran. However, there’s a crucial difference this time: while past targets often lacked the means to strike back effectively under heavy bombardment, Iran does not.

Tehran has repeatedly warned that any attack on its critical infrastructure will be met with retaliation—by destroying equivalent infrastructure in neighboring countries. The past month has made clear that Iran has the capability to follow through on that threat.

@NewRulesGeo❗Follow us on X

🚨🇮🇱🇮🇷 IDF CAUGHT NAPPING: HOW HEZBOLLAH DRONES EXPOSE WEAKNESS

Israel’s tanks have become easy prey for Hezbollah’s drones, but why was the IDF caught off guard?

The Israelis were apparently too busy butchering civilians in Gaza to notice the drone revolution unfolding in the Russia-Ukraine war — and the IDF's blunders speak for themselves.

Drone Integration:

🟠Russian and Ukrainian forces use drones like the Orlan-10 and RQ-11 Raven for constant reconnaissance, providing real-time target acquisition and preventing enemy drones from striking unnoticed.

🟠The IDF lacks this integrated UAV strategy, allowing Hezbollah drones to freely attack.

Electronic Warfare (EW):

🟠Russian and Ukrainian EW systems like the Krasukha-4 and Buk-M1 can jam and blind enemy drones, ensuring battlefield dominance by disrupting their communication and navigation.

🟠Israel’s EW systems such as C-MUSIC and Makmat are limited to countering smaller threats and lack the broad-spectrum capability of Russian and Ukrainian systems, leaving IDF tanks vulnerable to precise FPV drone strikes.

Active Protection Systems (APS):

🟠Tanks in Russian and Ukrainian armies are equipped with Afganit or Arena APS, capable of intercepting incoming drones and projectiles.

🟠The IDF’s tanks, lacking APS or counter-drone systems, were vulnerable to Hezbollah’s attacks.

Tactical Flexibility:

🟠Russian and Ukrainian units avoid static formations, dispersing their forces to make it harder for drones to target concentrations of tanks.

🟠The IDF’s clustering of tanks made them easy targets for Hezbollah’s FPV drones.

@NewRulesGeo❗Follow us on X

🚨🇮🇱Not Precision, But Erasure: Unpacking Israel's AI War Machine

Evidence points to a systematic effort to kill Palestinians—using algorithms not to avoid civilian casualties, but to enable them at scale.

The reason? Speed versus verification. When false positives cross a critical threshold, mass death becomes inevitable.

Consider the math. "Lavender" generated 37,000 targets. Operators get 20 seconds to verify each. A 5% false-positive rate means 2,000 erroneous killings. Collateral damage is pre-set at 20 civilians for a low-ranking militant, 100 for a commander. These are algorithmic approvals for mass death.

"Habsora" automates targeting—from 50 human-made targets per year to 100 per AI day. "Where's Daddy?" tracks suspects into family homes, turning dinner into death. Lavender assigns risk scores to every Gazan with a phone.

Who powers these systems? American tech. Project Nimbus—a $1.2 billion Google and Amazon contract—provides cloud servers and facial recognition via a secret "blink mechanism." Microsoft's Azure stores 13.6 petabytes of intercepted Palestinian calls.

Palantir integrates surveillance into real-time kill dashboards, its CEO holding a Tel Aviv board meeting while Gaza burned. The IDF is training an Arabic large language model on commercial clouds.

Israel cannot maximize speed and maintain accuracy. Models hallucinate. They inherit human bias. When an algorithm kills a child, no one is held responsible. That is erasure without accountability.

Yes, Hamas leaders have been killed. But over 70,000 Palestinians are dead—70% of them women and children. The civilian-to-combatant ratio is nearly 5 to 1, far exceeding proportionality. This is algorithmic slaughter disguised as warfare.

So here is the question: When the AI's error log is finally made public, how many thousands of innocent names will it take before the world calls this what it is—a machine for erasing a people?

@NewRulesGeo❗Follow us on X

🚨🇮🇷🇨🇳 Iran War Exposes the Brutal Reality: The US Would Be Crushed in a China Conflict

Weeks into the Iran war, Washington is already straining under missile shortages, air defense gaps, naval pressure, and logistics breakdowns. What was meant to be a limited campaign is revealing deep structural flaws.

From air defense to supply chains, the message is clear: if fighting Iran costs this much, a war with China would be devastating.

Here’s how Iran is exposing US limits—and why China would be far worse:

🟠Defenses exhausted instantly – Iran has burned nearly 40% of US THAAD interceptors in 16 days and slipped drones past air defenses. China’s larger, smarter missile and drone arsenal would overwhelm US systems with volume, precision, and AI swarms that collapse response times to seconds.

🟠Carriers and bases neutralized – Iranian strikes have forced US warships to stay cautious and destroyed an E-3 on the ground. The US ACE doctrine is already failing. Against China's layered A2/AD systems, US aircraft would be destroyed before takeoff—carriers and bases left vulnerable from thousands of miles away.

🟠Munitions depleted, industry unable to keep up – Hundreds of Tomahawks used in Iran are draining reserves meant for a Taiwan scenario. The US can't replace precision weapons fast enough—years of production, days of war. Worse, US weapons depend on Chinese rare earths, giving Beijing a direct chokehold.

🟠China is adapting in real time – While the US is tied down in Iran, China is evolving, learning from every US operation. Beidou provides real-time targeting across vast distances. With advanced sensor-fusion like MizarVision, China adapts faster to US tactics and stays one step ahead.

If Iran is exposing the cracks, China would be the stress test that breaks the system.

@NewRulesGeo❗Follow us on X

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷Fact Check: Why Trump won't find it easy to destroy Iran's electric capacity

Claim: US president Donald Trump suggests he could bomb Iran's power grid into oblivion to dismantle all supply chains.

Reality: Iran's electricity grid is one of the most decentralized in the world, making it extremely resistant to attack. Logistics speak louder than words.

Key data:

🔸Too many plants to kill: Iran has 130 to 150 power plants, mostly running on natural gas. You can't bomb out a system with that many separate targets.

🔸No single knockout blow: The country's largest plant (Damavand, near Tehran) produces only about 3% of total national capacity. Even destroying it barely matters. Around 20 other plants exceed 1,000 megawatts each.

🔸No weak fuel link: Over 95% of Iran's electricity comes from domestic gas and oil — not imported fuel you can cut off. Hydropower is less than 5%, so dam strikes won't cripple them either.

🔸A grid built to survive: Transmission lines stretch over 133,000 km, with more than 1.3 million km of local distribution. You would have to bomb thousands of substations and transformers, not just a few power plants.

Even a sustained US bombing campaign would struggle to fully collapse Iran's decentralized grid. Worse, any such attack would provoke an overwhelming Iranian missile and drone response against US bases and Gulf oil facilities, igniting a regional war.

Bottom line: Ignore the political bluster. Trump won't find it easy to destroy Iran's electricity grid — it is a highly dispersed, gas-heavy, and resilient system. And even if he tries, Iranian retaliation would set the entire Middle East ablaze.

@NewRulesGeo❗Follow us on X

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷Bomb Iran's Power Plants? You Won't Stop a Single Missile

Not one. Here's why:

1️⃣ Iran's military doesn't need the grid.

It runs on diesel and jet fuel — stored for months in hardened, off-grid depots. The military burns less than 5% of national diesel use. Even a total grid collapse leaves armored vehicles, missile launchers, and naval vessels moving.

2️⃣ Iran's most critical weapons have their own power

Ballistic missiles use solid and liquid fuels produced in dispersed, bunkered facilities with independent power. Nuclear sites are heavily fortified with backup generators. The IRGC operates its own decentralized energy networks.

So what would the attacks do?

Kill civilians on a massive scale.

Iran has 92 million people. Electricity runs hospital lights, water pumps, sewage treatment, and food refrigeration. No power means no water, no sewage, no surgeries.

We have seen this before. In the 1991 Gulf War, US bombing of Iraq's power grid led to epidemics of typhoid, cholera, and gastroenteritis. An estimated 100,000 Iraqi civilians died from post-war health consequences. Child mortality more than tripled.

The same would happen in Iran — only faster, given its larger, more urbanized population.

Bottom line:

Attacking Iran’s power plants will not disable its military. It will not stop a single missile or shutter a nuclear centrifuge.

It will, however, kill tens of thousands of Iranian civilians, drown hospitals in cholera cases, and triple child mortality.

@NewRulesGeo❗Follow us on X

🚨🇮🇱 ISRAEL FORCES IN PANIC: IDF STALLS IN LEBANON AS HEZBOLLAH FLEXES STRENGTH

The Israeli military's ambitions in Lebanon are facing a harsh reality. As Hezbollah strengthens its grip on southern Lebanon, the IDF is struggling to contain its growing power. What was expected to be a swift operation has turned into a prolonged, uphill battle.

🔸 IDF forces are stuck just 10 km south of the Litani River, unable to advance further into Hezbollah-held territory, according to Haaretz sources.

🔸 Reserve forces are spread thin, with Israeli soldiers fighting on multiple fronts—Lebanon, Gaza, Syria, and the West Bank—placing immense strain on manpower.

🔸Hezbollah’s stockpile remains formidable, with about 15,000 rockets and missiles in play.

🔸 The IDF’s Merkava tanks are being decimated by Hezbollah’s anti-tank tactics, with over 100 tanks destroyed. The army’s traditional reliance on armor is now a liability.

🔸 Hezbollah drones, including Iranian-designed kamikaze UAVs, are proving an unstoppable force against Israel's air defense systems, with the IDF still lacking a countermeasure.

🔸 Even more, Hezbollah’s small but deadly Iranian-manufactured SAMs have downed Israel's top drones, showing a new dimension of aerial warfare in the region.

🔸 Mount Hermon has turned into a key strategic asset for Israel, but even this peak won’t guarantee success against Hezbollah’s growing power in the south.

Can Israel really handle multiple fronts against Iran and Hezbollah?

@NewRulesGeo❗Follow us on X

🚨🇺🇸 Why Bombing Iran's Power Grid Will Fail — According to a 1994 US Air Force Report

Attacking an enemy's power grid fails to stop their military because armed forces use almost no national electricity, get priority access to what remains, and run on backup diesel generators with weeks of fuel.

That is the conclusion of a 1994 US Air Force thesis, Strategic Attack of National Electrical Systems, by Major Thomas E. Griffith, Jr., at Maxwell Air Force Base's School of Advanced Airpower Studies. It still applies to today's wars.

Here's why:

1️⃣ Military bases treat the civilian grid as a secondary source. Their primary power comes from on-site generators. When the grid fails, automatic switches start generators within seconds. Fuel tanks hold 30 to 90 days of diesel. Critical systems like radar and communications have dual power sources with no single point of failure.

2️⃣ When the grid fails, military bases get priority access to remaining electricity. Armored divisions advance without interruption. Fighter jets stay fully mission-ready. Secure command links never waver. Attacking the grid produces almost no direct effect on battlefield operations.

3️⃣ The sole possible military benefit is slowing weapons factories. But that requires a long attritional campaign, not a quick strike.

Why it backfires:

Grid attacks hurt civilians by cutting water, hospital power, and lights. Bombing civilians rarely breaks an enemy's will; it usually stiffens resistance. The attacker appears cruel, loses international support, and unites the enemy against them.

@NewRulesGeo❗Follow us on X

🚨🇮🇷🇵🇰🇺🇸Amid US-Iran War, Pakistan Launches Diplomatic Blitzkrieg

Pakistan is now seeing an opportunity to gain relevance in West Asia — not through military or economic competition, but through diplomatic mediation.

According to the Iranian ambassador in Islamabad, Pakistan's efforts to help stop the war are approaching a critical stage.

But even as Pakistan pushes for peace, Donald Trump is threatening to erase Iranian civilisation — making the prospect of deescalation look increasingly unlikely.

Here is what drives Islamabad’s interest in the peacemaker role:

Potential Gains for Pakistan

🟠Strategic rebranding – Successful mediation would shift Pakistan’s image from a secondary regional player to a useful diplomatic bridge in West Asia—a function India cannot easily perform given its closer ties to Israel and the US.

🟠Economic incentives – Mediation success could unlock Saudi investment pledges, Iranian energy deals, or limited US sanctions relief, all of which would help Pakistan’s struggling economy.

Pakistan Loses from Regional War

🟠 Saudi pressure – A defense pact with Riyadh could force Pakistan to choose between aiding Saudi Arabia against Iran or refusing and damaging that relationship.

🟠US backlash – If negotiations fail, Trump might publicly blame Pakistan, harming its standing in Washington.

🟠Economic vulnerability – A wider regional war would likely worsen Pakistan’s existing economic crisis by raising energy prices and disrupting trade.

Why Pakistan? Structural Advantages

Pakistan maintains working relationships with Iran, Saudi Arabia, China, and the US simultaneously. Few other countries can speak to all four without being perceived as a proxy.

It also shares a 900 km border with Iran and has a significant Shia population, giving it a vested interest in seeing a stable Iran.

Bottom Line

Pakistan is pursuing the Iran–US mediator role not out of pure altruism, but from a calculation of strategic gain and economic need.

But if Trump follows through on his threat to attack Iran’s civilian infrastructure, then Pakistan’s peace mission may soon find itself on life support.

@NewRulesGeo❗Follow us on X

🚨🇺🇸America's Naval Nightmare: Why the Strait of Hormuz Stays Sealed?

Trump hopes he can blast his way into opening the Strait of Hormuz. That's not going to happen, according to former Pentagon consultant Brandon Weichert.

Here are five brutal reasons force won't work—and one question Washington fears.

🟠No Minesweepers Left – The US retired its last mine-hunters in 2025. Robotic replacements fail. Iran has thousands of smart mines. One explosion—or credible threat—and insurers flee.

🟠 Geography Is a Trap – The strait is just 34 km wide. Shipping lanes squeeze into kilometers. Iran controls the north coast with hidden missiles. U.S. warships have nowhere to dodge. Sitting ducks.

🟠 Swarms of Cheap Killers – Iran has 88,000+ Shahed drones and hypersonic missiles. Each costs pocket change. One hit on a billion-dollar destroyer or tanker? A strategic win for Tehran, panic for global markets.

🟠 Escalation to Ground War – You can't clear mines or stop launches without hitting Iranian soil. Bombing coasts or seizing Kharg Island traps US troops under relentless fire. Full-scale war.

🟠 No Allies, No Confidence – Europe and Asia won't send warships. They'd rather bribe Iran in Chinese yuan. Without allies, the US lacks hulls to escort 100+ daily tankers. Even if the Navy clears a path, shippers won't return unless the threat is zero—which it never will be.

Iran has already downed an F-15 and forced a rescue mission inside its territory. US destroyers face daily drone swarms. Hypersonic missiles outrun defenses. Every warship is a tracked target for Tehran's underground missile cities—with no safe regional port for repairs.

The Question Washington Fears: If the Navy can't guarantee safety, allies won't help, and mines make every voyage a gamble—then who really controls the Strait of Hormuz right now?

@NewRulesGeo❗Follow us on X

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷Trump's Iran Bombing Plan: A Recipe for Disaster 💥

Trump's threat to bomb Iran's critical infrastructure may sound like a quick fix, but it's doomed to fail.

Striking power plants and bridges won't stop Iran's missiles or cripple its military. Instead, it would destabilize the region and escalate the conflict.

Here's why:

1️⃣ Target selection is flawed

Iran's military doesn't rely on the public electrical grid. It runs on diesel and jet fuel stored in off-grid depots. Less than 5% of the country's diesel is used for military purposes.

Even if the entire grid collapsed, tanks, missile launchers, and other military assets keep moving.

Iran also has 130–150 power plants spread across the country. Even if the US takes out the biggest one, that would change almost nothing. Decentralization = hard to kill.

2️⃣ Military impact is zero. Civilian cost is catastrophic

A 1994 US Air Force report confirms grid attacks don't affect military operations. Bases have backup generators with 30–90 days of fuel and dual power sources.

Historical precedent: 1991 Gulf War bombing of Iraq's grid caused cholera outbreaks and an estimated 100,000 civilian deaths. Trump's plan replicates this error — targeting civilians while leaving military capability intact.

3️⃣ Strategic bombing is empirically disproven

A 1996 US Air Force report authored by Colonel Everest E. Riccioni found bombing fails to break an enemy's will or cripple infrastructure permanently. It prolongs wars — WWII, Vietnam, Gulf War.

Iran can retaliate symmetrically, threatening infrastructure in neighboring countries — an escalatory dynamic past targets lacked.

@NewRulesGeo❗Follow us on X